Results 1,051 to 1,080 of 1522
-
2014-07-21, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Winnipeg, Canada
- Gender
-
2014-07-21, 05:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- South Korea
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 486
I can't say I've looked at every possibility, but with a cursory glance at the X stat to Y bonus thread, I don't see anything that would. Your best bet would be using something to use Dexterity on your Strength checks, as bull rush uses opposing Strength checks to determine success. I can't think of anything that would do this off the top of my head, however. There's also a warblade ability that allows you to use your Intelligence modifier on bull rush checks.“Sometimes, immersed in his books, there would come to him
the awareness of all that he did not know, of all that he had not read;
and the serenity for which he labored was shattered as he realized the
little time he had in life to read so much, to learn what he had to know.”
~Stoner, John Williams~
My Homebrew (Most Recent) | Forum Rules
/veɪnoɚ/
-
2014-07-21, 11:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q507
With the spell longshot(+10),ranged weapon mastery(+20),(+120) range weapon, Far Shot (1.5),Distance enhancement (x2),hawkeye ( x2), + crossbow sight (treats enemies a +2 range increment closer past first two)
Would I result with a 675 foot range increment with these things and would it result in 8100 feet at the 12 increment it gives?
I see nothing in the spells or anything in general saying these don't stack.Last edited by Platymus Pus; 2014-07-21 at 11:11 PM.
-
2014-07-22, 02:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 508
Do you have to take druid as your base class for the walker in the waste adaption (sandstorm p.93)?
(I'm asking because it says "a militant druid")
-
2014-07-22, 04:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 508 Ask your DM.
The Adaptation section is about altering the class to support a different character concept. Because that paragraph merely mentions the idea rather than specifying the differences in terms of rule language, the full changes would have to be worked out with your DM.
-
2014-07-22, 05:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 509
The Silver Marches Peerless Archer PrC's second level ablity 'Sharp Shooting' makes it so that targets receive "concealment one step worse than they should", which in 3.5 language simply means 10% less concealment. Everything that counts as a target -so literally everything- gets 10% less concealment at all times.
When combined with Improved Precise shot, this appears to let you ignore all concealment for ranged attacks; but how does this ability (be it by itself or combined with Improved Precise Shot) affect your capacity to function under conditions where you would by impeded by total concealment, like being in complete darkness without darkvision, being otherwise blinded, or being in the presence of an invisible opponent?
TL;DR: Does Peerless Archer 2 effectively give you mega-awesome super-vision?
Edit: Starting to feel like I'm posting here way to frequentlyLast edited by Jowgen; 2014-07-22 at 05:37 AM.
-
2014-07-22, 07:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q510
I think i can use Alacritous Cogitation to cast metamagic spells which dont exceed 1 full round, am i right?
-
2014-07-22, 09:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- TRAINTIEDUPHELP
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 511
Is vision obscured while you are in lava? Assuming immunity to damage.Just finding my roots again.
-
2014-07-22, 10:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A510
Re-read the feat, you can only cast spells that have a cast time of up to 1 round. So, it can take more than a full round action, but no more than 1 round.
-
2014-07-22, 10:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 511 Yes.
Vision is obscured whenever you're immersed in the ground, and that doesn't change if the ground exceeds its melting temperature.
-
2014-07-22, 01:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 29 or 512
Are melee/ranged touch attacks subsets of melee/ranged attacks? Or more specifically can Wall of Blades be used to parry rays and other abilities that require a melee/ranged touch attack?
Q 513
Can Wall of Blades be used if the initiator only has natural weapons?
-
2014-07-22, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 512 Yes, and yes.
The counter has no special restrictions on the attacks it can block.
A 513 No.
Unlike the open applicability to what attacks it can counter, Wall of Blades has two usage stipulations:Your weapon mastery transforms your blade into an extension of your arm, allowing you to wield it with the speed and timing needed to make a precise block.
...
When an enemy makes a melee or ranged attack against you, you can initiate this counter to oppose that attack by making an attack roll with any melee weapon you are holding.
-
2014-07-22, 02:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 514
Can a Trip/Disarm Attack be combined with the Combat Rhythm maneuver from Stormguard Warrior since they both require melee touch attacks?
If so, does the extra attack from Improved Trip count towards the number of touch attacks made (giving an extra 5 damage next round)?
-
2014-07-22, 02:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 515
Can you add special weapon/armor abilities (especially those with limited uses per day) more than once to an appropriate item? I know custom magic items are in the purview of the DM but is there anything explicit allowing or denying it?
Q 516
Does the doubling of damage on a dive attack granted by the Improved Dragon Wings Feat apply to all charge attacks if the charger has pounce or another ability to make more than one attack on the charge?Last edited by Andezzar; 2014-07-22 at 03:01 PM.
-
2014-07-22, 03:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 515
Yes, but it costs 50% more. Of course, if the enhancement in question has a +X price, you follow the usual price given in the DMG.
Originally Posted by SRD:Creating Magic Items
-
2014-07-22, 03:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 516
No. From the feat:
Originally Posted by Improved Dragon Wings
-
2014-07-22, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
-
2014-07-22, 03:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q517
Does anywhere have rules for hiring mercenaries past 1st level, and if so how much would a level 10 one cost?
-
2014-07-22, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 509 Reposting so it doesn't get lost and simplifying/condensing for convenience
If a character, through some means or another, has the ability treat all "targets" that have total concealment in regards to him as if they had 10% less concealment (giving them 40% concealment instead of 50%), does it follow that the character can ignore the "Can not see" penalties associated with total concealment?
-
2014-07-22, 10:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 517
Arms and Equipment Guide, p.66, has a fairly extensive list of different types (and levels) of mercenary hirelings, along with their daily wages.
Since this is a 3.0 book, there might be a more up to date listing, but this is the most extensive one I am aware of.
As it is not OGC, I can't post the specifics, unfortunately.Last edited by Thurbane; 2014-07-22 at 10:47 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2014-07-23, 12:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Why am I here?
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 518
Does destroying a lich's phylactery automatically destroy the lich? If not, then does the lich have the chance to make another phylactery before its body is destroyed?
-
2014-07-23, 12:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 519
When you apply a continuous damage effect to a creature - such as setting it on fire with alchemists fire or tagging it with an acid arrow spell, when does the continuous damage trigger?
-
2014-07-23, 01:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q520
When a mage creates a magic item, another character can pay the XP costs. When a mage casts a spell with an XP requirement (e.g. Wish), can another character pay the XP cost? The spell says "you must pay" but it also refers to you paying when you create or modify a magic item, and it's already RAW that another character can pay XP costs for a magic item.
-
2014-07-23, 05:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
-
2014-07-23, 05:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 520 No.
There are exceptions stipulated to the usual crafting rules for magic items, allowing cooperative effort. Unless a particular spell has a statement allowing cooperative XP expenditure, the spellcaster pays it all.
-
2014-07-23, 06:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 521
If a sorcerer chooses undying vigor of the dragonlords (from Dragon Magic) as the companion spell while casting contingency, is he allowed to sacrifice a sorcerer spell slot to increase the healing?
-
2014-07-23, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
Q 522
If a ranger wields a +1 Hunting weapon (MIC p. 36) in one hand and any other given weapon in the other, does the +4 favoured enemy damage get added to the weapon damage of both weapons he is wielding, or only the damage of the hunting weapon itself?
-
2014-07-23, 03:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 522
the bonus is added to any and all of your weapon damage rolls against your favored enemies. The rules don't even specify that you have to wield the weapon for the bonus to apply. So +1 hunting (spiked) gauntlets would also work while wielding a two-handed weapon.
-
2014-07-23, 03:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 522 Follow up
While I'm sure no sane DM would allow it, would the bonus from several hunting weapons stack with itself?
-
2014-07-23, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII
A 522 Follow-Up
The sanity of a DM is irrelevant. The stacking rules do not allow it as all hunting weapons are considered the same source.