Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 121 to 150 of 182
  1. - Top - End - #121
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Socratov's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Below sea level
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    I usually like zero. It means I can eliminate an entire piece of an equation, or reduce it to a one, or something. Except sometimes I hate zero. Like when the equation says ln(φ)=(1/RT)(integral from 0 to p (dp/p)). Because without that actually being explained in class, when you get to it on the homework it looks like you're supposed to have ln(0).
    it's also the very reason why differentials are way more awesome then integreals (or worse: double, triple, circle, surface and volume integrals)

    Debater of the Tyrion Lannister fanclub

    “The gods help those who help themselves, and my word, didn't I help myself.” - Avatar by the awesome Grinner

    Old avatars
    Spoiler
    Show

    Original Tyrion by Smuchmuch:



    Pony Tyrion by Elemental:


  2. - Top - End - #122
    Troll in the Playground
     
    The Extinguisher's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    3 inches from yesterday
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Socratov View Post
    that depends on you expecting the caculation in integers.

    For instance in integers it's the much awaited 4. However, to be overly correct one can assume that the '2's in the equation can be rounded numbers of anywhere between (for significance kept on 2 decimals) 1,50 and 2,49

    this then results in a range of minimum 1,50+1,50=3,00 (or: 2+2=3 for minimal values of 2)and a maximum of 2,49+2,49=4,98 (or: 2+2=5 for maximal values of 2), resulting 2+2=y in a range of 3=<y<5 for any value of 2

    When we apply rounding off again we shall see that 2+2 can be solved as 3, 4 or indeed 5.

    Now if the above explanation is the correct one, the 2+2=4 is not correct (in only providing 1 solution while others exist) even though 99.000 out of 100.000 people will probably say 2+2=4.

    note: this phenomenon becomes funnier if applied to slightly more complex problems. Imagine a calculation where the function is the between-2,50-and-not-quite-4-th root of (whatever). At some point you will encounter the euler root and the Pi root. have fun calculating
    I'm pretty sure claiming that's not how rounding works. If you round 1.86 to 2, you're committing that value to be two later. If I have 1.86 and 2.43 and I add them, I get 4.29, but if I round them both to two and add them I get 4.

    Thanks Uncle Festy for the wonderful Ashling Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by The Extinguisher
    So the moral of this story is that you should never listen to me ever.

  3. - Top - End - #123
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Saposhiente's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    An SQL database

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    "Even" means it can be divided by two and not yield a fraction. So technically zero is even, because 0/2=0 and zero isn't a fraction.
    (Terminology nitpick: Zero is a fraction. 0/1. 0/42. So is every other number, 3/1, 6/2, etc. What it is is an integer multiple of 2, 2*0=0.) Pendell: Dividing by zero has nothing to do with it.

    Technical Admin of the Minecraft server. Whitelist is here; put your name there and post it in the thread.
    The overly long monstrosity that is my extended signature lies here.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Grue Bait View Post
    Good game, guys. Sapo, you are just too good for this.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Rainy Knight View Post
    And by the way, your puzzle was one of the most interesting ones I've solved in a while. Kudos.
    Avatar by Akrim.elf

  4. - Top - End - #124
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    noparlpf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Saposhiente View Post
    (Terminology nitpick: Zero is a fraction. 0/1. 0/42. So is every other number, 3/1, 6/2, etc. What it is is an integer multiple of 2, 2*0=0.) Pendell: Dividing by zero has nothing to do with it.
    Eh, sort of. I don't consider n/1 a fraction. Not that it makes a difference, really.
    Jude P.

    Playing Pokémon X
    3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
    4- or 5-IV Pokémon available for trade listed on my Giant League Wiki page.

  5. - Top - End - #125
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Heliomance's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    Eh, sort of. I don't consider n/1 a fraction. Not that it makes a difference, really.
    Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
    Quotebox
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by hotel_papa View Post
    I maintain that until I see a movie trailer where Patrick Stewart introduces himself as Mordenkainen, there never was and never will be a D&D movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by dixieboy View Post
    I am unable to respond due to the awesomness of seducing a god, sorry
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalirren View Post
    The only person in the past two pages who has known what (s)he has been talking about is Heliomance.

    Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

  6. - Top - End - #126
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    noparlpf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Heliomance View Post
    Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
    If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really. And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
    Jude P.

    Playing Pokémon X
    3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
    4- or 5-IV Pokémon available for trade listed on my Giant League Wiki page.

  7. - Top - End - #127
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Castaras's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    You can't figure out all the numbers of pi. It's irrational.

    So the only way you can have pi as a fraction is pi/1.
    "I'm just going on motive and opportunity here and the fact that if the earth got swallowed by a black hole, I'd look suspiciously in your direction first."
    ~ Timberwolf

    "After the first day we universally agreed that she was banned from fire thereafter. The second day she ended up with the power to create 5 extra copies of herself."
    ~ Heliomance

    "You're like Pinkie Pie powered by a nuclear reactor."
    ~ Lix Lorn


  8. - Top - End - #128
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Urpriest's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stony Brook
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really. And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
    Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
    Lord Raziere herd I like Blasphemy, so Urpriest Exalted as a Malefactor

    Meet My Monstrous Guide to Monsters. Everything you absolutely need to know about Monsters and never thought you needed to ask.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
    One of the unwritten rules of Giantitp is that Urpriest is always right.
    Trophy!
    Spoiler
    Show


    original Urpriest (by Andraste)

  9. - Top - End - #129
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tail of the Bellcurve
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by ForzaFiori View Post
    I can tell you roughly when the dark ages are, who the US's first president was, the name of the person that discovered america is
    Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously.

    Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
    As I've tried a thousand times
    So I died a thousand times
    Can die no more


    Lake of Tears; Can Die No More
    From Neonai, 2002

  10. - Top - End - #130
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    noparlpf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Urpriest View Post
    Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
    Okay, that's fair.
    Jude P.

    Playing Pokémon X
    3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
    4- or 5-IV Pokémon available for trade listed on my Giant League Wiki page.

  11. - Top - End - #131
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Heliomance's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    You can't figure out all the digits of pi because it never ends - it has infinitely many digits, and never starts repeating. There is no way to write pi as a fraction.
    Quotebox
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by hotel_papa View Post
    I maintain that until I see a movie trailer where Patrick Stewart introduces himself as Mordenkainen, there never was and never will be a D&D movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by dixieboy View Post
    I am unable to respond due to the awesomness of seducing a god, sorry
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalirren View Post
    The only person in the past two pages who has known what (s)he has been talking about is Heliomance.

    Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

  12. - Top - End - #132
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Heliomance View Post
    Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
    If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really.
    You have answered a different question.

    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
    This is never going to happen, π is irrational. The term irrational means that you can never write it down as a rational number. A rational number is one which can be written down as some P/Q where P and Q are integers. This has been proven, though IIRC the proof is a little subtle.
    p = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  13. - Top - End - #133
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Socratov's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Below sea level
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by The Extinguisher View Post
    I'm pretty sure claiming that's not how rounding works. If you round 1.86 to 2, you're committing that value to be two later. If I have 1.86 and 2.43 and I add them, I get 4.29, but if I round them both to two and add them I get 4.
    well, rounding is only done in favor of less writing down (are you going to write every decimal? have fun with Pi) but that doesn't mean you can round off and calculate on with the rounded off numbers. You always continue with the non rounded numbers. I have been punished for not doing this in school (our teacher sometimes was slightly sadistic in making math tests like these). In maths acutally 2 things you need to know: 1) what is a function? (and how does it work and hwat can you do with it) 2)every numeral representation of a number is a range unless otherwise defined or reasoned.

    Debater of the Tyrion Lannister fanclub

    “The gods help those who help themselves, and my word, didn't I help myself.” - Avatar by the awesome Grinner

    Old avatars
    Spoiler
    Show

    Original Tyrion by Smuchmuch:



    Pony Tyrion by Elemental:


  14. - Top - End - #134
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2010

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Urpriest View Post
    Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
    Hurray, one explanation I don't have to do. Although the additional requirement that q≠0 needs to be added for the definition to be complete. Ie a rational number is defined as "p/q where p, q are integers and q≠0."

    Now, for even/odd:

    An even number is any integer that can be expressed as 2m, where m is any integer.

    An odd number is any integer that can be expressed as 2m + 1, where m is any integer.

    So, for the case of proving that odd + odd = even (To bastardize the language a bit), we have:

    (2m + 1) + (2n + 1) = 2m + 2n + 2 = 2(m + n + 1) = 2k

    The last "step" is unnecessary, but I figured it was better to play it safe and include it. It should be clear that k = m + n + 1 and we know k to be an integer because of the fact that integers are closed under addition.

    Bit of a weak explanation, but meh.
    Last edited by Ashery; 2012-10-28 at 04:08 PM.

  15. - Top - End - #135
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    TheFallenOne's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Heidelberg, Germany
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously.

    Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
    Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages.

    Lesson being: if you give some examples of basic facts you know, be sure everything you list is in fact accurate and not just a common misconception you picked up somewhere.
    Not a member of the Bayesian Conspiracy. Honestly. Probably. Maybe.
    Find your own priors!



  16. - Top - End - #136
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Earth

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFallenOne View Post
    Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages.

    Lesson being: if you give some examples of basic facts you know, be sure everything you list is in fact accurate and not just a common misconception you picked up somewhere.
    Just to further beat this point into the ground: technically speaking, the line "who the US's first president was", is, on account of the wording, more accurately answered by 'John Hancock' than 'George Washington'*. The reason for this being that while Washington was the first person to hold the office of 'President of the United States of America', the US's first president (note lack of capital) would have been Hancock due to him being the president of the Continental Congress when independence was declared.

    Pedantic? Yes, but it seemed fitting given the main topic of the thread


    *There are other potential answers that can be argued for as well, but Hancock is probably the strongest option.

  17. - Top - End - #137
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Knaight's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2008

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously.

    Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
    This, of course, doesn't actually matter: When they found America, there were already people living there. It had been discovered by them first, and while either Leif, Bjarni, or some other viking did make a legitimate discovery, they were by no means the first people to do so (had they been, they wouldn't have found people there, though there is technically a possibility for that to happen that simply didn't).
    Fudge Assistant in the Playground.

  18. - Top - End - #138
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2011

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    The reason for this being that while Washington was the first person to hold the office of 'President of the United States of America', the US's first president (note lack of capital) would have been Hancock due to him being the president of the Continental Congress when independence was declared.
    That would depend on when the United States actually started to exist as an entity. Is the current United States under the Constitution the same as the country that existed under the Articles of Confederation or before? The Declaration of Independence mentions "the united States of America" (note lack of capital).

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Pedantic? Yes, but it seemed fitting given the main topic of the thread

  19. - Top - End - #139
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Earth

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by razark View Post
    That would depend on when the United States actually started to exist as an entity.
    Quite so. 4th of July 1776 is traditionally considered the date when the USA started officially existing as an entity, although you could also argue for 1783 (when Britain formally recognised its independence) - which would make the first president Thomas Mifflin. 1781 is a possibility, which would make the first president John Hanson.
    Is the current United States under the Constitution the same as the country that existed under the Articles of Confederation or before? The Declaration of Independence mentions "the united States of America" (note lack of capital).
    The capital 'u' was in use by pretty much everyone at the time though, and was set when the Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781. Following that line would therefore be at least as likely to give you John Hanson as it would Washington.
    Basing a nation's age on a constitution however can be a bit awkward in any event, e.g. one could use it to make the argument that France has only existed since 1958. Things get very wonky in the cases of nations that don't have a written constitution, such as the UK*.

    Regardless of what the most accurate answer actually, the existence of this discussion just goes to show that "who the US's first president was" cannot really be considered as basic a fact as ForzaFiori assumed it could


    *it also leaves the proverbial door open to the 'type identity vs. token identity' discussion and how/whether that particular philosophical distinction does/should apply to countries.
    Last edited by Mr.Silver; 2012-10-29 at 11:02 AM.

  20. - Top - End - #140
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    TheFallenOne's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Heidelberg, Germany
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Regardless of what the most accurate answer actually, the existence of this discussion just goes to show that "who the US's first president was" cannot really be considered as basic a fact as ForzaFiori assumed it could
    Well, I'd say that ambiguity is still better than just being plain wrong like about who discovered America or the Middle Ages being dark
    Now I do wonder about the 'capital of Australia' bit; many, or even most, mistakenly believe it to be Sydney. Including me to be honest until I was corrected in, dunno, 8th grade maybe?

    That said, the little excursion on who was the first president of the USA under what criteria was quite interesting. But given the presidents are numbered, shouldn't there be an 'official' answer to it or at least one endorsed by the government?
    Not a member of the Bayesian Conspiracy. Honestly. Probably. Maybe.
    Find your own priors!



  21. - Top - End - #141
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tail of the Bellcurve
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Heliomance View Post
    You can't figure out all the digits of pi because it never ends - it has infinitely many digits, and never starts repeating. There is no way to write pi as a fraction.
    Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.

    *Although apparently it seems to be basically Euclidean, which is too bad. I'd much rather live in a hyperbolic universe. I want my pentagon with five interior right angles.

    Quote Originally Posted by Knaight View Post
    This, of course, doesn't actually matter: When they found America, there were already people living there. It had been discovered by them first, and while either Leif, Bjarni, or some other viking did make a legitimate discovery, they were by no means the first people to do so (had they been, they wouldn't have found people there, though there is technically a possibility for that to happen that simply didn't).
    A valid point, which is why I stipulated 'European.'

    (Strangely, the Norse may well not have been the first people to discover Iceland. There's some evidence that Irish monks used it as a prayer retreat before the Norse colonization. However they were certainly the first to *settle* it, as one can hardly count a seasonal population of celibate men as any sort of colonization.)
    As I've tried a thousand times
    So I died a thousand times
    Can die no more


    Lake of Tears; Can Die No More
    From Neonai, 2002

  22. - Top - End - #142
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Saposhiente's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    An SQL database

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.
    There are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers (greater cardinality), therefore the probability of pi being rational at any given location is zero. (Though it's technically possible)

    Technical Admin of the Minecraft server. Whitelist is here; put your name there and post it in the thread.
    The overly long monstrosity that is my extended signature lies here.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Grue Bait View Post
    Good game, guys. Sapo, you are just too good for this.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Rainy Knight View Post
    And by the way, your puzzle was one of the most interesting ones I've solved in a while. Kudos.
    Avatar by Akrim.elf

  23. - Top - End - #143
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.

    *Although apparently it seems to be basically Euclidean, which is too bad. I'd much rather live in a hyperbolic universe. I want my pentagon with five interior right angles.
    Assuming Einstein was right: then the universe has a parabolic geometry.

    Euclidean geometry is hyperbolic. (See Euclid:postulate 5)
    Last edited by nedz; 2012-10-29 at 09:23 PM.
    p = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  24. - Top - End - #144
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Heliomance's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Saposhiente View Post
    There are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers (greater cardinality), therefore the probability of pi being rational at any given location is zero. (Though it's technically possible)
    PROBABILITY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

    An event with P(x) = 0 cannot happen. Ever. No, not even then. If it's technically possible, the probability is not zero. It can be infinitesimally small, but not zero.
    Last edited by Heliomance; 2012-10-30 at 03:11 AM.
    Quotebox
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by hotel_papa View Post
    I maintain that until I see a movie trailer where Patrick Stewart introduces himself as Mordenkainen, there never was and never will be a D&D movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by dixieboy View Post
    I am unable to respond due to the awesomness of seducing a god, sorry
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalirren View Post
    The only person in the past two pages who has known what (s)he has been talking about is Heliomance.

    Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

  25. - Top - End - #145
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    GnomePirate

    Join Date
    Dec 2011

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFallenOne View Post
    Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFallenOne View Post
    Well, I'd say that ambiguity is still better than just being plain wrong like about who discovered America or the Middle Ages being dark
    Um... The Dark Ages are not The Middle Ages... Dark Ages is still a perfectly valid name for the Early Middle ages. Normally from the Fall of Rome to around 1050. It's really a much more defined period than the Middle ages.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Basing a nation's age on a constitution however can be a bit awkward in any event, e.g. one could use it to make the argument that France has only existed since 1958. Things get very wonky in the cases of nations that don't have a written constitution, such as the UK*.
    Poor example. The date the UK came in to existence is very easy. 1 January 1801, the date the twin 1800 Acts of Union came in to force (and in 1922 in its current state).
    GnomeFighter, Membership Advisor, Henchpersons Union, South and Central (UK) branch - Ask about membership today!

    Injured in an evil experiment gone wrong? Suffered defending your employers lair? Get the compensation you deserve! Why wait until you have a doomsday device to exact revenge? Call the Henchpersons Union today. Our specialist evil injury lawyers are waiting to help!

    Remember, just because the world will suffer doesn't mean you should too!

  26. - Top - End - #146
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by GnomeFighter View Post
    Um... The Dark Ages are not The Middle Ages... Dark Ages is still a perfectly valid name for the Early Middle ages. Normally from the Fall of Rome to around 1050. It's really a much more defined period than the Middle ages.
    The Dark ages was so called because:
    For Historians: there are very few written documents.
    For the Church: Christianity retrenched as 'pagan' hordes swept through Europe.

    Archaeologists don't like the term and it is considered outdated.

    The term Migration period is generally preferred, which overlaps with the, so called, Age of Invasions in Britain (Romans to 1066).

    The Dark ages were typically regarded as being from the end of the western Roman empire to the rise of the Carolingians. We now call that period late antiquity / early middle ages.
    p = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  27. - Top - End - #147
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Earth

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFallenOne View Post
    That said, the little excursion on who was the first president of the USA under what criteria was quite interesting. But given the presidents are numbered, shouldn't there be an 'official' answer to it or at least one endorsed by the government?
    The 'official' numbering scheme in the USA counts holders of the office 'President of the United States of America' (which are also easier to keep track of than the earlier 'presidents' because they have fixed terms). Unfortunately it doesn't actually provide the accurate figure for how many different people have held this position either, because it counts Grover Cleveland's two terms separately.
    So yeah, just because it's 'official' doesn't mean it's technically correct

    Funnily enough there is a similar 'official' numbering discrepancy in the British monarchy. Because monarchs only started being numbered after the Norman conquest, King Edward I was actually the second monarch to be called Edward (Edward the Confessor having been the first) and so on with all subsequent Edwards.

    Quote Originally Posted by GnomeFighter View Post
    Poor example. The date the UK came in to existence is very easy. 1 January 1801, the date the twin 1800 Acts of Union came in to force (and in 1922 in its current state).
    Yes, in much the same way that the USA is considered to have come into existence on the 4th of July 1776 with the Declaration of Independence.

  28. - Top - End - #148
    Troll in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by warty goblin View Post
    Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.
    Pi is a constant, originally defined as the ratio of the circumference and the diameter of a circle on a Euclidean plane.

    Its value doesn't change, even though there are non-Euclidean "circles" that are not on a Euclidean plane.

  29. - Top - End - #149
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Funnily enough there is a similar 'official' numbering discrepancy in the British monarchy. Because monarchs only started being numbered after the Norman conquest, King Edward I was actually the second monarch to be called Edward (Edward the Confessor having been the first) and so on with all subsequent Edwards.
    Its slightly worse than that since after the act of union we have two numbering systems: one English, one Scottish. Hence James I/VI etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay R View Post
    Pi is a constant, originally defined as the ratio of the circumference and the diameter of a circle on a Euclidean plane.

    Its value doesn't change, even though there are non-Euclidean "circles" that are not on a Euclidean plane.
    See below
    p = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  30. - Top - End - #150
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Heliomance's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

    Ah, but consider a 10' blast. It consists of 12 squares which have an area of 300 sq ft. Thus Pi must clearly be 3.
    Quotebox
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by hotel_papa View Post
    I maintain that until I see a movie trailer where Patrick Stewart introduces himself as Mordenkainen, there never was and never will be a D&D movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by dixieboy View Post
    I am unable to respond due to the awesomness of seducing a god, sorry
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalirren View Post
    The only person in the past two pages who has known what (s)he has been talking about is Heliomance.

    Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •