-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
Somehow both kiley AND yuki will dash in there and catch them in the act. Kiley will say something that lets yuki know they also slept together, and the psychotic violence shatters the world crotches of every male within 1000 miles.
fixed. char limit =\
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
Somehow both kiley AND yuki will dash in there and catch them in the act. Kiley will say something that lets yuki know they also slept together, and the psychotic violence shatters the world.
Nah, Gary will just be loyal to Yuki and not have sex with Amber. Of course, Yuki won't have sex with Gary. So, it'll be a stalemate.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Somebloke
Do not question the ways of porn stars, for they are subtle and quick to lather.
golf clap. that got a nice loud chuckle from me.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Y'know, that's one pretty damn thin line you got there Amber.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Weimann
Y'know, that's one pretty damn thin line you got there Amber.
Kind of like the line between a woman not showing her nipples while still showing the rest of her breasts, and showing all of them? :smallamused:
Because that's the line television tends to hold itself to for R-ratedness.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Which is so stupid. What about nipples is so sexy in comparison to the rest of the breast? If anything, given that our imaginations are our most powerful sexual sense, the fact that the nipple is the only part that still gets covered up might easily be what makes it sexy.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Weimann
Which is so stupid. What about nipples is so sexy in comparison to the rest of the breast? If anything, given that our imaginations are our most powerful sexual sense, the fact that the nipple is the only part that still gets covered up might easily be what makes it sexy.
It's the 'Forbidden Fruit' theory.
150 years ago, a woman flashing a bit of ankle or her neck was outrageously under-dressed, until a subtle change in fashion and morality allowed it to become more and more commonplace. When this happened, the 'taboo' moved onto calves and elbows. And then knees and upper-arms. And then thighs and shoulders. Etc, etc.
Jump forward to today where we've very nearly run out of taboos, and all that's left are the three most intimate of places (two of which, arguably, are already losing their mystique). Give it another 50 years, and maybe there'll be nothing left to hide?
Which, as you said, would be a sad thing and we'd have to start employing the very odd, Discworldian-concept that wearing clothes would be considered unusual.
Porn-stars would be famous for the size of their enormous, square black-out boards. Teenage girls wouldn't be allowed it of their parents' houses in skirts as long as that! Horny men would slip quietly into Burlesque bars and watch women pulling on overalls and winter coats for dollar bills stuffed into their Wellington boots..... :smalleek:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Or body-modification becomes the new 'outre' - piercings, tattoos, weird experimental surgeries - while ordinary human bodies are simply boring however they dress.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
Which, as you said, would be a sad thing and we'd have to start employing the very odd, Discworldian-concept that
wearing clothes would be considered unusual.
Porn-stars would be famous for the size of their enormous, square
black-out boards. Teenage girls wouldn't be allowed it of their parents' houses in skirts as long as
that! Horny men would slip quietly into Burlesque bars and watch women pulling on overalls and winter coats for dollar bills stuffed into their Wellington boots..... :smalleek:
An intriguing idea... I wonder if it could already work nowadays... I guess there would be too few people to market it to.
But really... I don't see the issue. Okay, Germany and I guess most of Europe is quite a bit ahead of the US when it comes to... how do I call it... nakedness in regular television. It's just a human body, get over it. It's just as spectacular as people make it out to be... And no child will get mentally scarred when it sees a nipple or a but. Sorry, I know it's not something all Americans think but I'm still perplexed once in a while at what some people believe...
(Which makes it all the more surprising when some TV shows have naked breasts all of a sudden...)
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
I don't think that a taboo is a general requirement for sexiness. It's actually much more subtle, then it seems. For one, not everyone will find certain things sexy. Second of, even if someone finds something sexy, it highly depends on the context of the situation.
Yes, some people will research new forbidden areas or activities for they find taboo (any taboo) sexy, but most would happily live their lives without ill-placed angst.
I'm sorry, if my post looks like incoherent, but I'm quite tired at the moment.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
It's the 'Forbidden Fruit' theory.
150 years ago, a woman flashing a bit of ankle or her neck was outrageously under-dressed, until a subtle change in fashion and morality allowed it to become more and more commonplace. When this happened, the 'taboo' moved onto calves and elbows. And then knees and upper-arms. And then thighs and shoulders. Etc, etc.
Jump forward to today where we've very nearly run out of taboos, and all that's left are the three most intimate of places (two of which, arguably, are already losing their mystique). Give it another 50 years, and maybe there'll be nothing left to hide?
I read an essay that, among other things, discussed the notion of us living in the "post-pornographic world"; a world where porn has lost its taboo and has become mainstream and common to our senses and therefore, fundamentally, fails to achieve it's artistic purpose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
Which, as you said, would be a sad thing
I want to point out that I never said that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
and we'd have to start employing the very odd, Discworldian-concept that
wearing clothes would be considered unusual.
Porn-stars would be famous for the size of their enormous, square
black-out boards. Teenage girls wouldn't be allowed it of their parents' houses in skirts as long as
that! Horny men would slip quietly into Burlesque bars and watch women pulling on overalls and winter coats for dollar bills stuffed into their Wellington boots..... :smalleek:
Well, I honestly don't believe that the veiling of secrets will ever be as interesting as the unveiling of them, at least not if it's not, in some respect, your secret (and here we can get into a whole other can of worms). Still, talking without any back-up whatsoever, I do believe that the view of what's sexy will shift away from solely nakedness, yes.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Well, the brain's the most important sex organ anyway. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radar
I don't think that a taboo is a general requirement for sexiness.
"Mystique" might be a better word than "taboo" perhaps. Not so much wanting it because you're told that you can't have it, but instead wanting it because it's a striking and unexplored thing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Weimann
I want to point out that I never said that.
Apologies - I seem to have inferred something from your post and then paraphrased it poorly. I did not intend to imply anything on your behalf.
Quote:
Well, I honestly don't believe that the veiling of secrets will ever be as interesting as the unveiling of them, at least not if it's not, in some respect, your secret.
Fair enough. One man's feather is another man's chicken, as they say. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Somewhere, I kind of am thinking Gary's most certainly deserved this turn of events, no matter if she will actually go get the heels or not.
Because hopefully it'll force him to get better at communication.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Well, at least he managed to immediately say no this time around. That's a start. :smallamused:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
And grab her by the wrist.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Domochevsky
Well, at least he managed to immediately say
no this time around. That's a start. :smallamused:
Indeed, he just forgot the "Not" between "it's" and "okay."
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Whelp, liking the turn of events so far.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
So the question is, if you're Gary, and you've once again gotten yourself in a messed up situation like this, what do you do?
Do you cheat on Yuki with Amber (not cool, but it's almost hard to blame him considering how messed up the relationship is)?
Do you run away to avoid the temptation?
Do you say, "Hold on one second" and call Yuki to break up with her so you can have guilt-free porn star sex?
Some other option?
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Question: would this be considered rape? It would if the genders/sexes were reversed.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Herpestidae
Question: would this be considered rape? It would if the genders/sexes were reversed.
Legally, a lawyer could easily twist this into rape, yes. Personally, even with the sexes switched, I wouldn't at this point, because at no point has Gary told Amber he doesn't want this, while he has clearly show interest in her at several occassions (and the giant porn stash is further proof of that).
Quote:
Originally Posted by
datalaughing
So the question is, if you're Gary, and you've once again gotten yourself in a messed up situation like this, what do you do?
Do you cheat on Yuki with Amber (not cool, but it's almost hard to blame him considering how messed up the relationship is)?
Do you run away to avoid the temptation?
Do you say, "Hold on one second" and call Yuki to break up with her so you can have guilt-free porn star sex?
Some other option?
While I'd certainly consider the third option, I'd say it's the weakest. Break-ups should be done face-to-face IMO, unless it can't really be done otherwise (due to distance issues or one party being particularly abusive -- which I wouldn't call Yuki).
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Iunno, i'd call the relationship status of Gary/Yuki questionable at best. Or rather "theoretical". Maybe that experience with amber will give him that much needed bit of experience to make progress with Yuki.
(Let's call her a "sex coach" for the purpose of this. It won't happen and Gary will get kicked in the balls, of course, but one can dream. >_> )
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Gary's going to end up castrated by the end of this or something. It's the only way to balance the karma he's building up.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Head in a jar, I'd say. That way, he can still use the swirly.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Herpestidae
Question: would this be considered rape? It would if the genders/sexes were reversed.
I don't think we're really capable of discussing this properly. :/
Quote:
Originally Posted by
datalaughing
So the question is, if you're Gary, and you've once again gotten yourself in a messed up situation like this, what do you do?
Don't date Yuki in the first place, of course. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eldan
Head in a jar, I'd say. That way, he can still use the swirly.
I hesitate to ask, given the events that are occurring, but.... which head!?!? :smalleek:
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
I hesitate to ask, given the events that are occurring, but.... which head!?!? :smalleek:
Frankly, if all of them have tongues, then I can understand Yuki's insanity a bit better.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Coidzor
Frankly, if all of them have tongues, then I can understand Yuki's insanity a bit better.
... I may need to see a Doctor then.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
That sounds like it might not end in a horrible explosion of bodyparts.
I don't believe it.
-
Re: Ménage à 3 III: 47 Seconds Later
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wraith
Well, that's a little bit hars-.... Oh, you mean Gary. Fair enough. :smallbiggrin:
No kidding! From what I know of Baseball, it's actually a really horrible metaphor for really bad sexual behaviour.
Think about it: There's a guy using his best moves to 'pitch' at the batter.
Either the batter takes a two-handed club and swats the first guy's balls 400 yards over a wall and into oblivion, or the batter is completely taken in by the pitcher's moves and ends up walking, alone and ashamed, back to their bench to the jeers and laughter of the hundreds - if not, thousands - of people watching.....
....Just another typical game on a Saturday morning. If You Know What I Mean. :smallwink:
So to put into a ckicket metaphor:
Gary is just one of those bowlers who bowl slow balls without any spin while yuki keeps her bat in front of the stumps so gary can't score a wicket? Or even worse, so Yuki can score 6's on every ball?
It is indeed a bad metaphor since the swirly is suggested to be an equivalent of a Yorker bowled by a fastbowler: works every time :smallamused: