Results 151 to 158 of 158
Thread: Is Watchmen important?
-
2015-01-03, 06:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Expat in Singapore
- Gender
Re: Is Watchmen important?
Oh wow, I learned a new term. And that USA comics predated a Japanese trend by about 90 years.
Which is another way of describing exactly why Rorschach was a horrible, horrible human being: because while he stuck to his code, his code explicitly denied certain people justice for no other reason than because they offended his deeply warped sensibilities.
-
2015-01-03, 11:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
-
2015-01-04, 07:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: Is Watchmen important?
Which is another way of describing exactly why Rorschach was a horrible, horrible human being: because while he stuck to his code, his code explicitly denied certain people justice for no other reason than because they offended his deeply warped sensibilities.
-
2015-01-04, 02:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
-
2015-01-04, 08:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
Re: Is Watchmen important?
Another thing, Rorschach commits casual theft and breaking and entering. He does this to people he knows without apology and helps himself to their food. He apparently does that often enough that the people he knows aren't surprised to see him doing that.
And he considers pretty much the large bulk of humanity uncivil barbarians who people like him barely keep restrained in order for civilization to be possible.I write a horror blog in my spare time.
-
2015-01-08, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Iowa
- Gender
Re: Is Watchmen important?
This. Exactly this. When thinking about the movie, one has to keep in mind it's still a movie. Which are at least partially intended to make money and they do that by being accessible to more than just fans of the comic. Which in turn means a lot of people knew to the franchise who, even if they did build up the creation of the giant squid earlier in the movie would still be like "What the everloving ****?"
Thanks to Kymme for my sweet avatar of Bendar Roy, my kick@$$ dwarven rogue.
-
2015-01-08, 08:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Expat in Singapore
- Gender
Re: Is Watchmen important?
Yes, it seems quite a few comics fan can't hear themselves and comprehend what a ridiculous idea a manufactured fake-alien space giant squid is. Normal cinema-goers can stomach a movie with superheroes, since they enter the building with that acceptance. But throwing something else even more unbelievable into the story without warning is something only fanfics and Bollywood movies do.
-
2015-01-09, 08:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: Is Watchmen important?
That was my reaction the when I read the comic. I mean, I went back a second time, and so I could see the pieces he was putting together, and I know more now about the Silver-Age goofiness that Moore was deconstructing than I did then, so I can at least intellectually appreciate it, but I kept coming back to that exact visceral reaction. So the movie was a huge step up for me precisely because it kept the tonal whiplash the squid induced to a minimum. It really was a wonderfully deft and surgical alteration. I think it's not appreciated more largely because Moore fans are so used to seeing his works butchered in screenplays that they just go nuts out of habit rather than thinking things through.
I will say in retrospect that, as much as they tried for a faithful adaptation, I really don't think Zach Snyder is a humanistic enough director to really bring the characters to life, which is I think why so many people complain about how flat the movie is as an adaptation. By this, I mean that there are humanistic directors (think Steven Spielberg) who are all about infusing the work with little touches that make characters feel lived and breathing in their work. I mean, Chrissy from Jaws was on screen for all of two minutes, but her death feels so gut-wrenchingly horrible precisely because in those two minutes, Spielberg went out of his way to give her characteristics like enthusiasm ("Swimming!") and delight, and then showed her in horrible, horrible pain and anguish.
Then there are directors who are largely indifferent to their characters (think Stanley Kubrick). Now there's nothing wrong with either one, as it's a valid artistic choice. I don't think Spielberg could have made something like A Clockwork Orange any more than Kubrick could have made Jurassic Park. But that's the thing: you really need a humanistic director, I think, to really bring out the tragedy of characters like Rorschach and Doctor Manhattan. However, Snyder, whether by artistic choice or just because he's not good at working with or filming actors, is far more on the Kubrick side of the Speilberg-Kubrick Humanity Scale. The actors are really doing a fine job, and they make you care, but I just get the feeling from seeing enough of Snyder's work that empathy just isn't his forte. I think it's one of the reasons why MoS was so jarring for so many people.Characters: