PDA

View Full Version : Prehistoric Fish found in Russian Pond



Setra
2007-11-12, 01:04 AM
http://englishrussia.com/?p=1633

Man that thing looks creepy

BizzaroStormy
2007-11-12, 01:06 AM
Wow, A not-so-live Trilobite (might be spelling it wrong) Never thought id see one of those.

Lord Iames Osari
2007-11-12, 01:07 AM
Holy frack!

Wow...

Serpentine
2007-11-12, 01:25 AM
That's not a fish! Lies! Lies and slander! =O

Setra
2007-11-12, 01:27 AM
Some people are saying it's a Horseshoe crab (http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=46897&rendTypeId=4)

Though there are differences.

ocato
2007-11-12, 01:28 AM
Looks an awful lot like a horse shoe crab to my nonexpert eyes. I'd probably never have worried about the thing if I saw it.

EDIT: Of course, I've never seen a 5 foot horseshoe crab before, and also the tail is a lot bigger. I'm not saying it's a horseshoe crab, but it might be a relative.

Serpentine
2007-11-12, 01:29 AM
You mean like the massive tail.
Yes. Some differences...
Any idea what terms to use to search for it elsewhere?

Skippy
2007-11-12, 01:40 AM
You mean like the massive tail.
Yes. Some differences...
Any idea what terms to use to search for it elsewhere?

Facehugger, of course...

Setra
2007-11-12, 01:41 AM
Facehugger, of course...
That's what a lot of other people are calling it..

Skippy
2007-11-12, 01:46 AM
Well, it really looks like one... It sure would be creepy to find out one of those, and more if it tried to bit me...

RTGoodman
2007-11-12, 01:53 AM
I've been searching various news sites and whatnot looking for more info, but as of now it looks like the website linked above the only place with the story. Of course, they're also the only website that had this story last year (http://englishrussia.com/?p=251) about another prehistoric beast supposedly found in Russia.

Not that I don't really hope that this thing is real, but I'd like some other evidence than some obscure website on 'teh intenetz.'

Skippy
2007-11-12, 01:55 AM
I've been searching various news sites and whatnot looking for more info, but as of now it looks like the website linked above the only place with the story. Of course, they're also the only website that had this story last year (http://englishrussia.com/?p=251) about another prehistoric beast supposedly found in Russia.

Not that I don't really hope that this thing is real, but I'd like some other evidence than some obscure website on 'teh intenetz.'

That thing is a Skeksis, definitely.

Semidi
2007-11-12, 02:12 AM
So that's what inspired Giger.

nephtis
2007-11-12, 02:32 AM
That thing is a Skeksis, definitely.

*ggg* Fun aside, that other thing looks like a half-rotten whale or dolphin, a toothed whale.

And the one this thread was started looks really like it could be a relative of a horseshoe crab.

I love how they claim all creatures that are uncommon are 'pre-historic' - although I'd really feel better if there were other sources as well that told of this find.

SDF
2007-11-12, 02:41 AM
Yeah, the picture screams horeshoe crab when I first saw it, the tail is much different, but I'm almost positive just looking at it's morphology that it is some kind of chelicerate.

nephtis
2007-11-12, 02:45 AM
What for do I know people working in Zoological Institutes...? I asked a bit around and it seems this could be some species of Triops, a crustacean.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notostraca

Serpentine
2007-11-12, 02:55 AM
Okay, lets have a proper look at this.

The "thing":
http://englishrussia.com/images/danger_fish/1.jpg

A trilobite:
http://files.turbosquid.com/Preview/Content_on_10_30_2006_04_41_45/trilobite.jpg15825181-99c0-4bfe-8a5e-82fc53f2457eLarge.jpg

A horseshoe crab:
http://rydberg.biology.colostate.edu/Dissections/Horseshoe%20crab/HScrab%20dorsal.jpg
http://rydberg.biology.colostate.edu/Dissections/Horseshoe%20crab/HScrab%20ventral.jpg

A triops:
http://www.museumonline.at/2000/bratislava/aqua/AquaSlowakisch/TriopsSite/Triops.JPG
http://es.geocities.com/estanqueskois/Triops2.jpg


A relatively large sort of triops seems plausible to me.
edit: Looking at it again, I do believe that's exactly what it is. Bravo nephtis.

thubby
2007-11-12, 02:56 AM
that is apparently what you get when you combine a horseshoe crap and a xenomorph.

SDF
2007-11-12, 03:00 AM
The morphology is similar in many ways to both, and morphology can be very misleading. In fact they are coming out with a completely different taxonomical hierarchy very soon completely reclassifying many phyla based on genetics. We probably won't be able to tell what it is for sure until mitochondrial gene sequencing has been done on it.

rubakhin
2007-11-12, 03:06 AM
Whatever it is, looking at the underside - it's quite beautiful, you know.

Icewalker
2007-11-12, 03:36 AM
Eeew. It's too bad they killed it. (attack of the horrible pun:) That could probably be a very important piece of...fishtory. You can kill me now.


(Also, Semidi, please see the spoiler inside my sig.)

banjo1985
2007-11-12, 06:03 AM
Yeah, looking at the pictures it looks like a triops to me too, though a big specimen. Freaky looking bugger though aint it? I love the strange stuff you get in the depths of sea trenches and such-like..some of the most beautiful animals in the world are down there.

Tor the Fallen
2007-11-12, 06:10 AM
It's definitely an Arthropod; most likely a Crustacean. The telson is all wrong for it to be a horseshoe crab. It also appears to lack the two long thingies (uropods?) hanging off its telson to be a Triops. The wiki says the uropods are diagnostic of Triops.

Actually, you can see in one of the pics it does, in fact, have two of the uropods.


The morphology is similar in many ways to both, and morphology can be very misleading. In fact they are coming out with a completely different taxonomical hierarchy very soon completely reclassifying many phyla based on genetics. We probably won't be able to tell what it is for sure until mitochondrial gene sequencing has been done on it.

mDNA? I thought they used mostly ss rRNA for that sort of thing.

Emperor Ing
2007-11-12, 06:11 AM
:eek: Oh my gawd, an evolved trilobite.

That has to be one of the most unusual things ive ever seen.

Oh, and this is a face hugger (http://filmsirkus.no/shop/images/Neca/stfacehuggerHK.JPG)

CrazedGoblin
2007-11-12, 06:19 AM
I've been searching various news sites and whatnot looking for more info, but as of now it looks like the website linked above the only place with the story. Of course, they're also the only website that had this story last year (http://englishrussia.com/?p=251) about another prehistoric beast supposedly found in Russia.

Not that I don't really hope that this thing is real, but I'd like some other evidence than some obscure website on 'teh intenetz.'

it is indeed very fishy (oof:smalltongue: ) that its the only site with it hehe

Rykaj
2007-11-12, 06:30 AM
I sure do hope it's real, it looks awesome! And the story that some long undiscovered animal survived for ages on some underground river is awesome as well.

...But if that's true, how did it get food and oxygen? Does it even live on oxygen? And aren't creatures who live perpetually in the dark usually translucent or at least depigmented? Questions question! And I want to know more!

Serpentine
2007-11-12, 06:34 AM
But if that's true, how did it get food and oxygen? Does it even live on oxygen? And aren't creatures who live perpetually in the dark usually translucent or at least depigmented? Questions question! And I want to know more!They're really only just seriously studying underground waterways here in Australia. Basically, they grab food whenever it happens to wash down and starve when it doesn't - with a low metabolic rate for the frequent times of famine. Oxygen is dissolved in the water, just like anywhere else. Interestingly, each aquifer is completely isolated from the next, so at every single one they find a whole new ecosystem with its own unique species.

Tor the Fallen
2007-11-12, 06:44 AM
They're also cold blooded, which means they have very low oxygen demands, compared to us mammals.

StickMan
2007-11-12, 09:03 AM
Wow, A not-so-live Trilobite (might be spelling it wrong) Never thought id see one of those.

My geology professor was Trilobite Expert, trust me that is not a trilobite.:smallamused:

Winterwind
2007-11-12, 09:30 AM
Comparing these pictures, it really does look very much like a triops.

Terumitsu
2007-11-12, 09:44 AM
We all need to think for a bit here... It was found in a Russian pond. Obviously it is mutated from the various toxic wastes in the water....

Joking aside, that is quite an interesting mophology. [/serious]A triops mated with the horshoe crab perhaps?[serious] Or better: A cousin of the pair? either way, an interesting find... if somewhat dubious as to the lack of additional information.

RTGoodman
2007-11-12, 09:56 AM
And apparently you can own your very own Triops (http://mytriops.com/), or even a whole community.

And yeah, now that I look through the gallery on that website, this thing is looking like a triops of some sort. And actually, now that I think about it, there's absolutely nothing in the picture of our "prehistoric" specimen that would indicate size. Really, it might be a normal size (or just a little bigger), but the camera is zoomed in very close.

SurlySeraph
2007-11-12, 05:49 PM
http://englishrussia.com/?p=1633

Man that thing looks creepy

<.<
>.>
I want one.

I'm going to have to throw my lot in with the people who say it's a triops. However, I think they're not being entirely truthful about the 5-foot length.


I've been searching various news sites and whatnot looking for more info, but as of now it looks like the website linked above the only place with the story. Of course, they're also the only website that had this story last year (http://englishrussia.com/?p=251) about another prehistoric beast supposedly found in Russia.

That thing looks a lot like a porpoise skeleton without fins. Or it could be the spine and rib cage of an unusually large horse. It's nothing crazy.

nephtis
2007-11-13, 02:10 AM
...But if that's true, how did it get food and oxygen? Does it even live on oxygen?

The problem of oxygen is solved easily. You see those leaf-like things on the underside? Those are branchiopods (in fact the whole group triops belongs to is called branchiopoda which translates as gill-feet) and are used to get the oxygen the animal needs from the water.
So, problem solved.

And yes, those 'gills' are the main reason I think it's not a horseshoe crab.