Printable View
I was wondering if the sneak attack feature may be used with weapons that aren't light and aren't rapiers. I thought that was the case, but looking at the SRD again seems to have removed that stipulation. I'm confused now. If I wanted to play, say, a Low Templar that wasn't originally a rogue, could I sneak attack with a longsword? Or am I basically limited to rapiers, short swords, and the like?
You can Sneak Attack with (almost) anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Archpaladin Zousha
Case in point: Skulking Slayer archetype. Part of it's schtick is Sneak Attacking with Two-handers.
Nothing in this references Finesse at all. Might I ask what gave you the impression there was such a limitation?Quote:
If a rogue can catch an opponent when he is unable to defend himself effectively from her attack, she can strike a vital spot for extra damage.
The rogue's attack deals extra damage anytime her target would be denied a Dexterity bonus to AC (whether the target actually has a Dexterity bonus or not), or when the rogue flanks her target. This extra damage is 1d6 at 1st level, and increases by 1d6 every two rogue levels thereafter. Should the rogue score a critical hit with a sneak attack, this extra damage is not multiplied. Ranged attacks can count as sneak attacks only if the target is within 30 feet.
With a weapon that deals nonlethal damage (like a sap, whip, or an unarmed strike), a rogue can make a sneak attack that deals nonlethal damage instead of lethal damage. She cannot use a weapon that deals lethal damage to deal nonlethal damage in a sneak attack, not even with the usual –4 penalty.
The rogue must be able to see the target well enough to pick out a vital spot and must be able to reach such a spot. A rogue cannot sneak attack while striking a creature with concealment.
Edit: Because I know it didn't exist in 3.5, and if the Pathfinder guys had tried to add it it would have been all over the 'How did Pathfinder screw up?' threads.
So far as I can tell, that restriction never existed. I haven't been able to find the exact text for the 3.0 Sneak Attack, but in various discussions and things I've yet to find any reference to such a limitation.
And before 3.0 Sneak Attack didn't even exist, being Backstab, right?
As someone who played 2e, that's right - it was Backstab, and it ALSO did not have any such limitation. Spears, whips, clubs, whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Answerer
I could have sworn that somewhere it said something like "Rapiers can be used to sneak attack even though they're not a light weapon" or something. :smallconfused:
You might be thinking of the rules on certain weapons where they can be Finessed despite not being light weapons - examples including rapiers, but also spiked chains.Quote:
Originally Posted by Archpaladin Zousha
I think you're confusing that with the clause that let Rapiers be used with Weapon Finesse, which is normally only for light weapons (and whips and chains).Quote:
Originally Posted by Archpaladin Zousha
I remember the first D&D game I ran back in high school, the party rogue carried a Warmace to sneak attack with simply because it was funny.
I thought you could only backstab with Thief weapons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth
You canbackstabsneak attack with any weapon.
Not that I was aware of. Mind you, I was backstabbing as a bard using a short sword, and it was also something along the lines of thirteen years ago now, so my memory may be rusty.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThiagoMartell
Backstab was really murky. There is a brazilian comic that lampshades it - a thief tried to backstab a dragon and the game stops because the DM says 'dragons don't have backs'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth
Anyway, a short sword is a thief weapon, so, yeah...
How did you get backstab on your bard, was it from a kit?
Now I'm kind of missing 2e.
I think I know where this came from. Did you ever play 4th Edition? because that's in 4e that you can only sneak attack with light weapons, IIRC. One of the only rules I cared for in 4e. Sometimes it gets a little silly. SA with a ballista, anyone?Quote:
Originally Posted by Archpaladin Zousha
I see no problems, as long as your target is within 30ft.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mcdt2
"Does the Ballista need to roll a Stealth check?"Quote:
Originally Posted by grarrrg
It's been like this since 3.5, I think. In 4th, there were only a handful of weapons you could sneak attack with, so maybe you were thinking about that.
....I had a player sneak attack someone with a boat once. Dropped a rowboat on the fleeing captain's head. That same rogue used a greatsword.. so yeah.. I'm glad they never tried purchasing a cannon and attempting to lug it around.