Originally Posted by Anarion
That said, I didn't understand the article to be making any argument about the proper cost of advertising, but rather the risk of advertising, which was apparently misunderstood due to the journalist not knowing how forums work.
That, or didn't actually poke around the site enough to notice the existence of the forums. <shrugs>
Or did, but didn't actually click on them. Who knows? But, yeah: mangled research.