Results 1 to 21 of 21
Thread: Arcane Thesis - errata
-
2012-09-06, 02:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
Arcane Thesis - errata
So I notice a lot of people on this forum using Arcane Thesis to apply -1 to each metamagic applied to a spell...
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/er/20040125a
Relevant quote:Arcane Thesis reduces the total spell level of a metamagic affected spell by one, regardless of the number of metamagic feats applied. An empowered (+2 levels), still (+1 level), silent (+1 level) fireball would be 6th level.
-
2012-09-06, 03:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
And where, exactly, was this found? Can you tell me which thing at that link to download?
Last edited by Marthinwurer; 2012-09-06 at 03:10 PM.
-
2012-09-06, 03:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Mountain View, CA
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
That's funny, the PHB2 errata - from the page you linked - says this when I download it:
Page 74– Arcane Thesis [Substitution]
Should read, “When you apply any metamagic feats
other than Heighten Spell” Thus if you were to
prepare an empowered maximized magic missile
(assuming magic missile is the spell you choose for
your Arcane Thesis), it would be prepared as a 4th
level spell (+1 level for empowered, down from +2;
and +2 levels for maximized, down from +3).Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.
Avatar by Ceika.
Archives:
SpoilerSaberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)
-
2012-09-06, 03:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Arcane Thesis appears in the Player's Handbook II. Any relevant errata would be in that update. I checked and did not see such an errata in the PHB2 or the PHB (as specified by the OP) anywhere that stated what was quoted above.
-
2012-09-06, 03:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
arcane thesis was originally printed in PHB2, so download the PHB2 update. here's the relevant text: (mods, if this isn't okay to post, go ahead and strike it. I think since WotC is putting it up free it's ok, but if I'm wrong, redact it)
Originally Posted by PHB2 errataI've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-06, 03:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
That opening text is actually from the FAQ, around the time when WotC started using it to push stealth errata into the game with mixed results. (Regardless of its disputed position in the rules hierarchy, some of it was outright wrong.) It does in fact appear on page 38 of that document, but shortly after its inclusion the errata was released to clarify how it actually worked. Kind of a "shut up, you imbecile" from the designers to CustServ.
-
2012-09-06, 04:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-06, 04:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
The text you posted was correct, it's just that with the passing of years and the lack of timestamps, the progression of events has been a bit obscured:
- PHB2 was published in May '06. Among other things, people notice Arcane Thesis and theorize how it can be used with loads of metamagic at once.
- In reaction to some particularly abusive builds, Customer Service decides to make a stealth nerf to the feat. By this point The Sage had generally become a mouthpiece for this sort of thing, so of course it gets published as a "question" and gets tossed in the FAQ. (jaybird posted this text.)
- Perhaps annoyed at bureaucratic meddling, PHB2's own designers explicitly define and correct how the feat worked in the errata published in October '07. As above, it contradicts the FAQ and (being the primary rules source) has precedent. (Everyone else who posted text, posted this text.)
This method of using the FAQ to stealthily alter or tweak the rules was one of the two things that got people so riled up over its use in the first place. (The other was the inconsistency of responses you could produce from CustServ by rewording the question.) It smacked of intellectual dishonesty to use a side channel not intended for this purpose (Sage responses and the FAQ), especially when there was a separate channel that was intended for this kind of thing (errata documents).
'Course, while WotC learned their lesson from this (monthly updates!) in 4E...Paizo's still had its share of like SNAFUs (such as Monk flurry).Last edited by NoldorForce; 2012-09-06 at 04:45 PM.
-
2012-09-06, 06:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Huh, interesting...okay. So the PHB2 errata takes priority over the PHB FAQ, then?
-
2012-09-06, 06:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Yes. Primary source always trumps a secondary source (text trumps table or sample character, for example) the FAQ is a secondary source, whereas errata are primary, so go with errata, which is essentially, subtract 1 from every metamagic lvl adjuster you apply to the spell.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2012-09-06, 06:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Right, thanks for the clarification!
-
2012-09-06, 07:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
As the saying goes, FAQs aren't RAW. My understanding is that if FAQ changes the functionality of something (which techincally it shouldn't) then it's not official, just like the Sage's answers aren't RAW.
-
2012-09-06, 08:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Gender
-
2012-09-06, 08:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- <<Undetected>>
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
It is at the start of pretty much every posted errata:
Errata Rule: Primary Sources
When you find a disagreement between two D&D® rules
sources, unless an official errata file says otherwise, the
primary source is correct. One example of a
primary/secondary source is text taking precedence over
a table entry. An individual spell description takes
precedence when the short description in the beginning
of the spells chapter disagrees.
Another example of primary vs. secondary sources
involves book and topic precedence. The Player's
Handbook, for example, gives all the rules for playing
the game, for playing PC races, and for using base class
descriptions. If you find something on one of those
topics from the DUNGEON MASTER's Guide or the
Monster Manual that disagrees with the Player's
Handbook, you should assume the Player's Handbook is
the primary source. The DUNGEON MASTER's Guide is the
primary source for topics such as magic item
descriptions, special material construction rules, and so
on. The Monster Manual is the primary source for
monster descriptions, templates, and supernatural,
extraordinary, and spell-like abilities. Note: The most
recent updates are shaded like this.Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)
Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.
-
2012-09-06, 08:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Ah, thanks. I rarely have to look at the errata so I never noticed it.
Funny that, since it means classes like the sacred fist get full spell progression which more or less makes them better than a straight up cleric.
-
2012-09-06, 08:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Avatar of George the Dragon Slayer, from the upcoming Indivisible!
My Steam profile
Warriors and Wuxia, Callos_DeTerran's ToB setting
-
2012-09-07, 07:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Newfoundland
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
-
2015-01-03, 02:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
I know this is an old thread, and this reply will likely never be seen, but I don't understand the confusion with this feat, or why it needed errata at all.
Let's look at the original text regarding metamagic:
"When you apply a metamagic feat other than Heighten Spell, the enhanced spell uses up a spell slot one level lower than normal."
This means that the total spell-level adjustment is reduced by one, not that you take one level off of every metamagic feat applied.
Am I missing something? Why was this ever a point of contention, when it clearly states that the "enhanced spell" uses up a spell slot one level lower?
-
2015-01-03, 02:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
When you apply one metamagic feat, the enhanced spell uses a slot one level lower than normal. When you apply a second feat, the enhanced spell uses yet a lower spell level. The feat doesn't apply its reduction to the other metamagic feats, but each metamagic feat has the reduction effect on the end result. This interpretation is backed up by the very conclusive errata, as was noted in this thread. There is thus no point of contention, but in the opposite direction of your claim.
-
2015-01-03, 04:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
Damn necromancers! Away with you! *Rebuke undead*
Thanks to Kurien for drawing my avatar, and NightWolf16a for coloring it.
Spoiler: The master lurker
-
2015-01-03, 04:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- The Steamboat
- Gender
Re: Arcane Thesis - errata
The Winged Mod: Thread Necromancy.