Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 46
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Topic pretty much says it all, although it's been discussed in other threads, I kind of thought it deserved it's own. So, to summarize:

    Wanda has "Decrypted" Ansom, he retains his status as a level 10 warlord. He no longer has an upkeep, and seems to be completely loyal to parson's side.

    Possible downsides noted so far:

    He might no longer be able to get experience/gain levels.

    Wanda might be exagerating the never decay part.

    This is more than likely his "Last life", she won't be able to decrypt him if he falls again.

    He could simply be faking loyalty.

    Any you can think of, post 'em here!

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Kreistor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    K-W, Canada

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    1. Uncroaked warlords can gain levels. You really think a more intelligent warlord wouldn't?

    2. Wanda is certain he won't decay.

    3. Enemy uncroaked are not known to be uncroaked more than once, so that's not different.

    Any suspicions of loyalty are just that.

    There is one, and only one, weakness of this unit in comparison to other units. They can't be popped. TO get a Level 10 Warlord, you must kill a Level 10 Warlord.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Sethram's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by Kreistor View Post
    1. Uncroaked warlords can gain levels. You really think a more intelligent warlord wouldn't?

    2. Wanda is certain he won't decay.

    3. Enemy uncroaked are not known to be uncroaked more than once, so that's not different.

    Any suspicions of loyalty are just that.

    There is one, and only one, weakness of this unit in comparison to other units. They can't be popped. TO get a Level 10 Warlord, you must kill a Level 10 Warlord.
    Ansom could possibly be one of the highest level Warlords as well given his impulse to always be fighting alongside his troops to preserve them.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    charles's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Seems like a freedom thing to me.

    It may not be that he's loyal to Parson, as much as the Loyalty spells that applied to him before are no longer present.

    i.e. it might turn out that he has free will.

    Then again, Wanda might hold some sway over him.

    If he costs 0 upkeep, it does imply that there must be some disadvantage. Upkeep seems to also imply that food pops for you in the morning. So maybe they have to start farming the land and gathering their own food to feed the masses.

    This all makes me wonder if there are far more powers to be discovered in the Arkenhammer than simply taming Dwagons, throwing bolts of lightning and turning birds into walnuts.
    Always spread Vegimite behind your ears to prevent attack by drop bears.
    SHADOWGIRLS FLIPSIDE

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Alteran's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by Kreistor View Post
    2. Wanda is certain he won't decay.
    Wanda was also certain that Jillian wouldn't break the suggestion spell. She may be less "certain" than she appears to be, as we do know that she is very proud of her work. I wouldn't be surprised if she made her creation look a little better than it is, much like the spell she had on Jillian.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by charles View Post
    It may not be that he's loyal to Parson, as much as the Loyalty spells that applied to him before are no longer present.
    He does say that he was misguided. Maybe he didn't mean mistaken, but given bad advice by someone, i.e. they misguided him.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Revlid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Old Blighty
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by Alteran View Post
    Wanda was also certain that Jillian wouldn't break the suggestion spell. She may be less "certain" than she appears to be, as we do know that she is very proud of her work. I wouldn't be surprised if she made her creation look a little better than it is, much like the spell she had on Jillian.
    No. That wasn't a sales pitch, she was CERTAIN Jillian wouldn't be able to break the spell - part of the reason she went BlueScreen.

    This is her stating, categorically, a trait possessed by a decrypted Warlord.
    Thanks to Andraste for the Void avatar.
    Deviantart/Fanfiction accounts, both rather sparse.
    Exalted Homebrew

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Bookworm
    Alright. Just for that, if we both make it into the game, the first test target for Total Annihilation whenever I get Solar sorcery is going to be you.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Cracklord's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by charles View Post
    Seems like a freedom thing to me.

    It may not be that he's loyal to Parson, as much as the Loyalty spells that applied to him before are no longer present.

    i.e. it might turn out that he has free will.

    Then again, Wanda might hold some sway over him.

    If he costs 0 upkeep, it does imply that there must be some disadvantage. Upkeep seems to also imply that food pops for you in the morning. So maybe they have to start farming the land and gathering their own food to feed the masses.

    This all makes me wonder if there are far more powers to be discovered in the Arkenhammer than simply taming Dwagons, throwing bolts of lightning and turning birds into walnuts.
    So totally overturning conservation of matter (and creating life), taming some of the best units in the game and allowing you to one hit a chief warlord who has to be around level ten (He wiped the floor with Jillian, who's a nine), and about fourty heavies is bad now? And it lets him fly, don't forget that.
    Nadir We,
    Youth Born,
    Blood Letters,
    Axe Weilders,
    Victors Still.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    May 2009

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    I mentioned this in the main strip thread, but it seems relevant here too...


    Notice that the royal radishes on Decrypt!Ansom's vest didn't change into hampsters, they changed into *skulls*. If anything symbolises Wanda, it's that.

    So... to whom are these new units loyal? It might be a moot point if Wanda is still loyal to Hampster or Stanley, but if not..?

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by azukar8 View Post
    Notice that the royal radishes on Decrypt!Ansom's vest didn't change into hampsters, they changed into *skulls*. If anything symbolises Wanda, it's that.
    It could also mean that he was decrypted. Also, it could be the symbol of the pliers.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Alteran's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by Revlid View Post
    No. That wasn't a sales pitch, she was CERTAIN Jillian wouldn't be able to break the spell - part of the reason she went BlueScreen.

    This is her stating, categorically, a trait possessed by a decrypted Warlord.
    She was certain, and she was wrong. Jillian broke the spell, and then Wanda broke down. The new Ansom is not unquestionably the way she says he is. He probably is, as we don't have a major reason to distrust what she's saying now. Just remember that she is a person with an overwhelming need to be in control. She may overestimate the capabilities of her control to pacify herself, to assure herself that she does indeed have the control she desires. We can't trust what she says entirely. I'm sure Wanda has motives we don't know about - after all, the Arkenpliers were one thing already. She implies that she has been seeking them for a very long time, something she did not tell anybody else (that we know of).

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Orc in the Playground
     
    dr pepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by charles View Post
    Seems like a freedom thing to me.
    Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose
    NOGENERATION Aleph(0): Copy this into your sig and add or subtract 1 whenever you feel like it. This is a pointless experiment.

    10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
    . . . . . . Dr Pepper
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .4

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    slayerx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Well, aside from the intelligence and no decay, i'm guessing Ansom has all the general traits of an uncroaked... one possibility is that uncroaked can not be healed by magic and could even be harmed as it is with some RPG's...

    Quote Originally Posted by Alteran View Post
    Wanda was also certain that Jillian wouldn't break the suggestion spell. She may be less "certain" than she appears to be, as we do know that she is very proud of her work. I wouldn't be surprised if she made her creation look a little better than it is, much like the spell she had on Jillian.
    No there is a sharp difference between Wanda's certainty over Jillian and wanda's certainty over the decrypted...

    Wanda's certainty over Jillian was based on what she THOUGHT she knew about Jillian... she THOUGHT Jillian loved her enough that she would not be able to pick ansom over her... she was not wrong about the suggestion spell, but wrong about Jillian's character, which all in all was nothing more than an opinion... Jillian's opinion of wanda and Ansom was an unknowable quality and thus wanda truly could have never been uncertain; this is more then likely, unlike "decay"

    When it comes to the Decrypted, remember Wanda does not know what they are... she is seeing this for the first time... She would not carelessly toss out info like saying it has "no decay". If she only THOUGHT their was no decay, then she would say it in a questioning fashion "it might not decay"... no her statement that it has "no Decay" more then likely comes from looking at Ansom stats... such as that uncroaked normally have "decay" in their stats where Ansom has none.

    Quote Originally Posted by charles
    If he costs 0 upkeep, it does imply that there must be some disadvantage. Upkeep seems to also imply that food pops for you in the morning. So maybe they have to start farming the land and gathering their own food to feed the masses.
    I find that unlikely... 0 upkeep more than likely means that the unit does not require food. More than likely, uncroaked probably have 0 upkeep as well... Waht Parson and Wanda are observing from Ansom is that he is some kind of cross between a living unit and an uncroaked... he does not need to eat like the uncroak, but he does not Decay either
    Last edited by slayerx; 2009-05-02 at 08:58 PM.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    WarriorTribble's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    I like to think the reason there is no upkeep is because the uncrypted units draw sustenance from the pliers itself. This should mean there’s a hard limit on how many units can be uncryted at once.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Troll in the Playground
     
    herrhauptmann's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Don't forget that she has the arkenpliers now.
    Maggie stated that the arkendish gave charlie a control of thinkamancy she couldn't match.
    And we already know that Wanda was a powerful croakamancer, so being attuned to pliers, she's far more capable at even normal croakamancy than she ever was before.
    What worries me: It strikes me that Wanda caused the downfall of FAQ at some point, because she had heard (from a fortune cookie?) that she'd be able to gain the pliers, and that everything she has done was towards that goal.

    In addition, she was under no loyalty spells to the Tool, which means that she chose to join him. So if she chose him as her path to the pliers, what will she do now that she has it? (probably already said on the regular thread, but I don't usually get to that fast enough, and have no desire to go digging through 5 pages before I have my say)

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Orc in the Playground
     
    ishnar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by herrhauptmann View Post
    What worries me: It strikes me that Wanda caused the downfall of FAQ at some point, because she had heard (from a fortune cookie?) that she'd be able to gain the pliers, and that everything she has done was towards that goal.
    That would be so funny if predictamancers were fortune cookie dispensers.
    "If I could just interrupt your stunningly dysfunctional group dynamic for a moment to interject." -- Erfworld

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Maybe he is a unit with no weakness. A unit that costs nothing, has free will, no Loyalty issues (and is smart enough to understand what happens around). Maybe the same applies to every other Decrypted.

    Maybe they become a lot less "units" and a lot more "humans". A game cannot continue with such "units" - and then Janis said - the war will end !

    The Game World will became an actual world. Something glorious indeed!
    Last edited by Earendill; 2009-05-02 at 09:16 PM.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DrakebloodIV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    1.) He counts as Uncroaked (probably) so any weapon that deals extra damage to uncroaked will be important
    2.) Wanda still most likely has a limit to the number of units she can decrypt
    3.) He might not heal, even if he dosent decay

    I believe that a decrypted unit counts as exactly the same unit it was before. It might not gain levels, but were maggie still a corpse she would probably still be able to cast as a decrypted unit.
    I make avatars if you ask nicely.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Void, usually
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    The fact that Ansom remembers his past makes Loyalty a problem. Even normal units can be turned; Ansom is not a normal unit, what with his close ties to Jillian and Vinny and his previous care for Jetstone's ideals and such. It's likely he can be turned back. Whether or not he will return to Jetstone is a different matter; Wanda and Parson can be quite persuasive, and Stanley, despite his faults, seems to instill a pretty strong sense of Duty in his units, so if that carries through Wanda to Ansom I don't see much chance of him switching back any time soon unless Jillian pulls a BY THE POWER OF HEART! or the like. However, other units might be problematic. If Wanda just re-rezzed any old Uncroaked, Webinar and Dora will be issues.
    Work in progress.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    May 2009

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by raphfrk View Post
    It could also mean that he was decrypted. Also, it could be the symbol of the pliers.
    True on both counts. But... when Wanda uncroaked the legions of Coalition warriors (the Trioxin spell), the grunts all changed from having a radish motif to a hamster motif.

    We'll have to wait and see, anyway.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    slayerx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Ya, i wouldn't mind getting a Klog to detail the strengths and limitations of the known arkentools...

    Without limitations, the arkentools can be serious game breakers...
    i mean, Wanda seems to be raising an entire army; and if they are decrypted just like Ansom is, then it means she pretty much captured every unit they croaked last battle and converted them to their side, but with the added benefit of no upkeep costs... all of this came at little cost... seriously, while the RCC has suffered a major blow, gobwinknob is as strong as ever... that massive battle resulted in pretty much no real losses for them as the pliers were able to pick them right back up... only loss would be the city (which will be rebuilt thanks to the money they just found, but that was no thanks to the pliers)... the dwagons are a bit more questionable as the sheer number of units wanda brought back might make up for the loss of dwagons... it sounds pretty game breaking to me

    granted, that's all if what wanda is doing is Decypting... what i'm kinda hoping is that she is just pulling an enhance form of her rasie... creating an army of uncroaked as she did before, but thanks to the pliers they will have higher strength and last many more turns... they have no cost(i presume), but they will still decay eventually and need to be replaced... this would make the pliers powerful, but not horribly game breaking

    with the uncroaked, the limitations are clear... uncroaked strength, and how long they "live" depends on how much time you spend raising it... you try to raise an entire army, and you end up with an army of very weak units that will be finished for good in a few turns... raise only a few units and you will get strong units at no cost, but they will die eventually...


    Quote Originally Posted by azukar8 View Post
    True on both counts. But... when Wanda uncroaked the legions of Coalition warriors (the Trioxin spell), the grunts all changed from having a radish motif to a hamster motif.

    We'll have to wait and see, anyway.
    Yes but that could have been a choice on Parson's part... as we saw the jetstones rising up they were still in their yellow colors... just as the Knights were able to dawn KISS gear on command, Parson may have done the same with the uncroaked... but instead made them to wear his colors... the armor itself could just pop as ordered in this case
    Last edited by slayerx; 2009-05-03 at 01:20 AM.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Demonicbunny's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    The various tools seem pretty well balanced against each other.

    The whole "decrypted" effect once in use seems slightly more powerful than the arkenhammers ability to summon dwagons. However, the only reason that the Arkenpliers are so powerful right now is that before they could use it they had to defeat a level 10 warlord and his entire army.

    That is.
    Arkenhammer&Arkendish makes you powerful, even if you had nothing before.
    With the arkenpliers you have to be powerful to become even more powerful.

    It's a classic case of "powerful artifact that makes its merry way around the factions as you need to risk it to use it, it's potentially really powerful and before you achieve an unstoppable horde you have to achieve a critical mass"
    And of course possessing it will make EVERYONE turn against you, both because they desire its power and because they know that leaving you alone is certain defeat.

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Orc in the Playground
     
    ishnar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    I think we should keep in mind that Wanda did NOT just res the entire coalition army. Just the units in the same hex. The "dirtamancy trap" affected multiple hexes and Ansom's army was spread out over at least 3 different hexs.

    Considering that most games don't allow movement after the use of a special power and I think ERF does not either, then we are only dealing with the forces that breached the walls.
    "If I could just interrupt your stunningly dysfunctional group dynamic for a moment to interject." -- Erfworld

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    May 2009

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Re: the Arkenhammer-is-underpowered-vs-Arkenpliers debate, "Clarity of purpose" is the Arkenhammer's stated weakness. It might have additional powers.

    If the Arkenhammer could tame (summon, recruit, command) dwagons, and had a bonus when fighting dwagons high enough to croak them in one hit, then it would be a close analogue of the Arkenpliers, for example.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    WolfInSheepsClothing

    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Charlie and Wanda are attuned to theirs. . . .

    Stanley is not. Doesn't that make a difference?

    Also, Stanley isn't a caster. perhaps an appropriate caster weilding the Hammer would ALSO have an OMFG! Power.

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Troll in the Playground
     
    T-O-E's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by Arssanguinus View Post
    Charlie and Wanda are attuned to theirs. . . .

    Stanley is not. Doesn't that make a difference?
    WHAT. How is he not attuned to it?
    'I shall be pleased and proud to have been the first who completely enjoyed the fruits of his writing, just as he wished, for my only desire has been to have people reject and despise the false and nonsensical histories of the books of chivalry, which are already stumbling over the history of my true Don Quixote, and will undoubtedly fall to the ground.' -Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote (Edith Grossman)

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Demonicbunny's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Stanley is DEFINITELY attuned to the Arkenhammer.

    And IMHO the Arkenhammer is pretty much pwn as it is.
    It summons/tames/commands dwagons (the only units we've seen being able to stand up to a dwagon one on one are Archons and high level warlords) and freaking shoots lightning.

    IMHO the Arkenhammer is different from the Arkenpliers/Arkendish, but pretty much on the same level of power.
    I'm willing to bet that those dwagons have WAY lower upkeep costs than they would have in any other army (if dwagons are even available without the arkenhammer).

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    charles's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Like the pliers, the hammer can be used as a weapon in combat but it evidently has a further purpose than that.

    We've seen the hammer change walnuts into birds and birds into walnuts (although if Bogrol's pie is any indication, it might be only temporary). While Stanley is attuned to his pliers he doesn't seem to be fully aware of it's powers yet (he could only do it now-and-then). Just as Wanda can use her pliers to resurrect the dead into some new kind of unit, maybe the pliers are capable of changing units in some other, unknown way.

    It seems to suggest that the Titans tools give them the ability to break the rules and possibly reshape Erfworld so something better.

    Parson now has a vast treasury and a large army of nearly every known unit type, that doesn't require upkeep to be paid.
    Always spread Vegimite behind your ears to prevent attack by drop bears.
    SHADOWGIRLS FLIPSIDE

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by WarriorTribble View Post
    I like to think the reason there is no upkeep is because the uncrypted units draw sustenance from the pliers itself. This should mean there’s a hard limit on how many units can be uncryted at once.
    Not necessarily. We don't know there is any limit to the power the Pliers can draw on.

    I have a slightly different idea. Uncroaked units either have no upkeep or little upkeep (Stanley joked 'it does make em cheap to feed'), thus decay. Decrypted units have no upkeep but don't decay, so the units must be sustained through the Pliers.

    But this links Decrypyed units to the pliers and Wanda in a manner that standard uncroaked aren't. I'd presume that if a croakmancer was killed in battle then it would have no effect on units they'd uncroaked. But if Wanda was Croaked/incapacitated/lost the pliers, what would happen then?

    It would be a pritty damm big weakness if your entire Decrypted army could be destroyed by croaking one unit.

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Wanda's new Unit/Ansom Weaknesses

    Quote Originally Posted by slayerx View Post
    No there is a sharp difference between Wanda's certainty over Jillian and wanda's certainty over the decrypted...

    Wanda's certainty over Jillian was based on what she THOUGHT she knew about Jillian
    Also, she was commenting on a Thinkamancy spell. Decrypting is a Croakamancy spell and thus in her field of expertise.

    I find that unlikely... 0 upkeep more than likely means that the unit does not require food. More than likely, uncroaked probably have 0 upkeep as well... Waht Parson and Wanda are observing from Ansom is that he is some kind of cross between a living unit and an uncroaked... he does not need to eat like the uncroak, but he does not Decay either
    I wonder if Ansom will get weaker without food, even if he doesn't technically decay. Maybe he can eat, but won't die if he doesn't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •