Results 751 to 780 of 1482
-
2015-10-24, 06:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Yeah, can I get an extension on that? I've been up to my ears in other humanoid [human]s' stupidity for the past 3 days and have barely slept, and haven't had time to work on this.
-
2015-10-24, 05:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-10-26, 04:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Well, right about now I've got everything except for robotics into a "Well, I'm just about okay with this"/minimum viable product type of thing. However, robotics. Freaking robotics.
I'm also a little worried by the dearth of competitors. Anyone want to finish off their entry/put something in?
-
2015-10-26, 05:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Location
- Right behind you.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
-
2015-10-27, 03:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I have no idea of things to add and so I should fix grammar but I am really bad at that.
At the end I will probably be disqualified for bad grammar.(something with bad grammar is really bad because it makes rules impossible to understand)
-
2015-10-27, 04:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Yeah, it's kind of sad. I was hoping people would like this contest's theme. Maybe not much time?
I suppose it might be an indication that we should do a Playground-voted theme for next contest. Ideas welcome.
Disqualifying for grammar would be lame. If I get time, I'll try to read through it and give some advice. No promises on that, though, as I do have a decent amount of work coming up on my schedule (not even counting the work I have to put into my own campaign).Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-10-27, 12:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Location
- Right behind you.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
So, out of the 5 entries, 2 are incomplete(Delver has no Similitudes or Greater Secret Proficiency Abilities and Tattler doesn't have any abilities.) and the Soul of Sight is confusing. I do like the Delver but if it's not finished then oh well. But the issue here is there aren't 3 people I can vote for since I can't vote for myself and it would be nice to have 4 people to vote for so I could have some choices.
-
2015-10-29, 04:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Oh no, really? Pft, that's what I get for trusting posting from my phone on a bus. I can add them in later tonight/tomorrow if the deadline is extended. If not, well, I learned a valuable and oddly thematically appropriate lesson about trusting too much in technology.
Last edited by Zrak; 2015-10-29 at 04:07 PM.
-
2015-10-29, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
-
2015-10-29, 06:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
-
2015-10-29, 08:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I believe in all of youuuu.
Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-10-30, 06:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Channel Holy Might (Su)
Techpriests can change their spells into holy power that allows them to make more inventions. By sacrificing a spell slot, their maximum invention points increase by 1 per level of the spell plus another 1. The maximum level of spell they can sacrifice in this way equals their level minus 1. They must sacrifice excess inventions when they lose this benefit, and they lose the benefit upon recovering spells. They can get no more than twice their IL in bonus IP in this way.
So we can create a feat for crafting inventions with gold since there is a way to give a value to IP.
So I think the feat Craft invention can be created
Financed research:
When you create an invention you can use 500 times its IP value in GP to create it this invention is normal except that when you recall it you get nothing at all.
if the invention is a single use invention it costs only 50 times its IP value in GP to create.
Normal: When you do not have this feat you always spend IP for creating inventions
(This is a lot less good than the tech-priest ability since people can break the invention and it can not be repaired while a magic item can be repaired by using true-naming and stuff of this kind)
Also I through to the fact that for each rule system of this kind(like magic, initiating, incarnum and etc) there is a feat for dabbling in this domain
So one feat could be
Apprentice inventor:
You can build level 1 inventions of one domain of inventing(that you choose when you take this feat)
You also gain your int modifier in IP.
-
2015-10-30, 07:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I don't really like the idea of people spending less than the cost of an item of ability score +6 to make a permanent Soul of the Tarrasque (70 IP = 35,000 GP). By WBL 20, that entitles you to have 21 Souls of the Tarrasque following you around, plus the one you make with real IP. If you manage to dip Techpriest without losing any of your IL to cleric levels, you can have another one.
Not that the idea of some dude rocking up with twenty-two mechanical Tarrasques and nearly enough money left over to kit out an eighth-level character doesn't amuse me, it just seems mildly silly.
-
2015-10-30, 07:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
"Capable of casting 2nd-level divine spells"
Is the only cleric requirement for an inventor to become a techpriest and you can get that from just taking one level in favored soul and the feat versatile spellcaster and you can cast immediately level 2 spells(or if it does not works because of spells known just grab earth spell(and be a cleric because they are way cooler) and get spells equivalent to second level spells(But you stop being a techpriest when your feet leave the ground and that is really very funny(my book tells me what to do only when I have my feet literally on earth)) you can also just use cleric + DMM + a random meta-magic but it costs two feats(one of which can only be taken after your first cleric level)) and so take that PRC.
So you have only one dead level of invention progression and so at level 20 you still can access to level 10 inventions.
So if you put levels in techpriest and have the right to do early entry then you do not need that feat at all and it is even worse than inventing yourself since when you invent yourself with techpriest and slotless level 0 bonus spell slot items and basically have inventions that does not screws you when destroyed(by opposition to the ones made with gold and this feat).
Else if the GM does not allows early entry in techpriest then this feat should be weakened appropriately.
Also a team of a techpriest and one regular inventor works for having no delay in getting the inventions(And doing them with money(Through those slotless items) and doing inventions in twice the normal amount of fields) thanks to that:
Someone can help you to make a hybrid invention. You can split up the IP needed to do so in a pre-agreed fashion. If anyone recalls them, everyone else must too.
Congratulations on captivating me so much efficiently.Last edited by noob; 2015-10-31 at 02:38 PM.
-
2015-10-31, 07:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Entries are required to use the Adventures/characteristics/Alignment/Religion preamble from earlier 3.5 instead of the Abilities/Races/Alignment one from later 3.5?
Tome of the Holy Grail: Draw power from legendary heroes.|The Dashing Dualist: Two weapons. One happy ending.|The Shifter: Be all that you can be.|The Professional: Mundanes, competent.|The Wuxia Fighter: Mundanes, Wacky.|The Generalist: Do literally everything.
Skill Trick Compendium|Cantrips for Days|Complete Control Revamped: Customize everything.|Bek's Book of Blissful Bewitchment: Who wants to spend their life in a musty cave?
-
2015-10-31, 09:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
-
2015-10-31, 10:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-11-03, 11:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I've been too unwell to do any more, but I'm gonna take out the templates and put them here in case I get the urge.
Spoilerx
Level: Aug
Invention Points:
Construction time:
Bind:
Something ostensibly witty goes here.
x
Level: Dem
Invention Points:
Construction time:
Equip to Robot:
Something ostensibly witty goes here.
x
Level:
Invention Points:
Construction time:
Something ostensibly witty goes here.
x
Level: Rob
Invention Points:
Construction time:
Slot:
Sustains:
An ostensibly witty comment goes here.
Size/Type: X construct.
Hit Dice: xd10 + y (z hp)
Initiative: +x
Speed: x feet (y squares)
Armor Class: x (+y A +z B) touch v flat-footed w
Base Attack/Grapple: +x/+y
Attack: X +a Y (bdc+d)
Full Attack: X +a Y (bdc+d)
Space/Reach: x ft/y ft
Special Attacks:
Special Qualities:
Saves: For +x Ref +y Will +z
Abilities: Str x Dex y Con - Int - Wis 1 Cha 1
-
2015-11-03, 01:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
-
2015-11-04, 04:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Not to be That
GuyHumanoid [Human] or anything, but isn't it time for votings?
-
2015-11-04, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
-
2015-11-04, 08:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Whoops. Was playing Baldur's Gate II and fell asleep.
Have a link.Last edited by Temotei; 2015-11-04 at 08:58 PM.
Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-11-04, 09:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Erutnevda
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I made it! I managed not to enter this time!
>>
May have started a class on a long bus ride because it looked like you were going to be stuck at 3 entries.
<<Peanut Half-Dragon Necromancer by Kurien.
Current Projects:
Group: The Harrowing Halloween Harvest of Horror Part 2
Personal Silliness: Vote what Soulknife "Fix"/Inspired Class Should I make??? Past Work Expansion Caricatures.
Old: My homebrew (updated 9/9)
-
2015-11-05, 10:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
-
2015-11-05, 12:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
I think most of the playerbase is begging for an invention-based class to have another class where Int matters.
-
2015-11-05, 01:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
my efevretis is using a system inspired by the WOWRPG technology system but its far from the complete state his is, otherwise i would have used it, not the class the system.
-
2015-11-05, 05:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Minnesota
- Gender
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
Last edited by Temotei; 2015-11-05 at 05:23 PM.
Homebrew
Please feel free to PM me any thoughts on my homebrew (or comment in the thread if it's not too old).
-
2015-11-05, 06:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Base Class Challenge Chat Thread IV: All Your Base [Class] Are Belong to Us
yes its greek, you know xefas set the bar for mythos classes to be. Its going to be as teriffying to think about as the original tinker class from WOWRPG but less DUFAQ OP NERF now going on. If I wanted that I would just repost the original class with 40 abilities that gave increase to Tech Limit then Ultron would be achievable at lvl 1.
Also gave up on gender pronouns along time ago i get called mam(I is a sir) all the time. If I pay attention when I'm writing something I stick to they but MEH
Fun fact I set the bar for bad grammar.
-
2015-11-05, 08:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
-
2015-11-05, 11:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013