Results 1 to 30 of 201
Thread: Is poison use evil?
-
2011-06-14, 12:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Is poison use evil?
Should poison use be considered evil?
I've been thinking about it, considering the implications of poison use vs. use of a regular weapon.
If you kill someone with a weapon, does it matter if it's coated in poison? In this instance, assume you've a 100% certainty in killing this person. Why would it be more evil than simply shanking him (again, assuming you've a 100% certainty of killing him)?
Is poison use considered evil because of the romanticized notion that only villains use it? An example being Hamlet.
Thoughts?Last edited by myancey; 2011-06-14 at 12:57 AM.
Bustin' chops.
SpoilerYeah man, I'd get out while you still enjoy d&d.
As much as it sucks to say, some people aren't meant to DM because they lack the ability to make judgment calls. These people include:
The drug-addled
Furries
People who buy Backyard Poultry magazine
People who post on Rants and Raves (craigslist)
People who buy hummers
Professional laser tag players
And this list goes on.
-
2011-06-14, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
According to the designers, in a fabulously hypocritical chapter of The Book of Exalted Deeds, poison is evil (except for poisons which cause no ability damage and only unconsciousness) because it causes undue suffering. To which I reply, 1) in that same chapter "ravages", which are magical good guy poisons, also cause ability damage; and 2) smashing his face in with my axe causes a lot more suffering than paralyzing him with dex damage, capturing him, and healing him.
If your DM enjoys logic (or, you the DM enjoy logic) , hopefully poison is not any more automatically evil than spells that cause ability damage (or, you know, stabbing people). But RAW it is...because it just is.
-
2011-06-14, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
-
2011-06-14, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: Is poison use evil?
As I recall the given explanation of why stat damaging poison use is evil is that the use of stat damaging poison causes undue suffering or something like that. Those that don't deal ability damage are fine.
Make of that what you will.
-
2011-06-14, 12:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Is poison use evil?
You see, someone on the Dev team thought that Poison deals damage constantly until the secondary damage kicks in, and that this damage causes incredible pain and suffering.
They decided that knowingly causing pain and suffering was an Evil act, while completely overlooking the moral standards that DnD sets as a baseline.
And then they do a 180 and print Ravages and Afflictions.
In other words, I don't think using poison is Evil, at least by DnD standards. How much suffering can you cause when the only poisons worth using can kill nigh instantly (or could be used with multiple attacks to achieve the same goal)?
-
2011-06-14, 12:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
By raw, poison is evil. Technically, this even includes poisons used against evil creatures, and ravages, which are designed only to affect evil creatures.
Personally, I'd say it isn't so much evil as dishonourable, by preventing a fair fight. When someone faces you sword to sword, they can reasonably know what to expect. If your sword is poisoned however, they can't know it just by looking, so it inherently makes the fight less fair.Last edited by Ashtagon; 2011-06-14 at 12:56 AM.
-
2011-06-14, 12:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: Is poison use evil?
I always argue: No. What is evil is how it is used.
Think of this, my distant relatives in the Amazon Rainforest use poison on their darts/weapons to take down game, and in the past war. They use it no different than a Fighter putting the Flame or Ice property on his weapon. It is clearly an enhancement to his weapon that is clearly coming at your face.
Now, what is evil is say putting it in an old king's drink and killing him cowardly. That is why we really relate poison to evil.
ps.
I consider being put aflame or being frozen as I am being sliced apart undue suffering.
-
2011-06-14, 12:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
Last edited by PollyOliver; 2011-06-14 at 12:58 AM.
-
2011-06-14, 12:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
So, in thinking:
If the person is going to die no matter what, it would be arguably not evil. The method of his death is not as important because with a 100% certainty, he is going to die.
But in practical application--by using it in combat or even in an assassination attempt where one person may not be aware of an impending confrontation--poison use is arguably evil. (By romanticized, moral standards, anyway). Poison use gives an unfair edge, tipping the balance...which could be construed as a neutral or evil action.
And interesting--by RAW it's evil. That's good to note. The ravages and afflictions thing is weird though...
I enjoy the take on this. Not something I thought of.Last edited by myancey; 2011-06-14 at 12:59 AM.
Bustin' chops.
SpoilerYeah man, I'd get out while you still enjoy d&d.
As much as it sucks to say, some people aren't meant to DM because they lack the ability to make judgment calls. These people include:
The drug-addled
Furries
People who buy Backyard Poultry magazine
People who post on Rants and Raves (craigslist)
People who buy hummers
Professional laser tag players
And this list goes on.
-
2011-06-14, 01:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Denver.
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
If you are using BoED (I suggest not doing that) poison is evil by RAW. If going by the PHB it is merely dishonorable by RAW.
-
2011-06-14, 01:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
Re: Is poison use evil?
The last time this was a topic, it devolved into a rather ridiculous argument. Poison being evil is entirely subjective with all sorts of exceptions concerning the greater good or alternative Assassin classes called something like Avengers...
I would simply say it's dishonorable, and plenty of heroes are plenty dishonorable.
-
2011-06-14, 01:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
It's very weird. I like to pretend it never happened (or, rather the always evil part never happened).
I wouldn't say that an unfair edge is evil though, necessarily. Going invisible and shanking your kidney out with sneak attack and staggering you with staggering strike so you can't retaliate is probably an "unfair advantage" by chivalrous standards. I tend to think honor and fairness are more in the realm of law v. chaos. Unfortunately, many of the designers appear to be of the opinion that lawful good is the best good, and this gets confused a lot. Or I'm just wrong. But it makes more sense to me as it being on the other axis, personally.
-
2011-06-14, 01:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
Re: Is poison use evil?
Poison use (among other things) being inherently evil is equally stupid as the assassin class requiring you to be evil. Assuming you want to rule that poison use is always evil, the use of one evil method does not an evil character make, anyway.
-
2011-06-14, 01:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
Bustin' chops.
SpoilerYeah man, I'd get out while you still enjoy d&d.
As much as it sucks to say, some people aren't meant to DM because they lack the ability to make judgment calls. These people include:
The drug-addled
Furries
People who buy Backyard Poultry magazine
People who post on Rants and Raves (craigslist)
People who buy hummers
Professional laser tag players
And this list goes on.
-
2011-06-14, 01:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Is poison use evil?
-
2011-06-14, 01:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Northern California
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
Well, as a perquisite to joining the mystical brotherhood of assassins, you have to kill someone in cold blood for no other reason to join the assassins. If your alignment isn't evil, it sure is after doing that.
Thus, alignment pre-req. A bit redundant, perhaps, but definitely there.Visit the Chocolate Hammer IRC channel!
(IRC Joining Guide Here!)
-
2011-06-14, 01:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
Re: Is poison use evil?
No, that's not what it says.
The character must kill someone for no other reason than to join the assassins.
-
2011-06-14, 01:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- SLC
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
People get confused because poison is on the Paladin no-no list, but it's there because it is underhanded, dastardly, and decidedly unhonorable--not because it is Evil.
-
2011-06-14, 01:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- You don't want to know.
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
I don't know why they put it as evil, but they did if you go by raw it is evil but if you don't find it evil and your the dm just say its not evil, or convince the dm to see your side of it, now none of my players know of poison so its not that big a deal for me.
Pirate avatar thanks to serpentine.
-
2011-06-14, 01:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
Bustin' chops.
SpoilerYeah man, I'd get out while you still enjoy d&d.
As much as it sucks to say, some people aren't meant to DM because they lack the ability to make judgment calls. These people include:
The drug-addled
Furries
People who buy Backyard Poultry magazine
People who post on Rants and Raves (craigslist)
People who buy hummers
Professional laser tag players
And this list goes on.
-
2011-06-14, 01:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Cydonia
Re: Is poison use evil?
It's up to you and your DM.
In my opinion, there is nothing evil about poison in the same way that there is nothing evil about a sword.
-
2011-06-14, 01:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
-
2011-06-14, 01:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
I do find it interesting that, going strictly by what's in the BoED, casting Shivering Touch (and doing 3d6 DEX damage, no save) is less evil than rubbing some terinav root (1d6/2d6 DEX damage, DC 16 Fort negates) on them. Their reasoning is: because.
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
~ Gay all day, queer all year ~
-
2011-06-14, 01:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
I can never understand WOTC's reasoning; taking RAW as a whole is like grabbing a book filled with fortune cookie sayings and basing your life off of them. "Poison is evil because it hurts people's stats!" "Ravages are good because they are eco-friendly!" "Assassins are evil because they kill people without the person seeing them!" "Sneak attacking someone isn't evil!" "BaB is equal to spell casting!" "You will find true love/a job/a pet/happiness today!" No one can use RAW indiscriminately and not be contradictory.
-
2011-06-14, 02:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
1) If you are killing them because they are corrupt or evil, you have failed the stipulation that there can be no other reason besides "join the assassins."
2) Killing evil people is neutral at best, unless you are saving the life of one of their imminent victims and there is no other way to do this.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2011-06-14, 02:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
-
2011-06-14, 02:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
If you use any criteria for selecting someone to kill for the PrC, you've failed the stipulations that there can be no other reason besides "join the assassins," by that logic
Even that wouldn't work, because you're killing them because they're a random person you selected to kill or because they're the first person you saw that's not in your party or the first person you saw and now your party wants to kill you so your character is a wash...
Or simply because it's impossible to be truly random.
Even if you roll a percentile dice, the character is now doing it because the entity outside the game universe that is controlling it rolled a 3 (on the table or without a table), while the player is doing it because the die roll told him to. Or the DM told him to.
-
2011-06-14, 02:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Is poison use evil?
No, but it could be construed as chaotic. If you're fighting someone, in many codes of honour, it is supposed to be a test of your skill verses theirs. The use of poison is an unfair advantage. Codes of honour in general are lawful things in my view.
Poisoning someones food would generally speaking be evil, but not because you used poison but because it is murder.
Originally Posted by Hirax
-
2011-06-14, 02:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
Re: Is poison use evil?
I disagree, on the basis that I've never actually seen anyone take any side other than 'It's so obviously stupid that poison use is considered evil.' This topic seems to be a biweekly thread and a favorite 'punching bag' issue - raging against the machine of the morality-imposing DnD-designing curmudgeons of olde, whose archaic game design restrictions and sacred cows of sanctimony must be torn down!
I agree with the consensus, I just find it a bit...'fish in a barrel', you know? Playing devil's advocate, it's pretty easy to think of fluff to explain the ravages/afflictions thing: maybe they don't cause the 'undue pain and suffering' of poisons, maybe are debilitating but just feel numb, or even euphoric like some drugs.
Of course, there are RL poisons which are like this - I've heard hemlock just makes you numb and sleepy before you die and isn't painful; don't ask me how we can know for sure though - and of course the 'but a sword or morningstar can be incredibly gruesome and painful' point remains a problem with declaring poison as evil.Last edited by ffone; 2011-06-14 at 02:23 AM.
-
2011-06-14, 02:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
Re: Is poison use evil?
And completely defeats the whole fluff of needing training and skills and finesse and talent if the entry requirement is, knife the first person you see until they stop bleeding.
If an assassin is all about planning and contracted killings but the entry requirement is to be a brainless killbot... That's some serious disconnect and fluff fail.