-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Hey, I'm a younger sibling, youngest of three actually, some of us are cool!
I hate Bratz and High School Musical(in fact most stuff disney has churned out in the last two years or so).
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haruki-kun
Younger siblings are weird. :smalltongue:
Indeed. Mine idolizes me.
I'm a very bad role model.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dragonrider
They're Barbie taken to a new extreme because not only are they expected to be girly and cutesy, they're expected to be BRATTY. Since when did it become acceptable for little girls to be catty and gossipy and mean? :smallfurious:
I now have a crush on you. :smalltongue:
I know what you mean. Not that much about Barbies or those other franchises were good anyway. With Barbies, girls are all expected to have a body that can't even fit their inner organs.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
only 1 week til all hallows eve. in the finest traditions of movie theatres everywhere please reserve your copy of "rocky horror picture show" early so as to not miss out on a most excellent tradition. and remember to other viewers of said movie if its your first time viewing your a virgin and only virgins go all the way down. you will under stand later if you dont know what that refers to. and no its not sexual.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
I've seen it, and I loved it. :smallbiggrin:
But I've never done the tradition thing. Besides, I'd have no one to watch it with...
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Ugh, hate to all these stupid things like Bratz and High school musical.
And my parents just think its me growing out of that stuff. >.<
And I only ever saw tv commercials for them...... Ugh...
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haruki-kun
Younger siblings are weird. :smalltongue:
So are older siblings. And siblings of the same age. And, well, I could keep this going for a while but I can't be bothered so I'll just cut to the chase and say people.
Hmm... For a 'cut to the chase', that was a rather long sentence. Since brevity is the soul of wit...
I'm going to Scarborough tomorrow. Maybe I should pack.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Hmm, I can insult my older brother, who is a geek as well pretty easily.
Just by saying one sentence : Your logic is invalid, hormones have taken you over.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haruki-kun
I now have a crush on you. :smalltongue:
I know what you mean. Not that much about Barbies or those other franchises were good anyway. With Barbies, girls are all expected to have a body that can't even fit their inner organs.
Um, thanks, I think. :smallbiggrin: :smallwink:
And yeah, barbies are RIDICULOUSLY thin, as are Bratz. Reality check here:
Barbie if she was a person vs. Average Woman comparison:
Spoiler
Show
Weight
B: 100 lbs
AW: 145 lbs
Height
B: 6 feet
AW: 5 feet 4 inches
Bust
B: 39 inches
AW: 36 inches
Waist
B: 19 inches
AW: 30 inches
Hips
B: 33 inches
AW: 42 inches
INSANE.
We live in a stupid world. :smalltongue:
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dragonrider
Bratz! GAH! :smalleek:
They're...they're....
The very name exemplifies all that is wrong with them. They're Barbie taken to a new extreme because not only are they expected to be girly and cutesy, they're expected to be BRATTY. Since when did it become acceptable for little girls to be catty and gossipy and mean? :smallfurious: Yeah. That's right. That's why I had no friends when I was a kid. :smalltongue: :smallwink:
No, really.
It's stupid.
EXACTLY!
And, to my great shame, I've seen an episode of Bratz. They're all fashion mad, mindless dolts who care about the following things:
1) Boys.
2) Shopping!
3) BOYS AND SHOPPING!!
Even Barbie is better than that because she used to be a nice doll; before the whole fifty million films a year thing, and at first the films were adequate.
Not that I watched them, but the plots were moderately intelligent if a bit cliched. But still stereotyped.
Stupid stereotypes of girls. Either fashion mad (with ethnic variation) or blonde haired, busty, tall, impossibly figured girls.
And That Song Of Which We Do Not Speak By Aqua does not help. *flees before the lyrics invade*
That song sounds so perverted.
Oh, Mr. Mybug from Cold Comfort Farm is too. He sees hills as the breasts of a great brown woman; buds are incredibly phallic shaped and even more absurdities. We saw a clip of the film (1995) and Stehpen Fry was Mr. Mybug.
This is hilarious as there're many hints that Mr. Mybug is a homosexual. And Stephen also acted as Oscar Wilde. :smallbiggrin:
Stephen Fry is an amazing actor. In everything from Blackadder (Meeeeeeeh!) to Oscar Wilde; he's a great TV show host and so funny and intelligent and wow.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
I should add one thing to that:
Wrists:
B: just over 1 inch
AW: 3 inches
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dragonrider
Height
B: 6 feet
AW: 5 feet 4 inches
Hate to the first one, seriously. And more hate that pretty much all of the guys are taller then that, just look at one of those things, the guys are always taller or way younger....
Urgh......
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CurlyKitGirl
And That Song Of Which We Do Not Speak By Aqua does not help. *flees before the lyrics invade*
That song sounds so perverted.
But if you talk about That Song of Which we do not Speak, are you not speaking of That Song of Which we do not Talk? :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gezina
I should add one thing to that:
Wrists:
B: just over 1 inch
AW: 3 inches
How do you measure that? You can't mean around...:smalltongue:
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CurlyKitGirl
And That Song Of Which We Do Not Speak By Aqua does not help. *flees before the lyrics invade*
Aaaah! My brain! *Fights to retain mental discipline*
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dragonrider
How do you measure that? You can't mean around...:smalltongue:
No, diameter. from thumb side to pink side.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Thufir
Aaaah! My brain! *Fights to retain mental discipline*
*sinisterly dirty laugh*
Oh, my sister's a doorknob. She's had two weeks to draft up and write up a story in neat. At least.
Now the thing is, she stole the story from me. It was one I told her when she was in Y6. It was a bit like Cinderella; but actually nothing like it.
So not only has she plagiarised me, but those two weeks were spent either writing some incredibly convoluted and twisted version of my story (so it's not even original), but it also means that she's done nothing for this fornight.
And she's now writing it up from draft into neat at after eleven in the evening. She's a total doorknob. And she's also lost all her laptop privileges (score!); but also her DS, stereo, CDs, games and pretty much anything bar books and TV.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CurlyKitGirl
*sinisterly dirty laugh*
Oh, my sister's a doorknob. She's had two weeks to draft up and write up a story in neat. At least.
Now the thing is, she stole the story from me. It was one I told her when she was in Y6. It was a bit like Cinderella; but actually nothing like it.
So not only has she plagiarised me, but those two weeks were spent either writing some incredibly convoluted and twisted version of my story (so it's not even original), but it also means that she's done nothing for this fornight.
And she's now writing it up from draft into neat at after eleven in the evening. She's a total doorknob. And she's also lost all her laptop privileges (score!); but also her DS, stereo, CDs, games and pretty much anything bar books and TV.
Curly I think you just stole the brains of your siblings:smallwink:
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
They didn't take the TV? o.O
When I was in the 10th. grade, I failed 4 subjects. Not badly, but like one point below what I needed to pass. :smallsigh:
Parents ruled: No TV, no videogames, no going out, no computer for non-educational purposes, no fun. I told this to a teacher of mine. "You're Boo Radley!" she said.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Aziraphale
Cut it open. Stuff it with magnesium. Light bonfire.
Throw on fire.
???
Profit.
Oooh! ??? could be 'sell tickets'!
I know I'd come!
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haruki-kun
They didn't take the TV? o.O
I have often said this: my sister and I share a room. I would not be happy as it is my TV/video and DVD player.
And she's not failing; but she's been procrastinating too long over this piece. Mum's given her more than enough leeway, she's had four forced sit-down sessions where she was supervised during writing; or mum was in the other room.
So you can see she's a bit silly.
@DD: No. She's just very lazy.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Mwahaha! I've just been inspired by this link (not going to help unless you read Russian). Basically, the premise of that link is that people are giving themselves nicknames with the following form: The name of your pet, and then the street you live on. According to said link, it's how porn stars made their names, but it doesn't really work that way. Some people even did two, one for the name of their first pet and the street they lived on then, and a second, current set.
So, my pseudonym would be Koshka Canyon. Sounds vaguely heroic, if I do say so myself. How 'bout you people?
I'd post this in its own thread, but it doesn't really deserve one. Just some random fun.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by CurlyKitGirl
@DD: No. She's just very lazy.
Citing the Rule of Cool I move that we disregard this comment and let it be widely known that CurlyKitGirl is in fact, an Illithid.
As corroborating evidence I bring to the attention of the house Miss Kit Girl’s passionate campaign to educate the masses as to the true nature of the Tethudian anatomy.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Well, since I've never had a pet, it gets kinda hard.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RightHandless
Citing the Rule of Cool I move that we disregard this comment and let it be widely known that CurlyKitGirl is in fact, an Illithid.
As corroborating evidence I bring to the attention of the house Miss Kit Girl’s passionate campaign to educate the masses as to the true nature of the Tethudian anatomy.
Citing Curly's awesomeness I move that we disregard this post as insane ramblings.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Flickerdart
Mwahaha! I've just been inspired by
this link (not going to help unless you read Russian). Basically, the premise of that link is that people are giving themselves nicknames with the following form: The name of your pet, and then the street you live on. According to said link, it's how porn stars made their names, but it doesn't really work that way. Some people even did two, one for the name of their first pet and the street they lived on then, and a second, current set.
So, my pseudonym would be Koshka Canyon. Sounds vaguely heroic, if I do say so myself. How 'bout you people?
Mozart Bowie. :smallconfused:
I've heard other kinds. One, I think, was just: your first name, then the name of the street that you live on. In which case, David Bowie. :smallcool:
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Flickerdart
Mwahaha! I've just been inspired by
this link (not going to help unless you read Russian). Basically, the premise of that link is that people are giving themselves nicknames with the following form: The name of your pet, and then the street you live on. According to said link, it's how porn stars made their names, but it doesn't really work that way. Some people even did two, one for the name of their first pet and the street they lived on then, and a second, current set.
So, my pseudonym would be Koshka Canyon. Sounds vaguely heroic, if I do say so myself. How 'bout you people?
I'd be Mr. 24. It's a cross between total lameness and Jack Bauer.
:smalltongue:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haruki-kun
I know what you mean. Not that much about Barbies or those other franchises were good anyway. With Barbies, girls are all expected to have a body that can't even fit their inner organs.
And don't forget that it's incapable of standing!
Seriously – a woman with Barbie's proportions wouldn't be able to support their own weight.
Though I"m really not that surprised.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Uncle Festy
I'd be Mr. 24. It's a cross between total lameness and Jack Bauer.
:smalltongue:
It would be the Batman law of inverse hilarity, like from Shortpacked.
-
Re: Cristo's Consistently Confusing and Constantly Casual Random Banter #105
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Phase
It would be the Batman law of inverse hilarity, like from Shortpacked.
That was the one where the less funny something is, the more funny it is if Batman's doing it? Wow I haven't read that comic in a while.
…
*blinks*
Since when do you read Shortpacked? :smallconfused: