-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
And we, on average, live seven years than you female types.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
And we, on average, live seven years than you female types.
Less or longer?
EDIT:
If we live longer then that would be the sole really good thing, that is until eternal life is invented :smalltongue:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Seven years less. I need to stop typing at 1:30 in the morning. :smalltongue:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
Seven years less. I need to stop typing at 1:30 in the morning. :smalltongue:
Damn you fate!
I read somewhere that girls are more creative annd social on a general level, can anyone confirm that?
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
I read somewhere that girls are more creative annd social on a general level, can anyone confirm that?
How does this matter on an individual "I prefer X sex" matter?:smallconfused:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
...
The grass is not always greener on the other side (We say that in Denmark, don't know an equivalent in English). ...
It's the same here. At least, in the Mid-West region of the US.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ichneumon
How does this matter on an individual "I prefer X sex" matter?:smallconfused:
I just want to yell at fate some more :smalltongue:
And lack social skills...
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Me I'm a man's man!
A man's man who watches Olivia Newton-John musicals but a mans man nonetheless.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
Damn you fate!
I read somewhere that girls are more creative annd social on a general level, can anyone confirm that?
Lies.
I also read somewhere that females are smarter and better cooks then men. Also lies.
Some of the greatest artists, scientists and chefs were/are men.
Gender has nothing to do with how smart, how creative or how well you can cook, that's defined by a number of other things.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Lies.
I also read somewhere that females are smarter and better cooks then men. Also lies.
Some of the greatest artists, scientists and chefs were/are men.
Gender has nothing to do with how smart, how creative or how well you can cook, that's defined by a number of other things.
We shouldn't count out that until a still quite recent time women simply weren't allowed to do any of these things professionally in most parts of the world, so men got a pretty good headstart in numbers.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Threeshades
We shouldn't count out that until a still quite recent time women simply weren't allowed to do any of these things professionally in most parts of the world, so men got a pretty good headstart in numbers.
I don't believe that there's ever been a law against woman picking up a paint brush and painting, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm also sure that if a woman wanted to discover the light bulb, she could. Although you could argue that with the lack of education women got in comparison to men at the time.
And whether women were aloud to do these things or not, men still did do them. Meaning that being male doesn't stop you from being able to achieve these things, meaning that gender doesn't have anything to do with how good you are as a chef or scientist and doesn't determine how smart you are which was the point I was trying to make.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
I don't believe that there's ever been a law against woman picking up a paint brush and painting, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm also sure that if a woman wanted to discover the light bulb, she could. Although you could argue that with the lack of education women got in comparison to men at the time.
And whether women were aloud to do these things or not, men still did do them. Meaning that being male doesn't stop you from being able to achieve these things, meaning that gender doesn't have anything to do with how good you are as a chef or scientist and doesn't determine how smart you are which was the point I was trying to make.
Sure they didnt have a law for that, but why would they need it, if women had enough to do raising children, cooking and doing housework so that men would have the time to make a career, inventions and art.
I didnt say men were unable to do any of these, im only saying these things did a lot to tip the scales towards males.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Threeshades
Sure they didnt have a law for that, but why would they need it, if women had enough to do raising children, cooking and doing housework so that men would have the time to make a career, inventions and art.
I didnt say men were unable to do any of these, im only saying these things did a lot to tip the scales towards males.
But I never said that men were able to do these things better then women can, which is why I don't see how your comment about the scales being tipped towards men is relevant.
Keveak said that he read somewhere that women were more creative and such. I was claiming that gender has nothing to do with a persons creativity. Therefore your comment about women not being able to have many professions has very little to do with what I said because all I said was that gender had nothing to do with creativity or intelligence. So unless you're claiming that women are better then men in these things and were unable to show that they were superior to men because they didn't have the opportunity, (which I don’t think you are), I’m not quite sure what you’re trying to say. in fact, my point is something which is held by most feminists.[/rant]
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
But I never said that men were able to do these things better then women can, which is why I don't see how your comment about the scales being tipped towards men is relevant.
Keveak said that he read somewhere that women were more creative and such. I was claiming that gender has nothing to do with a persons creativity. Therefore your comment about women not being able to have many professions has very little to do with what I said because all I said was that gender had nothing to do with creativity or intelligence. So unless you're claiming that women are better then men in these things and were unable to show that they were superior to men because they didn't have the opportunity, (which I don’t think you are), I’m not quite sure what you’re trying to say. in fact, my point is something which is held by most feminists.[/rant]
Women and men think different, that's proved. So it might make a difference based on what you are doing and how. I'm not being sexist here, I saw it on television :smalltongue:
You also used the fact that a lot of artists and such were male to back up your claim which Threeshades claims is incorrect by stating that women weren't allowed too be it for a long time.
Which is correct according to my education, women were not seen as able to learn anything beyond basic math until the eighteenth to nineteenth century.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Well, I'm posting here because this is the place I know. This is the core of the Fancomics section, in my opinion. It's not to get attention, it's because I'm not so sure where else to post this. So I'm just going to say that I'm withdrawing from the Fancomics section.
'I'm going to stop reading the comics here, and stop posting. I need more time in my life, and I'm not getting any. I've always wanted to be more active in the Town and the Homebrews section, but the comics here have prevented that. I need more time.
If I manage to get the backstory comic out, I will put it up here and post on it, but otherwise, I'm out. It's not that much of a big deal, of course, but I just thought I'd make it clear: I'm not coming back to ABR. I saw a few comments after my good-bye post, and they kind of depressed me. So I'm just going to oblige, here. I'm not going to come back within a week, I'm not doing this to get attention, and I'm not trying to whine. I'm not 'peeking through the window', I'm not making much ado about nothing. I'm not going to stay in a place where I'm not wanted.
But I'm pretty content now. I'm sorry for getting off-topic, some of the comments below mine upset me. I thought I'd sleep on it before this posts so that it wouldn't get personal, but I just read them again when looking up my own post, and I got mad all over again.
I'm kind of wasting my time here, actually. Most people must have thought me a troll when I said I was leaving, and ignored me. But I thought I'd pay this place some respect. It was a great comic for the very reasons people say it deteriorated. I loved the confusion, the many subplots. In trying to control it and avoid subplots, I hope the plots themselves will survive.
Good luck, and I mean it. No grudges this time. :smallsmile:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
We are seriously tempting the Mod-Gods here with the sex-V-sex discussion folks
And Grem, hope you find happiness in wherever you end up, I personally think you managed to add something to ABR affairs however little you think you contributed.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Keveak
You also used the fact that a lot of artists and such were male to back up your claim which Threeshades claims is incorrect by stating that women weren't allowed too be it for a long time.
Which is correct according to my education, women were not seen as able to learn anything beyond basic math until the eighteenth to nineteenth century.
You misunderstood. What you read claimed that men weren't as creative as women. I said that they are just as creative as woman, and used art as an example. Not just historical art, but even today, both in fine art and in commercial art. (And also very successful male authors, poets and musicians) I was using it as an example to say that a persons gender does not effect how creative that person is, which is what you read. I also never claimed that there weren't any creative women.
The historical discrimination against women has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that there were and still are creative men. Which is why I'm confused by why Threeshades bought it up.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lyinginbedmon
We are seriously tempting the Mod-Gods here with the sex-V-sex discussion folks.
And its all my fault! :smalleek:
Meh Oh well! :smallbiggrin:
Also... Keris should have finished his comic by now...
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kpenguin
FI is a continuation of the original FFF IN THE FUUUUTUUUUURE...
So, yeah.
There's also TJH Reboot.
FI sounds cool. Everyone loves the future.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EmeraldPhoenix
you already said that...
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Since my point got lost in the discussion, I'm just gonna stop bothering.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
That happens a lot her in Random Ban-
I mean, the ABR discussion thread.
...Yeah.
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Guys, first episode of the Avatar Battle Royale Podcast is here! Just got to the youtube channel at the bottom of this post and Episode 1 is playlisted. :smallbiggrin:
It starts really awkward then gets golden.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheABRChannel
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darklord Bright
Guys, first episode of the
Avatar Battle Royale Podcast is here! Just got to the youtube channel at the bottom of this post and Episode 1 is playlisted. :smallbiggrin:
It starts really awkward then gets golden.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheABRChannel
That there's some fun listenin'
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lyinginbedmon
That there's some fun listenin'
Sarcasm noted. :P
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Sarcasm noted. :P
No really, I'm having fun listening to it. All the ABR references and the stories is pretty cool :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
It might be that I'm searching for the folders containign my comic sketches at the moment, but I don't really understand much.
But thanks for the compliment on my MR comics :smallbiggrin:
Okay, done. I enjoyed listening. Seems like fun to do.
Hooray I found the folders!
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darklord Bright
Guys, first episode of the
Avatar Battle Royale Podcast is here! Just got to the youtube channel at the bottom of this post and Episode 1 is playlisted. :smallbiggrin:
It starts really awkward then gets golden.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheABRChannel
hehehehe Random chatting!
I'd do one... buuuut it would be rather awkward for me as well as anyone listening to me...
Unnnleeeesss >.>
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fayte Graydon
hehehehe Random chatting!
I'd do one... buuuut it would be rather awkward for me as well as anyone listening to me...
Unnnleeeesss >.>
Unless it's a farm!
-
Re: ABR Discussion Thread XXX - No Sexual Title for You!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Threeshades
Unless it's a farm!
I giggled :smallbiggrin:
EDIT:NO! unless i can get 6 litres of water and a punch in my gentiallia by mike tyson! Mind you that would also save money XD