Results 1,261 to 1,290 of 1747
-
2009-08-02, 10:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Garbsen, Germany
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 11:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Vash'jir
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 11:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
@^ You could join the club right now if you really wanted to, it's just that we recommend waiting until FI starts, for the sake of getting FFF over with. The Inkscape crashing thing seems pretty common from what I've heard. Your best bet would be to just save alot.
Originally Posted by Nameless
I was gonna say that.
Although I'm interested in how MM is going to smooth talk his way out of this one.Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 12:05 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 11:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
-
2009-08-02, 12:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I'm going to twirl my moustache and laugh villainously. Mwahahahahahaha !
Seriously, his argument would be valid if not for the fact that I intend FI to be "sandbox-style", with the characters able to travel anywhere any time as long as it makes sense.
Here are the rules to FI (may change):
- Your character must be appropriate, setting-wise and be fair to the rest of the cast (no overpowered weapons or abilities). All characters must come from Avbaroy and related grounds.
- Your actions must respect the setting and use common sense. So if you are with the Resistance, you do not have access to heavy weapons or massive armies. MacGuffins cannot be pulled out of a hat, either.
- You can't force another participant's character to make any decision. If you want to go on a mission, ask their permission to bring their characters with you.
- Whenever you enter a battle, you must accept that your character may die. After all, there's no element of risk if every body stays alive. However, you can only kill a given character if he has accepted to come in dangerous terrain*.
*Dangerous terrain is any area that is either openly contested between the ALF and the UNA or unoccupied by the same factions.Last edited by Mad Mask; 2009-08-02 at 12:07 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 12:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Despite anyone's intentions, I think his argument about you and several of these proclaimed "veterans" making and planning the entire intro for FI without all the other members giving their 2 cents is still valid.
I personally don't care about the FI intro, seeing as I just want to make comics and possibly kill a few characters. But this argument is relevant to my interests, so I have to keep it going.Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 12:15 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 12:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 12:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- On Paper
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I think the big sticking point is that, by choosing a group to make the "secret" intro to FI, you're saying that "These people are the leaders of ABR". You're establishing a heiarchy, and people don't like that.
Personally, I have no problem with you guys making the FI intro comics. But I do have a problem with you trying to establish that some ABRers are more deserving than others.
-
2009-08-02, 12:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 12:37 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 12:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Alpha Complex
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 12:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ottawa
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
-
2009-08-02, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
St. Elsewhere's Home for Imaginary Friends?
-
2009-08-02, 12:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 01:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Wait, are you saying that characters can be killed without permission from their owners? It's an interesting idea and all, but I sincerely doubt it would work in practice. It'll just make people angry and lead to arguments ("No, my character would've been able to dodge the bullet! ", etc.) and attempts to make the death non-canon. People don't particularly want to see the characters that they've worked hard on die.
-
2009-08-02, 01:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
To be fair, that's the price of trying to be a special snowflake, Sinister.
Plus we've talked about heavy character death from the first planning stages of FI. Can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs after all.
Besides, I doubt a character will be instagibbed by someone the moment they step into the action. There will probably be some sort of chance to save oneself in most scenarios. Also, I can't see many of the people here going overboard with it. I mean sure, there are some people you'll probably want to watch out for.. (Pretty much every mercenary pc springs to mind.)
But then there are people like Nameless or Skimmer who I just can't see killing off pc's left and right because they looked at them funny.
(But who knows, I may be wrong. )Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 01:21 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Tiffanie's got it right.
Also, the "characters can be killed without their owner's permission" only applies in fights you have agreed to be included in. If you don't want to have the possibility of dying, don't enter any fights ! It's that simple.Last edited by Mad Mask; 2009-08-02 at 01:22 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
The chance of death thing is largely why I've ramped up Bright's effectiveness. He's become much closer to Nero* from Devil May Cry 4 than anything, I've even dropped him down to a single gauntlet and have plans on him doing a lot more mid-air attacks like he was doing in his battle at the end of FFF. Seemed like natural character progression.
He's still not going to be wholly serious though, but as always, he is capable of serious-speak.
*He won't whine nearly as much as Nero thoughLast edited by Darklord Bright; 2009-08-02 at 01:28 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
-
2009-08-02, 01:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
The simple answer is to decide with the person you are fighting with through PM or something how the battle turns out. This way, you can set it up so that nobody dies, or that nobody dies in an unfitting way.
-
2009-08-02, 01:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
That sounds interesting. Good idea.
Last edited by Mad Mask; 2009-08-02 at 01:38 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
This also gives a chance to swap character abilities so you know, for instance, if one person can regenerate or not.
-
2009-08-02, 01:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
However, your idea may remove the risk part, since some people may not wish their character to die, and put them through odds that are insurmountable without any chance of death happening.
Perhaps a combination of the two methods would work best ?Last edited by Mad Mask; 2009-08-02 at 01:40 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I don't like the whole pm idea, it'd just slow down progress even more. If people don't want their character to die, then make a different one or stay out of the action. As said, we were planning on character death being far more common then it was in FFF. Stop with the safety blankets.
This also gives a chance to swap character abilities so you know, for instance, if one person can regenerate or not.Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 01:49 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Well, I've lost track of the discussion thread again. ON the plus side, I managed to keep up until about page 30...
Anyway...
I'm currently working on an introduction for a character and a couple of villains I'll be using in FI...Steam ID: The Great Squark
3ds Friend Code: 4571-1588-1000
Currently Playing: Warhammer 40000, Hades, Stellaris, Warframe
-
2009-08-02, 01:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Alpha Complex
- Gender
-
2009-08-02, 02:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
Last edited by Darklord Bright; 2009-08-02 at 02:05 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 02:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I think that if you character shares your name for example chriky or Lyinginbedmon it has to be agreed that they can die whereas if they do not share the creators name then you have to be more careful. Also if someone does kill somebody else they would have to make sure thats reasonable depending on the two characters abilities. That way a rather weak new character couldn't kill a more powerful older ABRer. For example I personally would be annoyed if chriky was killed by some random new ABRer however I might be a bit less troubled if chriky was killed by somone like Ins.
Edit - I totally agree with DLB on this one.
-
2009-08-02, 02:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
By "now" do you mean like it worked in FFF? Or as we originally planned for FI?
Planning the end of a battle to see who's going to get injured, who's going to live and whose going to die is completely different then having the fight run it's course and letting what happens happen.Last edited by Tiffanie Lirle; 2009-08-02 at 02:11 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 02:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I just don't agree with the assumption that "Sudden death for any reason" is realistic in any way. What's wrong with simply incapacitating someone? I can't see a lot of characters killing people all that much, if at all. It just feels like everyone is saying "When you enter a fight, someone WILL die" when it should be, "When you enter a fight, someone MAY die". The PM thing is just so we don't have half a million "Bang, your dead! No, bang YOUR dead!" moments or even just have someone get insta-gibbed.
Last edited by Darklord Bright; 2009-08-02 at 02:13 PM.
-
2009-08-02, 02:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XXIV: What is this "Haste" you speak of?
I have no problem with Mechafox's robot bodies being pulverized repeatedly. If someone tries to delete his AI, then we have a problem.