Josh_Kablack
2003-12-09, 05:18 AM
If you quote a post in which someone has used a naughty word, the actual word and not the replacement shows up in your message window while you are composing your reply.
For example, we'll pretend that "snugglebunnies" is censored to just "rabbits", we'll pretend that angle brackets are square brackets and we'll also pretend that I'm arguing about something with Tae Kwon Dan:
If Tae Kwon Dan were to write a post in which he said
"They are all a bunch of snugglebunnies"
It would appear as
"They are all a bunch of rabbits"
Until I decided to quote his post in an attempt to refute, at which point I would see
<quote>Originally posted by Tae Kwon Dan<time and date and format stuff>
They are all a bunch of snugglebunnies
</quote>
But it would appear in it's censored form again when my final post was displayed, so it would look something like this:
"
originally posted by Tae Kwon Dan
They are all a bunch of rabbits
They are not! They are quite clearly capybaras as it states on page XX.
"
Dunno if you care, but I thought I should point that out.
For example, we'll pretend that "snugglebunnies" is censored to just "rabbits", we'll pretend that angle brackets are square brackets and we'll also pretend that I'm arguing about something with Tae Kwon Dan:
If Tae Kwon Dan were to write a post in which he said
"They are all a bunch of snugglebunnies"
It would appear as
"They are all a bunch of rabbits"
Until I decided to quote his post in an attempt to refute, at which point I would see
<quote>Originally posted by Tae Kwon Dan<time and date and format stuff>
They are all a bunch of snugglebunnies
</quote>
But it would appear in it's censored form again when my final post was displayed, so it would look something like this:
"
originally posted by Tae Kwon Dan
They are all a bunch of rabbits
They are not! They are quite clearly capybaras as it states on page XX.
"
Dunno if you care, but I thought I should point that out.