Results 661 to 690 of 1486
-
2011-09-04, 12:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
I couldn't sleep and I felt like procrastinating my other projects... I've also been playing way too much Dawn of War 2... So I hashed out a 'Fun' minigame very quickly. I suspect there's probably already something very similar though in a WD somewhere.
Spoiler
Warhammer 40k Variant rules, Xenos!
These rules are designed for use in a campaign emphasising fun and story over tournament values of fairness. Armies do not resupply automatically between battles so phyrric victories will very quickly kill your chances of overall victory.
-Assembling the team
Each player begins the campaign with a single Elite, Fast Attack, Heavy or Troop unit. They may take any combination of upgrades they wish, including Transports.
Imperial Guard may opt to take a Platoon of up to 3 units instead of a single unit.
Record the models taken, their equipment, profiles on a Team reference sheet, along with the total points value of your team.
-Super Elite
All models gain the benefit of the Independant Character special rule and may join or leave squads as they desire.
Squadrons of vehicles behave as seperate vehicles.
-All Down to You
The stakes of such a mission are so high that only the most tenacious and toughest see deployment. All infantry have twice as many wounds as normal but are still subject to Instant Death.
-Deployment and Objectives
Roll to determine who goes first. The player going second determines the mission objective randomly (see table) and deploys it.
The team with the smallest points value may take additional, temporary, units to equalise the two teams. Temporary models taken in this way receive only their normal allowance of wounds and do not count as Independant Characters. Only the maximums of the Force Organisation Chart apply, not the minimums.
The normal rules for deployment are then followed.
-Incapacitation
Models reduced to 0 wounds during play are said to be 'incapacitated' rather than killed. For each roll a d6:
On a 4+ their apothecaries, doks or equivalents are able to patch the model up to full health. The model may participate fully in coming battles.
On a 2 or 3 the figure is badly injured, losing 1 Wound from their profile. If a figure loses their last wound in this way they are instead killed.
On a 1 the figure is outright killed.
Even attacks by weapons that cause Instant Death only Incapacitate, such is the level of knowledge retained from the Dark Age of Technology.
The winning team may repair any vehicles that have suffered a Wrecked result or less. The losing team are forced to abandon any wrecked or immobilised vehicles.
-Experience
Models receive 2 XP for being part of a squad contesting an objective at the end of the game. They also receive 1 XP for each other model they incapacitate and any vehicle they damage (weapon destroyed, immobilised, wrecked or exploded).
Models are said to 'level up' when they receive 3, 6, 12 and 24 XP.
Each time a model levels up they may increase WS, BS, A or Ld by 1. Each attribute may only be increased once each. Alternatively they may increase the number of Wounds by 1 any number of times.
-Loot
Several mission objectives award Wargear. A single piece of wargear is chosen from the army book of either team. The winner of the mission may give that wargear to one of their models - even if they may not normally equip it. Taking a Weapon in this way requires giving up one of the creature's normal weapons.
-Requisition and Resupply
At the end of the mission both teams receive 16 points which they may either stockpile or spend on army list choices.
-Objectives
d6
1 - Vehicle Supply Depot - The victor adds a vehicle (or Monstrous Creature) to the team.
2 - Armory - Wargear.
3 - Reliquary - Wargear.
4 - Teleportarium - May Deep Strike one unit in their next battle.
5 - Rescue the fallen - The victor receives an additional 16 points at the end of the mission.
6 - Strategic Value - No additional benefit is awarded.
Last edited by Tarinaky; 2011-09-04 at 12:36 AM.
So... Tired...
-
2011-09-04, 12:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
-
2011-09-04, 12:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Necromunda doesn't let you deploy Space Marines or Orks though :p
So... Tired...
-
2011-09-04, 03:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Oxford, UK
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Looks kinda like campaign rules for the Kill Team.
Watch out though: if all units are independent characters, and the teleportarium allows one unit to deep strike, i can band my entire army into one unit, deep strike it, and them split it up.- Avatar by LCP -
-
2011-09-04, 04:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Fabius' Enhanced Warriors special ability can only be used on generic Chaos Marine squads. You know, the Troops Choice with its choice of five different icons? You aren't allowed to use it on Noise Marines, Bikers or Berzerkers, and I can't see why you would possibly want to use it on any of those except possibly Bikers, except why would you want to take Chaos Bikers? I can see trying to use it with Plague Marines, I guess, since they get all the benefit at a relatively low cost, but... Yeah, regardless, it's very illegal to use Fabius Bile to Enhance non-generic-CSM units. You might want to point that out to your friend in the future.Avatar by the wonderful SubLimePie. Former avatar by Andraste.
-
2011-09-04, 04:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2011-09-04, 11:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Last edited by Tarinaky; 2011-09-04 at 11:24 AM.
So... Tired...
-
2011-09-04, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Oxford, UK
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
-All Down to You
The stakes of such a mission are so high that only the most tenacious and toughest see deployment. All infantry have twice as many wounds as normal but are still subject to Instant Death.- Avatar by LCP -
-
2011-09-04, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
For most models you can keep track of it by placing 'wounded' models on their sides to mark off 1 wound. Problem solved.
Saving throws have the problem that they're random which in a normal game is fine. But when you have a handful of terminators facing off against a mob of Ork Boyz and no prospect of replacing your losses between fights you want some certainties you can use to mitigate casualties.Last edited by Tarinaky; 2011-09-04 at 04:38 PM.
So... Tired...
-
2011-09-04, 04:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
-
2011-09-04, 05:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Boston, MA
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Well, it would seem that the Scenarios for the 'Ard Boyz Semifinals have been posted. As an interested party (being in the tourney myself), I'd like to discuss what people think general good tactics and ideas for each Scenario are.
For reference, I will be playing Orks, with a whole lot of boyz, 2 Deff Rollin' Battlewagons, Thraka, a Big Mek with KFF, and Snikrot. I'm seriously considering a big batch of Nob Bikerz.
1. I Haz A Mezzige!
For this mission, you have to get one specified troop model into your foe's deployment zone. After that, the mission is just Victory Points. So...as far as I can see, the answer is Deff Rollin' Battlewagon. Load up your Mezzinger in there with a whole bunch of other boyz (and either the Mek or Thraka), charge across the field, and then just play normally. Waaagh!
2. THE ANSWER IS ALSO DEFF ROLLIN'. No time to be more specific, but it's a Kaptur Da Flag game (only one objective in the dead center of the map)
3. Play normally, pretend you care what the mission is. Guess what it will be wrong, try to recover clumsily. Then WAAAGH!
Does anyone have any real suggestions?
-
2011-09-04, 06:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Somewhere.. Somewhere.
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Hum.. So, I tested out the new Sisters
codexupdaterules against Hootman's Orks a few days ago. Since I dislikecookie cuttercreepy, crazy old dudes in my army, I stuck with an updated version of my old list, which looks like this. (Tell me if I mess anything up in list posting):
Spoiler
HQ-
Saint Celestine-115 pts
Troops-
Battle Sistersx10-205 pts
-Flamer, Heavy Flamer
-Superior: Power Weapon, Combi-Flamer
+Rhino
Battle Sistersx10-205 pts
-Flamer, Heavy Flamer
-Superior: Power Weapon, Combi-Flamer
+Rhino
Battle Sistersx10-205 pts
-Flamer, Heavy Flamer
-Superior: Power Weapon, Combi-Flamer
+Rhino
Fast Attack-
Seraphimx6-160 pts
-Hand flamer pairx2
-Superior: Eviscerator
Dominionsx5-165 pts
-Meltasx2
-Superior: combi-melta
-Immolator: Dozer Blades
Dominionsx5-165 pts
-Meltasx2
-Superior: combi-melta
-Immolator: Dozer Blades
Heavy Support-
Exorcist-135 pts
Exorcist-135pts
1500pts
My old list ran a wing 'ness, but.. Yeah.
Anyways, first thing I noticed? Hot dog, 5e ways of organization and points makes putting together a list so smooth. Having only used Codex:WH up to this point, I must say, I'm pleased with this bit, at least.
Now, for the actual units...
Spoiler
HQ-
Saint Celestine-115 pts
She can revive without a chance of permanently dying, or deep-strike-mishap-ing. Good stuff. The fact that her sword is no longer a blessed weapon is offset by the fact that she's WS 7, and that she wounds on a 4+. Heavy flamer power is also awesome.
Sadly, she loses the ability to give her squad fearlessness, Wings of Faith, which gave her hit and run, and basically a jet pack. But I suppose the trade is fair enough. ...Also, don't get me started on her useless BS7, or the fact that she doesn't have her own faith power..
Troops-
Battle Sistersx10-205 pts
-Flamer, Heavy Flamer
-Superior: Power Weapon, Combi-Flamer
+Rhino
Here's the rub about their faith power, however- It says "If used IN the shooting or assault phase...", so does that mean I can roll my hits, look at all my ones, and THEN use their faith to reroll them?
Fast Attack-
Seraphimx6-160 pts
-Hand flamer pairx2
-Superior: Eviscerator
Dominionsx5-165 pts
-Meltasx2
-Superior: combi-melta
-Immolator: Dozer Blades
Seraphim, with Celestine are just a sight of awe and terror on the battlefield. Sadly, they're no longer the melee unit they used to be. The initiative drop hurts. Especially with the new H&R. ...Also, still str 3.
Heavy Support-
Exorcist-135 pts
Overall, the new WD stuff isn't UTTER TRASH, but it's definitely no Codex: Grey Knights, either. I give it a "Meh" out of five. More playtesting and opinions to come, I suppose. I'm really wanting to convert me up some Retributors, give their transport to my Repentia, and have fun delivering the Box o' Sharp to my opponents.
Edit: Oy! You! Up there! I didn't know you were online! Crazy kinda-ninja burrowing owl...Last edited by Mattarias, King.; 2011-09-04 at 06:37 PM.
-
2011-09-04, 07:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Mt. Ebott
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Take a squad of 3 Carnifex upgraded to handle different things (One close combat, one infantry killer, one tank killer). Spend upgrade points on BS then Wounds then WS then Ld. But then there's the whole instinctive behavior thing. Are you only allowed to take a single choice (Troop, elite, fast, heavy) and not allowed to get another? Like could I get a squad of warriors and a squad of Carnifi?
“I’m a Terrorist not an idiot.” - Me
░▄▀▄▀▀▀▀▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░
░█░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░▄░
█░░▀░░▀░░░░░▀▄▄░░█░█
█░▄░█▀░▄░░░░░░░▀▀░░█
█░░▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░▄▄░░▄▄▄▄░░▄▄░░█░
░█░▄▀█░▄▀░░█░▄▀█░▄▀░
░░▀░░░▀░░░░░▀░░░▀░░░
-
2011-09-04, 08:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sydney
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
I am the golden shadow. I am the Ninja Chocobo
Avatar by me.
My other avatars.
The rest of my signature.
Spoiler
-
2011-09-04, 08:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Boston, MA
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Yeah, no. Deploy in a transport at the center line. Easy peasy. That's part of the reason why I think I've actually got a shot at winning--all orks want to do ANYWAYS is charge forward in a Battlewagon. I'm not hampered at all. And, as mentioned, the Deff Rolla is pretty much guaranteed to make things more interesting.
-
2011-09-05, 01:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
-
2011-09-05, 01:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gender
-
2011-09-05, 09:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Mt. Ebott
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Good thing Carnifex come in squads. And yeah, since the whole rage thing I guess that means you should trick out your Carnifi to be close combat. Still that sucks that you HAVE to take Synapse creatures and only synapse creatures unless you want to have instinctive behavior everywhere.
Huh, maybe instead you could raise the Carnifi Ld so that they make there behavior test more often.“I’m a Terrorist not an idiot.” - Me
░▄▀▄▀▀▀▀▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░
░█░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░▄░
█░░▀░░▀░░░░░▀▄▄░░█░█
█░▄░█▀░▄░░░░░░░▀▀░░█
█░░▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░▄▄░░▄▄▄▄░░▄▄░░█░
░█░▄▀█░▄▀░░█░▄▀█░▄▀░
░░▀░░░▀░░░░░▀░░░▀░░░
-
2011-09-05, 11:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- England
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
It's tempting to let Tyranid Super-Elites have the same special rule Genestealers get that mean they don't use Instinctive Behavior... Except there's already a few units that have it that're more flavourful and need every reason they can muster to stand a chance at being taken :p
Some Lictors or Genestealers stalking a bug hunt patrol is pretty iconic.Last edited by Tarinaky; 2011-09-05 at 11:17 AM.
So... Tired...
-
2011-09-05, 02:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- ^ Creds to Lord Raziere
-
2011-09-05, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Mt. Ebott
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Yeah I know I pointed that out in my later post. So instead have the Carnifi go for Jack of all Trades master of none. Crushing Claws and Heavy venom cannons will do that.
“I’m a Terrorist not an idiot.” - Me
░▄▀▄▀▀▀▀▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░
░█░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░▄░
█░░▀░░▀░░░░░▀▄▄░░█░█
█░▄░█▀░▄░░░░░░░▀▀░░█
█░░▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░▄▄░░▄▄▄▄░░▄▄░░█░
░█░▄▀█░▄▀░░█░▄▀█░▄▀░
░░▀░░░▀░░░░░▀░░░▀░░░
-
2011-09-05, 08:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
how worth it is it to purchase an eldar battleforce? i'm trying to make an army that is built around several units of pathfinders (i like how they look and the idea of rending on a 5+ is intriguing). i have also made steps towards purchasing a farseer and a group of warlocks to go with him, as well as a full squad of fire dragons for anti tank exploits. i am going to get my self a few fire prisms in the near future. i want to shy away from a jetbike list, i already have white scars, and a mech list isn't really what i was going for either. i want something fun to paint, and fun to play. pathfinders seemed like a good choice in that respect, but i need something in my troop slot to add some beef, i thought the battleforce would be a good source of brawn to add to my existing army list plans.
-
2011-09-05, 09:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
If you don't plan on using anything out of the battleforce I don't know why you would even consider it. I think its a great set for my army, but I also use everything out of it.
For rangers to work you need a lot of them, and to get a lot of them you can't field much for guardians or dire avengers, half of whats in the box.
I've never been all that impressed with rangers, they have their uses but with the upgrades they are too expensive to be the core of an army. They also suck at advancing on and taking objectives, they are great at holding ones they can get to, but not for any of the others.
If you aren't looking at mech then the wave serpent isn't doing much good either. Though you can always use at least one for the fire dragons.
Whether or not you use the war walker depends a lot on how you want to do it. I think they would probably do ok with the little we know of your list, at least if you get a few of them.
I think though that if you have your farseer and warlocks on foot they are going to need a wave serpent for them as well or they aren't going to get anywhere alive.
Without knowing more of what you have planned it would seem like you would need half-mech and half rangers.
-
2011-09-05, 10:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
okay, thanks. i have a lot of players in my meta game, which is why i went for the fire dragons. i was thinking that splitting my troop choices into rangers (infiltrating onto objectives) and dire avengers (in wave serpents pushing people off of objectives). i haven't really looked at the war walkers, i just started playing eldar (i'm a long time space marine player). i was considering getting some banshees, or maybe scorpions to function as elite hunters, and to provide support to the dire avengers. i liked the combined fire rule for the fire prism, and i wanted to give that a go, but the kits are rather expensive, so i went with the fire dragons instead. they seemed more versatile, and much more resilient to railguns and the like. i guess i might be better off just getting the dire avengers kit and a wave serpent, seeing as how i don't really have a use for the guardians. just a quick question, how good are dark reapers? it seems kinda odd to me to have a heavy support unit designed to kill infantry. in your experience, are they worth the 40 something dollars i'd spend on them?
-
2011-09-06, 01:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
It depends what you need. S5, AP3, Heavy 2, as well as the Exarch's Barrage weapon (with Fast or Crack Shot) may as well be "Sweep any non-Terminator unit not in a Transport off the board." True story.
However, it's the 'not in a Transport' that gets them. How full of Mech is your meta-game? Do you generally use 25-33% cover as recommended or less? And more importantly, is cover usually only in each other's DZ's rather than in the middle of the board where they're more useful?
(Newbie Tip; If you take turns placing cover, terrain and cover are usually more useful in the centre of the board than in your DZ. Usually. If you're a gunline, obviously this doesn't apply.)
If you play with a lot of terrain, or your meta-game is smart and puts LoS blockers and cover in the middle of the board, then Dark Reapers aren't going to be helpful.
D-Cannons can generally serve the same purpose as Reapers, but have access to Warlocks, can hurt vehicles and force Pinning Checks all day long. Me, personally, I'm terrified of D-Cannons. It also seriously messes with Assault-based armies that like to get close which most Eldar armies aren't usually good against.
War Walkers are the Bee's Knees. If you have double-Autarchs, and function around that play-style. If you're not Outflanking War Walkers, Wraithlords can generally serve better. Unless you're against lots of Dark Eldar or Sniper players.
Fire Prisms are First-Turn Tank-Kills. If you're taking one, you're taking three (or at least two. One isn't helpful). Due to it's 60" range, there isn't much in the game that can ping it back. Especially after being hit by an S10, AP1 Twin-Linked weapon. Leman Russ Battle Tanks (the best IG tank, if I haven't already said at least 4 times) are the only thing that worry Fire Prisms in the broader sense of things.
While I do hate Tailoring, it has to be said that a player's army is shaped by their meta-game. Do you need Dark Reapers? If yes, then get them. If not, don't.
-
2011-09-06, 05:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Southwestern Germany
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Pathfinders, Fire Dragons and Fire Prisms are heavily represented in my own army, and so far, they are working just fine. The Fire Dragons have never disappointed me, and the Fire Prisms usually perform very well; as for the Pathfinders, they always perform well when I am cautious in deploying them, and perform poorly if I miss some way for the opponent to reach them more quickly than I anticipated. If something gets close to them, they fold immediately. Wonderfully deadly otherwise, though.
One note: Pathfinders are not rending on 5+. Rending happens on the To-Wound roll (respectively, Armour Penetration roll). The Pathfinders' rifles are only rending on a 6, as all other sniper weapons. What Pathfinders have is a special rule that their weapons get AP1 on a To-Hit roll of 5+. That means you have two chances to bypass armour - one on the To-Hit roll, if you roll 5+, and another one on the To-Wound roll, if you roll 6. (Unfortunately, it also means there is a chance for your AP1 shots to fail to wound...)LGBTitP Supporter
In a Wonderland they lie, Dreaming as the days go by, Dreaming as the summers die - Ever drifting down the stream - Lingering in the golden gleam - Life, what is it, but a dream?
- Lewis Carroll
-
2011-09-06, 05:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
If you play with a lot of terrain, or your meta-game is smart and puts LoS blockers and cover in the middle of the board, then Dark Reapers aren't going to be helpful.
The reaper launcher is a barrage weapon, so you fire over Los blockers, and the crack shot ability ignores cover (besides letting you reroll to wound, its by far the best ability).
You do of course kinda need a farseer nearby, if you want to hit stuff while firering indirect fire at hidden targets.thnx to Starwoof for the fine avatar
-
2011-09-06, 09:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Oxford, UK
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
So i have a 1500 point Imperial Guard army, and i'd welcome any comments or criticisms. It isn't nearly optimised enough, though it isn't for tournaments, just casual play.
SpoilerHQ
Company Command Squad- Bolter, Vox, Sniper rifle.
Lord-Commisar- Carapace armour, Powersword, Plasma Pistol
ELITES
Stormtrooper squadron- Flamer, Melta
TROOPS
Platoon 1
Platoon Command squad- Vox, Plasma gun, Autocannon, Bolter
2x Infantry Squads- Vox, Sniper Rifle, Lascannon
2x Infantry Squads- Vox, Sniper Rifle, Missile Launcher
Platoon 2
Platoon Command squad- Plasma pistol, Powersword, Heavy flamer, 2x Melta, Vox
2x Infantry Squads- Vox, Flamers.
FAST ATTACK
Vendetta Gunship
HEAVY SUPPORT
Leman Russ Laser Destroyer (Bog-standard Leman Russ, but has a str10 ap1 hull-mounted gun and no turret)
Leman Russ Vanquisher- Lascannon, Multi-meltas.
Griffon Heavy Mortar
Things I might change:
Spoiler
- I have a spare autocannon. I could stick that in the company command squad.
- The powersword on the platoon commander could be dropped to afford that.
- I could swap the flamers and meltas in my second platoon around, so two squads with meltas and a command squad with two flamers and a heavy flamer.
- I bet that Vanquisher will be blown up turn one. I should probably drop the upgrades, right?
- Avatar by LCP -
-
2011-09-06, 12:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Northern IL
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Rangers/Pathfinders are a very solid unit, but I agree with Erloas that they're too expensive to use as the core of your army. A mixed setup with Dire Avengers though could work well.
i haven't really looked at the war walkers, i just started playing eldar (i'm a long time space marine player).
i was considering getting some banshees, or maybe scorpions to function as elite hunters, and to provide support to the dire avengers
just a quick question, how good are dark reapers? it seems kinda odd to me to have a heavy support unit designed to kill infantry. in your experience, are they worth the 40 something dollars i'd spend on them?
Even when facing Orks or Nids, the normal Reaper Launchers can be a threat to most MCs, and the Exarch can still do a fair bit of harm to horde units.Last edited by Tren; 2011-09-06 at 12:27 PM.
"Apostate prostitutes? Apos-titues!"
-
2011-09-06, 02:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
Re: Warhammer 40K Tabletop XIII: "Ironclads, Furiosos and Soul Grinders, oh my!"
Okay, I'll take a crack at it.
SpoilerWhere's the Lord Commissar going? Because wherever it is, he's better off with a camo cloak; Stealth transfers to units he's with, while carapace armor does not. Also, sniper rifles are a waste of points unless you have lots of them; I only ever include them when I'm out of other special weapons, which it's possible for me to do since my infantry selection is still on the small side. The bolter is also unlikely to make a difference, though it at least gives the commander the same range as everyone else in the squad.
What are you doing with these guys? Suicide deep strike?
We're up to three sniper rifles so far. Still not lots. See above about the bolter. Lascannons and missile launchers are good, though.
Plasma pistols aren't worth the points; you're spending ten points to kill your commander before the enemy does. The power weapon would be better on one of the infantry squad sergeants; he's more likely to last long enough to use it. A command squad in assault is a command squad that's dead before you get to I3.
Yes. Can't go wrong here.
Will your opponents let you use stuff out of Imperial Armour?
Terrible setup. Leaving aside the fact that the standard battle tank is all-around better (the blast is likely to hit something; here you're taking a 50/50 shot at even getting close to doing anything), the Vanquisher is a long-range tank, and multimeltas want to get close. If you're ever close enough to your target to use multimeltas, to say nothing of actually being in melta range, you're doing it wrong.
Well, it isn't another sniper rifle, but at least it's more pinning. If you're going to do pinning, do lots of it; most opponents will have Leadership high enough that you want to force multiple saves to ensure having an effect.
If you're going to drop something to afford the other autocannon, start with the sniper rifles. The lascannon on the Vanquisher is fine if you must use a Vanquisher, but lose the multimeltas; in fact I wouldn't use any sponsons at all, since the longest range you can get out of them is 36"."Courage is the complement of fear. A fearless man cannot be courageous. He is also a fool." -- Robert Heinlein