Results 1 to 30 of 1494
-
2011-09-19, 07:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- NYC
Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
A continuation of the threads for Questionable Content, a M-F "slice of life" comic in which life is defined by coffee, robots, Butts Disease, and spontaneous metal interludes.
You have been warned.
Links To The Past
Questionable Content 1
Questionable Content 2: Espresso With Extra Scorn
Questionable Content 3: Ironically Quite Popular
-
2011-09-19, 07:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- WI, USA
- Gender
-
2011-09-19, 07:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- NYC
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Meh. I'm generally confused about the fixation on behinds in general. I mean... we all know what comes out of there, right?
As odd as this sounds, my fixation on the female behind is on a purely mechanical level. Like, the hip sway does this thing where the left cheek goes clockwise and the right goes counterclockwise.
-
2011-09-19, 10:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
^: Yeah, I never really understood how the heck the physics on that worked. Made me psyduck on more than one occasion in my physics and anatomy classes growing up...Sorta depends on our whim and caprice, really, since the new thread generally gets created between the top 4 posts of the 50th page or the top 4 posts of the 51st page.
Confusion, I think, is mostly because most men don't really have noteworthy tail plumage. They're kind of flat and nonexistent for most from what I've been able to gather. Or they're sculpted muscle and if they've managed to sculpt their gluteals to that extent, the rest of their body is quite likely to be drawing far more attention, because, well, pecs and biceps and male gaze of threat categorization. I think.
Also, because women's butts have something to do with fertility instincts and being judged to be a good child-bearer with less of the inherent deception of the reason why human women have breasts and chimps and such do not, but there's not really anything of that sort for why a man's would be worth noticing for mate selection or arousal.
As for non-gluteals... I got nothing.
Just like I'm not really sure what to make of this strip. Then again, shorts never really made sense to me for outdoors wear except in dry climates where one is going to be out in the sun and dust as opposed to going through vegetation at all, ever.
-
2011-09-19, 10:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- The Primus Imperium
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
This is because (no secret here) guys are generally focused on physical attractiveness, whereas girls generally focus on mental attributes (emotions, intelligence, tact) and a higher percentage of the populace is straight than homosexual. So females get sexualized while guys get emotionalized.
The problem is that neither gender likes being treated solely as meat and character development is done through actions, thoughts and emotions, so the females in stories get the shorter end of the stick.
That's my theory, anyway, and TBF, psychology doesn't have to make sense (someone in ancient greece discovered that things that go up and to the right are more aesthetically pleasing to humans than down and to the left... apparently)Hate me if you want. But that's your issue to fix, not mine.
Primal ego vos, estis ex nihilo.
When Gods Go To War comes out March 8th
Discord: HalfTangible
Extended Sig
-
2011-09-19, 10:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Look, women, on the whole, fall into one of two categories... butt likers and hand likers. Sometimes arm likers.
Yes, yes, we generally choose a bloke for his non-physical assets, but it doesn't mean we don't check out the physical ones.
For myself, I am a hand and arm chick, but most women I know check out behinds.
-
2011-09-19, 10:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
I don't think I've ever fallen for someone based on how they look. Otherwise my crushes on Alan Rickman, George Hearn when he's dressed as Sweeney Todd (but not Johnny Depp in the same story), and Havelock Vetinari would be TOTALLY nonsensical.
Spoiler: This signature is a historical relic from a long-ago time of regular forum activity.Aww man! Even all the witty self referencing sigs are gone now!
Excellent Avatar by CheesePirate, Awesome banners by Pink Haired August
Spoiler
-
2011-09-19, 10:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Well, everyone knows that the female form is a thing of beauty. Ain't too many male nudes in the art world aside from Michelangelo's David.
I don't get what the whole thing is about, since Marten's shorts hardly show off any more than his pants do. There isn't even any thigh exposure.
Can someone remind me of the arc where we started caring about Padma in the slightest way? Because if Marten isn't wondering where this is leading then I'm sure not either.
-
2011-09-19, 10:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- The Primus Imperium
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
A recent poll showed that, when cheated on, a woman will ask about the emotional part 62% of the time and the physical 38%. Males ask about the physical 54% and the emotional 46%.
I realize it's not always the case, dog. Hence 'generally'.
@V: That was the explanation given, yes.Last edited by HalfTangible; 2011-09-19 at 11:03 PM.
Hate me if you want. But that's your issue to fix, not mine.
Primal ego vos, estis ex nihilo.
When Gods Go To War comes out March 8th
Discord: HalfTangible
Extended Sig
-
2011-09-19, 11:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- United States
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Well, its generally a biological thing, isn't it? Men only need physically viable mates for children, while women are saddled with providing for themselves and the children without a means to gather resources, and so need a socially viable mate.
But to post on subject: Does anyone find Faye's warm behavior in the last panel a bit off? I'm hoping it will be revealed as some form of cynical ploy.Last edited by Luzahn; 2011-09-19 at 11:04 PM.
-
2011-09-19, 11:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
-
2011-09-19, 11:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Chicagolandia
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Last edited by Mutant Sheep; 2011-09-19 at 11:11 PM.
-
2011-09-19, 11:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
-
2011-09-19, 11:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- The Primus Imperium
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Personally i find the most appealing feature on a person to be their back when they're walking faster than me.
Because it means they're walking away.
Jokes aside, I have this thing for blood-red/brick-red hair... the kind of redhead that is RED. not orange. RED. Orange reminds me of one my friend's mother...Last edited by HalfTangible; 2011-09-19 at 11:25 PM.
Hate me if you want. But that's your issue to fix, not mine.
Primal ego vos, estis ex nihilo.
When Gods Go To War comes out March 8th
Discord: HalfTangible
Extended Sig
-
2011-09-20, 05:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
-
2011-09-20, 06:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Chicagolandia
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Yeah Padma is strange to me too. I like the background. Looks like one of those jigsaw puzzles where every... single... piece looks the same. Working around the sides is the only way!!
-
2011-09-20, 07:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- United States
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Gah! Too much background... Also, what I like is how Momo is not even spraying her skin. Looks like its just going on the shorts.
And I hope those aren't Hannelore's.Last edited by Luzahn; 2011-09-20 at 07:07 AM.
-
2011-09-20, 08:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Somewhere...
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Padma DOES seem to be becoming stranger, the more we get to know her. It's hard to figure her out...
-
2011-09-20, 09:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- The cyberpunk present
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Pffft.
Padma made me laugh so hard.Truth resists simplicity.
-
2011-09-20, 09:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
I keep being reminded of a fifth grade me and a me now combination when I see Padma. This is somewhat disconcerting.
Spoiler: This signature is a historical relic from a long-ago time of regular forum activity.Aww man! Even all the witty self referencing sigs are gone now!
Excellent Avatar by CheesePirate, Awesome banners by Pink Haired August
Spoiler
-
2011-09-20, 10:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Argonth
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Why is she spraying bug spray on herself? Isn't it hard to get that cleaned off plastic?
Witty sig here nosey, aren't ya?
Avatar by Hacktor
-
2011-09-20, 10:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- WI, USA
- Gender
-
2011-09-20, 10:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
-
2011-09-20, 10:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Momo's skin is apparently made out of something so flesh-like that people can be standing right in front of her and not know that she's a robot, so it's not simply plastic in the sense that we think about it. I suppose it wouldn't be too much of an exaggeration to wonder if she'd fool the mosquitoes too, so the bug spray might be a good idea to prevent punctures in skin that wouldn't necessarily heal itself.
-
2011-09-20, 11:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Mosquitoes have a very developed sense of smell; they look for very specific chemicals produced by the human body, then they use visual detection and heat detection to acquire and home in on their hapless victims.
It is therefore unlikely that just looking like human skin would be enough to fool them.
-
2011-09-20, 12:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
I'm in Southern California and I refuse to not wear long pants year round. I hate shorts. Tshirts too for that matter.
Actually, an eco-freindly fun fact from my days as an oceanography student. Apparently a simple way to avoid mosquitoes is to just wear long sleeves and pants. Mosquitoes are lazy, if it's not conveniently right there in plain sight I guess they don't bother.
-
2011-09-20, 01:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
At the very least, Momo's chassis would almost certainly also be radiating heat, if for no other reason than that Marigold wasn't yelping in pain when Momo was spooning her on that first night. You're right that she probably wouldn't be excreting the scents herself (although that top-of-the-line model she was envying might...), but if she rubbed up against a human, who is to say that she wouldn't pick up something?
And, yes, this is wildly over-thinking the situation. If nothing else, I'm sure that she's doing no harm by applying bug spray and may just be seeing what it feels like.
-
2011-09-20, 02:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Momo's chassis would almost certainly also be radiating heat,
Do carry on, over-thinking things is exactly what this forum is there for.
What d'ya mean "no" ?
-
2011-09-20, 02:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Gender
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Speak for yourself. I was clothes shopping recently, and had to go from my usual 34" waist shorts up to a 36" waist because my butt is TOO big for the 34" ones. The clerk made a joke about finding me some apple bottom jeans, and my girlfriend got a good laugh. She tells me she likes my butt all the time. Keep in mind, its not wide, just...bulbous. The opposite of flat.
Discussions of hot redheads and no mention of Felicia Day? Blasphemy!
-
2011-09-20, 02:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Freljord
Re: Questionable Content 4: Attack of the 60-Inch AnthroPC
Homebrewer's Signature | Avatar by Strawberries