New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Occasional Sage's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    This isn't a big thing, but it's stuck in my craw: Parson's order in the last panel has been bothering me since I first read it. Not the order itself, but the delivery of it.

    It is at odds with both his expression in the panel, and his curt tone in the preceding panel. Using "I want" and "try" softens his command and make little sense after he's just dehumanized his friends by denying them names. He looks angry, determined, and confident, so why sound wishy-washy?

    I find an order like, "The three of you will uncroak the volcano and destroy the city" more in keeping with everything else around it. It's harsh, concise, and determined, all of which Parson has committed himself to in panel 11. Even a very small change like, "You will try..." carries more weight and conviction.

    Thoughts? As I said in the title line, Please Evaluate And Comment Honestly.
    Last edited by Occasional Sage; 2009-03-28 at 10:31 PM.
    Avatar by the incomparable araveugnitsuga!

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    memnarch's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In the mind.

    Default Re: 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    Well, Parson didn't really know if that sort of thing was going to work, did he? I mean, a dead volcano is pretty dang big.
    If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.

    Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Orc in the Playground
     
    ishnar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    His most likely order to me seems to have something to do with breaking the link. Last time they broke the link the damage was not distributed evenly, so one caster was killed, one incapacitated, and one was left fine. Parson was probably going to order the damage to be distributed evenly, to give the best odds of everyone surviving, or for the thinkmancer to take all the damage on herself to atone for killing wanda.

    But if he ordered that, then they might have been too damaged to heed, or act on his orders at a time when fast response matters the most. And there is no guarantee it would work either.

    So basically, "I want you to" then he realizes that if he doesn't order it, he'll be ignored. So then he changes it to "I order you" then he decides that this really isn't the best time, so he says screw it.
    Last edited by ishnar; 2009-03-28 at 11:34 PM.
    "If I could just interrupt your stunningly dysfunctional group dynamic for a moment to interject." -- Erfworld

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    GreataxeFighterGirl

    Join Date
    Apr 2008

    Default Re: 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    Quote Originally Posted by ishnar View Post
    His most likely order to me seems to have something to do with breaking the link. Last time they broke the link the damage was not distributed evenly, so one caster was killed, one incapacitated, and one was left fine. Parson was probably going to order the damage to be distributed evenly, to give the best odds of everyone surviving, or for the thinkmancer to take all the damage on herself to atone for killing wanda.

    But if he ordered that, then they might have been too damaged to heed, or act on his orders at a time when fast response matters the most. And there is no guarantee it would work either.

    So basically, "I want you to" then he realizes that if he doesn't order it, he'll be ignored. So then he changes it to "I order you" then he decides that this really isn't the best time, so he says screw it.
    He's talking about 147.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Godskook's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Re: 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    As I understood it, calling the casters by function instead of name was not because of ruthlessness or anything of that sort, but rather because Parson was using his words to set the stage for the trimancer setup. I don't really see it as dehumanizing*. I see it more as determination. He's treating them as if the already were linked, helping to establish his new resolve for that course of action.



    *It would be if he chose to always refer to them that way, but consistency does change the meanings of words.
    Avatar by Assassin89
    I started my first campaign around a campfire, having pancakes. They were blueberry.
    My homebrew(updated 6/17):

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default Re: 147/134, speach improvement? [PEACH]

    Perhaps he was worried if he ordered them to "uncroak the volcano" and it turned out impossible, the tri-mancer link would "crash" forcing him to reboot (which would be dangerous), or they'd just die due to failing to fulfill their duty, or something like that.
    Current avatar is a placeholder until I get a custom one.

    I am:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Chaotic Neutral Elf Wizard (4th Level)
    Ability Scores:
    Strength- 13
    Dexterity- 11
    Constitution- 12
    Intelligence- 18
    Wisdom- 17
    Charisma- 13

    What Kind of Dungeons and Dragons Character Would You Be?


    My controversial opinions:
    Spoiler
    Show

    Varsavius is male.
    Belkar is chaotic evil.
    Sabine is a fiend.
    "I... I must succeed" were not the 4 words.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •