-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Personally, I believe that Mad Mask is twelve.
According to this post of Mad Mask's, MM is the son Valerie Lewis, who apparently has a sex blog. Note that MM later edited out the fact that he was her son, but Lying quoted it before he did so.
After doing some searching through said sex blog, we discover that Valerie Lewis does have a single son, age 12. We discover this in her blog post here. If you scroll down to comments, Mrs. Lewis reveals her son's age.
Now, this being the internet, any number of these things could be lies, but based on the information presented, my conclusion is that MM is 12, not 10.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shades of gray
It's not usually this full of Drama. Just since Crimsonangel joined in.:smalltongue:
I'd like to have the first person to post an ABR kill to join back, especially if you come back with your current style.
Seconded. Something ironic is that I'm reading through the old threads right now.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gremlin
Great. We scared off a potential ABR-ian.
And while I agree with most of what you say, just wanna say one thing: English isn't really that easy to learn for a non-native speaker, it had a lot of weird things.
Just saying that for Keveak's sake.
Oh, definitely. English is probably one of the most pointlessly complex and idiotic languages.
When you grow up with it, though, it's pretty simple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shades of gray
It's not usually this full of Drama. Just since Crimsonangel joined in.:smalltongue:
I'd like to have the first person to post an ABR kill to join back, especially if you come back with your current style.
Ha, trying to tempt me to join during exam week! I'm not fooled by you! :smalltongue:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ninja Chocobo
This is more drama than is usual, believe me. I'd recommend giving it a couplle of days to blow over, but I'd advise against leaving entirely.
Yeah, I'll probably do that actually. I am interested in ABR (have been for a while, never worked up the courage to join...aside from that first thread, that is)...but like I said, exam week probably isn't the best time to start up a new project. :smallwink:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ninja Chocobo
Um, no, he doesn't. The Beans incident has already been mentioned.
The Beans incident. I dunno whether to feel good about that name or not.
And with regard to age, insert surprise here.
I feel ancient---I'm fifteen. Now you young'uns go get me my cane and reading glasses.
But in all seriousness,
1. Many of you are very mature for 12-and-suches. Many, not all.
2. I'm a relentless, goosestepping, mercy-is-the-tool-of-the-weak Grammar Nazi, so I guess it's to be expected that I rag on CA. I'm sort of sorry. Mostly not.
3. I did try to... maybe not make peace with CA, but to be a little lighthearted with him back around New Years'. I made a little New Years' comic, in which he had a small role. I'd really rather not have him snapping at my throat like an angry lizard.
4. I just want to give everyone a big, tentacular (made-up adjectives are fun) undead hug.
Also, working away on my intro. It's interesting to note that Thryza isn't very pleasant.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
Personally, I believe that Mad Mask is twelve.
According to
this post of Mad Mask's, MM is the son Valerie Lewis, who apparently has a sex blog. Note that MM later edited out the fact that he was her son, but Lying
quoted it before he did so.
After doing some searching through said sex blog, we discover that Valerie Lewis does have a single son, age 12. We discover this in her blog post
here. If you scroll down to comments, Mrs. Lewis reveals her son's age.
Now, this being the internet, any number of these things could be lies, but based on the information presented, my conclusion is that MM is 12, not 10.
Okay, that looks really weird that you're going to all that trouble just to see how old MM really is.:smalleek:
Also, it might offend Mad Mask that you're going into his private life.
Also, Nameless quoted it first.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
He probably edited out that post for a reason. Maybe he didn't want people to know who his mother is or his real age.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Why cant you drop the subject. Leave him alone and drop this for good.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Wait, wasn't Sneak already in ABR? I think he fought with a urinal or something.
Sneaky ninjas.:smalltongue:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beans
2. I'm a relentless, goosestepping, mercy-is-the-tool-of-the-weak Grammar Nazi, so I guess it's to be expected that I rag on CA. I'm sort of sorry. Mostly not.
Heil five! And if no-one gets that reference I'm going to feel even older.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megadoomer45
Why cant you drop the subject. Leave him alone and drop this for good.
Because CA is annoying, whiny and incapable of taking criticism. Not to mentioned how he spams. There are some people who just shouldn't be allowed to be in ABR. Where do we draw the line?
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ninja Chocobo
Heil five! And if someone doesn't get that joke I'm going to feel even older.
I laughed inside.
Everybody, let's not fight. Why can't we just be one big, content (happy is a bit too far), dysfunctional family? Fighting solves things very badly or not at all.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Szilard
Wait, wasn't Sneak already in ABR? I think he fought with a urinal or something.
Sneaky ninjas.:smalltongue:
I (and Andy, my trusty urinal companion) was indeed in the original ABR thread, before all this silly "plot" and "continuity" nonsense. :smalltongue:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beans
I laughed inside.
Everybody, let's not fight. Why can't we just be one big, content (happy is a bit too far), dysfunctional family? Fighting solves things very badly or not at all.
And yet, a lot of troubles (like slavery)seem to have been stopped by fighting.:smalltongue:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
According to
this post of Mad Mask's, MM is the son Valerie Lewis, who apparently has a sex blog. Note that MM later edited out the fact that he was her son, but Lying
quoted it before he did so.
After doing some searching through said sex blog, we discover that Valerie Lewis does have a single son, age 12. We discover this in her blog post
here. If you scroll down to comments, Mrs. Lewis reveals her son's age.
Yeesh. The lad's apperently 10 or 12 and his mom has a sex website he seems to be aware of. That must be a little difficult for him somehow. Even knowing that your mother is on a website doing that stuff must be pretty strange. :smalleek:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gremlin
Because CA is annoying, whiny and incapable of taking criticism. Not to mentioned how he spams. There are some people who just shouldn't be allowed to be in ABR. Where do we draw the line?
Nazi kitty! :smalleek:
You should not un-allow people to join ABR. It's just not right.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Which is probably why he, you know, edited his post.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gremlin
And yet, a lot of troubles (like slavery)seem to have been stopped by fighting.
Hm. True, very true. I guess I should've been more specific.
Fighting may solve our problems here and now, but I believe other ways would work better.
Also, PRAISE THE POTATO GODS. I have completed my intro. Posting will commence soon.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gremlin
Because CA is annoying, whiny and incapable of taking criticism. Not to mentioned how he spams. There are some people who just shouldn't be allowed to be in ABR. Where do we draw the line?
no one is allowed to say who and who cant be in abr.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Q
Yeesh. The lad's apperently 10 or 12 and his mom has a sex website he seems to be aware of. That must be a little difficult for him somehow. Even knowing that your mother is on a website doing that stuff must be pretty strange. :smalleek:
Nazi kitty! :smalleek:
You should not un-allow people to join ABR. It's just not right.
I would quote NC here, but I don't want to get banned. And how does thinking that some people shouldn't be in ABR make me a nazi?
And ABR is meant to be fun. Can it be fun when one of the guys will yell at whoever criticizes his comics? I think we should put it down to a vote.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
no... we will not banish anyone from abr. I am sick of this. the only people that are complaining are the ones that DONT EVEN MAKE COMICS!
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
*MM age proof*
Good grief, how long did it take you to find that???
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
I say we shouldn't even have to vote if someone can come back or not. Sure they may have to improve on some aspects, but to say they cannot contribute to ABR? This is madness!
I now prepare for a Sparta joke.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gremlin
I would quote NC here, but I don't want to get banned. And how does thinking that some people shouldn't be in ABR make me a nazi?
And ABR is meant to be fun. Can it be fun when one of the guys will yell at whoever criticizes his comics? I think we should put it down to a vote.
1. I agree with your first and second issues. The point is, as far as I see, to have fun---achieved by people contributing well.
2. Although I'm really new at the whole ABR shebang, I agree with your proposal of a vote.
One thing: I think that we need to encourage improvement where its needed---both from the positions of critic (constructive, I hope) and criticized.
EDIT: I don't think banishment is a good idea at first, but maybe...
Perhaps people could be put on probation; they are warned, told how they can improve, and expected to do so---or at least, make an effort. Whether banishment would follow (if the person ignored the warning and such), I dunno.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megadoomer45
no... we will not banish anyone from abr. I am sick of this. the only people that are complaining are the ones that DONT EVEN MAKE COMICS!
Excuse me? I make comics, and so does NC! He just withdrew his characters, FOR NOW, so that he'll be ready for FI!
And I make comics, too!
Even if we didn't make comics, that would make us any less valid or intelligent. Also, I am sick of people here who have been a round a while treating the rest of us like annoying side-kicks! When I was in Tiff's poster, I was shown in KP's sphere! People are always ignoring what I say, while they hang on Salmon, TS, and Lying's every word! What's it take to be acknowledged?! WHAT'S IT TAKE???!!!:smallfurious:
Okay, I'm, done ranting now. But I still say that CA should be banned!
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
That Thryza dude swears a lot.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
This really is madness. I cant understand you. You have no right to say what ca can do.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megadoomer45
This really is madness. I cant understand you. You have no right to say what ca can do.
No, I don't. But the ABR-ians do. I say, VOTE!!!
I vote for banning him. Non ABR-ians are WELCOME to vote, as their opinion matters just as much. They can still judge whether or not someone deserves to be shown the boot.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Szilard
That Thryza dude swears a lot.
I just noticed that. I'll need to look out for it later.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
@Banning CA: No, just... no. CA might be immature. He might spam our discussion threads. However, no one has the right to ban anyone from ABR, or any other thread for that matter. Nightwing was annoying, but we didn't ban him. Master Ranger was annoying, but we didn't ban him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
memnarch
Good grief, how long did it take you to find that???
Not long. Once I found Mad Mask's post claiming that Valerie Lewis was his mother, it was quite easy to get to the site. Once there, I simply searched for any mentions of a son.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
@Banning CA: No, just... no. CA might be immature. He might spam our discussion threads. However, no one has the right to ban anyone from ABR, or any other thread for that matter. Nightwing was annoying, but we didn't ban him. Master Ranger was annoying, but we didn't ban him.
amen brother!! :smallbiggrin::smallbiggrin:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XVII: 40% Spam, 55% Banter, 5% Actually Meaningful Discussi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
@Banning CA: No, just... no. CA might be immature. He might spam our discussion threads. However, no one has the right to ban anyone from ABR, or any other thread for that matter. Nightwing was annoying, but we didn't ban him. Master Ranger was annoying, but we didn't ban him.
Perhaps my idea of "probation" might apply here?
