New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 51 of 91 FirstFirst ... 2641424344454647484950515253545556575859606176 ... LastLast
Results 1,501 to 1,530 of 2721
  1. - Top - End - #1501
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q746

    A. Can a dragon(great wyrm) use detect gem to locate a demilich?

    B. Would the Heighten Breath feat plus the spell Rebuking Breath use the reflex
    save vs breath weapon? And would the demilich be able to use their plus 20
    bonus against turn/rebuke?

    C. If a rebuked undead creature is attacked will that end the rebuke effect?

  2. - Top - End - #1502
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 746 A. Yes.

    That ability is limited to 60' range, though.

    A 746 B.

    Rebuking Breath rebukes undead unless they succeed on the breath weapon's saving throw (a Reflex save for Dragons). Heighten Breath increases the DC of that saving throw. A Demilich's Turn Resistance increases their effective HD for a Cleric's turn/rebuke attempt, which is not the mechanism used by Rebuking Breath.

    A 746 C. No.

    There is no interaction between being rebuked and being attacked except for the creature doing the turning/rebuking.
    You can attack them with ranged attacks (from at least 10 feet away), and others can attack them in any fashion, without breaking the turning effect.

  3. - Top - End - #1503
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 747

    Does anyone have a source for the Half-Construct Template?

    EDIT: Never mind, found it in the MM2 starting on page 209. Thanks anyway.
    Last edited by Getsugaru; 2012-08-22 at 11:49 PM.
    Incarnum: VoP's best (and possibly only) friend.
    Spoiler: Quotes and Fun Links
    Show
    Spoiler: Quotes:
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Tvtyrant View Post
    Actually I got it from you, I just love how many applications it has. It can be oh so broken.


    Formerly Lestroisrois. Shorten my new name however you wish; I've seen plenty.

  4. - Top - End - #1504
    Banned
     
    willpell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Repost and new question.

    Quote Originally Posted by willpell View Post
    Q740

    If a creature has Psi-Like abilities which are automatically augmented to its Effective Manifester Level, does the creature have the ability to choose among all the augmentation options that the EML allows it, or does it always produce the PLA with a particular augmentation option? Most psionic creatures' statblocks seem to list one particular version of a power as the PLA, but it isn't clear whether this is meant to be a default, typical choice or the only legal option.

    For example, Psionic Dominate offers the option to augment it in a wide range of ways. When an aboleth uses its Psionic Dominate PLA, augmented up to its EML of 13, does it always have to affect "any creature, 24 hours", or can it choose, say, "humanoids only, two targets, one day per manifester level", and enslave an entire six-person party for almost two weeks within three rounds?
    Q748

    How does a Pearl of Power interact with metamagic? If I have a Pearl for 2nd-level spells, and the Still Spell feat, which (probably two) of the following cases are correct?

    * I prepare Still Hypnotism (a 1st-level spell in a 2nd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. I now have Still Hypnotism prepared again.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotic Pattern (a 2nd-level spell in a 3rd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. I now have Still Hypnotic Pattern prepared again.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotism (a 1st-level spell in a 2nd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. I now have a regular Hypnotism prepared again; it is no longer Still.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotic Pattern (a 2nd-level spell in a 3rd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. I now have a regular Hypnotic Pattern prepared again; it is no longer Still.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotism (a 1st-level spell in a 2nd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. The attempt fails, and my daily usage of the Pearl has been squandered.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotic Pattern (a 2nd-level spell in a 3rd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. The attempt fails, and my daily usage of the Pearl has been squandered.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotism (a 1st-level spell in a 2nd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. The attempt fails, or cannot be attempted in the first place; I am still free to use the Pearl today.
    * I prepare Still Hypnotic Pattern (a 2nd-level spell in a 3rd-level slot). I cast it, and then attempt to re-prepare it with the Pearl. The attempt fails, or cannot be attempted in the first place; I am still free to use the Pearl today.

  5. - Top - End - #1505
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 748

    You need a pearl corresponding to the final version of the spell (including metamagic) If you use the pearl it is exactly as if you hadn't cast the spell.

    So if you prepare a still spell (in a +1 slot) you need a pearl of power (spell level +1) to use the spell again. this spell is still in both castings.

    There is no mention what happens if you use the wrong pearl AFAIK.

  6. - Top - End - #1506
    Banned
     
    willpell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Quote Originally Posted by Andezzar View Post
    A 748

    You need a pearl corresponding to the final version of the spell (including metamagic) If you use the pearl it is exactly as if you hadn't cast the spell.

    So if you prepare a still spell (in a +1 slot) you need a pearl of power (spell level +1) to use the spell again. this spell is still in both castings.

    There is no mention what happens if you use the wrong pearl AFAIK.
    So in other words a level 2 pearl will work for a Level 1 spell with +1 in metamagic. That's what I considered the most likely scenario but I figured I should be sure, since anything other than Heighten Spell doesn't change the spell slot, and I didn't recall the Pearl saying "spell's effective level" or "level of spell slot" or anything.

    749

    If someone is slain in a way that prevents the use of resurrection spells which you have available, but they've gone to an Outer Plane upon death as is assumed to occur in default D&D metaphyics, is it possible to rescue them from that afterlife and return them to the living world via Plane Shift? (Cast once on yourself to get to Hades or wherever, then cast it on them to send them back to the PMP, and optionally cast a third time to get back yourself.) Or would they return to the PMP as a corpse, or would the spell fail altogether, or what? Do any of these answers change for any other mechanisms of getting from plane to plane (other than Astral Projection, I'm pretty sure that wouldn't work in any case)?
    Last edited by willpell; 2012-08-23 at 03:50 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #1507
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Thurbane's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Terra Australis
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 749 (maybe)

    Looking at the "The Nature of the Dead" section of MotP (p.89) and the "What happens after you die?" section of CD (p. 125-130), there is nothing that specifically says you cannot use planar travel to transport souls, although both are fairly specific about what spells are required to return a soul to it's former body (and Plane Shift doesn't get a mention).

    In absence of any specific rules I can find, I can only assume that an attempt to shift a disembodied soul through the planes using magic would fail, since it isn't listed anywhere as an option to return a character to life.

    Also, refer to whatever specifically caused the character to die - that will generally spell out exactly what is required to return the character to life.

  8. - Top - End - #1508
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Apr 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 750
    Do the effects of Pharaoh's Fist and Pain Touch Stack?
    Reasoning for "yes": Pain Touch does not specifically state a "Stunning Fist attack", but only "victim of a stunning attack". Pharaoh's Fist is a "stunning attack" (that in being an attack that stuns the enemy)

    Followup: Does it work on every enemy that is stunned, or just the one in the center that was actually hit by an attack?

  9. - Top - End - #1509
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    HalflingPirate

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In an Octopus's Garden

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 750

    Yes. Assuming you mean the CW feat Pain Touch, any creature that is stunned by your pharaoh's fist attack will be affected by the nausea from pain touch. (Excepting immunities of course.)
    Dex

    Spoiler
    Show
    Regarding my Necrotic Apprentice trick:
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    This is brilliant.
    Regarding my Non-Epic Hidecarved Dragon:
    Quote Originally Posted by Amphetryon View Post
    Nicely done. Probably too cheesy for many tables, but I'd be inclined to allow it at mine, just for chutzpah.

    Have a cookie.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Check out the Versatile Domain Generalist.

  10. - Top - End - #1510
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    RedSorcererGirl

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    Question Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q751:

    A spell stacking question: I cast Protection From Energy (Fire) on myself twice. Since this spell doesn't say castings replace themselves, I should have two instances of this spell on me, set to absorb 120 fire damage (e.g. both need to be dispelled to remove the protection). A Red Dragon breathes on me in two consecutive rounds, rolling 140 fire damage both times. How much damage do I take, and more importantly why? Options include but aren't limited to:

    1. 0 damage in round 1 (the 1st breath uses up and discharges the 1st casting, and the rest of the damage is absorbed by the 2nd casting), and 40 damage in round 2 (the 2nd breath uses up and discharges the remainder of the 2nd casting).
    2. 20 damage in round 1 (the 1st breath uses up and discharges the 1st casting and the rest gets through), and 20 damage in round 2 (the 2nd breath uses up and discharges the 2nd casting and the rest gets through).
    3. 20 damage in round 1 (the first breath uses up and discharges both castings simultaneously and the rest gets through), and 140 damage in round 2 (since neither spell is active anymore).

  11. - Top - End - #1511
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 751

    Option 1. is correct. The Player's Handbook example in Stacking Effects (pages 171-172) is:
    For example, two bless spells don’t give twice the benefit of one bless. Both bless spells, however, continue to act simultaneously, and if one ends first, the other one continues to operate for the remainder of its duration.
    Quote Originally Posted by Protection from Energy
    When the spell absorbs 12 points per caster level of energy damage (to a maximum of 120 points at 10th level), it is discharged.
    The first Protection from Energy spell is discharged when it absorbs 120 points of energy damage. The second casting of Protection from Energy continues to act simultaneous to the first casting, so it absorbs the remaining 20 points of damage in the first round.

  12. - Top - End - #1512
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 752

    Are there any prestige classes specific to the Sorcerer, like how the Master Specialist is specific to the Wizard?
    Incarnum: VoP's best (and possibly only) friend.
    Spoiler: Quotes and Fun Links
    Show
    Spoiler: Quotes:
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Tvtyrant View Post
    Actually I got it from you, I just love how many applications it has. It can be oh so broken.


    Formerly Lestroisrois. Shorten my new name however you wish; I've seen plenty.

  13. - Top - End - #1513
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    The Great White North

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 752

    The only sorceror-only prestige class that leaps to mind is the Pact-Bound Adept (Dragon Magic), as it requires a dragonpact.

    Dragonpacts, introduced in the same book, can only be entered by a sorceror, not any spontaneous caster.

  14. - Top - End - #1514
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2011

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 753

    Is there any reason you couldn't use the psionic power "call weaponry" to get colossal or colossal+ weapons?

  15. - Top - End - #1515
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 754

    I think I remember reading somewhere that with 5 ranks in Balance you can get up from prone without provoking AoOs. Where was that?

  16. - Top - End - #1516
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 754
    Sorry no. 5 ranks in balance permit one to retain one's dexterity bonus to AC while balancing.
    There are a number of ways of standing without provoking (e.g. DC 35 tumble check) but not with balance.

  17. - Top - End - #1517

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Quote Originally Posted by 123456789blaaa View Post
    Q 753

    Is there any reason you couldn't use the psionic power "call weaponry" to get colossal or colossal+ weapons?
    A 753: There doesn't seem to be. Note, however, that you can't actually wield the weapon you call unless you're almost equally large (and since the power says "You call a weapon “from thin air” into your waiting hand..." that may be grounds to prevent you from doing it, but that's less RAW and more a DM thing, which is out of the purview of this thread).
    It's been a bit, GitP. If you're reading this, you're either digging through old stuff, or I've posted for the first time in forever.

    If you want to stay in touch, reach out to me on twitter (same username).

    The best answer is always to ask your DM.
    Unless you're the DM, in which case you should talk to your players.

  18. - Top - End - #1518
    Banned
     
    willpell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A753 additional
    The examples they give of weapons that you can call do not specify a size, so a DM might very well rule that it's impossible to ask for a given size of weapon. Certainly if you are Colossal yourself you will call a Colossal weapon by default, but otherwise the text says nothing specific about size but by omission implies that no option exists to determine the size of weapon you get. Remember that D&D rules are generally a list of things you can do, with an assumption that anything unlisted cannot be done (save when Rule Zero is applied of course). If it says nothing, the default answer is generally "no".

  19. - Top - End - #1519
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Re: A 754 [correction]
    Quote Originally Posted by Khedrac View Post
    There are a number of ways of standing without provoking (e.g. DC 35 tumble check) but not with balance.
    Making the DC 35 Tumble check for Free Stand still provokes AoOs. From page 103 of Complete Adventurer:
    Free Stand: With a DC 35 Tumble check result, you can stand up from prone as a free action (instead of as a move action). This use of the skill still provokes attacks of opportunity as normal.
    There's no listed provocation if you move from prone to kneeling (a move action), and no listed provocation if you move from kneeling to standing (another move action). So taking two move actions should get you from prone to standing, slowly but safely. Other than that you would need some special ability like the Thief-Acrobat's Kip Up (Complete Adventurer, page 83).

  20. - Top - End - #1520
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    St Fan's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    France
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 755

    Can a character with 10 levels of Dragon Disciple (thus having the half-dragon template) then take levels in the Half-Dragon Paragon class?

    For that matter, could he still take another Paragon class, the one for his original race?
    Spoiler
    Show

    DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
    PC: Excuse me, what?
    DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.


    "Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."

    Extended signature

  21. - Top - End - #1521
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 755: Yes, a Dragon Disciple can take levels in half-dragon paragon.

    The SRD has a paragraph that makes this clear:

    Quote Originally Posted by Racial Paragon Classes
    It's possible for a powerful magic effect such as shapechange, reincarnate, or wish to change a character's race. If a character has already taken racial paragon levels in his original race, he can never become a paragon of another race. However, such shapechanging and form-altering magics also cause no loss of a paragon's class abilities—the class abilities gained from racial paragon levels are affected no more or less drastically than benefits gained from having levels in any other class.
    Thus if you have already taken racial paragon levels, you cannot take racial paragon levels in your new race. If you have not, then you are free to take racial paragon levels in your new race (as a half-dragon).

    But as a member of your new race, you are ineligible to take racial paragon levels in your previous race.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  22. - Top - End - #1522
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    DwarfBarbarianGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q. 756

    I apologize in advance if this question has been asked before. My question is: what happens if you cast magic jar at a ghost?

  23. - Top - End - #1523
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 756
    By casting magic jar, you place your soul in a gem or large crystal (known as the magic jar), leaving your body lifeless. Then you can attempt to take control of a nearby body, forcing its soul into the magic jar.
    You place your soul in the gem, but all further steps fail if the nearby creature does not have a body.

  24. - Top - End - #1524
    Banned
     
    willpell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q757
    Is there ever any game-mechanical difference between "the save DC of your spells is increased by 2" and "the target of your spells takes a -2 penalty on saving throws"? To me the use of the latter just seems like awkward grammar.

  25. - Top - End - #1525
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Time for a Repost:
    Quote Originally Posted by Andezzar View Post
    Q 728

    Do you gain the damage bonus from Blade Meditation with all strikes or only those of the chosen school?

    For example, if you took Blade Meditation (Devoted Spirit) and used a Falchion, would you gain the bonus with any maneuver or only those of the Devoted Spirit school?
    Q 758

    Can you stack moment of alacrity several times in the same encounter (if you refreshed it in between)?
    Last edited by Andezzar; 2012-08-25 at 04:07 AM.

  26. - Top - End - #1526
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Gandariel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 759: can monsters and animal companions grapple you without provoking?

    if i'm a druid, do i need to have my companion take any feats to be ablr to grapple? does he need Imp unarmed strike and Imp grapple?
    Quote Originally Posted by actual quote from this forum
    So yeah. your wrong.
    Check out Camp Archimedes, a (slightly homebrew) mercenary camp full of interesting units. A great addition to any campaign (in my very biased opinion)

  27. - Top - End - #1527
    Banned
     
    willpell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandariel View Post
    Q 759: can monsters and animal companions grapple you without provoking?

    if i'm a druid, do i need to have my companion take any feats to be ablr to grapple? does he need Imp unarmed strike and Imp grapple?
    A 759 partial

    Several monsters have the Improved Grab special attack, which allows them to grapple without provoking an AoO. I don't know of any animals that have this ability, though some may. Note that if you're asking about having your elephant pick you up with its trunk or something, whether the attack provokes is not relevant, since you can just choose not to take the AoO, and train the animal to recognize that it can safely make the attempt.

  28. - Top - End - #1528
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    A 757

    Mathematically, there's no difference between adding 2 to the DC or subtracting 2 from a roll.

    However, there are non-mathematical reasons why you might want to do one or the other. For example, if you don't want the target to know that the power is unusually difficult to resist. Or if you have somebody who is bad at math, it's usually just faster not to bother them with the extra mathematical steps.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  29. - Top - End - #1529
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Q 728: All strikes with chosen weapons from that discipline.

    There are several caveats in the phrasing of the benefits of that feat.

    • +1 bonus on damage rolls with all the preferred weapons of your chosen discipline when using a strike combat maneuver
    • +2 bonus on checks involving the discipline’s key skill
    • save DCs of any maneuvers that you perform from the chosen discipline are increased by 1


    Chosen discipline is mentioned in each of the three potential bonuses from the feat, but the +1 on damage applies during any strike combat maneuver.

    A 758: No

    Refer back to stacking, from the SRD:

    Quote Originally Posted by Stacking
    In most cases, modifiers to a given check or roll stack (combine for a cumulative effect) if they come from different sources and have different types (or no type at all), but do not stack if they have the same type or come from the same source (such as the same spell cast twice in succession). If the modifiers to a particular roll do not stack, only the best bonus and worst penalty applies.
    This maneuver, despite providing an untyped bonus, would not then stack with itself.

    A 757 additional:

    Do note that increasing the DC of your spells by 2 only affects your spells that target others, while the literal wording you quoted: "the target of your spells takes a -2 penalty on saving throws" could affect other saving throws the target makes, depending on the exact wording.
    Last edited by mattie_p; 2012-08-25 at 07:03 AM.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  30. - Top - End - #1530
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Gandariel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

    Quote Originally Posted by willpell View Post
    A 759 partial

    Several monsters have the Improved Grab special attack, which allows them to grapple without provoking an AoO. I don't know of any animals that have this ability, though some may. Note that if you're asking about having your elephant pick you up with its trunk or something, whether the attack provokes is not relevant, since you can just choose not to take the AoO, and train the animal to recognize that it can safely make the attempt.
    Q 759 ADDENDUM
    The thing i was thinking about is: can a Dire Eagle companion grapple an enemy, fly up and then drop him for massive damage?

    but the question is extended to every monster and animal. is grapple possible for monsters? or do they provoke every time as well?
    Quote Originally Posted by actual quote from this forum
    So yeah. your wrong.
    Check out Camp Archimedes, a (slightly homebrew) mercenary camp full of interesting units. A great addition to any campaign (in my very biased opinion)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •