-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
One I found that's just great. :smallbiggrin:
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Morph Bark
One I found that's just great. :smallbiggrin:
Context, for the uninitiated?
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
It had something to do with giving personality-changing candy to a bunch of captains and lieutenants of the literal soul-saving army they're a part of. Can't remember the exact details beyond that.
Besides that, I don't think context is completely necessary for this one, as it's just funny to see a little girl act like Doctor Evil.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
A few demotivations about my favorite class in d&d.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Ive been lurking a while, take a free poster.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NagromC
Ive been lurking a while, take a free poster.
BigHugeLabs doesn't save posters. You'll have to rehost the image on another image hosting site.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NagromC
Ive been lurking a while, take a free poster.
If that's the house you're running from, you have bigger concerns than drunk wizards. Especially if you happen to be made of meat and don't enjoy the company of old crones or hags.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
I have a sudden image of a russian necromancer riding around in a cottage supported on a set of massive necrotic chicken legs.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
They made it an artifact in verson 2.5, it's fairly nice item, just well you have to get it away from who ever owns it.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
D_Lord
They made it an artifact in verson 2.5, it's fairly nice item, just well you have to get it away from who ever owns it.
It's also going to be used for about half of the current PF Adventure Path, Reign of Winter. Yes; she still owns it.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
I should probably pay some back taxes. Here's a start…
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
I've been lurking for quite a while myself, so here's a bit o' back tax from me.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
@^ Is that a pic of the doctor holding some early form of Toclafane?
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Nope.
It's the Tall Man (who's picture was actually used as a base for the original Slender Man pics) from the horror series "Phantasm", holding one of the iconic Sentinel Spheres from the series.
Thoough, now that you mention it, Angus Scrimm (The guy who plays the Tall Man) does look a bit like William Hartnell (The 1st Doctor)
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/t...ps62edafa3.jpg
It has been a long time since I posted a demotivator.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NagromC
Ive been lurking a while, take a free poster.
Is that Babayaga's hut? Awesome! :D
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
D_Lord
They made it an artifact in verson 2.5, it's fairly nice item, just well you have to get it away from who ever owns it.
There was a dragon magazine article that was a whole adventure inside the hut, with maps and traps and all that fun, it was awesome :)
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Red Lantern
nothingtoseehere
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
A couple I found while on Very Demotivational:
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Chop Chop!
I mean almost a week with only four posts? Really? :smalltongue:
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chilingsworth
This, this is why people have a problem with your college, Nelacar. :smallwink:
That thing is like the poster child for why people hate necromancers.
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Not really gaming related, but I had to make a demotivator for this just because of the wtf-ness:
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chilingsworth
Not really gaming related, but I had to make a demotivator for this just because of the wtf-ness:
Hello Kitty airsoft guns are indeed a thing.
And I don't know about brands, but I heard there are pink guns too, from a dealer on the radio (they were talking about potential ramifications of not being allowed to sell fully automatic weapons).
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
They're out there.
Full auto has been illegal for normal sale since 1986 in the US... no new guns on the market, so they're all $3,500++ and require a hefty background check, $200 "tax stamp" and approval from a local Chief Law Enforcement officer (police chief, sheriff, etc). The only legally owned full auto weapon used in a crime was owned by a cop.
(disclaimer: education only, responding to previous post - did not include any opinions, not trying to do any kind of political debate)
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jade Dragon
Hello Kitty airsoft guns are indeed a thing.
And I don't know about brands, but I heard there are pink guns too, from a dealer on the radio (they were talking about potential ramifications of not being allowed to sell fully automatic weapons).
Someone in my college owns a pink automatic weapon (I don't remember what model). It's not so shocking when you realize there's also a student who runs around campus with a LoTR-style cloak, a bone knife, and a sewing kit.
Also,
-
Re: D&D Demotivators Episode VI: Return of the JPEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J-H
They're out there.
Full auto has been illegal for normal sale since 1986 in the US... no new guns on the market, so they're all $3,500++ and require a hefty background check, $200 "tax stamp" and approval from a local Chief Law Enforcement officer (police chief, sheriff, etc). The only legally owned full auto weapon used in a crime was owned by a cop.
(disclaimer: education only, responding to previous post - did not include any opinions, not trying to do any kind of political debate)
Bans on full-auto goes back to the 1930's. The 1986 one was just the latest incarnation of that law…
I'm getting horribly off topic. Here, have a demotivator or two!