-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mynxae
That was kinda lame. :smalleek:
I'm confused because the words and your choice of emoticon say different things.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AllIHaveIsCrunk
I'm confused because the words and your choice of emoticon say different things.
It was more scared of what you might say in response. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mynxae
It was more scared of what you might say in response. :smalltongue:
Well good dodge because it was going to be in all caps and filled with slurs.
Seriously, though. James Blake is the bomb, yo.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Socratov
I see your Afrikaans and raise you Dutch which seems to have that harsh 'sch' sound every other word...
As I recall, Afrikaans has some Dutch heritage to it- which might explain the matter at hand somewhat.
Need to get back to writing rather than just procrastinating- why are even the things I want to do so unappealing today?
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Dubstep is fun in moderation. So is alcohol. But you don't seem me drowning myself in either.
BVVVVVVVVVVVT BMP BMP BMP BMPMMM BPM BPM WAH WAH WAH
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mercenary Pen
As I recall, Afrikaans has some Dutch heritage to it- which might explain the matter at hand somewhat.
Yup. In fact, Afrikaans is mostly modified Dutch. Any Afrikaans-speaker and Dutch-speaker would be able to understand each other without too much trouble.
I've never heard an English-speaker try to speak Dutch, but I assume it would be just as amusing :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Asta Kask
...I'm not familiar enough with dubstep to judge, but this has been called "a capella dubstep."
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mercenary Pen
As I recall, Afrikaans has some Dutch heritage to it- which might explain the matter at hand somewhat.
Need to get back to writing rather than just procrastinating- why are even the things I want to do so unappealing today?
yes they do share a heritage, kind of logical since the Dutch owned South Afrika for some time. but since then english and other more indigenous languages have entered a bit, So the differences really are there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Feytalist
Yup. In fact, Afrikaans is mostly modified Dutch. Any Afrikaans-speaker and Dutch-speaker would be able to understand each other without too much trouble.
they would, albeit with some difficulty. Some words and bits of grammar have become very different. On the other hand, much has stayed the same though are just pronounced differently
Quote:
I've never heard an English-speaker try to speak Dutch, but I assume it would be just as amusing :smallbiggrin:
yes it is. Seeing an Englishman (or German for that matter) try to pronounce the 'sch', 'ui', the 'hard g' and the rolling 'r' is better then tv :smallbiggrin:
Though I can imagine the reverse true as well when some Dutch people start to speak English. it's like they invent a whole new language...
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
"Indeed" was a response to your explanation of the phenomenon, which means that I was backing it up, which means that I was seeing it that way by the time. At least, those were my intentions, and with this in mind, I became confused when you told me to start.
Even if you don't agree with me about this, just drop this line. It won't get us anywhere anyway.
I do disagree here, for multiple reasons, but mostly because for it to mean that, you would have to be agreeing with me on something I hadn't even said yet... I'm happy to outline and discuss all the reasons for your benefit, but as per your request, I will leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
Yes, I know my mind is probably both clouded and biased, but I don't think that is going to change before I can give any of this enough time to sink in and settle down. If, you feel like I've acted egotistical or unjust in any way, I just want you to know that I'm deeply sorry for that. I feel rather bad for this whole thing and any distress it may have caused you... :smallfrown:
If I may ask something of you, I'd like to suggest that you try to approach things slightly differently in the future.
My first is a request is that if you feel slighted by anything I have said, stop, and take a moment to rethink what I really meant. It's a good idea to do it with anyone, but I'm specifically mentioning me because I know that I don't go out there intending to insult anyone (and the same is true for most, but not all, other people, but it's those few people that do which ruin it for the rest of us).
And the second is a suggestion. If you still feel concerned by what I've said, why don't you PM me instead? I suggest this because you may feel less defensive or feel less of a need to defend yourself if it's a private conversation between you and me.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mynxae
Ooh. Please say it's got places big enough for a ranger to shoot past people. Once I remember my party was descending into a tunnel via ladder, got down, opened up into a big room.. People kept crowding the entryway so much I wanted to just say 'Screw it, I'm trying to shoot past you. If I critically fail and hit you in the head, it's your friggen' fault!' :smallbiggrin:
Yes, it does, but this is 4E so no shooting your buddies in the back of the head :smallwink:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheWombatOfDoom
Dubstep is fun in moderation. So is alcohol. But you don't seem me drowning myself in either.
BVVVVVVVVVVVT BMP BMP BMP BMPMMM BPM BPM WAH WAH WAH
In my expierance, if you took a group of ewoks and told them to just say random crap, it sounds like dubstep.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
I really. REEEEEEALLY don't like cats.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
As long as you still feed them and pet them, they're ok with that.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
I have a sudden desire to play Cyberpunk 2020.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Coidzor
Well, it's not much, but these are the ones I liked. Aside from the Game II that was mentioned earlier.
Spoiler
Show
I also approve of the names of the last two, haha. Quite heartily.
Thank you, Coidzor. Actually the Rambling Rose is one of my favourites too, although I have been fixated by Game II since Mr. August brought it up.
You like purple, I see? If I recall your complexion correctly from having seen your pictures, it would be a good colour for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Elemental
I would probably not. Money requires a colour scheme that inspires confidence and stability in my mind.
You're right, and I suppose also that it should not be so pretty that one would rather keep it than spend it. :smalltongue:
And thank you as well, Elemental.
I notice all three of the people who responded chose a white-on-white tie. I find that style very attractive myself. Hmm, the choice is going to be difficult.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LaZodiac
In my expierance, if you took a group of ewoks and told them to just say random crap, it sounds like dubstep.
Now I've got the image of Ewoks in a blender somehow. Actually...that's not a bad analogy of dubstep. Random shouts from Ewoks and the occasional blender grinding sound as it gets stuck and unstuck.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LaZodiac
Yes, it does, but this is 4E so no shooting your buddies in the back of the head :smallwink:
Aww. I remember that in that campaign I also ended up rolling a one on an attack roll with my bow and shot myself in the foot. :smallsigh:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mynxae
Aww. I remember that in that campaign I also ended up rolling a one on an attack roll with my bow and shot myself in the foot. :smallsigh:
Well, that's just natural ones for you, and some of us aren't quite as punitive as that (I for one prefer to have the arrow hit something ridiculous that can't have an overall effect on the encounter)
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mercenary Pen
Well, that's just natural ones for you, and some of us aren't quite as punitive as that (I for one prefer to have the arrow hit something ridiculous that can't have an overall effect on the encounter)
It was still pretty funny though. There was another time with that same ranger that to be able to get through a town gate, I slept with a whole guardhouse (like 10 guards?). It was awesome. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
I remember a campaign I was playing... I was a Halfling Rogue. The other two were a Dragonborn Fighter & a Dragonborn Warlord. We killed everything except 3 gargoyles that were damaged & turned to stone on a ledge to heal up. We climbed up to pull them down, each of us targeting one.
As we approached, they flew about 15 feet from the ledge. We were, like, 30 feet up. Fluff the DM added after all our rolls were successful: Me and the fighter glance at each other, nod, and leap off the ledge, each onto a gargoyle. As our weight brings the gargoyles down to the ground, we wrestle them down to use as landing cushions, killing them both on impact, both landing upright & ready to continue the fight.
The numbers:
- Athletics check to jump.
- Grapple check (I think it was Athletics vs Con for the fighter & Acrobatics vs Ref for me? I kinda forget. Whatever the 4E rules were.)
- He let us use an acrobatics check to force our opponent downward, resulting in 150% fall damage to them & 50% fall damage to us.
- Acrobatics check to reduce my own fall damage to 0, so I didn't land prone. The fighter took some damage, but his magic boots allowed him to not be prone when he landed.
After all this, the DM decided to name the campaign "Legends of Wrestling 3". The next room involved the Dragonborns fighting in oil while I threw pies (from our Everlasting Provisions) at a thingy making sparks to prevent it from igniting the oil.
That was a fun campaign.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MoonCat
Oh, and then, when trying to argue with me whether it was fair for me to stop responding to him, he tried to use examples of horrible things which made sense for me ignore him about, his supposed horrible things, at least one was one I actually supported. :smallsigh: I'm not going into details, obviously, but gods, I'm pissed at him. Frakker.
Hmm, that's too bad. I hope you'll get past it and on good foots with him again soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kneenibble
I have, in my frequent trawling of all mercantile avenues for ways to slake my wyrmish lust for material fineness, been fixated by
this Etsy vendor of neck- and bow-ties for several months now.
The only problem is, there are too many to choose from. I wish that the discursives here might indulge me with their favourites.
Hmm, many of them are pretty indeed, although personally, I think I prefer deep colours (especially blue or green) together with minimalistic designs, which isn't quite what that site has to offer... They have many pretty ties, they just aren't for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pokemon-freak89
...When I describe things, they usually sound much worse than they are.:smallredface:
Join the club. I can't retell a story of a minor bruise without having LaLa think I'm trying to kill myself. :smallwink::smallamused:
Oh, and regarding your maths question earlier, yes, 1111111 * 11111 is indeed 12345554321.
ION:
Went to bed before midnight, woke up at ten. Then I remembered that I had homework for my Single Variable Calculus course that I had to hand it at 13:15. Progress with that one went slower than expected, since I'd forgotten how to calculate the tangent's equation and had to reason myself to the correct calculations. I was finally done at 12:30, but by then I was pretty much gone due to hunger, since I hadn't had any breakfast. Thankfully, despite being a slow eater, I managed to push two Gorbachevs down my stomach ("Gorby"s, or ready-cooked pasties. There are pan-pizzas called "Billy"s too :smallamused:) and get there in time.
IOON:
Saw something rather unusual over here: A bird of prey flying over the houses. I was studying the neighbourhood from our bathroom window when suddenly all fieldfares left all at ones from our neighbours great maple tree, and a smaller flock of great tits appears out of nowhere and lands in our two junipers, quickly making their way in between the thick branches. I wonder what caused all this commotion when a hawk (at least I think it was a hawk) enters the scene from the left. It seems rather unconcerned about the commotion around it and cruised past with little effort. So cool. :smallcool:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
Oh, and regarding your maths question earlier, yes, 1111111 * 11111 is indeed 12345554321.
Is that question really easy, really hard, or somewhere in between (when doing it in your head)? I need to figure out if I'm an idiot, a genius, or neither.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pokemon-freak89
Is that question really easy, really hard, or somewhere in between (when doing it in your head)? I need to figure out if I'm an idiot, a genius, or neither.
Well, when you know the trick for multiplying two strings of 1s, it's really easy, but if you don't, it's at least tedious (I wouldn't say hard, but I'm very biased toward thinking maths is easy). It's nothing I would ask of the man on the street to do, at least.
The trick (which only works if none of the numbers have more than 9 digits):
Start by counting up from 1 until you reach the length of the shorter number (12345), repeat the last digit until you reach the length of the longer number (1234555) and then count down to 1 again (12345554321). That's the answer.
With numbers longer than 9 digits, you get some weird overflow behaviour that doesn't match this pattern nearly as nicely (1111111111 * 1111111111 = 1234567900987654321).
Now, if you calculated that on your own without knowing the trick, then good job and I think it's reasonable to say that you're definitely better at head-counting than the average. If you figured out the trick yourself, I think you're worth an eulogy as well. If you knew of the trick since earlier and used it to get to the solution, well, that's hardly enough to say anything about your intellect, except possibly that you know how to count to 10. :smallwink:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
Well, when you know the trick for multiplying two strings of 1s, it's really easy, but if you don't, it's at least tedious (I wouldn't say hard, but I'm very biased toward thinking maths is easy). It's nothing I would ask of the man on the street to do, at least.
The trick (which only works if none of the numbers have more than 9 digits):
Start by counting up from 1 until you reach the length of the shorter number (12345), repeat the last digit until you reach the length of the longer number (1234555) and then count down to 1 again (12345554321). That's the answer.
With numbers longer than 9 digits, you get some weird overflow behaviour that doesn't match this pattern nearly as nicely (1111111111 * 1111111111 = 1234567900987654321).
Now, if you calculated that on your own without knowing the trick, then good job and I think it's reasonable to say that you're definitely better at head-counting than the average. If you figured out the trick yourself, I think you're worth an eulogy as well. If you knew of the trick since earlier and used it to get to the solution, well, that's hardly enough to say anything about your intellect, except possibly that you know how to count to 10. :smallwink:
I think I would've just used a calculator. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Amidus Drexel
I think I would've just used a calculator. :smalltongue:
Pfft, where's the fun in that? :smallamused:
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
Well, when you know the trick for multiplying two strings of 1s, it's really easy, but if you don't, it's at least tedious (I wouldn't say hard, but I'm very biased toward thinking maths is easy). It's nothing I would ask of the man on the street to do, at least.
The trick (which only works if none of the numbers have more than 9 digits):
Start by counting up from 1 until you reach the length of the shorter number (12345), repeat the last digit until you reach the length of the longer number (1234555) and then count down to 1 again (12345554321). That's the answer.
With numbers longer than 9 digits, you get some weird overflow behaviour that doesn't match this pattern nearly as nicely (1111111111 * 1111111111 = 1234567900987654321).
Now, if you calculated that on your own without knowing the trick, then good job and I think it's reasonable to say that you're definitely better at head-counting than the average. If you figured out the trick yourself, I think you're worth an eulogy as well. If you knew of the trick since earlier and used it to get to the solution, well, that's hardly enough to say anything about your intellect, except possibly that you know how to count to 10. :smallwink:
I don't know what a eulogy is, but apparently I earned one in elementary school.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pokemon-freak89
I don't know what a eulogy is, but apparently I earned one in elementary school.
A congratulatory speech for certain occasions. They give them at funerals too (at least, I think that's the word for it).
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Teddy
Pfft, where's the fun in that? :smallamused:
There are better things I could spend my time doing, like trying to find my calculator, or laughing at all of my physics homework.
-
Re: Coid's Crowing Conundrum of a Canticle of Crookedly Random Banter #185
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pokemon-freak89
I don't know what a eulogy is, but apparently I earned one in elementary school.
Praise, basically.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Amidus Drexel
There are better things I could spend my time doing, like trying to find my calculator, or laughing at all of my physics homework.
I have at times calculated moderately tricky figures faster in my head than my friends have been able to on the calculator. It doesn't happen every day, but I still consider myself fast enough to prefer to work without one. Keeps my brain up to shape, which always is a good thing.