Results 1 to 28 of 28
Thread: Paladin Code
-
2012-04-07, 04:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
Paladin Code
My character has a background where he lost parents by clerics of Vecna killing them (yes it seems generic but it is the shortest way to sum it up, no reason to type the whole history). This caused my character to desire nothing more than to stop evil in any way possible. So when he sees an evil based church such as Vecna or someone else, he will try to steal the money from the church and will give the money to the poor or donate it to the good-based churches. He does this without any bloodshed except for the one time he walked in on a sacrificial ritual, and obviously stopped them.
Now my DM has been keeping back whether this will cause me to fall or not, as I am breaking the law, but the Paladin's code is arguable more set for justice and combating anything evil. Another member of my group is going through manopause as he constantly nags about it, but I view it as a greater good, as a paladin may work with an evil character to stop a greater evil for a time.
I was wondering on some views from you all, for or against. I will eventually find out through the DM but we will have arguments to back our points, but he will only make his ruling through the gameplay, whenever he fully decides.
Thank you!Last edited by Sugashane; 2012-04-07 at 04:13 PM.
-
2012-04-07, 04:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Somewhere Warm
Re: Paladin Code
Paladins are expected to respect the local laws.
Though, this depends on what you mean by "Stealing".On a quest to marry Asmodeus, lord of the Nine Hells, or die trying.
-
2012-04-07, 04:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
If you're a thief, why are you a paladin? They have zero thieving skills. You'd be better off with a rogue that has two levels of paladin, or just a rogue. Or a swordsage, they get halfway decent thieving skills.
I would say this doesn't break the code. Paladins are more about law than good. But the code is vague, except when it's not, if that makes any sense. Paladins, however, shouldn't even have a code. They should just have an alignment restriction. Unless you're going specifically for some paladin-only spells and the Battle Blessing feat, you're better off playing a cleric or rogue. Especially since no matter how many splatbooks you have, cleric is always stronger.Avatar of George the Dragon Slayer, from the upcoming Indivisible!
My Steam profile
Warriors and Wuxia, Callos_DeTerran's ToB setting
-
2012-04-07, 04:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
Paladins are expected to obey local laws only when the paladin recognises and respects the authority of the people who issued those laws. If a paladin visits a nation where slavery is allowed or legally enforced by law, they would be under no compunction to uphold such laws if they decided not to recognise the authorities that issued them. This lack of recognition would stem, of course, from moral disagreements. After all, Hell is Lawful too, yet you wouldn't expect paladins to abide by their laws when they go there to kill Asmodeus.
-
2012-04-07, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Earth... sort of.
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
Originally Posted by SRDLast edited by shadow_archmagi; 2012-04-07 at 04:53 PM.
Avatar by K penguin. Sash by Damned1rishman.
MOVIE NIGHTS AND LETS PLAYS LIVESTREAMED
-
2012-04-07, 05:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
-
2012-04-07, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Elsewhen
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
Paladins aren't defined by their quality of being anti-evil. They are defined by the fact that they hold their actions as more important than the results of their actions. They will seek to do good in all ways, but they hold the cause as more important than the effect.
Stealing is an evil action. You may attempt to justify the action, but that's not was a real paladin does. A paladin asks, "Is this action itself good or evil?" while ignoring the results of that action. Paladin's possess a deontological perspective on morality. To put the result of the action as more important than the action itself is more in line with the ontological or consequentialist perspective of morality.
Code of Conduct: A paladin must be of lawful good alignment
and loses all class abilities if she ever willingly commits an evil act.
Additionally, a paladin’s code requires that she respect legitimate
authority, act with honor (not lying, not cheating, not using poison,
and so forth), help those in need (provided they do not use the help
for evil or chaotic ends), and punish those who harm or threaten
innocents.
I'm guessing that you think the actions were justified because they punished people who were evil. That's not good evil for a LG Paladin. You could attempt to set up a type of CG Paladin of Freedom who can use a consequentialist perspective of morality. That would likely be a better fit for you. It's a better fit for the majority of people.
-
2012-04-07, 05:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
I would say that its incredibly un-paladin like to steal from anyone like such.
The idea of being a force of justice is that you don't stoop to their levels. You may kill, but typically under a modified castle law saying that you can defend yourself, or someone unable to kill themselves.
If the Vecna church is evil, truly evil, you should have no problem with liberating the country-side from the ugly pockmark. If they haven't done anything wrong, and are just simply clerics and priests researching new material in the name of a dark lord, but aren't actually doing anything wrong themselves; then the code requires you to let them be until they do wrong.
One of the many frustrations of not playing a grey-guard paladin.
-
2012-04-07, 10:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
Re: Paladin Code
I appreciate the replies. I see both sides of the argument now. As of now, the only reason I haven't had a direct confrontation is that when I try to find out if they are actively doing an evil deed or where they are taking the money, they somehow disappear (even detect evil did not show) so I am yet to catch them doing anything, plus fairly low level at the moment as we started a new campaign. Even our bard has been unable to find out where their money goes or what it is funding. I dislike the (poorly done) sneaking about but make do so I have a reason to go in swinging.
-
2012-04-08, 02:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- South East USA
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
I don't feel like quoting anything specific from the thread, but just making some general statements.
I don't see why Lawful implies Not-Sneaky. I've heard it that people find the idea of Lawful Rogues or other such types odd. And frankly, I find that just plain stupid, if only due to the idea of Government Super Spies and Black Ops, who would easily be Rogues, and could just as easily be Lawful. I always think of James Bond as a Lawful Good Rogue.
I'm certainly not going to say that a Paladin sneaking around isn't odd, if only because the class isn't really built for it, although that's hardly relevant to the discussion. But I see no issue with a Paladin fighting evil in such a way. If he pocketed the money, that's one thing. But stealing from an evil church to donate to charity? That doesn't seem like it would ping on an allignment scale to me.
Then again, I'm a rather loose person myself, prefering Neutral to Lawful or Chaotic.
I could have sworn I read in the Good Book (of Exalted Deeds) about whether or not it is more important to be Lawful or to be Good, specifically sighting a Paladin respecting local authority vs the Paladin's order in tracking down a criminal. I think it rules in favor more of Good than of Lawfulness. Then again, not everyone uses the Good Book, or the Evil Book (of Vile Darkness). For that matter, why isn't there a Lawful or Chaotic book?
-
2012-04-08, 05:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Below sea level
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
lawful doesn't imply you never do an dishonerable act, hell, the lawful evil alignment is all about beïng a dishonerable douche without actually breaking the law (hence it's a great alignment for lawyers).
A paladin does what is Right(tm), and sometimes some circumstances call for a different Right(tm) thing to do. IMO as long as the paladin can properly justify his actions as being Right(tm) he won't fall.Warlock Poetry?
Or ways to use me in game?
Better grab a drink...
Currently ruining Strahd's day - Avatar by the Outstanding Smuchsmuch
First Ordained Jr. Tormlet by LoyalPaladin
-
2012-04-08, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
My brother does philosophy in college and had a long and rather heated debate about alignments with a mate of mine who has a Masters in Science (can't remember the exact title) and wants to do another Masters in philosophy. Now I can't remember exactly which one said what but the argument for a pally was this. (and I'm misquoting because I can't remember the exact wording)
A pally will always do what is right regardless of consequence later on; if his actions are pure at the time he does them, then he has done no wrong despite the outcome. If the outcome is evil then it is because another person did the evil. Example, if the BBEG has a hostage says do something evil or I'll kill the hostage then the Pally would still refuse to do evil (the death of the hostage and it's evil would be totally on the BBEG). The same if an evil army demanded that a city "Kill/hand over one single innocent in order to save the city" as refusal would kill more than one innocent.
If you are unsure if your characters actions would cause you to lose your pally abilities then ask your DM for a more clear guideline, as it is his decision (and his interpretation of morality within the D&D setting that he/she has built for you) that is important."People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff."
The First Rule of Thesaurus Club is: You do not Talk, converse, chat, speak, gossip, chatter, natter, utter, discuss, confer, reason, deliberate, consult, parley, lecture, sermon about Thesaurus Club!
-
2012-04-08, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Paladin Code
While there are moral absolutes in D&D books, PHB2 has one paladin philosophy as
"Outside of moral absolutes, an ethical code is based on the greatest good of the greatest number"
Killing isn't always evil (such as in defence of self, defence of others, or when it's a just penalty for a serious crime). See BoED and BoVD for details.
BoVD also has lying as "not always evil- but risky"
Why then should stealing be "always evil"?
Though in general- I would require similar mitigating factors. Stealing from the Big Bad, specifically in order to prevent the Big Bad harming innocents with whatever it is you have stolen- seems quite in order for Good, and possibly even Lawful Good- if the authority has "forfeited respect" (Lawful types are supposed to respect authority under normal circumstances).Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2012-04-08, 12:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
well, HunterOfJello already mentioned it, but i'll throw in my 2 cents.
the issue is whether or not the DM rules that an action is in and of itself evil, or if they judge good and evil by their results/consequences.
if they rule actions are inherently good or bad, then stealing is mostly likely bad no matter what you do.
if they rule that the ends justify the means then stealing from evil priests to give to charity is probably cool.
the problem stems from the fact that D&D authors claim that actions are inherently good or bad and players often are at odds with that.
-
2012-04-08, 02:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Paladin Code
Quite a few D&D authors allow for context-senstitivity in acts- the difference between Justified Killing and Murder, for example.
Some acts are specifically called out as evil in books though.
From "channelling negative energy" in the PHB, to "destroying souls" in BoVD.
"The ends don't justify the means" for Always Evil acts- but some acts are, perhaps intentionally, left "greyer".
If a Chaotic Good character (with Exalted feats, or class that prohibits Evil acts) can steal and not Fall, then that would suggest that "stealing" is one of these context-sensitive acts.
That's a big if, however.Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2012-04-08, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- A place with no pants
Re: Paladin Code
Isn't Robin Hood a classic example of Chaotic Good? One of the biggest parts of his character the fact that he steals money and gives it to the poor and needy?
If stealing is an Evil act, and charity is a Good act, then he would some variant of Neutral, not Good.
Stealing is not an Evil act. It's a Chaotic act. This can still shift your alignment over time (which will still remove your Paladin abilities), but having strict restrictions on who you steal from (i.e. only evil churches) can limit that, or negate it.
-
2012-04-08, 03:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Paladin Code
I see stealing as like killing- "unjustified killing" is an evil act (murder, in the case of sapients) - "unjustified stealing" is an evil act- but both can be justified given the right context and conditions.
For Robin to be Good IMO, he must only steal from those whose gains are, in a sense- ill-gotten- the imposes of unjust, excessive taxes. Even then, his motive needs to be in order to succour those who were the victims.
Stealing, then going abroad and giving it to the needy elsewhere, who weren't victimised by the people Robin's robbin'
would not be justified.Last edited by hamishspence; 2012-04-08 at 03:12 PM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2012-04-08, 03:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: Paladin Code
That does not follow, since not all thefts have the same contexts as Robin Hood's, who was stealing from a usurper who was destroying the peasantry with oppressive taxation. In effect, he was stealing what was someone else had stolen and giving it back to those who had been robbed. That is chaotic, but not evil. It's entirely different, for instance, to steal vital penicillin research on behalf of the largest distributor of mercury in order to prevent the market for mercury treatments for syphilis from being undercut. That's actually both chaotic and pretty darned evil.
Characters:
-
2012-04-09, 01:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- USA
Re: Paladin Code
Yeah, why aren't you playing a Paladin of Freedom? They are CG and it sounds much more like what you want. Talk to your DM, ask to rebuild your character as CG instead of LG. You now get to tear down oppressive, evil, and generally nasty organizations by any (non-evil) means necessary--steal, sneak, go undercover, whatever--and still get to be a paladin. Paladin of freedom is different in flavor; you aren't going to have that "honorable soldier" feel to it--Paladin of Freedom is more like playing the revolutionary who is fighting to free his people from an oppressive government.
A paladin of freedom doesn't particularly care for honor or the law, and he cares very much about protecting the oppressed. The one thing that'll get him crusading the most predictably is probably slavery or mind-control; that goes against everything he believes in. They aren't honorable and they won't worry about whether they have to steal or lie; but they're every bit as Good-aligned as the LG type, and care just as much about the usual Good-aligned goals.
So yeah, talk to the DM, explain your character concept is chaotic, not lawful, and you need to switch classes. It shouldn't be that much of a difference, as far as mechanics goes. Still the same power level, and all that.
One more thing--while your character is focusing on killing evil things, remember that he's got to have more motivation than just that. If a person vows to kill evil clerics because he wants revenge, there's nothing about that which would induce a deity to choose him as a paladin. Ask yourself why he's killing evil things--it can't be just revenge. For example, he might want to prevent the tragedy which happened to him from happening to anyone else. He might be carrying on his parents' work (obviously there's some reason why they were targeted by the evil clerics, yeah?). Also, don't just focus on killing stuff. A paladin is a soldier and that's what he's trained to do; but there's a reason they get high charisma and Diplomacy as a class skill. They are also good leaders, negotiators, and role models. So instead of just killing stuff, they should also be trying to influence others. Whether that means preaching sermons, starting up soup kitchens, or leading a squad of soldiers into battle depends entirely on who the character is.
-
2012-04-09, 07:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Middle of an Unread Book
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
Paladin code debates...
I guess I'll just leave this comment here=>
Paladins, while always assumed to be "generic paragons of LG" while clerics are assumed to be paragons of a Diety that may-or-may-not be LG. IMO and as far as I know per books[especially gray guard varient shows this a LOT] this isn't true. Both of them can do one or the other. So with this in mind, a quickest way for one to solve Paladin code issues[aside from talking to the DM] is to be part of a Church of A God. Choose a Lawful Good God[quite a few of those] and worship him/her. For example => Choose Yondalla. You aren't halfling? Who cares! Yondalla isn't racist [I hope not lol, Lawful Good should suggest that she isn't]!
She has protection and community as domains. This could be interpreted as, you are protecting the community from "Evil Vecna church" by all means you currently can[if say, full scale war isn't an option]. Also, worshiping Yondalla and being part of her church should reasonably let you behave more like a halfling, as in a little less of a "shiny man/woman in shiny armor on a shiny horse" and more of a clever guy/gal that means well and nice to hang around with.
P.S. Just by the by, any moral arguments in D&D like in real life, bring conflict so be careful with that to not wreck real life relationships over a game^^.Last edited by Red_Dog; 2012-04-09 at 07:16 AM.
Blasphemy, all fights are necessary. ~ Deadpool
Factotum Shadowcaster Jedi
-
2012-04-09, 12:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- USA
Re: Paladin Code
Well... Yondalla *is* pretty much a halfling deity. You would've had to dedicate your life to protecting halfling communities for her to take you on as a paladin.
There is one technicality that you may be able to slip through, as far as deities are concerned: If you have a LG deity, and are a Paladin of Freedom, then you can't be a paladin of that deity, but you can still be a paladin of a cause, who just happens to worship a LG deity. If you choose a deity that's heavy on the Good, light on the Law, you will probably not have any particular issues. Just don't make your paladin particularly religious; after all, his powers wouldn't be coming from that deity, but from his own faith, powered by the Good-aligned outer planes.
-
2012-04-09, 01:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
Re: Paladin Code
Somehow I am forced to say this in every paladin thread ever: Unless you are playing in the Forgotten Realms, Paladins are gods-optional. No gods were harmed or helped in the creation of your paladin. Worship whoever you freakin' want.
At no point is it said that the Paladin gets his power from, or relates to, a deity in any way. If you want to be a Paladin of Freedom that worships Yondolla, your afterlife is between you and her, but your class features work just fine.
-
2012-04-09, 01:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- USA
Re: Paladin Code
Last edited by Callista; 2012-04-09 at 01:04 PM.
-
2012-04-09, 01:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
Re: Paladin Code
I realize, but I get kinda annoyed that after ten years of 3.5 people still haven't managed to read that section of the paladin class. It got especially touchy for me after I started an entire thread on the subject. Forcing paladins to worship a god the way a Cleric has to not only blurs the line between them more (a blurring that favors Cleric in the extreme) but vastly limits a lot of character concepts that might otherwise see play as new, interesting takes on the archetype.
-
2012-04-09, 02:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
-
2012-04-09, 02:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Middle of an Unread Book
- Gender
Re: Paladin Code
Cleric does not need to warship a deity.
It seems to me, that Paladin is a lot more similar to Favored Soul. As in, power is granted by someone, weather you want it or not. Just like Favored soul, you can walk away from it and refuse it. I would imagine that someone has to be rather specific? Of course you could go with "concept" granting you these powers. But I though, an equally valid choice would be some deity? This would give a better position to argue about the code with the DM. Which was kind of my original point...
I also specifically mentioned Gray Guard in my comment since Gray Guard explicitly sates that you are an agent of some church[and they give examples of typical justice gods].
Well... Yondalla *is* pretty much a halfling deity. You would've had to dedicate your life to protecting halfling communities for her to take you on as a paladin.Last edited by Red_Dog; 2012-04-09 at 02:41 PM.
Blasphemy, all fights are necessary. ~ Deadpool
Factotum Shadowcaster Jedi
-
2012-04-09, 03:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- USA
Re: Paladin Code
Yep, anybody can worship any god. It's just that when you are a paladin of a deity or a cleric of a deity, your personal goals have to coincide with the deity's goals, or else it wouldn't make sense in terms of plot and personality for the god to take you on as a paladin or a cleric.
Yondalla is a halfling deity whose primary goal is to keep halflings safe and living in harmony. She's got nothing against any other race; it's just that halflings are her particular responsibility, and one she takes rather seriously. If you were to be a cleric or paladin of Yondalla, you'd have to have that goal yourself, for it to make much sense that you're serving Yondalla rather than some other more general deity. So you could probably justify a human cleric or paladin of Yondalla, if that particular human cared about halflings specifically.
-
2012-04-09, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Somewhere Warm