-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Murkus
Bellan can be plotcloned anywhere he's needed.
This is actually precisely why I asked for volunteers - I don't want to force people toplay their characters a way they don't want, and it's a matter of my Cherub being in the right place at the right time. Makes things difficult.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
You can shoot any of my characters whenever.
I can't guarantee the results, but there it is. :smalltongue:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
What would happen if you shot someone twice with the love arrows?:smallconfused:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
I wouldn't recommend trying to pair the creature in the streets at the moment.
As a manifestation of Lust, she's not quite susceptible to that sort of mind-warping.
She's also essentially an animal.
A rather clever, demonic, dark-magic wielding animal.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Unless it's during some huge, melodramatic plawty thing, I'm pretty okay with any of my characters being shot too.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Shoot my characters anytime!
It doesn't even have to be with love arrows!
I let my characters die off.
And teenage Cupid need arrows of hatred too. Break up a few relationships we got going on in the Nexus, he must.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Yeah. The only characters who I wouldn't want shot with love magic would be immune anyway.
Although it would be pretty damn funny to watch the Cupid try to shoot Fferrir.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Down timez, I iz stealing it
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
well, ther Cherub whose name is yet to be revealed has two kinds of arrows - Love, and Lust. Both work effectively the same way - implant the emotion, then make it take over when dealing with that person.
And I'm not going to do hatred arrows. Villainous as he is, I don't like breaking up relationships. Just feels wrong to me, characters or not. Guess I'm too good aligned >.>
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Bushranger
"SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS..."
*whimpers in a corner* Don't blow up my house.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Morning guys.... I hate it when i wake up at 8:30 then turn around and the next tijme I look it's 11:30.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Alexandrian
Shoot my characters anytime!
It doesn't even have to be with love arrows!
I second this. Any of my characters, and I'll try to throw up one or two for them to interact with at times.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Just posted in Trog's for Mindfreak and noticed page 50. OH NOES:smalleek:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Wen need a bigger
new Thread
like this otherwise people miss it.^^
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
*pokes TE to the Treasure Hunting plot*
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Waiting for Zefir actually.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
*Poker The Alexandrian to NO, three days in the future, which is the infirmary.*
...
*Apologizes to space-time*
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zefir
((Strange thought I had made the ppost here))
Pie Shop
Zefir will then just wait until this enchantment fade away, what indeed will e a bit faster then by others, since his natural ability to get used to such spells helps here a lot.
Indeed he will then go and create a trap, a simple step on it trap in front of the place where the pies appear. If nothing happens he will go to building 7 thought it's the NPC bar.
You sure about that, TE?
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Poke Third and Lost_Deep to random plots.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mindfreak586
Harley St - John
"Well, she's also pregnant with my kids right now as well, but yes, I believe I can keep both in my life. It was a very magic night."
This night was the same one in which she got raped, right?
...So how does he know they're his kids? :smallconfused:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rebonack
Trog's kitchen isn't a safe place.
And the malevolent intelligence that rules over that twisting labyrinth of cages and butcheries and burning, smouldering appliances isn't at all pleased that some meat managed to get away.
Cosmo is displeased! Fear the wrath of the grumpy gnome! :smallamused:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lord Magtok
This night was the same one in which she got raped, right?
...So how does he know they're his kids? :smallconfused:
Obviously he removed the Dam'Buls......potency....from her when he caste cure light wounds.:smalltongue:
Also, the pregnancy took a week, which is how long it takes to have an immortal child so there!
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ThePhantom
Poke Third and Lost_Deep to random plots.
I don't have anything to say to what has happened. Nothing has really occurred that requires my characters to react, or nor do they see a reason to react.
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
But what about your Orcs did they fall into the trap?
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ThePhantom
Poke Third and Lost_Deep to random plots.
*Counter-pokes to Inside, Kappa Rangers! plot*
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mindfreak586
Air
John is actually still flying. He doesn't use magic, he is a being of pure magic and as such his spells do not get disrupted. He floats down and grabs Riley.
"You hold onto the cat."
He drops the cat in Riley's arms and then flies towards the golem! He becomes made of metal and he casts every buffing spell he knew on himself. He then punched the golem as he transformed into his abomination form.
http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q...cons/g4309.png
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beans
Stuff went here
I'm more confused as to how being made of magic would make it easier to resist anti-magicky things, instead of tear one apart entirely. :smallconfused:
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beans
Crap, I did the wrong paste. Fixing....
-
Re: [NEXUS] OoC 21: Blackjack, But No Hookers
Do ALL the things!
Generally speaking limiting a character to two, maybe three actions in a single post is best. Also, punching the golem is god-modding. Trying to, aiming to, attempting to, punch the golem is not.
Yay.