Originally Posted by Ron Miel
I don't think that's correct. I'd hope that Rich is a big enough man to take people disagreeing with him, even over WOG.
I'm sure he is. I made the rule as a better-safe-than-sorry adherence to situations like the one in the red text here
. Maybe there is a better way to word it than the way I have.
I can change the rule to be more accurate if need be.
Is the new phrasing more acceptable?
"And yet, will we ever come to an end of discussion and talk if we think we must always reply to replies? For replies come from those who either cannot understand what is said to them, or are so stubborn and contentious that they refuse to give in even if they do understand." - St. Augustine
The Index of the Giant's Comments
| Thanks, Bradakhan, for the avatar!