-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
yea I have no clue what happened.
They were running from Bad Guy. Bad Guy shot Thunt's winding key off. Thunt's wife shared hers with him. Now they have one for 2 people so they can't live separately.
(unless one of them dies, then it'll be 1 key for one person, but I don't think that is what Thunt wanted to say through this comic)
Quote:
it's obviously a reference to an episode of stargate.
what
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Sounds like a long winded pun for "she really turns my crank."
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ravens_cry
Sounds like a long winded pun for "she really turns my crank."
"Sometimes she is really cranky"
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
"Sometimes she is really cranky"
"She winds me up"
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
its a cute gesture. I wish my husband would draw something like that.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
I thought Tarol and Danielle were trying to have a kid. Now all of a sudden they have a son who's old enough to have kidney stones? is confused
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Tarol already has two teenage sons, Dixon and Kyriel. Now that they're married, Tarol and Danielle are trying to have a baby together.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Yeah, those're kids from Thunt's first, crazy, wife. Now Thunt and Danielle want a kid spawned from, well, Thunt and Danielle.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
willpell
I thought Tarol and Danielle were trying to have a kid. Now all of a sudden they have a son who's old enough to have kidney stones? is confused
If I'm not mistaken, they already have three children.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Emperordaniel
If I'm not mistaken, they already have three children.
Ember is a dog, not a child. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marnath
Ember is a dog, not a child. :smalltongue:
Well, with certain people, there's little difference.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
There's a huge difference!
Dogs are better. And this is coming from a cat person!
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marnath
Ember is a dog, not a child. :smalltongue:
I guess I was mistaken, then. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheSummoner
There's a huge difference!
Dogs are better. And this is coming from a cat person!
Exactly:
Some people save their dogs over strangers when asked if your dog or a stranger was drowning (not sure why dog is) who would you save if only could save one.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
One day we're talking about batman killing people. The next, arguing dogs are better than cats. I do believe this thread topic is currently lost.:smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TrinityGrace
One day we're talking about batman killing people. The next, arguing dogs are better than cats. I do believe this thread topic is currently lost.:smallbiggrin:
I don't see anyone arguing that dogs are better then cats, just better then children.
The superiority of cats to mere dogs is beyond argument!
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChowGuy
I don't see anyone arguing that dogs are better then cats, just better then children.
The superiority of cats to mere dogs is beyond argument!
Cats must be destroyed, they are larger, more annoying versions of rats. Ok, not really, but I prefer my pets to be larger than cats, therefore by definition, cats are terrible animals.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
In 'coolnes' order:
children<dogs<cats<platypi
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
Cats must be destroyed, they are larger, more annoying versions of rats. Ok, not really, but I prefer my pets to be larger than cats, therefore by definition, cats are terrible animals.
So chihuahuas and dachshunds are terrible animals, then? :smalltongue:
And what about the Savannah breed of cat? They're pretty large for domestic cats. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Emperordaniel
So chihuahuas and dachshunds are terrible animals, then? :smalltongue:
The only good dachsunds are the ones bigger than cats, the ones that are smaller than cats are just weird in my experience anyway and chihuahuas are, ounce for ounce, the meanest dogs in the world.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
Cats must be destroyed, they are larger, more annoying versions of rats.
You're a horrible person and I don't like you anymore. :smalltongue:
But yes, for me, pretty much bugs<rats<children<all other animal on Earth<<<dogs<cats. :smallwink:
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Strawberries
You're a horrible person and I don't like you anymore. :smalltongue:
But yes, for me, pretty much bugs<rats<children<all other animal on Earth<<<dogs<cats. :smallwink:
Look in your heart, you know Granddaddy long legs are better than rats.
One Ears would agree that dogs are better than cats. They even did a few movies that dogs play basketball, soccer, and chess. Air Bud?
On a closer to topic origin, how long till we get back to Team Minmax?
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Starbuck_II
On a closer to topic origin, how long till we get back to Team Minmax?
Probably faster than when we get back to the goblin adventurers. Honestly, go back to them. They're being chased by Kore! I want to see what happens.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TrinityGrace
One day we're talking about batman killing people. The next, arguing dogs are better than cats. I do believe this thread topic is currently lost.:smallbiggrin:
Well until Thunt updates what else are we going to talk about? :smallcool:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Starbuck_II
Exactly:
Some people save their dogs over strangers when asked if your dog or a stranger was drowning (not sure why dog is) who would you save if only could save one.
I don't have a dog but I would save virtually ANY animal before I would save a stranger - strangers are dangerous! I know a dog that I pull out of a river or something isn't just pretending to drow so it can rob me at gunpoint, while people are very capable of exactly that kind of nonsense. I trust a dumb animal to follow its nature; humans may or may not have an inherent nature, but I see no evidence that it's good if they do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Strawberries
But yes, for me, pretty much bugs<rats<children<all other animal on Earth<<<dogs<cats. :smallwink:
Some bugs are quite interesting, and rats are only gross if they're feral, cage-bred rats are some of the sweetest animals you'll ever meet. Plus you left out gerbils, hamsters, squirrels, rabbits, turtles, geckos, and the entire bird kingdom (okay, not so much vultures), all of which I prefer to dogs (though it varies a bit by breed). Children are dead last to me; I've never understood why anyone thinks they're cute, other than being biologically programmed to. (And yes this means I didn't have anything supportive to say about Thunt's announcement. It's his life and thus not my business, but if he asked my opinion it'd be "dear God, no, what the devil are you thinking?")
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dienekes
Probably faster than when we get back to the goblin adventurers. Honestly, go back to them. They're being chased by Kore! I want to see what happens.
I'm about 66.6% certain we will have at least a few Mingathkin strips before we see the titular Goblins (other than Dies, and possibly Chief if we visit him in the afterlife for some reason) again. To me, it's patently obvious what the cliffhanger was, and the only way we won't be seeing the end of the Maze of Many run first is if Thunt decides to do it in flashbacks instead, which I think would be lame
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Rats pee on everything, its like ant pheromone trails. They follow their path by leaving a trail of urine everywhere. Its not some thick trail, but still, PEE EVERYWHERE! One of my cousins used to have a pet rat and yes it was neat. But now that I know, they will never be allowed near me. As for small breeds of dogs, they get the same tolerance as cats for me. I will pet them if they approach, but dont expect me to adopt one. Except for pomeranians. Those things are just too damn adorable to dislike.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Gee, I always figured that was pretty much all mammals (other than the better-behaved humans). If you pick them up, you will get excreted on, one way or the other.
Also +1 to pomeranians. I'm picturing one now and I can't stop smiling....
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
willpell
Well until Thunt updates what else are we going to talk about? :smallcool:
Well, we could speculate how his son is doing with that 1.4cm kidney stone. Has he been into surgery yet? No word from Thunt yet.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traab
Rats pee on everything, its like ant pheromone trails. They follow their path by leaving a trail of urine everywhere. Its not some thick trail, but still, PEE EVERYWHERE! One of my cousins used to have a pet rat and yes it was neat. But now that I know, they will never be allowed near me. As for small breeds of dogs, they get the same tolerance as cats for me. I will pet them if they approach, but dont expect me to adopt one. Except for pomeranians. Those things are just too damn adorable to dislike.
Aren't pomeranians the ones that look like a ball of fluff, and sound like a squeaky toy? Personally I'm fond of the bigger dogs myself. Huskies, those things are gorgeous.
-
Re: Goblins IX: For that, you shall DIE!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marnath
Well, we could speculate how his son is doing with that 1.4cm kidney stone. Has he been into surgery yet? No word from Thunt yet.
There was no news, but just for the sake of this discussion kidney stone can be removed without a surgery - there is a method, where you break it to pieces with ultrasound. It's not very pleasent, when those pieces (more like sand at this point) come out, but it's still better then cutting into the kidney.