Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
BLARGH!
New FFF up.
EDIT: Oh look, page 50.
Speaking of which, it's getting close to the time where we should think up a new title for the art thread.
Since FI would start either before the current one finishes or just after, I suggest "If we were any edgier we'd cut ourselves".
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
For the Art Thread title, I once again vote for the very clever title :"Avatarmageddon".
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ninja Chocobo
Speaking of which, it's getting close to the time where we should think up a new title for the art thread.
Since FI would start either before the current one finishes or just after, I suggest "If we were any edgier we'd cut ourselves".
I like that one...
Or, "So dark and edgier we cut ourselves"
... sounded better in my head.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Yes, but he doesn't go around randomly killing people, does he?
He just announced it.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Ok Squark. Main post discussion thread bit changed as requested.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ninja Chocobo
Speaking of which, it's getting close to the time where we should think up a new title for the art thread.
Since FI would start either before the current one finishes or just after, I suggest "If we were any edgier we'd cut ourselves".
Four pages is a rather long time for the art thread...
But when we do reach page 50, this title definitely gets my vote.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
@Nameless: Wouldn't Ins, a nanomachine soul in a dead (well the body was) wizard's body count as out of death's field of work? Thus every power related to death's job wouldn't work (neither nanomachines or corpses can die you know) and he could be weaker against Ins' attacks, that could explain why he doesn't just kill him.
And it's very different if it's Nameless that kills a person than if it was anyone else, Nameless has immortality (a power of death so if the victim fight back it could count as misuse) and omnipresence to help him.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Hey guys, me again.
Just thought I'd note that the new discussion thread has apparently been approved and is currently open for posting. Just in case you missed it again. :smallsmile:
Kay, bye.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIII: Because We're Lazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Threeshades
He just announced it.
What I mean is, he doesn’t go around killing people with absolutely no reason. This is a war, and they’re being attacked, so he has every right to intervene. He’s not really going to be able to use his reaping ability., so what’s the problem?
EDIT: Ah damn, new thread, sorry.