New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Carrion_Humanoid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    A house
    Gender
    Male

    Default Candy Land D20, minds needed!

    Hey guys I have a question to ask anyone whos up to make some templates for me. Could any one of you make these for one of my campeign settings? It was a old idea, called Candyland D20. So will any of you please make a. . .

    -Gummy Templete
    -Chocolete Templete
    -Tooth Templete

    Oh, and I already made some-non templete monsters, but mabye one of you guys could make some other monsters that would be cool. So far I made a Gummi Worm, Nerds(race), Gingerbread men(race) and some other things.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    thehothead's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sol 3, commonly known as Earth

    Default Re: Candy Land D20, minds needed!

    I'm scared...
    I'm not lazy, just efficient

    Town-ness

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Default Re: Candy Land D20, minds needed!

    THAT'S AWESOME!!! I'LL SEE IF MY FRIEND WADE AND I CAN COME UP WITH SOme goOD IDEAS

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re: Candy Land D20, minds needed!

    That sort of game would actually probably be a lot better with rules that are simpler than the D20 system. I am not knocking your idea, my own players say my games have a really high "Rainbow Bright factor" to them, but something much simpler would be a better basis.

    If you are really in love with the D20 rules then I would suggest you take the SRD and start chopping things out left and right.

    Off the top of my head for that sort of game I would remove the following.

    All classes other than fighter, cleric, and wizard. Remove the concept of multiclassing.

    I would remove the entire skill system, and replace it with the simple system that when a character tries to do something "appropriate for their class" then they roll D20+ character level + whatever ability score would be relevant. If it is not "appropriate" for their class then they only get D20 + ability score. This is basically what castles and crusades does.

    I would remove attacks of opportunity, charges, disarms, trips, sunders, flanks, and most other combat manuevers other than attacks and grapples. I would also remove delays and readied actions as well.

    I would then carefully remove all feats related to anything you already removed. You many want to consider removing everything in the game that temporarily raises or lowers ability scores, and finally, go to a simplified initiative system, where everyone at the table (GM included) rolls D20, high roll goes first, and then play continues to the left from there.

    Playing a Candyland game with the full D20 ruleset ends up with the situation where the rules just don't match up with the genre. Dimmy Doo and the Great Wazoo shouldn't be worrying about AOOs, flanks, prestige classes or barbarian rage when they are fighting Gummy bears. It just ISN'T even remotely a serious genre, so there is no reason to use a heavy ruleset. It is more of a cartoon genre.

    The castles and crusades rules could pretty much handle this genre unmodified, although the basic D&D red box set from the 1980s would be even better.

    *****************************

    When suggesting things to cut I firmly attacked the biggest offenders in gameplay slowdown. The number one offender in gameplay slowdown is the attack of opportunity. This rule alone pretty much doubles the true length of most combats, and the rule doesn't even really model what it is supposed to model. Unfortunately removing it requires major surgery to the system.

    The next biggest offender is the overly complex initiative system, along with the delays and readies.

    Temporary ability score changes can really slow down the game, it just depends on your group of players. People who are bad at math, bad with the rules, or just not too bright are really slowed down by these, or they fail to apply them at all.

    The flank causes endless minute figure reshuffling each turn, which slows down the game. The flank rule isn't needed if your game doesn't feature sneak attack, and since I suggested cutting the rogue, there is no need for the flank either.

    Most of the classes don't fit the flavor, or are simply over complicated fighters, which is why I suggested chopping the classes down to 3. Removing the rogue serves a dual purpose, the class doesn't seem likely for people wandering around gum drop mountains fighting ice cream sandwiches, and removing the rogue allows you to excise the skill system and the the flank rules.
    Check out Red Box Fantasy a very modern and different take on retrogaming. http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/paigeoliver

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    purple gelatinous cube o' Doom's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    on a cosmic wagon train
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Candy Land D20, minds needed!

    I might have to go dig my game out and see what I can come up with.
    Grinning Purple Gelatinous Cube avatar courtesy of Lord_Herman
    Attacking Cube courtesy of Sampi
    Current avatar courtesy of Rutskarn

    My GiTP stuff
    Spoiler
    Show
    DM
    Currently none

    Player
    currently none

    Creations:
    Fimbulwight

    I have my own RB thread right here.





    Come and join in the newly minted Fictional Character Contest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •