Originally Posted by Reverent-One
There does seem to be an error in the table. Since Hakhpur called Teshiq as a Tie, the intersection of the Teshiq column and Hakhpur row should say Tie, not passive.
Indeed; corrected. I think I either missed Balthasar's tie, or thought it wasn't detailed enough to count as one. My bad in either case (particularly the second).
A'den, Reverent-One is pretty much spot on the money about the table. Each row details the connections of each character. Yours, for example, has been contrasted by Kihtsah and tied by Hakhpur. Furthermore, you have contrasted Medinah. You now would have to choose to tie either Amirah or Rahman, but Rahman is already tied passively by Medinah, so you are pretty much stuck with Amirah, unless someone else changes their minds about their own ties.
A row will be correctly filled when it has a tie, a contrast, a blue passive and a red passive. It cannot have more than one of any of them, though.
(Multiple edits: cleaned up the text for increased clarity, and a few corrections)
There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Originally Posted by The Giant & Yendor
"GIANT IN THE PLAYGROUND: On a saner forum, there wouldn't have been such speculation."
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread