New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 175
  1. - Top - End - #31
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    I'm really surprised at the number of people who are saying that they flat-out won't play in an otherwise tolerable game if the DM dares to make them roll dice for stats and HP. It's almost like the DM expects them to play some kind of largely luck-based dice rolling game!

    My biggest dealbreaker is obvious inflexibility in a DM, and I don't mean in a railroading sense. In fact, I think the DM's story is pretty important, and if the DM has an overarching plot then I'm fine with letting them set things up as they please (so long as they aren't restricting the characters.) But no DM has every facet of their world in place and every race's cultural history set in stone. So long as it doesn't interfere with the DM's story, I would hate to hear "No, your Elf Barbarian can't be the sole survivor in a great war because I don't have any Elf wars planned in my background's history." (Again, if the pacifism of the Elves is a key point in the DM's story that's valid, but if this is a werewolf-hunting campaign then it shouldn't come up at all.) Similarly, I see absolutely no reason that a Faerun-inspired setting should be disallowed Changelings or Warforged or Shifters, or an Eberron setting should lack Sun Elves and Deep Imaskari. I would be wary of playing in a campaign where generalizations like setting are so absolute that it takes away from the enjoyment of the players.

  2. - Top - End - #32
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by jedipotter View Post
    Max hit points every level. This just says ''no death'' in the game
    It says nothing of the sort.

  3. - Top - End - #33
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2014

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronGolem View Post
    It says nothing of the sort.
    {Scrubbed}
    Last edited by Vaynor; 2014-10-17 at 01:57 PM.

  4. - Top - End - #34
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    GreataxeFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Shadow
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Houserules that aren't all clearly spelled out in a big neon sign before the game starts.

    I'm a by the book, rules lawyer type of guy. So if something doesn't work as the book writes it should, then I need to know so I can plan around that -- not find out mid-session that my Grease spell doesn't work because your CR 1/2 Orcs suddenly grew angel's wings.

  5. - Top - End - #35
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by ComaVision View Post
    {Scrub the original, scrub the quote}
    Good point, I'll leave it alone.

    I'll also echo the sentiment regarding "realism" as rationale for screwing over character types who already lag behind the balance curve. If you want realism, you're playing the wrong game, and that's not just because of the wizards and elves.

    As for rolling for stats and HP, D&D may be a game where luck and dice play a large role, but the proper place for that role is in the gameplay, not in the preparation phase. I shouldn't do better (or worse) playing the game simply because of the results of a purely luck-based minigame I had to play before I was allowed access to the game I came to play.
    Last edited by Vaynor; 2014-10-17 at 01:57 PM.

  6. - Top - End - #36
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Honest Tiefling's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    • Gender based stats unless the race is very non-human. That just does not end well in 99% of cases
    • DMs limiting things for players, but not for minor NPC use. No, I am not going to travel with your damnable dragon DMPC. No, I am not okay with every form of magic not being available to players without good reason.
    • DMs being too limiting. Having 2 races and 4 classes is a bit much unless they can really sell me on it.
    • Tables with PvP, or no communication to prevent a Orc and a Orc-Hunter in the same dang party, or an evil assassin and a LG cleric of the god of nobility. I don't mind compromise, but I'd like it if other people had the same idea so we don't want to kill each other in the first five minutes.
    Last edited by Honest Tiefling; 2014-10-16 at 05:29 PM.

  7. - Top - End - #37
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Crake's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2011

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    I can handle pretty much anything, but for me, it's a dealbreaker when I feel like the players are completely irrelevant to the happenings of the game. If I can ask myself "What would have been different had we not been here?" and the answer is "Nothing" for the majority of the time, then I can't justify even being there.
    World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
    The new Quick Vestige List

    Quote Originally Posted by Kazyan View Post
    Playing a wizard the way GitP says wizards should be played requires the equivalent time and effort investment of a university minor. Do you really want to go down this rabbit hole, or are you comfortable with just throwing a souped-up Orb of Fire at the thing?
    Quote Originally Posted by atemu1234 View Post
    Humans are rarely truly irrational, just wrong.

  8. - Top - End - #38
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fairfield, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crake View Post
    I can handle pretty much anything, but for me, it's a dealbreaker when I feel like the players are completely irrelevant to the happenings of the game. If I can ask myself "What would have been different had we not been here?" and the answer is "Nothing" for the majority of the time, then I can't justify even being there.
    So basically you don't want to play Indiana Jones...?

  9. - Top - End - #39
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Venger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    fumble rules.

    nothing communicates quicker or more clearly that a DM does not understand that casters are more powerful than mundies than something so idiotic as a fumble rule. watch in amazement as you explain that a mundy kicking a scarecrow is more likely to knock his own teeth out as he levels up and get more iteratives.
    I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.

    Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!

    Quote Originally Posted by weckar View Post
    Venger, can you be my full-time memory aid please?
    Iron Chef Medals!
    Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition

  10. - Top - End - #40
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2014

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Venger View Post
    fumble rules.

    nothing communicates quicker or more clearly that a DM does not understand that casters are more powerful than mundies than something so idiotic as a fumble rule. watch in amazement as you explain that a mundy kicking a scarecrow is more likely to knock his own teeth out as he levels up and get more iteratives.
    A lot of people enjoy them because they add diversity to the game. If you're using a fumble table, something interesting happens. It's not about balance. 3.5 is not about balance. It's fine if you don't like it but it doesn't mean the DM or other players don't understand that casters are already superior.

  11. - Top - End - #41
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fairfield, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by ComaVision View Post
    A lot of people enjoy them because they add diversity to the game. If you're using a fumble table, something interesting happens. It's not about balance. 3.5 is not about balance. It's fine if you don't like it but it doesn't mean the DM or other players don't understand that casters are already superior.
    Sometimes it is though.

  12. - Top - End - #42
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Venger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by ComaVision View Post
    A lot of people enjoy them because they add diversity to the game. If you're using a fumble table, something interesting happens. It's not about balance. 3.5 is not about balance. It's fine if you don't like it but it doesn't mean the DM or other players don't understand that casters are already superior.
    it's problematic because it penalizes what are already the weakest classes (those who have to make attack rolls) and leaves the ones that don't untouched. DMs who use these rules do not understand this and think that because the fighter deals some HP damage in a round when the wizard "only" debuffs with glitterdust, that clearly the fighter needs to be nerfed so he slices his fingers off every ~5% of the time.
    I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.

    Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!

    Quote Originally Posted by weckar View Post
    Venger, can you be my full-time memory aid please?
    Iron Chef Medals!
    Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition

  13. - Top - End - #43
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    BarbarianGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2013

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    The biggest deal breaker for me is poor attendance. I understand that people are busy but sometimes all it takes it's a little effort. The rest of us are let with the choice to leave your character behind or play it or selves.

  14. - Top - End - #44
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2012

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Wow, this thread really took off. I'd have to add PvP that wasn't in the advertisement to my list - it's one thing if we all know it could happen, and another when it's because one person makes so many plans the DM needs a flowchart to keep up and you don't know why you just ate a Sudden Maximized Fireball OOC *or* IC.

    As for Stat/HP rolling, the idea of having less HP than the Wizard as a Fighter really puts me on edge. Aegis013, your rule actually provides higher-than-average HP (a Fighter would do 5+CON/6+CON in average), so I like it. Stats are a bit different because I don't always have a concept beforehand - having an array thrown at me can help me figure that out sometimes, but I'll always be happy to take a Point Buy alternative.

  15. - Top - End - #45
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    cobaltstarfire's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Amphetryon View Post
    The DM citing 'realism' as a reason for house-rules is generally pretty close to a dealbreaker for me.
    This generally for me as well, because those sorts of houserules always end up being overly complicated and in my opinion a waste of time.

    PVP is a deal breaker for me, and so are DM's with a DM Vs PC style of running the game.

    DM's that ban things without any good reason.

    Players who are patronizing, cheat on their rolls/sheets, are control freakish, and/or are constantly talking over and arguing with everyone (including the GM). Also depending on how strong they smell it may also be a deal breaker. (I have a very sensitive nose...although I haven't met anyone yet who's so stinky that I need to vacate or get sick).

    It's not really a "deal breaker" but I do also avoid high op games because I'd just irritate everyone involved since I'm no good at optimizing and am still having trouble with the rules, despite having gotten back into the game for several months now.

  16. - Top - End - #46
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Ysgard
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    A DM who actually gets ticked in real life when I interrupt his BBEG's arrogant, overly melodramatic speech with even more arrogant smart remarks.

  17. - Top - End - #47
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Venger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Krobar View Post
    A DM who actually gets ticked in real life when I interrupt his BBEG's arrogant, overly melodramatic speech with even more arrogant smart remarks.
    Villain monologues at all. I mean... why are we even here?
    I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.

    Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!

    Quote Originally Posted by weckar View Post
    Venger, can you be my full-time memory aid please?
    Iron Chef Medals!
    Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition

  18. - Top - End - #48
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    ClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    1. Having a game where there is a "high likelihood" of PCs dying, multiple times, in a low-level game. No, thank you, I do not want to roll up my fifth new character for this campaign. And you wonder why people have stopped giving you backstories to work with...

    2. Ex post facto fixes. I understand most people do not like the way diplomacy works as written. But if you wait to fix it until the first time my character with a maxed-out diplomacy score tries to use his defining ability, I will not be happy.

    2b. Along the same lines: forcing a roleplaying of a diplomacy or bluff check. I appreciate the possibility for a bonus due to a well-phrased request, but do not force me to try to phrase the request appropriately. We are role-playing. You don't force the fighter to actually jump up and down every time he makes a Jump check "for realism's sake," so don't force me to actually try to bluff or negotiate. The reason I'm role-playing a character like this is because I'm terrible at it IRL, and I want to fulfill a fantasy of being a smoothtalking person.

  19. - Top - End - #49
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Jeff the Green's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Great PNW
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Venger View Post
    Villain monologues at all. I mean... why are we even here?
    Eh, I like them. Granted, I play mostly PbP where they work and in face-to-face games I like them because they're fun to subvert.
    Author of The Auspician's Handbook and The Tempestarian's Handbook for Spheres of Power.
    Ask me (or the other authors) anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lateral View Post
    Well, of course I'm paranoid about everything. Hell, with Jeff as DM, I'd be paranoid even if we were playing a game set in The Magic Kiddie Funland of Perfectly Flat Planes and Sugar Plums.
    Greenman by Bradakhan/Spring Greenman by Comissar/Autumn Greenman by Sgt. Pepper/Winter Greenman by gurgleflep

  20. - Top - End - #50
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Roxxy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Players who try to join a game that just doesn't the thematically fit what they want to play, then argue with me when I veto their character. If the game tone wasn't something you wanted, why did you try to join?

  21. - Top - End - #51
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    EisenKreutzer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Trondheim, Norway
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Railroading GMs who only play to fulfill some power fantasy or to tell their story no matter what the players do. That **** will not be tolerated.
    Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed.
    - G. K. Chesterton

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Fel View Post
    Are you some sort of Wizard?
    This is Æl-Ceald, an ice-age fantasy campaign setting. Updated!

    Avatar by gurgleflep!

  22. - Top - End - #52
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Snowbluff's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2011

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff the Green View Post
    Eh, I like them. Granted, I play mostly PbP where they work and in face-to-face games I like them because they're fun to subvert.
    Additionally, they are good when Hannibal has a point or Jerkass has a point.
    Avatar of Rudisplork Avatar of PC-dom and Slayer of the Internet. Extended sig
    GitP Regulars as: Vestiges Spells Weapons Races Deities Feats Soulmelds/Veils
    Quote Originally Posted by Darrin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowbluff View Post
    All gaming systems should be terribly flawed and exploitable if you want everyone to be happy with them. This allows for a wide variety of power levels for games for different levels of players.
    I dub this the Snowbluff Axiom.

  23. - Top - End - #53
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Raven777's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dominion of Canadia

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Anyway, talking is a free action, so I would feel free to monologue right back at them, the hammier the better.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zanos View Post
    The professionally offended will always find something to be angry about.

  24. - Top - End - #54
    Banned
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2013

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronGolem View Post
    It says nothing of the sort.
    Sure it does.

    So what is the point of more HP? So the characters never die. What else could be the reason? A high hit point character can take hit after hit after hit after hit after hit and still be fine. That is the whole point of high hit points.

    And Max Hit Points is a red flag for the type of play style where you won't lose hit points much anyway. It's the style where a beholder uses ''inflict wounds for like seven points of damage'' and not distengrate.

  25. - Top - End - #55

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fax Celestis View Post
    So basically you don't want to play Indiana Jones...?
    While Indy never changed the overall outcome, he did have an effect on the story and would've, if he'd been more successful/focused, thwarted the villains' plans himself.


    Also in Temple of Doom.. HE DID!


    Granted, it was only because he mentioned that one thing in front of that one guy.

    Quote Originally Posted by jedipotter View Post
    Sure it does.

    So what is the point of more HP? So the characters never die. What else could be the reason? A high hit point character can take hit after hit after hit after hit after hit and still be fine. That is the whole point of high hit points.

    And Max Hit Points is a red flag for the type of play style where you won't lose hit points much anyway. It's the style where a beholder uses ''inflict wounds for like seven points of damage'' and not distengrate.
    Actually, that may be a useful one to use when pitting players against every single Elder Evil at once. If I'm going to constantly try to make them reroll characters, I might as well give them a fighting chance. Making characters takes a lot of time.
    Last edited by Threadnaught; 2014-10-16 at 07:36 PM.

  26. - Top - End - #56
    Titan in the Playground
     
    DruidGirl

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by jedipotter View Post
    Sure it does.

    So what is the point of more HP? So the characters never die. What else could be the reason? A high hit point character can take hit after hit after hit after hit after hit and still be fine. That is the whole point of high hit points.

    And Max Hit Points is a red flag for the type of play style where you won't lose hit points much anyway. It's the style where a beholder uses ''inflict wounds for like seven points of damage'' and not distengrate.
    What's the point of not playing minimum HP on every hit die? Maybe with a modifier for larger HD, like d4 and d6 get +0, d8 and d10 get +1, and d12 gets a +2.
    Last edited by eggynack; 2014-10-16 at 08:11 PM.

  27. - Top - End - #57
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2010

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Houserules that aren't in writing. If they aren't in writing they should be short, unless you rewrote spells instead of banning them. This isn't counting stuff like blocking drown healing or unwritten houserules you can tell me verbally in under a minute. Double points against your game, if you spring bans on me rapid fire as I point out potential issues your existing houserules may raise.

    Ludicrous DMPC's.

    The game not being what it says on the tin. If I make a dirty cop Deputy for an Old West game; I have no interest in getting Rip Van Winkled to a modern setting. I know good games can come from curveball like this, but I had my fill in my teens/early twenties. At this point I feel I'm a mature enough roleplayer to play a fish out of water without being surprised OOC.

  28. - Top - End - #58

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Actually, I like the idea of a Beholder casting Inflict Wounds at my players. As long as there are other Beholders and possibly a Daelkyr nearby, ready to use Disintegrate when the players decide to chase it when it "retreats".

  29. - Top - End - #59
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Ysgard
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raven777 View Post
    Anyway, talking is a free action, so I would feel free to monologue right back at them, the hammier the better.
    Exactly. Only in the case I'm talking about it was more arrogant hubris than ham.

    Red Dragons don't like to be told to cease their tedious prattling, pit fiends don't like being called tawdry, unimportant little jackanapes, and High Priests of evil gods don't like when you sarcastically mimic and mock their gods to their faces. My bard did all of those things. He was a fun character.
    Last edited by Krobar; 2014-10-16 at 08:14 PM.

  30. - Top - End - #60
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    A penthouse in Malfeas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Biggest Dealbreaker for a Game?

    DMs who violate the rules of the setting. Even if it's a "cutscene", I won't game with someone who breaks the rules of the setting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •