[3.5] List of Half-Breeds

[AJWB]

Half-Titan (Anything/Titan) - Bastards & Bloodlines

OUCH

[newbDM]

OUCH

Not necessarily. The father could have been the non-titan.

[arguskos]

As a note, I am fairly certain that Bastards & Bloodlines is a third-party supplement, which is why many people here haven't heard of these half-breeds.

[newbDM]

As a note, I am fairly certain that Bastards & Bloodlines is a third-party supplement, which is why many people here haven't heard of these half-breeds.

It is. But like many 3rd party book, it is usually a better read than the official WotC stuff.

[arguskos]

It is. But like many 3rd party book, it is usually a better read than the official WotC stuff.

That's true, that's true. (Savage Species anyone... >_>)

[newbDM]

That's true, that's true. (Savage Species anyone... >_>)

Funny, I actually liked Savage Species. Sure it was cruel trick by WotC, but I liked it if only for the Racial Progression rules, which have come in handy for me as both a player and DM.

[arguskos]

Funny, I actually liked Savage Species. Sure it was cruel trick by WotC, but I liked it if only for the Racial Progression rules, which have come in handy for me as both a player and DM.

It read like a train wreck on fire from hell.

Personally, I hated the book. It dates from that stupid time somewhere between 3.0 and 3.5 when the design team had NO idea what rule set to use, and just sorta hoped for the best, and I can't stand that.

I like the idea behind the rules, but the implementation and the "wtf guys" rule set just puts me off something fierce. >_<

/rant

[newbDM]

It read like a train wreck on fire from hell.

Personally, I hated the book. It dates from that stupid time somewhere between 3.0 and 3.5 when the design team had NO idea what rule set to use, and just sorta hoped for the best, and I can't stand that.

I like the idea behind the rules, but the implementation and the "wtf guys" rule set just puts me off something fierce. >_<

/rant

True. And WotC later even admitted that they purposefully made Savage Species, the book meant to allow players to play monsters, a book to detour players from doing so.


Another thing I dislike about 4.0. They know a lot of us love to play monsters, yet after five editions they make it even harder?

[Xyk]

But it's easy. Look in the back of the monster manual, they're practically player races...

Oh, you meant non-humanoid monsters...Nope, can't do that.

[Otogi]

Or can you?

[Asbestos]

Allear (Elf/Giant Eagle) - Bastard & Bloodlines

Alicorn (Elf/Unicorn) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Blinkling (Halfling/Blink Dog) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Burrower (Gnome/Umber Hulk) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Decatuar (Elf/Centaur) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Green Folk (Human/Lizardfolk) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Half-Gnoll (Human/Gnoll) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Half-Kuo-toa (Dwarf/Kuo-toa) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Krestel (Halfling/Harpy) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Lasher (Dwarf/Roper) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Lurker (Gnome/Cloaker) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Morlok (Gnome/Troglodyte) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Sthien (Elf/Naga) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Watcher (Dwarf/Gargoyle) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Wendigo (Dwarf/Frost Wolf) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Woodwose (Elf/Treant) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Wretch (Orc/Hag) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Half-Beholder (Anything/Beholder) - Bastards & Bloodlines

These are causing me to need the brain bleach.

Forgot Wisplings (halfling tiefling pretty much) and... shoot... what're the dwarf/devils called?

[Threeshades]

The decataur doesn't make much sense to me. Aren't centaurs already described in the Monstermanual as having elf-like torsos?


I'm just keeping in mind that most of those crossbreeds are produced magically, that makes BnB readable.

[Otogi]

The decataur doesn't make much sense to me. Aren't centaurs already described in the Monstermanual as having elf-like torsos?


I'm just keeping in mind that most of those crossbreeds are produced magically, that makes BnB readable.

It says it's more probable that Half-Beholders occur naturally

[Otogi]

Sorry, just got it from Aasimar & Teifling. I'll change it right now.

[KingGolem]

Forgot Wisplings (halfling tiefling pretty much) and... shoot... what're the dwarf/devils called?

The dwarf/devils are called maeluths. They're in Fiend Folio, right next to the mechanatrices, part human, part inevitable, and shyfts, part human, part whatever lives on the Ethereal Plane.

[Dacia Brabant]

Half-Beholder (Anything/Beholder) - Bastards & Bloodlines

Okay, now there's some really messed up stuff on this list (half-ROPER?! someone been watching too much tentacle hentai) but this one I have to call shenanigans on. Aside from the fact it doesn't even make sense, Beholders are bar none the most xenophobic creatures in all of D&D. They won't even treat with any beholder that doesn't have the exact same look as they themselves do (which is to say, isn't from the same brood), so why in the Nine Hells would they--gah! I don't even want to think about it, though I'm sure there would be heavy doses of Polymorph Other involved, but still it's highly likely that the Beholder involved would be extremely unwilling no matter how it was done.

Oddly though the elf-treant one doesn't raise any eyebrows for me, I mean they are tree-huggers.

[newbDM]

It says it's more probable that Half-Beholders occur naturally

Okay, now there's some really messed up stuff on this list (half-ROPER?! someone been watching too much tentacle hentai) but this one I have to call shenanigans on. Aside from the fact it doesn't even make sense, Beholders are bar none the most xenophobic creatures in all of D&D. They won't even treat with any beholder that doesn't have the exact same look as they themselves do (which is to say, isn't from the same brood), so why in the Nine Hells would they--gah! I don't even want to think about it, though I'm sure there would be heavy doses of Polymorph Other involved, but still it's highly likely that the Beholder involved would be extremely unwilling no matter how it was done.

Not as unlikely as one might think...

Sorry, just got it from Aasimar & Teifling. I'll change it right now.

What?

[Otogi]

Okay, now there's some really messed up stuff on this list (half-ROPER?! someone been watching too much tentacle hentai) but this one I have to call shenanigans on. Aside from the fact it doesn't even make sense, Beholders are bar none the most xenophobic creatures in all of D&D. They won't even treat with any beholder that doesn't have the exact same look as they themselves do (which is to say, isn't from the same brood), so why in the Nine Hells would they--gah! I don't even want to think about it, though I'm sure there would be heavy doses of Polymorph Other involved, but still it's highly likely that the Beholder involved would be extremely unwilling no matter how it was done.

Oddly though the elf-treant one doesn't raise any eyebrows for me, I mean they are tree-huggers.

Not necessarily. Unless, of course, you see ropers as having their genitals on their lashings, to witch you would be the one watching questionable erotica, sir. Besides, with all the variations and different species of beholder, coupled with the fact that they are outside nature, could result in some half-beholders. Besides, it's not like beholders are that understandable - it could be a psychological contradiction.

[RTGoodman]

The Dragonlance Campaign Setting (3.5) also has Half-Kender, which means that, somewhere in the setting, there's at least one human (I guess) that put up with a Kender long enough to, you know, do the deed.

[newbDM]

The Dragonlance Campaign Setting (3.5) also has Half-Kender, which means that, somewhere in the setting, there's at least one human (I guess) that put up with a Kender long enough to, you know, do the deed.

I have always liked kender and haling personalities myself. Some guys like spunky girls...

[Otogi]

Okay, updated with Half-Kender and Half-Farspawn

[Frog Dragon]

Are there official rules for a Gnome/Dwarf?

[Dacia Brabant]

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f173/celestialkin/93b62f42.jpg

Not as unlikely as one might think...




What?

...

You were just waiting to use that, weren't you?

Besides, with all the variations and different species of beholder, coupled with the fact that they are outside nature, could result in some half-beholders. Besides, it's not like beholders are that understandable - it could be a psychological contradiction.

I seem to remember each subspecies of Beholder being explained as a magical alteration of existing Beholders created for a specific purpose, like flying a ship or being able to cast spells.

As for Ropers, come on it's the obvious joke.

The Dragonlance Campaign Setting (3.5) also has Half-Kender, which means that, somewhere in the setting, there's at least one human (I guess) that put up with a Kender long enough to, you know, do the deed.

That's what Silence spells are for.

Nah you know what, you're right, even that's not enough. I'm surprised all the other races of Krynn haven't banded together to wipe them out for the good of the world. Tinker Gnomes too.

[lisiecki]

there's a 3.5 dark sun?

[Otogi]

Indeed, there is.

[Asbestos]

As for Ropers, come on it's the obvious joke.

I suppose there was some grappling involved, things got really awkward, and both parties slinked away avoiding eye contact.

[Tingel]

List

The term is Tiefling, not Teifling.

"Hobogoblin" (sic) amuses me.

[lisiecki]

Indeed, there is.

kewl, had no idea that existed

The term is Tiefling, not Teifling.

Otogi,HOW DARE YOU MAKE A TYPO
HOW DARE YOU?

[Otogi]

It wasn't me, it was the one armed man! How else do you expect typos?!

[Tengu_temp]

I sense a fellow soul in the creator of Bastards & Bloodlines.