New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 8 of 32 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 240 of 941
  1. - Top - End - #211
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by SavageWombat View Post
    Even in a Lawful society, replacing a feudal lord on competence grounds was harder than it would be today. It falls under "not done" territory. I suspect that Hinjo could have done it with the backing of the generals or other nobles, but no one outside the direct succession.
    Furthering that point, while Shojo was outwardly senile, we have little reason to believe that his apparent senility extended to how he governed the city. The word eccentric might apply better to how he acted.
    “Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”

  2. - Top - End - #212
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Bulldog Psion's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Treated unfairly? Yes, kind of. But you can't have a "tragic fall" story without that happening. So, yes, she was treated unfairly, but she had to be. And the story wouldn't have been as interesting if she hadn't.
    Spoiler
    Show

    So the song runs on, with shift and change,
    Through the years that have no name,
    And the late notes soar to a higher range,
    But the theme is still the same.
    Man's battle-cry and the guns' reply
    Blend in with the old, old rhyme
    That was traced in the score of the strata marks
    While millenniums winked like campfire sparks
    Down the winds of unguessed time. -- 4th Stanza, The Bad Lands, Badger Clark

  3. - Top - End - #213
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    RangerGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by orrion View Post
    It's a Smite. By definition it's supposed to be MORE lethal to the things you use it on than whatever else you choose.
    Or just do more damage. Again, I see nothing that says you can't smite with a nonlethal attack.
    Dude, sarcasm. Seriously, the ":P" wasn't enough to give that away?
    Apparently not.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    Still, it was pretty clear that, by all appearances, Shojo was unfit for duty. To everyone in Azure City, he seemed pretty clearly insane. I would imagine the only reason that he didn't get replaced is that the nobles found that having an insane ruler made it easier for them to carry on with their schemes and that a more rational person might put a stop to their plotting.
    He wasn't insane, just a bit senile. Why would the nobles want to replace him, when all he needs is the proper "guidance"?

    There's no reason at all to remove Shojo, particularly when the replacement waiting in line is the far more competent and less manipulable Hinjo (at least by appearances)?

  4. - Top - End - #214
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Keltest View Post
    Furthering that point, while Shojo was outwardly senile, we have little reason to believe that his apparent senility extended to how he governed the city. The word eccentric might apply better to how he acted.
    I doubt he would have been all that much better at government. If someone noticed the discrepancy between how he acted in public and how well he was able to govern I don't think his facade would have lasted very long. And it was more than just eccentricity, since Hinjo described it as a "mental affliction". He was probably only an okay ruler, or at least not one bad enough to be removed.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  5. - Top - End - #215
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    It occurs to me that it is, at best, problematic for any members of an order of paladins to take orders from a source they do not consider sane.

    Never mind the fact that it was Miko, never mind the fact that to what extent she did not obey the orders she disobeyed them to be harsher than ordered, never mind the fact that Shojo was (unknown to all the paladins) faking it: the fact that the members of the Sapphire Guard were willing to go to another country and in any way bother people who had never heard of them on the orders of a nonsapient housecat was indicative of something deeply wrong with the Sapphire Guard. Shojo's deception should have resulted in the Sapphire Guard effectively ceasing to pay any attention whatsoever to his orders, as soon as it became "clear" to them that he was insane.

  6. - Top - End - #216
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by UsaSatsui View Post
    He wasn't insane, just a bit senile. Why would the nobles want to replace him, when all he needs is the proper "guidance"?

    There's no reason at all to remove Shojo, particularly when the replacement waiting in line is the far more competent and less manipulable Hinjo (at least by appearances)?
    That's pretty much what I said.
    having an insane ruler made it easier for them to carry on with their schemes and that a more rational person might put a stop to their plotting.
    Also, mental senility or dementia can be described as insane, so saying he wasn't insane, just a little insane doesn't make much sense.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  7. - Top - End - #217
    Troll in the Playground
     
    David Argall's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    La Puente, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by FujinAkari View Post
    can we please stop pretending that Miko had orders from Shojo not to kill the Order? Those orders quite explicitly came from Mr. Scruffy, whom Miko has sworn no oaths to obey :P
    While the reason is invalid, the point is correct. Miko did not have orders not to kill the order. She merely had order to try not to, which, when given to the cop on the scene who can't be supervised, is pretty much meaningless. The cop has to make the call and is not restricted by orders that essentially say "use your best judgement."
    Any fault here belongs to Shojo, who knew of Miko's ways and still sent her on the mission. Nor was there any hurry or need as far as he knew. X might have stayed inactive for a decade or more. He was the one who framed them as criminal. Since he sent paladins to investigate the destruction of the previous gate, he could also send them to investigate this destruction, and/or to gather witnesses such as the Order. It would have been inconvenient to his plans possibly, but as it was, he pretty much set them up.
    But Miko has been thru this probably several times before. She has been told to go arrest Jones, and when she reported back that Jones had resisted arrest and was then killed, she was told to go and arrest Smith. [Not text of course, but do you see anything in text that makes you doubt this is what happened?] She had solid reason to deem words about "try hard to bring them in alive" to be close to meaningless and the efforts she made with the order fully satisfied her orders.

  8. - Top - End - #218
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2011

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Okay, first things first. There seems to be a lot of confusion about Miko's obligation here, so let's check the source.

    Shojo: Mr. Scruffy says that you should try hard to bring them back alive for trial.
    Miko: As your cat wishes, Master, if it is possible.

    She has agreed to the orders, so she is obligated to obey. But the orders are not to bring them back alive at all costs. They are to try hard to bring them back alive. These orders absolutely include the leeway to kill some or all of them, if it turns out that bringing them back alive is not realistically feasible.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    My point is that Miko was in the wrong to attack them. Whether it results from disobedience (which, even if she assumes that the Order could identify her, is still occuring), is not the main point.
    It may not be important to you, but intentional disobedience vs. gross incompetence is a difference that will determine whether she falls in veti's campaign, so it's well worth considering. If you and I can agree that incompetence is at least a plausible reason for her screw up, then we don't have to hash out whether it was the actual reason or not, if you don't want to.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    It occurs to me that it is, at best, problematic for any members of an order of paladins to take orders from a source they do not consider sane.
    For a Lawful person, there's some value in supporting the command structure for its own sake. As long as his orders aren't hurting anything, that perceived benefit can outweigh a pretty good amount of embarrassment or inconvenience.

    EDIT:
    Quote Originally Posted by David Argall View Post
    But Miko has been thru this probably several times before. She has been told to go arrest Jones, and when she reported back that Jones had resisted arrest and was then killed, she was told to go and arrest Smith. [Not text of course, but do you see anything in text that makes you doubt this is what happened?]
    Yes. The fact that she jumped straight to "my blades will be bathed in the blood of those responsible" rather than something more like "alive or dead?" suggests she doesn't get told to bring them in alive often, if at all.
    Last edited by theNater; 2014-04-23 at 11:47 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #219
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    But she didn't try very hard. Of the course of a round, she jumped from surrender to attack. Her attempts at diplomacy were non-existent and she didn't even try to subdue Roy.

    I will agree with David Argall that Shojo should have made better efforts when framing his orders so that Miko would not have the leeway that she interpreted in his statement and that he probably shouldn't have sent her out. However, fault still falls on Miko for assuming that this situation would be identical to all others and, as I said before, for not even trying to follow Shojo's wishes. Also, the fault falls on Miko, in this hypothetical situation, for being so willing to kill those resisting arrest. The commands of her superiors shouldn't be the only things restraining her.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  10. - Top - End - #220
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    RangerGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    Also, mental senility or dementia can be described as insane, so saying he wasn't insane, just a little insane doesn't make much sense.
    Simply having a mental illness does not make you "insane". There is no actual medical definition of the term, it's a legal term, and it means your mental state is at a point where you can't function in society or tell right from wrong. Shojo, assuming he actually was senile, is not even close to that point. Maybe he couldn't be the most effective ruler, but hey, those are the breaks in a society with hereditary rule.
    Quote Originally Posted by David Argall View Post
    Any fault here belongs to Shojo, who knew of Miko's ways and still sent her on the mission. Nor was there any hurry or need as far as he knew.
    This is a very good point. It is semi-justified in that Miko is likely the only Sapphire Guard member who is an effective tracker, and it's made pretty clear that she gets chosen for field missions frequently because she's kind of a pain in the ass. But Shojo absolutely knew about Miko's over-zealousness and it doesn't take much to conclude that Miko would try to kill the people he really, really needed to bring in (or even that they might kill her). This was probably a two-Paladin job, and honestly, by sending a second Paladin to assist, maybe all this could have been avoided.

  11. - Top - End - #221

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    She had no indication from Shojo that the people she was after were anything other than ruthless terrorists.
    She had multiple witnesses accounts of various atrocities that the people she was after had committed recently.
    She even had Detect Evil confirmation that the leader was strongly evil aligned.

    The existence of extremely bad luck does not imply that she did not take reasonable precautions to determine guilt.

  12. - Top - End - #222
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by UsaSatsui View Post
    Simply having a mental illness does not make you "insane". There is no actual medical definition of the term, it's a legal term, and it means your mental state is at a point where you can't function in society or tell right from wrong. Shojo, assuming he actually was senile, is not even close to that point. Maybe he couldn't be the most effective ruler, but hey, those are the breaks in a society with hereditary rule.
    I would say that Shojo would have difficulty functioning in society if he actually was like how he pretended to be. However, I will concede that calling him insane is a little extreme. Your last point I agree with.

    Edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by Koo Rehtorb View Post
    She had no indication from Shojo that the people she was after were anything other than ruthless terrorists.
    She had multiple witnesses accounts of various atrocities that the people she was after had committed recently.
    She even had Detect Evil confirmation that the leader was strongly evil aligned.

    The existence of extremely bad luck does not imply that she did not take reasonable precautions to determine guilt.
    And I say that those precautions were not enough. First, Shojo did no such thing. All he told Miko was the Redmountain Gate had been destroyed and that Miko knew what needed to be done (she didn't apparently, given Shojo's look of surprise, but that's besides the point. Shojo should have definitely been more specific here, but he didn't cal the Order "ruthless terrorists"). Then, when Miko was collecting witnesses, she never bothered to see the Order's side of the story or to confirm those witnesses*. Finally, the Detect Evil spell, as shown, is not the best way to determine the guilt of someone.

    *I'd like to point out how Miko continues to state that Shojo ordered the Order's execution, despite him having done no such thing.
    Last edited by Jaxzan Proditor; 2014-04-23 at 12:30 PM.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  13. - Top - End - #223
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by David Argall View Post
    While the reason is invalid, the point is correct. Miko did not have orders not to kill the order. She merely had order to try not to, which, when given to the cop on the scene who can't be supervised, is pretty much meaningless. The cop has to make the call and is not restricted by orders that essentially say "use your best judgement."
    Ok, but she didn't "try not to" at all. Even when Roy stopped actively fighting her and the rest of the Order was subdued, she still decided to go for the kill.

    Any fault here belongs to Shojo, who knew of Miko's ways and still sent her on the mission. Nor was there any hurry or need as far as he knew. X might have stayed inactive for a decade or more. He was the one who framed them as criminal. Since he sent paladins to investigate the destruction of the previous gate, he could also send them to investigate this destruction, and/or to gather witnesses such as the Order. It would have been inconvenient to his plans possibly, but as it was, he pretty much set them up.
    What do you mean there was no hurry or need? Shojo knew 2 of the 5 gates holding a world-eating and god-killing monstrosity (as far as he knew) were down. Of course there was reason to hurry.

  14. - Top - End - #224
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    RangerGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    I would say that Shojo would have difficulty functioning in society if he actually was like how he pretended to be. However, I will concede that calling him insane is a little extreme. Your last point I agree with.
    He thought his cat was talking to him, and he occasionally took political advice from it. That's about the only outward sign of dementia he shows. And it's harmless. A little embarrassing to the state, maybe, but harmless.

    It's not really about the delusion, it's about the behavior. "Mr. Scruffy thinks these people should have a fair trial" is very different from "Mr. Scruffy thinks we should develop nuclear weapons and use them on our enemies". One's quirky, the other is a serious problem.

  15. - Top - End - #225
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by UsaSatsui View Post
    He thought his cat was talking to him, and he occasionally took political advice from it. That's about the only outward sign of dementia he shows. And it's harmless. A little embarrassing to the state, maybe, but harmless.

    It's not really about the delusion, it's about the behavior. "Mr. Scruffy thinks these people should have a fair trial" is very different from "Mr. Scruffy thinks we should develop nuclear weapons and use them on our enemies". One's quirky, the other is a serious problem.
    Fair enough. I can agree with that.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  16. - Top - End - #226
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2011

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by David Argall View Post
    Miko did not have orders not to kill the order. She merely had order to try not to...
    Ooh, that's subtle; so subtle I missed it the first time around.

    Miko was not directed to try not to kill the Order. She was directed to try to bring them back alive. In reality, that's the same thing, but in a world where Raise Dead exists, it's not.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    But she didn't try very hard. Of the course of a round, she jumped from surrender to attack. Her attempts at diplomacy were non-existent and she didn't even try to subdue Roy.
    It's true that by any objective measure, her attempts to take them peacefully were laughably feeble. But given her social and psychological shortcomings, they may have been the best she could do.

    As for subduing Roy, attacking someone until their HP are in negative numbers is one of the traditional ways of subduing people in D&D. Note that beating him into unconsciousness is more feasible for Miko than for most characters, because she can heal him a bit to keep him from bleeding to death.
    Quote Originally Posted by Koo Rehtorb View Post
    She even had Detect Evil confirmation that the leader was strongly evil aligned.
    I just want to clarify for those who may not be familiar with D&D rules: a creature which reads as strongly Evil is either extremely high level(like, near Xykon's level) or bolstered by supernatural powers. Creatures which give off such a reading may be much more dangerous than they otherwise appear.

    Note that Xykon himself would give off an even greater reading, due to being both high level and bolstered by supernatural powers.

  17. - Top - End - #227
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by theNater View Post
    Ooh, that's subtle; so subtle I missed it the first time around.

    Miko was not directed to try not to kill the Order. She was directed to try to bring them back alive. In reality, that's the same thing, but in a world where Raise Dead exists, it's not.

    It's true that by any objective measure, her attempts to take them peacefully were laughably feeble. But given her social and psychological shortcomings, they may have been the best she could do.

    As for subduing Roy, attacking someone until their HP are in negative numbers is one of the traditional ways of subduing people in D&D. Note that beating him into unconsciousness is more feasible for Miko than for most characters, because she can heal him a bit to keep him from bleeding to death.

    I just want to clarify for those who may not be familiar with D&D rules: a creature which reads as strongly Evil is either extremely high level(like, near Xykon's level) or bolstered by supernatural powers. Creatures which give off such a reading may be much more dangerous than they otherwise appear.

    Note that Xykon himself would give off an even greater reading, due to being both high level and bolstered by supernatural powers.
    Ok, but even if Roy tested "strongly evil," Miko scanned Roy, Durkon, and Elan. Roy shows Evil (presumably Lawful), Durkon shows Lawful Good, and Elan shows Chaotic Good. More information required is what I would have thought.

  18. - Top - End - #228
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by theNater View Post
    It's true that by any objective measure, her attempts to take them peacefully were laughably feeble. But given her social and psychological shortcomings, they may have been the best she could do.
    Well then, I would say that being unable to make any sort if diplomatic attempts is another large flaw of Miko's. She still didn't seem to try very hard, regardless of whether that was a result of how little she cared to follow commands or how little she was able.

    As for subduing Roy, attacking someone until their HP are in negative numbers is one of the traditional ways of subduing people in D&D. Note that beating him into unconsciousness is more feasible for Miko than for most characters, because she can heal him a bit to keep him from bleeding to death.
    She was most assuredly not trying to subdue. Her intent was to kill, as expressed by her saying "Die, evildoer!!" and "I execute you for crimes against existence!". I doubt she would have tried to Resurrect* him either, as that wouldn't make this much of an execution.

    *Paladins cannot cast Raise Dead or the like, and given their distance from any Clerics at this point it is unlikely they would find any in time to cast it. I would like to point out that coming back from the dead is hardly costless, since (for resurrection) you lose a level, plus the 10,000gp of diamonds lost by the caster. Also, there is no guarantee that all of the Order (especially Belkar) would want to come back to face justice, like Shojo.
    Last edited by Jaxzan Proditor; 2014-04-23 at 01:40 PM.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  19. - Top - End - #229
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by orrion View Post
    Ok, but even if Roy tested "strongly evil," Miko scanned Roy, Durkon, and Elan. Roy shows Evil (presumably Lawful), Durkon shows Lawful Good, and Elan shows Chaotic Good. More information required is what I would have thought.
    No, Detect Evil only detects, well, evil. You'd need Detect good to know that half (2-thirds when the crown wasn't on Roy) of the Order is Good. Miko made the not unreasonable assumption that Durkon and Elan were Roy's unscrupulous but not evil accomplices. considering Miko didn't know which member of the order destroyed the gate, she probably assumed Roy was the culprit.

    Granted, "One person pinged 'Evil' on my radar!" isn't reason enough to attack, but, then again, that's one of Miko's biggest problems- She's too quick to jump to conclusions.
    Last edited by Squark; 2014-04-23 at 02:17 PM.
    Steam ID: The Great Squark
    3ds Friend Code: 4571-1588-1000

    Currently Playing: Warhammer 40000, Hades, Stellaris, Warframe

  20. - Top - End - #230
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Squark View Post
    No, Detect Evil only detects, well, evil. You'd need Detect good to know that half (2-thirds when the crown wasn't on Roy) of the Order is Good. Miko made the not unreasonable assumption that Durkon and Elan were Roy's unscrupulous but not evil accomplices.

    Granted, "One person pinged 'Evil' on my radar!" isn't reason enough to attack, but, then again, that's one of Miko's biggest problems- She's too quick to jump to conclusions.
    Yes, this is the main thing that I don't like about Miko's use of detect evil: she used it to jump to the conclusion that everyone on the Order was evil or at least working with evil without trying to make certain this was true. Plus the jumping to conclusions thing.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  21. - Top - End - #231
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2011

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by orrion View Post
    Ok, but even if Roy tested "strongly evil," Miko scanned Roy, Durkon, and Elan. Roy shows Evil (presumably Lawful), Durkon shows Lawful Good, and Elan shows Chaotic Good. More information required is what I would have thought.
    Detect Evil is not Know Alignment. It does not reveal the target's position on the Law-Chaos axis, and it does not distinguish between Neutral and Good on the Good-Evil axis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    Well then, I would say that being unable to make any sort if diplomatic attempts is another large flaw of Miko's.
    Yes it is.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    She still didn't seem to try very hard, regardless of whether that was a result of how little she cared to follow commands or how little she was able.
    Again, we don't have to argue about the whys if you don't want to. You seem to be alternating between not caring as to the whys and wanting to prove it's not because she was unable, which is confusing me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    She was most assuredly not trying to subdue. Her intent was to kill, as expressed by her saying "Die, evildoer!!" and "I execute you for crimes against existence!".
    Indeed. She may have concluded he is too dangerous to be taken alive, given how far she'd have to drag him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    I doubt she would have tried to Resurrect* him either, as that wouldn't make this much of an execution.
    It is not clear how final an execution has to be, in a world with resurrection. We can't conclude that she must intend his death to be permanent.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    Paladins cannot cast Raise Dead or the like, and given their distance from any Clerics at this point it is unlikely they would find any in time to cast it.
    The town they left on the way to the forest had a temple to Freya in it. The gentleman manning it is probably a Cleric. Azure City also has clerics who can cast Resurrection, which can work on someone who's been dead for years.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    I would like to point out that coming back from the dead is hardly costless, since (for resurrection) you lose a level, plus the 10,000gp of diamonds lost by the caster.
    So? She isn't even encouraged to bring them back with all their class levels, or unharmed, or anything. She would presumably pay for the diamonds out of her stipend(or loot confiscated from Roy's corpse).
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    Also, there is no guarantee that all of the Order (especially Belkar) would want to come back to face justice, like Shojo.
    Firstly, you've jumped from "she tried to kill Roy" to "she would obviously kill every member of the Order", and secondly you've forgotten Xykon's "anything to avoid the big fire below" speech. Shojo, of course, was not at any risk of the big fire below, as he was Good.

  22. - Top - End - #232
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by theNater View Post
    Indeed. She may have concluded he is too dangerous to be taken alive, given how far she'd have to drag him.
    This had nothing to do with how she wanted to capture him. She was explicitly executing him.

    It is not clear how final an execution has to be, in a world with resurrection. We can't conclude that she must intend his death to be permanent.
    I don't see why she would execute him only to resurrect him to possibly execute him again.

    The town they left on the way to the forest had a temple to Freya in it. The gentleman manning it is probably a Cleric. Azure City also has clerics who can cast Resurrection, which can work on someone who's been dead for years.
    The town was far away enough at this point that it might as well be Azure City that they travel to.

    So? She isn't even encouraged to bring them back with all their class levels, or unharmed, or anything. She would presumably pay for the diamonds out of her stipend(or loot confiscated from Roy's corpse).
    Roy wouldn't have 10,000gp of diamonds on him, which is a theoretically high price. It is certainly one that Miko couldn't pay of she could barely afford that inn. My point is that even in this world where Raise Dead exists, there are still costs to killing your prisoners and then raising them.

    Firstly, you've jumped from "she tried to kill Roy" to "she would obviously kill every member of the Order", and secondly you've forgotten Xykon's "anything to avoid the big fire below" speech. Shojo, of course, was not at any risk of the big fire below, as he was Good.
    I don't see why she would stop at Roy. At the very least, she would presumably move onto Belkar, yet another evildoer. Are you trying to say that Belkar has the same knowledge and goals as Xykon?

    Edit: My overall goal in this part of the discussion is to show that Milo messed up in her first confrontation with the Order.
    Last edited by Jaxzan Proditor; 2014-04-23 at 02:44 PM.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  23. - Top - End - #233
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Toledo, Ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Let's put Miko's actions in a more familiar context.

    Chief: An important installation was destroyed, this is who we think did it. Take care of it.

    Cop: I'll kill them all.

    Chief: No, bring them in for trial.

    Cop: As you wish.


    Cop: I'm looking for this group.

    Witness: They're over there.

    Cop: DEAD OR ALIVE YOU ARE COMING WITH ME

    Party: What? Who are you, and what are you talking about? I have no reason to go with you.

    Cop: YOU HAVE CHOSEN "DEAD".

    Such a reasonable way to deal with the situation.

  24. - Top - End - #234

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnoman View Post
    Let's put Miko's actions in a more familiar context.

    Chief: An important installation was destroyed, this is who we think did it. Take care of it.

    Cop: I'll kill them all.

    Chief: No, bring them in for trial.

    Cop: As you wish.


    Cop: I'm looking for this group.

    Witness: They're over there.

    Cop: DEAD OR ALIVE YOU ARE COMING WITH ME

    Party: What? Who are you, and what are you talking about? I have no reason to go with you.

    Cop: YOU HAVE CHOSEN "DEAD".

    Such a reasonable way to deal with the situation.
    Chief: These people blew up a dam, the resulting flooding threatens a sizable metropolitan area.
    Cop: I'll kill them all.
    Chief: Try to bring them in alive if you can.
    Cop: I'm looking for these people.
    Witness: They're over there. Also they're guilty of blowing up the dam, kidnapping, and multiple counts of murder.
    *cop confronts armed and dangerous criminals, alone*

  25. - Top - End - #235
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    May 2009

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    It occurs to me that it is, at best, problematic for any members of an order of paladins to take orders from a source they do not consider sane.
    Whatever the answer to that conundrum is, I would assume it's something that the Sapphire Guard had considered and reached a decision about long, long before it became an issue in this case. Let's imagine senior members of the SG getting together, and discussing whether they should continue to take orders from Shojo/Mr Scruffy.

    Maybe they considered the orders, rather than the manner in which they were delivered, and found that they were still quite sound. Maybe they just accepted their duty to take the orders in blind faith, and would continue to do so unless they became physically or morally impossible. Maybe they used some sort of magical divination to seek guidance from the Twelve Gods on whether they should replace Shojo, and got the answer "no". We don't know.

    But whatever happened, it happened years ago. It's not something that was new in this scenario, and required Miko to make up new policy on the fly.
    "None of us likes to be hated, none of us likes to be shunned. A natural result of these conditions is, that we consciously or unconsciously pay more attention to tuning our opinions to our neighbor’s pitch and preserving his approval than we do to examining the opinions searchingly and seeing to it that they are right and sound." - Mark Twain

  26. - Top - End - #236
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Israel

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koo Rehtorb View Post
    Chief: These people blew up a dam, the resulting flooding threatens a sizable metropolitan area.
    Cop: I'll kill them all.
    Chief: Try to bring them in alive if you can.
    Cop: I'm looking for these people.
    Witness: They're over there. Also they're guilty of blowing up the dam, kidnapping, and multiple counts of murder.
    *cop confronts armed and dangerous criminals, alone*
    Cop goes to criminals:

    Cop: You are coming with me or you die.

    Criminals: On what claims?

    Cop: Die!

  27. - Top - End - #237

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by super dark33 View Post
    Cop goes to criminals:

    Cop: You are coming with me or you die.

    Criminals: On what claims?

    Cop: Die!
    I don't find that particularly unreasonable? The criminals presumably know that they're guilty of multiple crimes and any attempts at denying it are likely an effort to stall for time while they get ready to murder you or flee the scene. These aren't petty criminals that you're arresting for shoplifting.

    Miko really just had extraordinarily bad luck that all the evidence pointed in precisely the wrong direction.
    Last edited by Koo Rehtorb; 2014-04-23 at 04:49 PM.

  28. - Top - End - #238
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koo Rehtorb View Post
    I don't find that particularly unreasonable? The criminals presumably know that they're guilty of multiple crimes and any attempts at denying it are likely an effort to stall for time while they get ready to murder you or flee the scene. These aren't petty criminals that you're arresting for shoplifting.

    Miko really just had extraordinarily bad luck that all the evidence pointed in precisely the wrong direction.
    The cop should at least identify themselves as such. Otherwise it looks like a random stranger is telling you to come with them, in which case protesting is quite reasonable.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

  29. - Top - End - #239

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaxzan Proditor View Post
    The cop should at least identify themselves as such. Otherwise it looks like a random stranger is telling you to come with them, in which case protesting is quite reasonable.
    Well I agree that something like "FREEZE, POLICE(paladin)!" would probably have been the most correct way to go about it. That's really a pretty minor quibble, though, and easily something overlooked by someone who isn't used to following correct police procedure for arresting people.

  30. - Top - End - #240
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Skyron, Andromeda
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Was Miko treated unfairly by the narrative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koo Rehtorb View Post
    Well I agree that something like "FREEZE, POLICE(paladin)!" would probably have been the most correct way to go about it. That's really a pretty minor quibble, though, and easily something overlooked by someone who isn't used to following correct police procedure for arresting people.
    Not really a minor quibble, as it alters the reaction of the targets. And Miko, being the person who usually goes on assignments like this, should know what the proper procedure is.


    Peelee’s Lotsey

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •