2010-01-02, 07:00 AM (ISO 8601)
Firbolg in the Playground
Re: The 3.5/Pathfinder Handbook
Oh, I don't really think they're too weak. Wizards didn't get all that much, but then they didn't really need all that much, and the buffs they did get help them out in the early game, when they need it most. Wizards are still a very good class - I'm playing one now, in fact. And the school powers are a fun way to set the school specialisations apart a bit.
Originally Posted by Roderick_BR
The Druid player in our campaign's only just joined, so I haven't had a good chance to look at it, but my suspicion would be that Druid is still a top-tier class. 3.5 Druids are so ridiculously strong that they can afford to have one of their primary class features nerfed and still be very powerful.
Originally Posted by Eldar Ditto
Paladins are probably the strongest martial class now - I'd rank them above Fighters and Barbs.
Actually, Paladin MAD has been reduced by their good Will save and basing their spellcasting off Cha. This means they can now afford to dump Wisdom. So a Pathfinder pally only needs high Cha, high Str, decent Con.
Originally Posted by tyckspoon
Hmm, could be. Bards are the only class I haven't seen, which makes it hard to judge. Do you think they're actually better than their 3.5 equivalents, though?
Originally Posted by Epinephrine
I would have picked Chancery, but the forum doesn't have it.
Originally Posted by Flickerdart