Lord Loss
If you want to know my reasons,PM me.look at my next post.
Printable View
Lord Loss
If you want to know my reasons,PM me.look at my next post.
Superdark because people seem to be suggesting it's a bad idea to vote Lord Loss.
Zar Peter
Perhaps he's made a deal of some sort?
I'm sorry. :smallfrown: I didn't want to lynch you again and will advocate them not lynching you in the next game you're in. Although your reasoning for pointing at me I don't understand....:smallconfused:
Either way, trust me when I say that I was offered a ... very convincing deal.
Mr. Pelay walked the streets of Paris, he loved the lovely air. Too bad it was tainted by the dark raising of both supernatural and mundane surges. He would have to learn many things of all factions involved. See if he could a spot of war profiteering. He was simply an assassin, nothing less, and the good lord knows, nothing more.
Perhaps that Mr. Zar Peter would know more about the up and coming businesses.
Larspcus2, simply because the dissemination of information in a WW game is one of the best tools that the village can have. Claiming to have motivation second day and requiring people to PM for it seems like a very easy way to ferret out those who are paying the most attention, or a way to get the more trusting into a false network.
I have the feeling that someone is bribing the whole player base and it is not Super Dark33
You got it.
im getting many PM's now of people offering me stuff. maybe it was planned so they can manipulate me?
who knows.
stuff that can save me it seems.
Dibs on your juicer.
Oh, I just re-read my pm, and it seems I'm being bribed to vote Superdark as well. Sorry about that. :smallfrown:
Is everyone here getting bribed? :smallannoyed:
No. Some of us are pure and not corrupt in the least and totally trustworthy.
Right superdark33?
I'm going with superdark33. If some dirty deed is going to be done I want to be part of it.
Is that the bribe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Loss
Is there even neutral roles in this game?
@Lord Loss: Care to tell us who you've infected on night 1? Thanks.
Just a thought, but isn't having 10 infected people alive by day 11 rather extremely difficult? Heck, wouldn't the game almost be over by that point anyways?
Does this role even exist? Like Gray Mage said, it sounds really suspicious to me...
In Vampires, there's a lot of secret roles and items and abilities not covered in the rules.
So maybe, maybe not. It's impossible to know for certain.
So. Why is everyone trusting the word of a proclaimed Neutral? They're Neutral. Does the word even need explained? How do you know this "infection" isn't going to kill you slowly and painfully?
While it's true that I've been sending various PMs to various posters in an attempt to gather support and not die, superdark's idea seems kind of dumb because telling superdark would be pointless (one of us has to die, right?) and 10 people alive at once is kind of a herculean task.
The point of Vampire is to be convoluted and impossible to figure out with a simple spread sheet. There are roles and items and events that go on behind the scenes and aren't publicized.
In order to win/survive, you must be able to come to logical conclusions of your own wit. That said, I'm not confirming anything either which way, just stating that it is possible for someone to have a role not stated in the initial post.
Then there's the fact that so many pointed out that they got the PM. Wouldn't that make them easy targets to get rid of to keep the Neutral from winning?
I'm pretty sure the first thing that comes to mind of the word 'infection' in Vampire is, well... Vampires.