The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed
The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed - Coming in December and available for pre-order now
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 40
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Titan in the Playground
     
    DrowGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2008

    Default Diplomacy Disagreement

    In a play by post game I am in three of us were having a discussion about diplomacy. One poster, Graven, said that normal diplomacy attempts wouldn't work, because all NPCs would be aware of how the skill works and thus not allow you to complete the one minute attempt. Specific examples were a merchant who turns to pour himself a glass of wine as the PCs haggle on a price, asking "What was that you were saying?" or the guard who tells the PCs to get lost, thus not allowing them to complete the required uninterrupted 10 rounds of diplomacering. This is also their way of fixing potential diplomacy abuses.

    My opinion is that itís far better to tweak diplomacy than to have this solution. Not only do I find it unrealistic in a lot of situations (Surely ambassadors upon their arrival speak for longer than 1 minute without interruptions? Plus how can you decide that not a single guard will ever speak to the PCs for minute or more) but it also makes the game un-enjoyable. I don't want NPCs coming up with creative ways to interrupt every conversation, whether or not I have any ranks in social skills or am the DM.

    So anyway, the discussion was starting to clog up the OOC thread, so I thought we could move it here to continue it (if Graven has an account), and I also wanted to hear what the playgrounders have to say on the subject.
    "It doesn't matter how much you struggle or strive,
    You'll never get out of life alive,
    So please kill yourself and save this land,
    And your last mission is to spread my command,"

    Slightly adapted quote from X-Fusion, Please Kill Yourself

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth... sort of.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    I don't think that diplomacy requires a full minute of uninterrupted monologue; It seems ridiculous to think that negotiations can break down because someone sneezes.

    Furthermore, NPCs metagaming is just silly
    Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
    MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Eldritch Horror in the Playground Moderator
     
    The Glyphstone's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Since when are NPCs aware of game mechanics outside the OotS-verse, and thus aware that it takes 1 minute of discussion for you to change someone's attitude?
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Fel, on quest rewards View Post
    "Is a stack of ten pancakes too many pancakes to give to the party, even if most of them fell on the floor and one or two were stepped on? I wanted to give my party pancakes as a reward but I'm unsure if it's too much. The pancakes are also laced with blowfish poison so the party would have to get an antitoxin before they could eat the ones which weren't pulverized by shoes."

    I don't think anyone would want those pancakes even if you paid them to eat them.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth... sort of.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    I have to admit that it's a hilarious idea:

    An entire world where no one talks to each other for more than 54 seconds in a row, at which point they shout "SHUT UP! GET OUT OF HERE! STOP TRYING TO USE YOUR WORDS ON ME, PRETTYBOY" and shove their fingers into their ears
    Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
    MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    freebiewitz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    You could always do a sort of rushed Diplomacy check. I'm not sure of the exact rules but you should be able to do one by just standing there. Look at Kamina from Gurren laggan I bet he makes one instantly when you meet him. He doesn't even have to say anything and already you know he's awesome.

    (Cloak of charisma maybe?)
    "A knife can only bring true happiness in the hands of a chef."

    "What if the other person was Masochistic?"

    "........."

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Beholder

    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by Boci View Post
    Specific examples were a merchant who turns to pour himself a glass of wine as the PCs haggle on a price, asking "What was that you were saying?" or the guard who tells the PCs to get lost, thus not allowing them to complete the required uninterrupted 10 rounds of diplomacering. This is also their way of fixing potential diplomacy abuses.
    Nothing mentions "uninterrupted" in the skill explanation. Changing attitudes usually takes a minute or more, but absolutely uninterrupted, especially with the first example or the notion of NPCs metagaming to interrupt, is ridiculous. However, against NPCs who you fail a rushed diplomacy check against, the minute or more diplomacy will probably be ignored or halted entirely, both of which are a failure.

    Fixing diplomacy requires an entire reworking of the mechanics.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth... sort of.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by Vangor View Post
    Nothing mentions "uninterrupted" in the skill explanation. Changing attitudes usually takes a minute or more, but absolutely uninterrupted, especially with the first example or the notion of NPCs metagaming to interrupt, is ridiculous. However, against NPCs who you fail a rushed diplomacy check against, the minute or more diplomacy will probably be ignored or halted entirely, both of which are a failure.

    Fixing diplomacy requires an entire reworking of the mechanics.
    The description says 10 CONSECUTIVE rounds.

    Thus, if you spent a round unable to diplomacy, you'd fail
    Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
    MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Banned
     
    DragoonWraith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Yeah, but it doesn't say that you have to be the one talking for the entire 10 rounds. Listening can be a part of diplomacy.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by Vangor View Post
    Nothing mentions "uninterrupted" in the skill explanation. Changing attitudes usually takes a minute or more, but absolutely uninterrupted, especially with the first example or the notion of NPCs metagaming to interrupt, is ridiculous. However, against NPCs who you fail a rushed diplomacy check against, the minute or more diplomacy will probably be ignored or halted entirely, both of which are a failure.

    Fixing diplomacy requires an entire reworking of the mechanics.
    If the NPCs can metagame, then the next logical step is that you'll be playing in the tippyverse.

    It might be an interesting concept for a game, but I certainly wouldnt consider that standard, or intended by the designers.
    Back from a lengthy vacation from Giantitp. I've been dabbling with 3d printer technology and game design, PM if you're curious.

    "World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimization."

    New: Tyndmyr has a game shop!

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth... sort of.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonWraith View Post
    Yeah, but it doesn't say that you have to be the one talking for the entire 10 rounds. Listening can be a part of diplomacy.
    and if they stop listening? Leave the room? Or just shout "BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH' and drown you out for a moment?
    Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
    MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    They get a negative modifier to their diplomacy roll? After all, yelling "BLAAAARG" is probably not going to be a favorable circumstance.
    Back from a lengthy vacation from Giantitp. I've been dabbling with 3d printer technology and game design, PM if you're curious.

    "World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimization."

    New: Tyndmyr has a game shop!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth... sort of.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    They get a negative modifier to their diplomacy roll? After all, yelling "BLAAAARG" is probably not going to be a favorable circumstance.
    There is no penalty to the roll if they prevent the roll by interrupting you got a full round
    Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
    MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Beholder

    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by shadow_archmagi View Post
    The description says 10 CONSECUTIVE rounds.

    Thus, if you spent a round unable to diplomacy, you'd fail
    Consecutive full-round actions doing diplomacy is not the same as any minor interruption stopping your diplomacy, you simply need to be doing nothing but attempting to be diplomatic throughout the minute or more.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by shadow_archmagi View Post
    There is no penalty to the roll if they prevent the roll by interrupting you got a full round
    The idea that you can interrupt diplomacy by talking loudly shows a very poor understanding of what diplomacy is.
    Back from a lengthy vacation from Giantitp. I've been dabbling with 3d printer technology and game design, PM if you're curious.

    "World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimization."

    New: Tyndmyr has a game shop!

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Zhalath's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Astral Plane
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    That seems pretty bogus. Imagine if in a discussion, anything you say means nothing if for six seconds, you stop talking. Imagine that if you don't post every six posts, your points mean nothing. As a reality simulation, it makes no sense.

    I'd suggest just augmenting Diplomacy, like adding the DC modifiers from Bluff depending on what you're asking and your relationship with the person.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by SwordChucks View Post
    The most unpleasant plane is the one filled with snakes and Samuel L. Jackson.
    Quote Originally Posted by Keld Denar View Post
    You kill people by teleporting their brain...into your hand. That's about as badass as it gets, and should come with a free +30 on all Intimidate checks made...ever.


    No gods. No kings. Only PCs. Ceteris paribus.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Moginheden's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    The way I see it, (not necessarily by RAW); to use diplomacy the player has to be willing to spend 10 rounds trying to talk to the NPC. The NPC's reaction to the diplomacy attempt during those 10 rounds are part of the diplomacy check and not under the control of the DM until the roll is made, (and it should be rolled during the player's first round of diplomacy before the NPC's next action.)

    If the roll fails miserably, then NPC will probably say "BAH! I'm not listening" and plug his ears, or something similar. Allowing the player to do something else during the remaining rounds. But if the check succeeds, (or at least doesn't spectacularly fail), the NPC will hear them out for all 10 rounds, (but still be free to react to other things around them and will still act their current, not their improved attitude to them.) The player can do nothing for the further 9 rounds though or else the check automatically fails.

    Note: This is not a way to fascinate an NPC as other circumstances such as the PC's friends attempting to stealing from/attacking said NPC will also void the diplomacy check.

    Edit: If the NPC would never agree with your point of view the DM does get to set situational modifiers. If changing the NPC's attitude would destroy your story either you need to re-think the story or put a -100 modifier on the roll.
    Last edited by Moginheden; 2010-09-06 at 01:14 AM.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Plugging your ears and shouting "LALALALALALA" is not the way to "fix" diplomacy. I think too much metagaming is going on. Just roleplay it normally, and when the time comes for the DM to figure out an uncertain response, roll the diplomacy check. For example, roll it if bribing a guard but only if he's the kind that might takes bribes. Etc.
    So you never have to interrupt a game to look up a rule again:
    My 3.5e Rules Cheat Sheets: Normal, With Consolidated Skill System
    TOGC's 3.5e Spell/etc Cards: rpgnow / drivethru rpg
    Utilities: Magic Item Shop Generator (Req. MS Excel), Balanced Low Magic Item System
    Printable Cardstock Dungeon Tiles and other terrain stuff (100 MB)

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Dec 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    I play another character in the same game(Evindura)

    Anyways, I think the way the DM has chosen to do it seems to be fine.
    Simply if the conversation is rushed then it is at a -10 and if the conversation isn't it is normal.

    When I have rolled in the past I roll per conversation, after all a good diplomat gets the listener to listen to them for awhile, As on the forum the best way to argue a point is to take you time and work on every point.

    It is kinda asom though A first lvl binder has no problems with it, just bind Naberius, then the -10 is gone... and the ability to take 10 during a rushed check isn't bad either.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Troll in the Playground
     
    GreenSorcererElf

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    You can just do a rushed diplomacy check, that way the only way they can interrupt you is if they readied an action before you started talking. You take a -10 penalty, but hey, if you're a diplomancer you can just eat the penalty, and even if you're not serious all you need is hostile -> unfriendly to stop a fight, or unfriendly -> indifferent to get them to listen fairly or barter. So even rushing you only need to roll a 30 to stop a fight or a 25 to get merchant to stop being a butthead, easy peasy.

    Edit: gack! Ninja!
    Last edited by Fizban; 2010-09-05 at 11:58 PM.
    Attention Imgur Users! Imgur apparently doesn't like hosting images anymore and only works in certain places or for people who already have the image cached: No one can see your avatars or images!
    Also Photobucket users? Don't know if it's a bandwidth or region lock or something, but I'm seeing some avatars blurred out with a watermark that looks like the photobucket icon.

    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Octopus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fizban View Post
    sheer awesomeness

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Titan in the Playground
     
    DrowGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2008

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by armada3 View Post
    I play another character in the same game(Evindura)

    Anyways, I think the way the DM has chosen to do it seems to be fine.
    Simply if the conversation is rushed then it is at a -10 and if the conversation isn't it is normal.
    Yeah that works fine. Graven seemed to be worried about some TO diplomancer style character, which no one in the group has any plans or intentions of.
    "It doesn't matter how much you struggle or strive,
    You'll never get out of life alive,
    So please kill yourself and save this land,
    And your last mission is to spread my command,"

    Slightly adapted quote from X-Fusion, Please Kill Yourself

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2010

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by shadow_archmagi View Post
    The description says 10 CONSECUTIVE rounds.

    Thus, if you spent a round unable to diplomacy, you'd fail
    Even with this line of thinking, the world doesn't stop when you start trying to use Diplomacy. Here is how it would look like in a round by round situation between two people.

    Round 1. You start your check by saying 'Hello' and generaly being a nice person for 6 seconds.
    Round 1. Your target might respond if they're 'Indifferent' or better, or might be a bit rude about it for their 6 seconds.

    Round 2. You continue making being a nice person and such for 6 more seconds.
    Round 2. Your target continues feeling the same way about you.

    Round 3-9. Same thing happens.

    Round 10. 'Look, you're a really great merchant and I think it would get you more business if you helped us out to catch that killer.' Roll your check.
    Round 10. Your target thinks about what you've said and adjusts their attitude.

    So as you can see, because the two people keep taking turns, the 'interrupt' effect is already in the game. The only times you might have issues with taking the full 10 rounds is if the target is Hostile towards you then you either have to rush or live for 10 rounds.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    FelixG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Sounds like because of his sillyness concerning diplomacy that a diplomancer is the only way to get things done with diplomacy at all.

    If all of his NPCs meta game the player should roll with it and just make a diplomancer so that the NPCs dont have a chance to be so stupid and try to ignore him.

    Alternative: Use some kind of psi or magical power to talk into their brain, no interruptions then just willsaves :D

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Beholder

    Join Date
    Apr 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Just chuck the regular diplomacy rules. They're broken anyway. I like Rich's version much better. It's logical, consistent and best of all, not broken!

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    There is basically nothing regarding the diplomacy skill that cannot be easily handled with situational modifiers. I have no hesitation with giving ... lets say a +60 bonus to someone who cannot be swayed.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    So the DM can see that Diplomacy by RAW is not
    "skill in managing negotiations, handling people, etc., so that there is little or no ill will; tact" but actually more like "magical ming-control words that turn people into my lackey if I can talk at them for long enough".

    They then choose not to
    A) house-rule a less simplistic social mechanic, or find someone else's fix in the amazing internet machine
    B) handwave the precise functioning of diplomacy, assigning appropriate results to a roll based on their interpretation of the current situation
    C) declare "social mechanics encourage dice-rolling instead of roleplay so we won't be using them"
    or even
    D) have NPCs react to Diplomacy attempts as if it were "magical mind-control words" by fleeing, attacking or calling the guards, just the same as if the PC tried to Enchant them or slip something into their drink.

    Instead the DM opted for E)
    Quote Originally Posted by shadow_archmagi
    An entire world where no one talks to each other for more than 54 seconds in a row, at which point they shout "SHUT UP! GET OUT OF HERE! STOP TRYING TO USE YOUR WORDS ON ME, PRETTYBOY" and shove their fingers into their ears
    Is it possible that the DM would secretly prefer option C: "No Social Mechanics" but for some reason doesn't want to say (perhaps they're afraid of getting into a big arguement with players who insist "But it says in the rules.....") and is instead clamping down on Diplomacy in an incredibly passive-agressive jackass sort of way?
    If a tree falls in the forest and the PCs aren't around to hear it... what do I roll to see how loud it is?

    Is 3.5 a fried-egg, chili-chutney sandwich?

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2009

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Bind Naberius. Rush diplo at no penalty. And with a hefty bonus too, IIRC.

    Pair with warlock for more charm. And then hellfire when it fails.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Random NPC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Starter town
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by 2xMachina View Post
    Bind Naberius. Rush diplo at no penalty. And with a hefty bonus too, IIRC.

    Pair with warlock for more charm. And then hellfire when it fails.
    Reason #7 why Binder 1/Warlock 8/Hellfire Warlock 3 is awesome: People will either look nice at you or look dead to you
    Last edited by Random NPC; 2010-09-06 at 01:36 PM.
    Image by Rich Burlew

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Jan 2010

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by Acromos View Post
    There is basically nothing regarding the diplomacy skill that cannot be easily handled with situational modifiers. I have no hesitation with giving ... lets say a +60 bonus to someone who cannot be swayed.
    This.

    Of course, you have to pair this with some DM common sense and remember that the PCs *did* invest in a skill and expect some payback for it. I just save big modifiers for problems of the "Hey Succubus, stop attacking us . . . and while you're at it, get me a beer and a sandwich from the kitchen and be GRATEFUL for the privilige of doing it!![slaps butt]" nature that RAW extremism can sometimes lead to. Thankfully, I haven't had to deal with it IRL at my table yet. :)

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Worira's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    Quote Originally Posted by shadow_archmagi View Post
    I have to admit that it's a hilarious idea:

    An entire world where no one talks to each other for more than 54 seconds in a row, at which point they shout "SHUT UP! GET OUT OF HERE! STOP TRYING TO USE YOUR WORDS ON ME, PRETTYBOY" and shove their fingers into their ears
    "NO YOU SHUT UP I WILL BE FRIENDLY IF I HAVE TO BREAK YOUR FINGERS TO DO IT"
    The following errors occurred with your search:

    1. This forum requires that you wait 300 seconds between searches. Please try again in 306 seconds.

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    HalfOrcPirate

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location

    Default Re: Diplomacy Disagreement

    While the idea that NPCs know diplomacy rules is laughable, there is a bit of truth in that some people just won't be willing to listen to you. Your arch-nemesis may be too busy trying to smash in your face with a hammer to engage in diplomacy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •