Lycanthromancer
2009-02-15, 02:45 PM
My current DM insists that RAW state that you can have a maximum of two metamagic feats on any given spell. He says it's in the core rules, even though neither he, nor anybody else I know, can actually point it out.
I say it's bullpucky. I've never seen, nor heard, of this rule anywhere (except for metapsionics, but that's because of the inherent restrictions regarding psionic foci).
I know that proving something that isn't in the rules doesn't exist is...well...difficult, but can anyone back up his claim?
I wouldn't mind if it was a houserule; metamagic-out-the-wazoo is easily breakable, and I don't mind restrictions on something so abusable, but I really would like to know if anyone else has heard of this.
I say it's bullpucky. I've never seen, nor heard, of this rule anywhere (except for metapsionics, but that's because of the inherent restrictions regarding psionic foci).
I know that proving something that isn't in the rules doesn't exist is...well...difficult, but can anyone back up his claim?
I wouldn't mind if it was a houserule; metamagic-out-the-wazoo is easily breakable, and I don't mind restrictions on something so abusable, but I really would like to know if anyone else has heard of this.