New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 234
  1. - Top - End - #151
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Eldan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Duh. You don't increase or decrease the photon's energy. You turn it sideways, into imaginary energy. That's what magic does. (Calculate that, physicists! )
    Resident Vancian Apologist

  2. - Top - End - #152
    Titan in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London, EU
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Eldan View Post
    Duh. You don't increase or decrease the photon's energy. You turn it sideways, into imaginary energy. That's what magic does. (Calculate that, physicists! )
    i


    (Obligatory extra text)
    π = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook
    Warped Druid Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  3. - Top - End - #153
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    panaikhan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    You don't need to destroy the sun. Just cast an 'Illusion' of destroying the sun.
    Doesn't need sound, doesn't need substance (touch), doesn't need smell, doesn't need taste. Just increase the spell level to increase the area covered by this visual-only effect. High spell level = high saving throw, and only IF people viewing it have reason to disbelieve it.
    Last edited by panaikhan; 2012-10-11 at 08:01 AM.
    Current Character: Pathfinder Tiefling Sorcerer (Abyssal Sorcerer 5, Souleater 1)
    Previous Favorite Characters:
    D&D1e: Elven Mage 15/Thief ??
    D&D2e: Saurian Necromancer 12
    D&D3e: Warforged Juggernaut 5/ Artificer 5/ Acolyte of the Skin 4
    D&D4e: Drow Swarm(?) Druid 3
    OWoD: Daughter of Cacophony
    NWoD: Galatea Promethean
    DH: Hiveborn Assassin 3
    Rifts: Nanobot Swarm / Airborne Computer Virus

  4. - Top - End - #154
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Axier's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    The spell light, doesn't produce any energy.
    The spell continual flame doesn't produce any energy.
    The spell darkness does not say that fires go out, or energy gets dampened in its effect. At the end of the day, you just cant apply physics to this system of magic, because this is a poorly written magic system to deal with scientific function.

    If anyone would like to make a scientifically accurate magic system, be my guest.


    I think mass effect did a fairly decent job with its magic biotics.

  5. - Top - End - #155
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Dr Bwaa's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by panaikhan View Post
    You don't need to destroy the sun. Just cast an 'Illusion' of destroying the sun.
    Doesn't need sound, doesn't need substance (touch), doesn't need smell, doesn't need taste. Just increase the spell level to increase the area covered by this visual-only effect. High spell level = high saving throw, and only IF people viewing it have reason to disbelieve it.
    Ahahaha. This is actually perfect. I believe we have hit the solution:
    • Fly as high as you can, ideally above cloud level.
    • Cast Silent Image on the sky above you to make it look like nighttime.
      • Silent Image has a size of at least five 10' cubes.
      • There's no need for your illusion to have any depth, since it is only relevant if it's viewed from below.
      • Use your 10' cubes to create a flat "wall" of illusory darkness. This can be arbitrarily thin and therefore may extend arbitrarily far in all directions, as long as it lies all in one plane.
    • Repeat as desired up to three more times (creating a tetrahedron around the planet; fewer castings are needed if you only need to shadow, say, a continent).
    • Win.


    As long as none of your minions try to interact with the sky where your illusion is, they'll keep believing it. If they end up interacting with it somehow, it's basically irrelevant, since they'll immediately pop through the other side and see the sun up there. This solution also has the entertaining side-effects of still actually allowing the sunlight to come through, so (A) the ground is still lit when it's day; dark when it's night, (B) crops still grow, (C) Vampires still can't go out at daytime, and (D) if the peasants disbelieve it (equivalent to destroying the effect--for them), that doesn't actually hinder your setup.

    Achievable Level: 1 (with potions of Fly, and assuming you're okay with a duration of Concentration, though technically if WBL isn't a factor you can just use scrolls of Permanent Image anyway).
    Permanent Solution Achievable Level: No later than 11 (for Permanent Image).
    Last edited by Dr Bwaa; 2012-10-11 at 09:04 AM.
    For people who enjoy reading or writing.

    Spoiler
    Show

    Awesome banner/avatar by El_Frenchie!

    Play chess? Look me up! (bwaa)


    Formerly known as lordhenry4000

  6. - Top - End - #156
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2009

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Axier View Post
    The spell light, doesn't produce any energy.
    The spell continual flame doesn't produce any energy.
    The spell darkness does not say that fires go out, or energy gets dampened in its effect. At the end of the day, you just cant apply physics to this system of magic, because this is a poorly written magic system to deal with scientific function.

    If anyone would like to make a scientifically accurate magic system, be my guest.


    I think mass effect did a fairly decent job with its magic biotics.
    You could. But you need to throw away everything you know about physics. D&D reality is 99% different from ours.

    EDIT: Meaning, they have physics, but their rules are 99% different from ours.
    Last edited by 2xMachina; 2012-10-11 at 09:10 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #157
    Titan in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London, EU
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    I suppose you could do it with Illusionary Wall. Its only 10'x10', so you would need a lot of them, but it is permanent. A long term project for the inhabitants of the underdark perhaps ?
    π = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook
    Warped Druid Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  8. - Top - End - #158
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Axier View Post
    I think mass effect did a fairly decent job with its magic biotics.
    Nope! But it's easy to swallow.

  9. - Top - End - #159
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Axier's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreaz View Post
    Nope! But it's easy to swallow.
    True...

    I mean, If anything, it has more accuracies than the system we are using for this discussion.

  10. - Top - End - #160
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2011

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Is there a way to uncap:

    Shrink Item?

    if so, you could shrink the sun after the other ways of teleporting to it or whatever.
    If not, back to the drawing board.
    Path of the Nefarious: A Way of the Wicked Journal.
    Please take a look at the adventures of my group going through Fire Mountain Games's Way of the Wicked, An evil based Pathfinder Compatible adventure path.
    http://d20evil.blogspot.com/

  11. - Top - End - #161
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Alleine's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A mound of Rainbowflesh
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Man, six pages and no one has even mentioned using low level Warblade and a certain notorious maneuver? It. . . it's like I don't even know you people any more.

    Super-amazing avatar by Ceika!
    << It's a mound of rainbowflesh, do NOT forget that.

    Quote Originally Posted by xNadia View Post
    See the rainbowflesh, EAT the rainbowflesh, BELIEVE THE RAINBOWFLESH!

  12. - Top - End - #162
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Eldan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    But Scent doesn't kill the sun... ;)
    Resident Vancian Apologist

  13. - Top - End - #163
    Titan in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London, EU
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Alleine View Post
    Man, six pages and no one has even mentioned using low level Warblade and a certain notorious maneuver? It. . . it's like I don't even know you people any more.

    See post #4
    π = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook
    Warped Druid Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  14. - Top - End - #164
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by nedz View Post
    I suppose you could do it with Illusionary Wall. Its only 10'x10', so you would need a lot of them, but it is permanent. A long term project for the inhabitants of the underdark perhaps ?
    Long term my ass, this is what armies are for.

    Get a few hundred casters to do some serious item creation, get a few thousand wands, hand them off, and swarm out one evening, have a continent covered by sunrise!

  15. - Top - End - #165
    Titan in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London, EU
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by TypoNinja View Post
    Long term my ass, this is what armies are for.

    Get a few hundred casters to do some serious item creation, get a few thousand wands, hand them off, and swarm out one evening, have a continent covered by sunrise!
    1 mile = 5,280 feet.
    1 square mile requires 278,784 Illusionary Walls.
    Definitely long term.
    π = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook
    Warped Druid Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  16. - Top - End - #166
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Eldan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by nedz View Post
    i


    (Obligatory extra text)
    Well, yes. I meant "calculate the effects of imaginary energy". An i prefix should lead to a few interesting formulae.
    Resident Vancian Apologist

  17. - Top - End - #167
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Find a way to roll an 88 on this encounter chart.

  18. - Top - End - #168
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Acanous View Post
    Find a way to roll an 88 on this encounter chart.
    Totally awesome find.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  19. - Top - End - #169
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    dascarletm's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Bwaa View Post
    Ahahaha. This is actually perfect. I believe we have hit the solution:
    • Fly as high as you can, ideally above cloud level.
    • Cast Silent Image on the sky above you to make it look like nighttime.
      • Silent Image has a size of at least five 10' cubes.
      • There's no need for your illusion to have any depth, since it is only relevant if it's viewed from below.
      • Use your 10' cubes to create a flat "wall" of illusory darkness. This can be arbitrarily thin and therefore may extend arbitrarily far in all directions, as long as it lies all in one plane.
    • Repeat as desired up to three more times (creating a tetrahedron around the planet; fewer castings are needed if you only need to shadow, say, a continent).
    • Win.


    As long as none of your minions try to interact with the sky where your illusion is, they'll keep believing it. If they end up interacting with it somehow, it's basically irrelevant, since they'll immediately pop through the other side and see the sun up there. This solution also has the entertaining side-effects of still actually allowing the sunlight to come through, so (A) the ground is still lit when it's day; dark when it's night, (B) crops still grow, (C) Vampires still can't go out at daytime, and (D) if the peasants disbelieve it (equivalent to destroying the effect--for them), that doesn't actually hinder your setup.

    Achievable Level: 1 (with potions of Fly, and assuming you're okay with a duration of Concentration, though technically if WBL isn't a factor you can just use scrolls of Permanent Image anyway).
    Permanent Solution Achievable Level: No later than 11 (for Permanent Image).
    A cube, by definition has equal height width and depth.

    Dascarletm, Spinner of Rudiplorked Tales, and Purveyor of Puns
    Thanks to Artman77 for the avatar!
    Extended Signature

  20. - Top - End - #170
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by dascarletm View Post
    A cube, by definition has equal height width and depth.

    To be more precise: it's not "4000 cu ft + 1000 cu ft/level", it's "four 10' cubes + one 10' cube/level (S)". The distinction is unfortunately important; you can't shape it any tighter than 10' on a given dimension (according to the usual spell shaping rules).
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  21. - Top - End - #171
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    panaikhan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by tuggyne View Post
    To be more precise: it's not "4000 cu ft + 1000 cu ft/level", it's "four 10' cubes + one 10' cube/level (S)". The distinction is unfortunately important; you can't shape it any tighter than 10' on a given dimension (according to the usual spell shaping rules).
    So research a new silent image spell, that lets you be a bit more 'creative' with the surface area, and call it a level higher...
    Current Character: Pathfinder Tiefling Sorcerer (Abyssal Sorcerer 5, Souleater 1)
    Previous Favorite Characters:
    D&D1e: Elven Mage 15/Thief ??
    D&D2e: Saurian Necromancer 12
    D&D3e: Warforged Juggernaut 5/ Artificer 5/ Acolyte of the Skin 4
    D&D4e: Drow Swarm(?) Druid 3
    OWoD: Daughter of Cacophony
    NWoD: Galatea Promethean
    DH: Hiveborn Assassin 3
    Rifts: Nanobot Swarm / Airborne Computer Virus

  22. - Top - End - #172
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by nedz View Post
    1 mile = 5,280 feet.
    1 square mile requires 278,784 Illusionary Walls.
    Definitely long term.
    Not so, 278,784 walls is 5,575 wands, an apprentice can drain a wand in 5 minutes. Assume an 8 hour night cycle, and one caster can drain 96 wands in a night.

    58 casters to black out one square mile in one evening. 2000 1st level apprentices could black out enough space to go from horizon to horizon.

    Stockpiling the wands would take forever, In fact it's probably better to craft a custom item that lets one cast Illusionary Wall at will. But once you were prepared an army of say 10k or so could make pretty good time expanding the dark area.

  23. - Top - End - #173
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kelb_Panthera's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by dascarletm View Post
    A cube, by definition has equal height width and depth.

    Quote Originally Posted by tuggyne View Post
    To be more precise: it's not "4000 cu ft + 1000 cu ft/level", it's "four 10' cubes + one 10' cube/level (S)". The distinction is unfortunately important; you can't shape it any tighter than 10' on a given dimension (according to the usual spell shaping rules).
    The shaping rules nuked that Idea, but it gave me a brilliant one!

    Wall of stone. Unlike X image and other spells it has a clause in its spell description that allows you to thin-out the wall to increase its area. It also says you can shape it however you please as long as it's anchored to existing stone.

    Here's the plan. Put a handful of Largish boulders into geo-syncronous orbit. Let's say 6 of them, two points on the three dimensional axes. You then cast wall of stone with these points as the anchors and shape it into an arbitrarily thin sheet. It'll only have a fraction of a hp per 5ft square, but you could theoretically cover an entire planet.

    Thus, wall of stone can give the world a stone eggshell to block out the sun. If you want to be a bit more mindful of the physics, you could find out the limit of thinness by determining how thick a sinlge molecule of "stone" is and how many are in a sheet of the spell's normal area. This may require more anchors, more castings, and simultaneous action across the globe, but that's what craft-contingent spell and mindless constructs/undead are for.

    In any case, subsequent castings to thicken the stone eggshell until its opaque will probably also be necessary.
    Last edited by Kelb_Panthera; 2012-10-12 at 02:23 AM.
    I am not seaweed. That's a B.

    Praise I've received
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by ThiagoMartell View Post
    Kelb, recently it looks like you're the Avatar of Reason in these forums, man.
    Quote Originally Posted by LTwerewolf View Post
    [...] bringing Kelb in on your side in a rules fight is like bringing Mike Tyson in on your side to fight a toddler. You can, but it's such massive overkill.
    A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign

    Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle

  24. - Top - End - #174
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelb_Panthera View Post
    The shaping rules nuked that Idea, but it gave me a brilliant one!

    Wall of stone. Unlike X image and other spells it has a clause in its spell description that allows you to thin-out the wall to increase its area. It also says you can shape it however you please as long as it's anchored to existing stone.

    Here's the plan. Put a handful of Largish boulders into geo-syncronous orbit. Let's say 6 of them, two points on the three dimensional axes. You then cast wall of stone with these points as the anchors and shape it into an arbitrarily thin sheet. It'll only have a fraction of a hp per 5ft square, but you could theoretically cover an entire planet.

    Thus, wall of stone can give the world a stone eggshell to block out the sun. If you want to be a bit more mindful of the physics, you could find out the limit of thinness by determining how thick a sinlge molecule of "stone" is and how many are in a sheet of the spell's normal area. This may require more anchors, more castings, and simultaneous action across the globe, but that's what craft-contingent spell and mindless constructs/undead are for.

    In any case, subsequent castings to thicken the stone eggshell until its opaque will probably also be necessary.
    This falls afoul of orbital mechanics; geosynchronous orbit is an altitude at which satellites orbit at the same angular speed the earth rotates, but geostationary orbit (which you were probably referring to), in which a satellite appears to hover over a single point, is only possible within a narrow band surrounding the equator at that altitude*; any further north or south, and the orbit describes a figure-eight pattern on the ground below it as it alternates between orbiting faster and slower than the ground is rotating. So you can't have a geostationary orbit that hovers over, say, the North Pole.

    I could also go into the potential physical problems of tidal forces, orbital perturbations, cosmic rays, and micrometeorites, but that should do for now.


    *Tangentially, this is why competition is so fierce for geostationary orbit positions — after only fifty or so years of putting satellites there, it's already nearly full!
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  25. - Top - End - #175
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kelb_Panthera's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by tuggyne View Post
    This falls afoul of orbital mechanics; geosynchronous orbit is an altitude at which satellites orbit at the same angular speed the earth rotates, but geostationary orbit (which you were probably referring to), in which a satellite appears to hover over a single point, is only possible within a narrow band surrounding the equator at that altitude*; any further north or south, and the orbit describes a figure-eight pattern on the ground below it as it alternates between orbiting faster and slower than the ground is rotating. So you can't have a geostationary orbit that hovers over, say, the North Pole.

    I could also go into the potential physical problems of tidal forces, orbital perturbations, cosmic rays, and micrometeorites, but that should do for now.


    *Tangentially, this is why competition is so fierce for geostationary orbit positions — after only fifty or so years of putting satellites there, it's already nearly full!
    I meant geo-synchronous. It doesn't matter how the anchor points move in relation to the ground at all. Only that they're stable relative to one another. The entire wall would then form already moving in such a way that all points on it are moving in geo-synchronous orbit. Tidal forces might make it wobble a bit, but as long as it doesn't come crashing down, it doesn't really need to be absolutely perfect. If there's anything to worry about it's the fact that IRL gravitational pull isn't perfectly equal at a given altitude. There are places relative to the ground that pull a bit harder than others.

    I suppose this means periodic repar work would be necessary as places start to sag here and there above mountain ranges and such.

    Already got an idea to help firm things up a bit. The hardening spell (ECS) or the psi-power of the same name can make the shell a bit tougher, and a clever caster could shape the wall with a grid pattern protruding slightly from it to anchor walls of force along its exterior over a period of time once it's in place.
    Last edited by Kelb_Panthera; 2012-10-12 at 03:13 AM.
    I am not seaweed. That's a B.

    Praise I've received
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by ThiagoMartell View Post
    Kelb, recently it looks like you're the Avatar of Reason in these forums, man.
    Quote Originally Posted by LTwerewolf View Post
    [...] bringing Kelb in on your side in a rules fight is like bringing Mike Tyson in on your side to fight a toddler. You can, but it's such massive overkill.
    A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign

    Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle

  26. - Top - End - #176
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelb_Panthera View Post
    I meant geo-synchronous. It doesn't matter how the anchor points move in relation to the ground at all. Only that they're stable relative to one another.
    Sorry, I thought I'd addressed that. The problem is precisely that they won't remain at all stable relative to each other. A geosynchronous polar orbit, for example, moves perpendicular to a geosynchronous equatorial some of the time, and parallel to it some of the time; the distance between them can vary drastically (if you're lucky, perhaps only by a few hundred miles). None of the other orbits will be fundamentally any better, and there is no way to fully synchronize them.

    What you would in fact need is an orbit that doesn't exist: one that describes a circle around a center point that is nowhere near the Earth's center of mass. For example, the anchor point near the Pole would need a relatively small orbit that centers somewhere along Earth's axis, but not necessarily within the crust at all. This is because you're designing a spherical cover for a (rough) sphere and making it orbit as a whole; a given unified body can only have one orbit, not the numerous disparate orbits the anchors would need to remain aloft.

    Come to think of it, this is basically the problem that governs certain choices in the Dyson sphere ideas — specifically, the decision to use solar wind/light pressure to support the structure, rather than orbiting as such. Which you could do, except that Earth-like planets don't radiate much at all.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  27. - Top - End - #177
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kelb_Panthera's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by tuggyne View Post
    Sorry, I thought I'd addressed that. The problem is precisely that they won't remain at all stable relative to each other. A geosynchronous polar orbit, for example, moves perpendicular to a geosynchronous equatorial some of the time, and parallel to it some of the time; the distance between them can vary drastically (if you're lucky, perhaps only by a few hundred miles). None of the other orbits will be fundamentally any better, and there is no way to fully synchronize them.

    What you would in fact need is an orbit that doesn't exist: one that describes a circle around a center point that is nowhere near the Earth's center of mass. For example, the anchor point near the Pole would need a relatively small orbit that centers somewhere along Earth's axis, but not necessarily within the crust at all. This is because you're designing a spherical cover for a (rough) sphere and making it orbit as a whole; a given unified body can only have one orbit, not the numerous disparate orbits the anchors would need to remain aloft.

    Come to think of it, this is basically the problem that governs certain choices in the Dyson sphere ideas — specifically, the decision to use solar wind/light pressure to support the structure, rather than orbiting as such. Which you could do, except that Earth-like planets don't radiate much at all.
    I follow now, but at the same time, the choice of 6 anchor points was essentially arbitrary. You can get 2 anchors in geosynchronous or even geostationary orbit and have them stable to each other for the same net-effect. The whole wall is springing into existence in an instant in the basic version.

    For the completist version start with the anchors in geostationary orbit, create a ring using the afformentioned mindless contingency carriers, and then build outward toward the poles with subsequent castings. In fact, you could build the ring up pretty massive before expanding outward to make it good and sturdy and to give it the momentum to resist gravity during the short periods that it might be a touch unstable.
    Last edited by Kelb_Panthera; 2012-10-12 at 04:26 AM.
    I am not seaweed. That's a B.

    Praise I've received
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by ThiagoMartell View Post
    Kelb, recently it looks like you're the Avatar of Reason in these forums, man.
    Quote Originally Posted by LTwerewolf View Post
    [...] bringing Kelb in on your side in a rules fight is like bringing Mike Tyson in on your side to fight a toddler. You can, but it's such massive overkill.
    A quick outline on building a homebrew campaign

    Avatar by Tiffanie Lirle

  28. - Top - End - #178
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Eldan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Hm. Where are the earth/sun Lagrange points? Maybe you could build something there.
    Resident Vancian Apologist

  29. - Top - End - #179
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    I fail to see how this is easier than having a cancer mage UMD a scroll of plane shift.

  30. - Top - End - #180
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Israel

    Default Re: lets destroy the sun

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry View Post
    A: find a way to go to the elemental plane of water.

    B:find a way to cast gate and keep it up permanently. (gate plus permanency is one way)

    C:find a way to automatically leave the elemental plane.

    First go to the elemental plane, then open up a gate to the sun. The infinite water of the plane should take out all the fire and plasma and heat of the sun....eventually.

    The way to leave the plane automatically is because you don't want to be sucked into the sun.

    That's one way to do it.

    That would only make things worse, as shown here: LINK!
    Despite everything, its still me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •