-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
*GUTPUNCH*
Better?
I know I feel better.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
*GUTPUNCH*
Better?
T________T
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
T________T
Atleast it was only your gut and not a few inches bellow. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
*takes Namelesses Scythe and swings it into Crim family jewels*
You mean like that? :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Yes. *cringe* exactly like that.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CrimsonAngel
Yes. *cringe* exactly like that.
Im so smart ^_^
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
Kobolds aren't even mammals
According to unforgotten realms they are. :smalltongue:
Kobold!
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Kobolds were originally more dog-like than lizard-like.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CrimsonAngel
Yes. *cringe* exactly like that.
Haha.
Haha.
I'm laughing at your misfortunes.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lemming
They say it's homebrew so it don't count.
@Shades: That's right but they aren't in this version (technically they were a kind of elf or gnome in GFermany long before DnD)
And I am the one with most right to decide about kobolds, ain't I? (maybe except Lying or Mad but they have no kobolds)
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
They say it's homebrew so it don't count.
@Shades: That's right but they aren't in this version (technically they were a kind of elf or gnome in GFermany long before DnD)
And I am the one with most right to decide about kobolds, ain't I? (maybe except Lying or Mad but they have no kobolds)
Indeed. Keveak has the most say about kobolds, just like I have the most say about Qs and Randomizer has the most say about Arcane Incarnations.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
And I am the one with most right to decide about kobolds, ain't I? (maybe except Lying or Mad but they have no kobolds)
Because you have a kobold character? Yeril's got you beat there.
And if we're going off D&D knowledge, I've got the Monster Manuel and Races of the Dragon sitting next to me, along with other sundry sourcebooks, so I reckon I supply a bit of information on the subject. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
So, is anyone making an FFF comic so that we can finally finish it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Q
Indeed. Keveak has the most say about kobolds, just like I have the most say about Qs and Randomizer has the most say about Arcane Incarnations.
What do I have the most say about? Penguins? :smalltongue:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SinisterPenguin
So, is anyone making an FFF comic so that we can finally finish it?
I was going to make a comic in response to Lying's comic where everybody beats the crap out of Q. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keris Rain
Because you have a kobold character? Yeril's got you beat there.
And if we're going off D&D knowledge, I've got the Monster Manuel and Races of the Dragon sitting next to me, along with other sundry sourcebooks, so I reckon I supply a bit of information on the subject. :smalltongue:
No, because I wrote up a backstory for a tribe of kobolds.
And I don't use that much DnD stuff anymore (their apearance and some fun facts are basicly it)
EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Q
I was going to make a comic in response to Lying's comic where everybody beats the crap out of Q. :smallbiggrin:
Keveak won't beat him (way too serious and meanless reasons like this aint gonna make him beat you)
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
No, because I wrote up a backstory for a tribe of kobolds.
And I don't use that much DnD stuff anymore (their apearance and some fun facts are basicly it)
OK. Just so long as you don't go defining "EVERY KOBOLD, EVER!" you should be fine.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Here, I have an idea for an FFF that may make a nice intro to FI. I will begin making this comic.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
And I am the one with most right to decide about kobolds, ain't I? (maybe except Lying or Mad but they have no kobolds)
If thats your view then technically i have the most to say about Gods..... :smallannoyed::smallamused:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keris Rain
OK. Just so long as you don't go defining "EVERY KOBOLD, EVER!" you should be fine.
I only define Keveaks home tribe (they got plenty of dragon blood mixed in there, possible seperated from the other kobolds back when they wheren't evil, if Mad agree on that then I''ll discuss that further) so I don't define that much.
@Fayte. That's a bit bigger than a single tribe (503 living 5 ghosts) of kobolds.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Okay, this is HILARIOUS!! :smallbiggrin:
Im editing this one aspect of an avatar i'm making, and inkscape crashes. Luckily it automatically backs up the file.
I open it again, and by editing the singular aspect, I cause Inkscape to crash again.
And it happens 3x in a row. Its not frustrating, its just hilarious. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
If thats your view then technically i have the most to say about Gods..... :smallannoyed::smallamused:
And me. And Lavidor gets a say. And a bunch of other people. But so far, Qs and Arcane Incarnations are pretty exclusive to Q and Rand respectively.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
When was Blauport destroyed by the Moon Elf Empire ? In the wiki article about Gwen Caelurus, it says she lived before its destruction, and then went missing for 4 years before resurfacing as a member of the Order of the Driving Lance. To me, it doesn't make sense that Blauport was destroyed circa 1020 AC, so I just want to hear your opinion.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keris Rain
And me. And Lavidor gets a say. And a bunch of other people. But so far, Qs and Arcane Incarnations are pretty exclusive to Q and Rand respectively.
And Yerill haven't posted for very long so I am the only kobold guy around currently (and I still limit me to one tribe)
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keris Rain
And me. And Lavidor gets a say. And a bunch of other people. But so far, Qs and Arcane Incarnations are pretty exclusive to Q and Rand respectively.
yeah well i was working on Kevaks logic.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
And Yerill haven't posted for very long so I am the only kobold guy around currently (and I still limit me to one tribe)
I'd already conceded any control over your tribe. I was responding to Fayt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
yeah well i was working on Kevaks logic.
Keveak's Logic (as understood by Keris Rain, may not be at all accurate):
"I have the only kobold in ABR. So really, kobolds are up to me, aren't they?"
You do not have the only god in ABR. So gods are not up to you.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
yeah well i was working on Kevaks logic.
Yeah, good choice to pick the logic of an insane brat whom you should be more mature and smarter than :smalltongue:
@Keris: No, the basics of them are their personalities and individual abilities are up to the Creator of the character (and the basics can be loose since my characters are dragon-descendant too) so I can say that they are reptiles (pretty logical anyway) but not that they are my slaves and über-powerful
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keris Rain
And me. And Lavidor gets a say. And a bunch of other people. But so far, Qs and Arcane Incarnations are pretty exclusive to Q and Rand respectively.
I'll allow anyone to become an Arcane Incarnation if they want to, as well as play as one.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
Yeah, good choice to pick the logic of an insane brat whom you should be more mature and smarter than :smalltongue:
:smallamused: hehe... You ask any of my friends and theyd tell you that im possibly one of the most imature people at times.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Randomizer
I'll allow anyone to become an Arcane Incarnation if they want to, as well as play as one.
I'd imagine one would only have to play a maniacal killer, but with long term goals requiring universal stability (such as retaining immortality, and having people available to kill). :smalltongue:
Then again, it'd be interesting to see an AI paladin... or just one that is actually Lawful Good.
-
Re: Avatar Battle Royale-Discussion Thread XXII: Mutual agreement? What's that?
Working on a Wrapup to FFF.