The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed
The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed - Coming in December and available for pre-order now
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 34
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Protective Spell a la WoW

    Hello guys... I was hoping that this great community would be so helpful as to comment and rate my spell. ANy comment will be much appreciated. So by all means... PEACH away!

    Angoriel’s Divine Ward
    Abjuration
    Level: Clr 3
    Components: V, S, M
    Casting Time: 1 standard action
    Range: Touch
    Area: 5-ft.-radius spherical emanation, centered on target
    Duration: 1 round/ 2 level (D)
    Saving Throw: None; See text
    Spell Resistance: No; See text
    The spell creates a faintly shimmering golden globe of protective positive energy around a single target touched by the caster. While under the effect of Divine Ward, the recipient is completely safe from damage of any type. This includes damage from spells of any level. The ward absorbs 10 points of damage per 2 levels of the caster to a maximum of 50 points of damage at level 10. Since the ward is created of positive energy any healing receives while under the effect of Divine Ward are increased by 2 point per spell level. Being positive energy, this spell shuns out undead, which must succeed in a will save to enter the spell area. This however is produces a Hallow effect upon any undead inside the spells area.
    Divine Focus: Holy symbol


    Again thanks in advance!
    Last edited by Max Caysey; 2013-11-30 at 06:19 PM.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Caysey View Post
    Level: Clr 3
    This is a very substantially better spell than protection from arrows, which is level 2, and in most respects significantly superior to stoneskin, which is level 4 (but level 6 for domains). Probably bump it to 6 or so, maybe 7, and perhaps add an expensive focus or material component or something. 7 would be good if you improve the cap.

    Components: V, S, M
    Should be V, S, DF, and leave out the Divine Focus entry at the end.

    Range: Touch
    Area: 5-ft.-radius spherical emanation, centered on target
    I feel like the Range should be "Touch and 5'; see text"

    Duration: 1 round/ 2 level (D)
    Levels, and maybe even out the spaces around the slash.

    The ward absorbs 10 points of damage per 2 levels of the caster to a maximum of 50 points of damage at level 10.
    I'd suggest evening this out to "5 points of damage per caster level".
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    I like the spell.

    its a great way to increase surviveability. in that a) is gives temp HP (up to 50) and b) bascially gives a caster free augment healing (+2 per spell level)

    I think teh added hallow effect is a bit powerful for a 3rd level spell.

    As fo right now this spell is basically an improved 2nd levle spell ( false life) with a first level spell ( heroics gives a bonus feat) and a limited Hallow but only in aspect of the +4 bonus to turn undead.

    SO i think 4th level would be more appropiate for the Spells level.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    First of all, thansk you for your feddback!

    I have made a few modifications based on your comments.

    It now looks like this:

    Angoriel’s Divine Ward
    Abjuration
    Level: Clr 3
    Components: V, S, M, DF
    Casting Time: 1 standard action
    Range: Touch
    Area: 5-ft.-radius spherical emanation; see text
    Duration: 1 round / 2 levels (D)
    Saving Throw: None; see text
    Spell Resistance: No; see text
    The spell creates a faintly shimmering golden globe of protective positive energy around a single target touched by the caster. While under the effect of Divine Ward, the recipient is completely safe from damage of any type. This includes damage from spells of any level. The ward absorbs 10 points of damage for every two levels of the caster to a maximum of 50 points of damage at 10th level. Since the ward is created of positive energy any healing receives while under the effect of Divine Ward is increased by 2 point per spell level. Being positive energy, this spell shuns out undead, which must succeed in a will save to enter the spell area.
    Materiel Component: A sprinkling of diamond dust worth at least 50 gp

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Dalebert's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Take a look at stoneskin and all the limitations on it.
    1) It gives dmg reduction 10/adamantine so it only absorbs 10 pnts from any one attack and there's a way, albeit challenging, to get past that.
    2) It does nothing for energy attacks.

    It's 4th level and has a 250gp material component. It does last longer and can absorb more in the long run, but yours will absorb one really powerful attack that might kill someone. Stoneskin won't.

    Plus your spell enhances healing.
    Plus your spell blocks out undead.

    I think it's dramatically overpowered for a 3rd level spell. I think you should probably raise the level a lot and also maybe make it more focused. Is it a force effect that blocks things (like mage armor or wall of force) and therefore maybe blocks straight damage, or is it a positive energy effect? Maybe the latter enhances healing or even give fast healing while also blocking undead or doing dmg to them if they attack.
    If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?

    In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.

    Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    I agree with the other guys.
    I think it should be a lvl 5 Sanctified spell. (The ones that use the PC's stats as a component and can only be casted by truely good people.)
    Last edited by Kazy; 2013-12-02 at 10:15 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    First I want to say, that I wholly enjoy all the feedback that I have gotten here, when that has been said, I have some comments for the comments.

    If we were to look at Mass Aid, which is a level 3 spell, we find that not only does is give +1 morale attack and saves vs fear, it also gives 1d8+ (max 15) temporary hit points. And is has a duration of 1 minute per spell level and on top of this is has multiple allies as target.

    The spell I posted here gives a max of 50 temporary HP, which indeed is a lot, but it has a max duration of 5 rounds, it also does not aid directly in combat, nor has it multiple targets. The added augment healing feat effect is only good if the target en question receives any healing during the duration.

    All this tells me, compared to Mass Aid, that this should be a level 3 spell.

    Any further comments or ideas are always very welcome. I hope I dont come off as not listening to what comments are posted here, and I have already changed some based on the comments, but I wholly disagree that this spell should be a level 5 or 7 for that matter.

    Again thanks in advance
    Last edited by Max Caysey; 2013-12-03 at 07:03 AM.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Hamste's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2012

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    It doesn't have a max duration of five rounds you only put a cl limit on the amount of damage it blocks.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    I think PF's Ablative Barrier, Ablative Sphere, and PF/3.5's Protection From Energy are good comparisons. All are 3rd level.

    Ablative Barrier
    Casting Time 1 standard action
    Components V, S, M (a piece of metal cut from a shield)
    Range touch
    Target creature touched
    Duration 1 hour/level or until discharged
    Saving Throw Will negates (harmless); Spell Resistance no

    Invisible layers of solid force surround and protect the target, granting that target a +2 armor bonus to AC. Additionally, the first 5 points of lethal damage the target takes from each attack are converted into nonlethal damage. Against attacks that already deal nonlethal damage, the target gains DR 5/—. Once this spell has converted 5 points of damage to nonlethal damage per caster level (maximum 50 points), the spell is discharged.


    Ablative Sphere
    Casting Time 1 standard action
    Components V, S, M (a crystalline sphere worth 10 gp)
    Range personal
    Target you
    Duration 1 minute per level (D)

    An immobile, crystalline, web-like globe surrounds you. When the ablative sphere winks into existence, it provides you with improved cover (see below). The barrier does not impede a spell's line of sight or effect.

    The sphere is 1 inch thick per caster level, has hardness 5, and 3 hit points per inch of thickness. When an ablative sphere loses hit points, the level of cover it provides is reduced. When the ablative sphere has lost one-third of its hit points, it provides cover instead of improved cover. Once it has lost two-thirds of its hit points, it provides only partial cover. Finally, when the ablative sphere's hit points reach 0, the globe is destroyed. When an attack reduces an ablative sphere's hit points to 0, you take any remaining damage.

    Improved Cover

    In some cases, such as attacking a target hiding behind an arrowslit, cover may provide a greater bonus to AC and Reflex saves. In such situations, the normal cover bonuses to AC and Reflex saves can be doubled (to +8 and +4, respectively). A creature with this improved cover effectively gains improved evasion against any attack to which the Reflex save bonus applies. Furthermore, improved cover provides a +10 bonus on Stealth checks.

    As we Protection From Energy does not stack with Resist Energy. Lasts 10 min/level, and absorbs 12 damage/level (max 120) from one specific energy type.

    One thing all of these have in common, is that there's a way to deal damage through them. Ablative Barrier converts 5 damage at a time to non-lethal. Ablative Sphere doesn't block targeted spells and can doesn't fully block other attacks (AC bonus and the defense lowers with damage). Protection From Energy only works against one energy type.

    Ablative Barrier is similar in that it converts any sort of damage. But it lasts much longer (1 hour/level). It also has a cap at 50 damage, so it lasts for essentially 10 hits at 10th level. Lastly, it provides a small +2 AC bonus if you don't wear armor (which is pretty worthless given Mage Armor is +4 and is a 1st level spell).

    Ablative Sphere is similar in that it is also a sort duration. You also can't move, which effectively means it is just good for one battle. It has Hardness 5 and 3 HP/caster level. That's pretty good (hardness blocks any kind of damage) -- it's a bit like 8 HP per caster level or less though, but with no cap. However it doesn't block spells and can be bypassed if you get around the Improved Cover. This cover gets worse as you take damage.

    Protection From Energy lasts for multiple Fights, protections for over twice as much, but only against 1 kind of damage. If PfE protected against ALL energy damage, then I think your spell would be balanced. It also provides no secondary effects, unlike your spell.

    So, my thoughts:

    • I'd drop the material component. Expensive components are a bad way to balance spells. You never know what the situation at a particular table is going to be.
    • I think the buff needs to be reduced to something like 10HP + 3HP/Level. Or just provide Hardness 5 or 10 or something.
    • I'd also bump it up to 1 round/level. That's one combat which is easy to keep track of. You generally want to avoid having to keep track of how long a spell will last.
    • Alternatively, keep it at 5HP/level, but have it require a move action to maintain each round with no duration cap. That's a lot easier to remember.
    • +2 HP healed per spell level is pretty small, I think, so that's fine.
    • I'd drop the undead bit, since I think that's too powerful against undead. Plenty of positive energy things don't have any special effect against undead. Often it is better to have a spell be simple than complicated with several things to remember.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Drachasor View Post
    Ablative Barrier is similar in that it converts any sort of damage.
    I'm not sure it does, actually, given the parallel of DR for non-lethal and conversion for lethal. I think it only works for weapon attacks, although the RAW is muddled.

    Assuming this is correct, it is quite plain that the spell as written is more powerful than any of its peers, and should be releveled.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamste View Post
    It doesn't have a max duration of five rounds you only put a cl limit on the amount of damage it blocks.
    Thats a mistake... It was to have a max duration of 5 rounds! I will have to edit that. Thanks!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    I'm not sure it does, actually, given the parallel of DR for non-lethal and conversion for lethal. I think it only works for weapon attacks, although the RAW is muddled.

    Assuming this is correct, it is quite plain that the spell as written is more powerful than any of its peers, and should be releveled.
    Spells can do lethal or non-lethal damage. Technically speaking, "lethal" damage is really only defined as damage that isn't non-lethal. Note that this is just about damage in general, not only weapon damage. They do go over weapon damage in particular with regards to lethal and non-lethal damage, but that's after going over non-lethal damage in more general terms.

    With metamagic like Merciful Spell it becomes even more clear. Note that the brief description of Merciful Spell is "Spell inflicts nonlethal damage instead of lethal".

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Caysey View Post
    Thats a mistake... It was to have a max duration of 5 rounds! I will have to edit that. Thanks!
    I think a short duration is problematic because it troublesome to keep track of something that lasts for less than a battle.
    Last edited by Drachasor; 2013-12-03 at 07:27 AM.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Drachasor View Post
    Spells can do lethal or non-lethal damage. Technically speaking, "lethal" damage is really only defined as damage that isn't non-lethal. Note that this is just about damage in general, not only weapon damage. They do go over weapon damage in particular with regards to lethal and non-lethal damage, but that's after going over non-lethal damage in more general terms.

    With metamagic like Merciful Spell it becomes even more clear. Note that the brief description of Merciful Spell is "Spell inflicts nonlethal damage instead of lethal".
    Sure, but DR never applies to spells*, so DR that applies to non-lethal damage quite clearly only works for weapons. Thus, by parallelism, the lethal to non-lethal conversion should also only work for weapons, just like the +2 armor bonus to AC does.

    Apparently the writer forgot that, for spell purposes, an "attack" is anything that harms, hinders, or does damage, and no attack roll need be involved, never mind weapons.


    *Unless you're using DSP's rules, in which case only spells that do bludgeoning, slashing, or piercing damage suffer DR, which still leaves out the vast majority.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    Sure, but DR never applies to spells*, so DR that applies to non-lethal damage quite clearly only works for weapons. Thus, by parallelism, the lethal to non-lethal conversion should also only work for weapons, just like the +2 armor bonus to AC does.

    Apparently the writer forgot that, for spell purposes, an "attack" is anything that harms, hinders, or does damage, and no attack roll need be involved, never mind weapons.

    *Unless you're using DSP's rules, in which case only spells that do bludgeoning, slashing, or piercing damage suffer DR, which still leaves out the vast majority.
    DR in that spell only applies to non-lethal damage. The Conversion has nothing to do with DR.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Drachasor View Post
    DR in that spell only applies to non-lethal damage. The Conversion has nothing to do with DR.
    I already addressed that: the structure of the spell is such that it is clearly intended to work on weapon damage only, and to the extent that it works on spells by RAW, it is dysfunctional. As such, using its dysfunctional RAW as a touchstone for proper intended balance does not seem justifiable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Keep in mind guys that Damage Reduction, as written, is terrible all round.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    It is really good and excessively abusable while only effect ting a single target, so it joins the ranks of polymorph. I would make it multi target, 10-20 temp HP and DR 5/escalating requirement (magic, adamantine, nothing.)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Glyphstone View Post
    Vibranium: If it was on the periodic table, its chemical symbol would be "Bs".

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    I already addressed that: the structure of the spell is such that it is clearly intended to work on weapon damage only, and to the extent that it works on spells by RAW, it is dysfunctional. As such, using its dysfunctional RAW as a touchstone for proper intended balance does not seem justifiable.
    One could just as easily argue that the DR part is an oversight. Or that you are just reading too much into the spell.

    The spell does not seem to be too powerful for a third level spell. In fact, it is weaker in several ways than other protective spells of its level. Taking non-lethal damage means that you still get taken out of the fight at the same point overall, for instance. Using it as a touchstone seems to work pretty well to me. Or do you disagree with the conclusions I made from using it along with other spells as a touchstone?

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Drachasor View Post
    One could just as easily argue that the DR part is an oversight.
    That's pretty weak, since that is a terribly obvious consideration. "DR does not apply to most spells" is not some weird niche of the rules; it's something anyone with any experience in spellcasting or running monsters should know.

    Or do you disagree with the conclusions I made from using it along with other spells as a touchstone?
    Yes. You downplayed several of the important considerations that explain why those spells are lower level than this should be. For example, PfE protects against one of five flavors of elemental energy. It does nothing for any physical type of damage, nothing for force or negative or positive, nothing for vile or divine or city, and each casting only works for a single chosen one of the five. Contrast a spell that works on all of those named at the same time, and it's not difficult to see that the general version is considerably more powerful, to the tune of several spell levels right there. Or ablative sphere: many spells will bypass it in whole or in part, it only works if you stay in place, and even weapons can often (*coughImprovedPreciseShotcough*) either entirely ignore or often avoid the protection, so it's essentially a temporary battlement that can be chipped away or just attacked around.

    There are no 3rd-level spells that I would consider a good match for this, power-wise.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    That's pretty weak, since that is a terribly obvious consideration. "DR does not apply to most spells" is not some weird niche of the rules; it's something anyone with any experience in spellcasting or running monsters should know.
    Eh, granted. That doesn't mean that the spell is of an unreasonable power level as it is written. Seems about right for 3rd level (Ablative Barrier, that is).

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    Yes. You downplayed several of the important considerations that explain why those spells are lower level than this should be. For example, PfE protects against one of five flavors of elemental energy. It does nothing for any physical type of damage, nothing for force or negative or positive, nothing for vile or divine or city, and each casting only works for a single chosen one of the five. Contrast a spell that works on all of those named at the same time, and it's not difficult to see that the general version is considerably more powerful, to the tune of several spell levels right there. Or ablative sphere: many spells will bypass it in whole or in part, it only works if you stay in place, and even weapons can often (*coughImprovedPreciseShotcough*) either entirely ignore or often avoid the protection, so it's essentially a temporary battlement that can be chipped away or just attacked around.

    There are no 3rd-level spells that I would consider a good match for this, power-wise.
    Obviously the original and updated versions are too powerful, hence my list of suggestions to dramatically tone the power down to keep it as a 3rd level spell.

    Heck, if anything my suggestions make the spell less powerful than what you suggested. So I am not sure what you are complaining about here.
    Last edited by Drachasor; 2013-12-04 at 04:06 AM.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    I hope I have not come accross as complaining. I personally think that my spell should be 3rd level, but that does not mean that I dont listen and that the comments posted here are not interesting or somehow become less valid in my mind.

    I want to stress that 50 points of damage at level 10 or call it 50 points of temporary HP I personally dont think should be raised to a higher level.

    The spell is sopposed to work as Power Word: Shield from wow. Make someone survive for a short period of time, save them from something nasty or something like that.

    I will remove the anti undead aspect of the spell, but were I to raise the level I would feel the need to increase the duration and amount of temporary HP... for instance raise the level bar to level 20 so it would be 100 HP for 10 rounds at level 20. And make it level 6 or something.

    Any further comments are much appriciated!

    Thanks
    Last edited by Max Caysey; 2013-12-04 at 04:40 AM.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Caysey View Post
    I hope I have not come accross as complaining. I personally think that my spell should be 3rd level, but that does not mean that I dont listen and that the comments posted here are not interesting or somehow become less valid in my mind.

    I want to stress that 50 points of damage at level 10 or call it 50 points of temporary HP I personally dont think should be raised to a higher level.

    The spell is sopposed to work as Power Word: Shield from wow. Make someone survive for a short period of time, save them from something nasty or something like that.

    I will remove the anti undead aspect of the spell, but were I to raise the level I would feel the need to increase the duration and amount of temporary HP... for instance raise the level bar to level 20 so it would be 100 HP for 10 rounds at level 20. And make it level 6 or something.

    Any further comments are much appriciated!

    Thanks
    It's just quite a bit more powerful than other 3rd level protection spells out there. I mean you can compare it to mass aid if you want, but look at single target protection spells of that level, level 4, and level 5.

    I do get the reference. However, extra HP and healing in D&D is a lot harder than it is in WOW. Bear that in mind.

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Drachasor View Post
    Heck, if anything my suggestions make the spell less powerful than what you suggested. So I am not sure what you are complaining about here.
    I have to admit I only skimmed the two most important parts of your proposal.
    I think the buff needs to be reduced to something like 10HP + 3HP/Level. […] Alternatively, keep it at 5HP/level, but have it require a move action to maintain each round with no duration cap. That's a lot easier to remember.
    I'd still consider that a fourth-level spell, but it's rather closer than the current form, at any rate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Caysey View Post
    were I to raise the level I would feel the need to increase the duration and amount of temporary HP... for instance raise the level bar to level 20 so it would be 100 HP for 10 rounds at level 20. And make it level 6 or something.
    That would make a lot of sense, since generally powerful effects are not hamstrung by having tiny caps. I think that would work fairly well, although I might shove it to level 7 and raise the cap still further. *shrug*
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Maybe our difference of oppinion comes from my view that a total potential power like that stoneskin kan absorb 150 points of damage makes it a lot stronger. Also duration has a lot to say in my view, and indeed number of targets. Thats why I plead for 3rd level, even though that 50 points are a lot. its one target and for a very short duration.

    I do agree thought that other level 3 spells are weak, but they have their strengths.

    It did take me a long time to design the spell, because I thought it was difficult to get the powerword shield basic idea down on paper in a d20 game.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    I'd still consider that a fourth-level spell, but it's rather closer than the current form, at any rate.
    As a third level spell that's 19 temp hp (basically), +3/level, capping at 40 HP at 10th.

    I think that's notably weaker than Stoneskin overall. Sure, there are lots of types of damage besides physical, but a significant portion of the damage you take is physical.

    Stoneskin at 7th level blocks 70 damage, 10 at a time. It lasts for 10 min/level, so that can work over multiple combats. It blocks 100hp at 10th level and 150hp of damage at 15th level.

    This would block 25hp of damage at 7th, though there's no limit. Still, that's almost 1/3 of the same total blocking power. It would last for 1 round/level, so it is really only good for one fight. Even at max power, 40HP is nice, but not stellar. Stoneskin is definitely a far superior spell overall, in no small part due to the duration.

    Compare to Cure Serious Wounds. That heals 3d8+1/level (max +15). So that's an average of 18.5 at 5th level. At 10th level it it is only 23.5, but that's HP that doesn't go away once healed, whereas the above protection only lasts for mere rounds.

    Compared to Protection from Energy, it is about 1/4 as effective and lasts for a much, much shorter time. That seems a pretty fair trade for protecting against a lot more things.

    Compare to Aid, generally I don't think this is considered a very good spell. It has an average of 9.5 HP at level 5, and 14.5 at level 10. But it also gives a +1 attack/fear saves. It lasts for minutes, so you can more easily cast it ahead of time. Dropping that bonus is worth at least another 1d8 hp, I'd think. Dropping the bonus, upping the level by 1, and reducing the duration should be worth 1d8+1/level hp or so, I think. 2d8+2/level is a bit worse than 10+3/level, though aid isn't a very good spell.

    Hmm, that said. If we made it so damage was reduced from this shield before any other effect (Protection From Energy, Resistances, Damage Reduction, Hardness, etc), then that would weaken in a good bit. I think this should be done.

    I grant this is a bit hard to judge. There aren't many defensive spells that block damage or provide temp HP. Still, 10+3/level (max +30) for 1 round/level is pretty weak.

    And I think 5/level (max 50) requiring a move action to maintain is another route. The loss of mobility alone without giving up a standard action is absolutely huge.

    Another option, which the OP doesn't like, would be having the spell give Hardness (which does protect against all damage sources). Hardness 5 or Hardness 10 with a damage cap of 5/level (max 5) would be another way to really weaken it. Again, the duration would be a major limiting factor here.

    I know the OP likes the idea of an extra-short duration. But I want to emphasize that 1 round/level is probably for the best. Shorter doesn't do much but make it more annoying to keep track of.

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Tvtyrant View Post
    It is really good and excessively abusable while only effect ting a single target, so it joins the ranks of polymorph. I would make it multi target, 10-20 temp HP and DR 5/escalating requirement (magic, adamantine, nothing.)
    DR 5 for a spell that is being gotten at level 5 at it's earliest? It's not the only thing that is being given mind you, but DR 5 stopped mattering at level 1.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Tanuki Tales View Post
    DR 5 for a spell that is being gotten at level 5 at it's earliest? It's not the only thing that is being given mind you, but DR 5 stopped mattering at level 1.
    I don't know about that. A Brown bear does 26 average damage on a full attack (8+8+10) and it is reduced down to 11 by this. More than half of the damage reduced.

    I suppose you could make it a percentile reduced instead of a flat amount; that would make it work better at higher levels and stack with other defenses better. A Tarrasque does about 90 damage a round, so we could make it a 30% of all damage reduced spell to get it to 60.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Glyphstone View Post
    Vibranium: If it was on the periodic table, its chemical symbol would be "Bs".

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Tvtyrant View Post
    I don't know about that. A Brown bear does 26 average damage on a full attack (8+8+10) and it is reduced down to 11 by this. More than half of the damage reduced.

    I suppose you could make it a percentile reduced instead of a flat amount; that would make it work better at higher levels and stack with other defenses better. A Tarrasque does about 90 damage a round, so we could make it a 30% of all damage reduced spell to get it to 60.
    The flaw here is you're using unoptimized statted monsters to base your math.

    Let's go with a semi-optimized beatstick using the following assumptions:

    • 18 base in Strength.
    • +2 racial bonus
    • Two-handing a longsword
    • Level 1 Warrior


    So, on a successful attack roll you're looking at 8 to 15 damage on a regular hit, with the average being 11 damage. On a critical hit, that changes to 16 to 30 damage, with the average now being 22 damage. Even on the lowest roll for the die, we're already outpacing DR 5.


    Let's optimize a little more, shall we?

    • 18 base in Strength.
    • +4 racial bonus (Orc)
    • Two-handing a longsword
    • Level 1 Fighter (Power Attack and Weapon Focus for feats)


    So now, on a successful attack roll, you're looking at 13 to 20 damage on a regular hit, with average damage being 16. On a critical hit, that changes to 26 to 40 damage, with the average damage being 32. DR 5 maybe just stopped you from dying, but you better make the next round count.



    Now, finally, let's make a few unlikely but still potentially plausible optimization tweaks.

    • 18 base in Strength
    • +4 racial bonus (Orc)
    • Two-handing a +1 bastard sword (either large bastard sword or assuming magic gear re-sizes)
    • Level 1 Fighter (Exotic weapon prof, Power Attack and Weapon Focus as feats)
    • Mitigated Flaw
    • Under the effects of an Enlarge Person spell


    This is one bad Orc taking a swing at our DR sporting test dum...sorry, "character". The damage he's bringing to the table is 16 to 30, with the average being 23 damage on that nasty hit. If he happens to get a critical? Well, now we're looking at 32 to 60 damage, with average being 46. DR 5 meant nothing to this ambitious first level Orc Warlord and his potion or tribal shaman.

    Now, I know assuming he'd have a +1 weapon may be stretching belief some, but keep in mind that only added 1 damage on average, 2 on a crit. He doesn't even need it for size purposes, since the Enlarge Person takes care of that.


    Edit:

    I'm personally testing a fusion of old DR/ER and Next's concept of Resistance right now. You subtract the initial value (the old DR/ER value) from the damage and then cut the rest in half.
    Last edited by Tanuki Tales; 2013-12-04 at 07:54 PM.

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by Tanuki Tales View Post
    The flaw here is you're using unoptimized statted monsters to base your math.
    No, really? That's clearly completely unreasonable, since no one ever plays with monsters right out of the MM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Protective Spell a la WoW

    Quote Originally Posted by TuggyNE View Post
    No, really? That's clearly completely unreasonable, since no one ever plays with monsters right out of the MM.
    We can play this game if you want.

    Yes, because all that matters is how the game designers made the game and intended it to be played. Damage Reduction is so hard to deal with; a party is sure lucky to have its blaster wizard to help them take care of those difficult beasties that are practically insurmountable to the big, strong, party fighter.

    Seriously, this is the homebrew subforum. If you want to design things that adhere to the original design philosophies of 3.X and that's your goal, more power to you. But a lot of 3.X is flawed from the ground up (shocker) and it's disingenuous to not do better when your goal is to improve where the design team failed or at least admit that you didn't know that aspect of the game is flawed and may need improvement (and either you don't want to improve it or need to consider improving it).

    Edit:

    And you know what, your snark is really not called for since a Level 1 Human warrior with half intelligent stat allocation and item choice is not something that people who just plop open the MM and pull stuff out would find strange throwing at a bog standard group.

    Edit Edit:

    Even the second example Orc is something realistically facing seriously vanilla groups.


    Edit Edit Edit:

    I also just looked up the Brown Bear and, on average, it actually deals 35 damage, not 26: Claw 1 is 12 damage (4.5 plus 8, rounded down), Claw 2 is 12 damage (4.5 plus 8, rounded down), and Bite is 11 (7 plus 4).
    Last edited by Tanuki Tales; 2013-12-04 at 08:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •