View Poll Results: Would it be cumbersome?
- Voters
- 27. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
19 70.37% -
No
8 29.63%
Results 1 to 27 of 27
-
2007-04-10, 01:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
As the title asks, would you find combat resolution like this cumbersome?
Step 1: Attacker rolls d20, adds modifiers.
Step 2: Defender rolls d20, subtracts it from attackers roll.
Step 3: Compare result to a Defense Chart
The defense chart is similar to the way the to hit rolls work in World of Warcraft. You start at 0 and work your way up. I'm just not capping it at 100 and using percentages. So in this example, the attacker has a total bonus of +15 to their roll. The defender has a defense of 10, dodge of 4, parry of 4. Attack rolls a 15, for a total of 30. Defender rolls a 10, which makes the attack a normal hit.
Miss = 0 to 10
Dodge = 11 to 14
Parry = 15 to 18
Hit = 19 to 28
Crushing Hit = 29 to 34
Critical Hit = 35+
Obviously, buffs and other modifiers would come into play, but a lot of them could be figured out beforehand. Commonly used buffs could have their own chart on scrap paper, to speed things up.
-
2007-04-10, 02:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- In the Playground
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Huh. Interesting. I actually really like this, and don't find it particularly confusing, although each character would have to have their own chart, as they'd have different dodge and parry and such. I think this'd work excellently for someone going for realism with custom characters sheets.
Miss: should be constant I think, but I dunno bout 1 through 10, low level characters would never hit. Could scale with level...
Dodge: Replaces old AC bonus from dex / dodge feat and such.
Parry: special feats and the other stuff that gives parry bonuses, I guess
Hit: the next 10 numbers
Crushing hit (x1.5 dmg?) next 5 numbers
Critical hit, as weapon: anything higher.
-
2007-04-10, 02:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Behind a screen computer or DM
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
i could stand using it, but would prolly default to the old system for simplicity's sake also it reminds me of the dodge roll system
-
2007-04-10, 02:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
I'm using it for an rpg I'm making for irc games. Eventually going to script a bot to handle combat with little interaction from the GM. The "Miss" section of the chart varies, based upon the characters Defense skill.
A starting character would have at max, Agility 4, Defense 2, Parry 2, Dodge 2, Block 2, for a total of 12, but they would be required to have a weapon in one hand and a shield in the other. Otherwise they wouldn't get the benefit of Parry and Block. Heavier armors reduce damage taken, but also reduce your defense value. An attacker using a melee weapon could have a Strength 4, Attack 2, Weapon 2 for a total of 8.
The system favors defense over massive hit points, using a wound level system similar to World of Darkness and Shadowrun. A single, well placed attack can devastate anyone. The problem I'm seeing now, is that there's no room for the lucky hit from the novice. I don't have any rules written for natural 1's or 20's yet, so that's probably where I can add them.
-
2007-04-10, 02:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Gender
-
2007-04-10, 02:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
No, anything less then zero is treated as a zero.
-
2007-04-10, 02:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
As it stands, you have a range of nearly fourty possible results for a given set of modifiers. Since there are two dice rolled, the middle results should happen much more often than the extremes. (IE, for 1d20 + x - 1d20, there are 20 possible sets of two rolls that result in a final number of x, but only 1 possible set of two rolls for a result of either x - 19 or x + 19.) Instead of normal d20's 5% odds for max and min rolls; with two d20 dice you end up with .25% chance of rolling max and min. You get .5% chance to roll x - 18 or x + 18 and .75% chance to roll x - 17 or x + 17, up to 5.0% chance to roll x.
If you want lucky strikes and lucky misses to happen more often, you could replace the 1d20 + x - 1d20 system with a 1d39 + x - 20 (To a bot, d39 dice are just as likely as d20). You'd end up with the same range, but each possible result from x - 19 to x + 19 has exactly the same odds of happening.
-
2007-04-10, 02:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ēast Seaxna rīc
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
I voted yes since it's a lot more cumbersome than the current system. However it could be made to work.
"that nighted, penguin-fringed abyss" - At The Mountains of Madness, H.P. Lovecraft
When a man decides another's future behind his back, it is a conspiracy. When a god does it, it's destiny.
-
2007-04-10, 06:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Nowhere
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
How about
Attack roll = normal
defense roll = d20 + circumstance modifiers
{table]less than -5|miss
-5 till dex modifier|dodge
dex modifier +1 till armor bonus + dex modifier|scrapes armor
armor bonus + dex modifier +1 till armor bonus dex modifier + parry bonus[br](including two weapon defense)|parried
armor bonus + dex modifier + parry bonus +1 till AB + DM + PB + 15 - crit mod of weapon|normal hit
AB + DM + PB +16 - crit mod and up|critical[/table]
So a 14 dex rogue with leather armor and no shield has
{table]less than -5|miss
-5 till +2|dodge
+3 till +4| scrapes armor
+5 till +4 (not happening)|parried
+5 till 20 - crit mod|normal hit
21 and up|critical[/table]٩๏̯͡๏)۶
New found land. It's like Untitled Document, for places - Flickerdart
Avatar by Domochevsky
-
2007-04-10, 09:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Yes. I played using something like this about 8 years ago online, back before AOL's roleplaying chatrooms had completed their descent into lesbian vampire furry-dom. It used d100s instead of d20s, but it was a similar concept. Battles took forever, modifiers were obnoxious to figure out, and it was just generally a pain in the butt.
-
2007-04-10, 10:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Uh, you guys keep trying to put this into d20 rules, and it's not made for that. The modifiers are pretty much all there already. Having two or three charts pre-written to cover usual buffs would speed things up quite a bit.
-
2007-04-10, 11:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
If a bot is going to be deciding the result, then really the chart can be as confusing as you want, the players can just treat it as a black box system.
Also, in Gezina's defense, you yourself was already using the 1d20 + x system so it made sense to assume you were at least basing this off of d20 rules.
-
2007-04-10, 12:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Just because something uses a d20 doesn't mean it is the d20 ruleset.
-
2007-04-10, 12:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Well, I'd prefer the standard D20 System, but in response to your question it is not at all cumbersome, I find it easy to understand and simple.
Gnoll Paladin with Zanbatou Avatar by Oregano.
Homebrews:
Originally Posted by ExHunterEmerald
-
2007-04-10, 01:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
I understand that, I was merely saying that it was logical to assume that you might have been. Possibly incorrect, but much of what is said is context based anyway.
The first paragraph of the SRD for d20. Beyond ACs and +1 greatswords, the very basis of d20 starts with the mechanic of if (1d20 + x >= y) then success.
You are free to use whichever system you want, but if you post a thread in a homebrew section that is mostly d20 and it isn't d20, you may not wish to get angry when posters think it is.
If you were not angry, then ignore this post.
Generally, once you put the system into a program/bot, the rules can be as complex as you wish. This is why most tactical RPGs/Turn-based strat games can be so involved, because since players don't have to understand the details, you can include stuff like "If you fire up wind, you are more 3% likely to miss" or "Left handed sword fighters gain a 2.5% bonus against right handed mace bearers". You'd want to tell the players the general rules, but they don't have to figure out exactly how misses and parries are decided.
-
2007-04-10, 02:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Well the title of the forum is d20 & RPG, not just d20. =p
I want the system to work for pencil and paper games too. Not just a scripted bot in irc. The bot for irc is only to make the DM's task easier. I'm planning on putting in commands that allow the players to assess the status of all the foes in combat with them via a private message with the bot. So they would type /battlestatus or /bs and it would send a private message to them listing each foe and their visual status: Orc1 - Healthy, Orc2 - Wounded, Orc3 - Wounded, Orc4 - Dead, Orc5 - Healthy/Stunned. It could work for any number of rpg systems with some work. It's purpose is to keep the players from having to ask constantly who's wounded, dead, dying.
The d40 - 20 is an easier way to do the rolls, but it takes the defender out of the rolling process. Rolling for the defense isn't that bad in a pnp game. It keeps people paying attention and since everyones at the table, it's easier to get them to roll. I've noticed in my many irc campaigns, that keeping the interest of the players can be hard at times when combat slogs down a bit or players have to keep asking what is where, wounded, etc.
-
2007-04-10, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Orlando, FL
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
that seems kind of cumbersome to me, and I think that makes it so that people miss quite a bit more than they would previously.
-
2007-04-10, 03:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
-
2007-04-10, 08:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Das Kapital
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
I like it. I may use it in my next campaign. However, i would like to wait to see it completed... But certainly a yes!
Oh snap, i just clicked the wrong button! Oh well.
-
2007-04-10, 10:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
That's about all it is Gwyn. I could probably whip up a d20 version pretty easily.
Attack Roll = d20 + BAB + Str Mod + Size Mod + Other Stuff
Defense Chart
0 to 10 = Miss (This is the base 10 ac everyone gets)
11 to Avoid = Dodge (Add in any dodge/size bonuses as well)
Avoid+1 to Avoid+Armor = Armor Hit (Armor AC bonus)
Armor+1 to Armor+Shield = Block (Shield AC bonus)
Shield+1 to Shield+Misc = Other (Other bonuses like luck/holy/sacred/whatever)
Misc+1 or higher = Hit
If you want to give them a parry skill or something you can toss it in there somewhere. So a fighter with platemail and dex of 12, a large shield would have a defense chart of:
Defense Chart (AC 21)
0-10 = Miss
11 = Dodge
12-19 = Armor/Parry
20 = Shield Block
21+ = Hit
It looks like you're missing one point of AC from the shield block, but that's just because in d20 you only have to equal the AC, not exceed it.
-
2007-04-11, 01:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
It'd be great if you could get a computer to do it for you.
-
2007-04-12, 10:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
What exactly is the aim of this system?
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2007-04-13, 07:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- HALO and HALO timeskip
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
meh, sounds ok to me. but thats just me
-
2007-04-13, 09:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
If you're running the system automated, then it can add flavor to a fight. If it's not automated, or not automated enough, then it risks being a time-consumer that weakens suspension of disbelief.
-
2007-04-13, 03:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
I would think it would only be time consuming if you have inattentive players who don't write down beforehand.
-
2007-04-14, 03:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- NC
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
Pagemaster (Rolemaster to those who haven't played it.) killed the idea of looking up results on charts for me. Yes it's simple, but anytime you look something up you're slowing the game. Worse, you're interrupting the flow of combat. It can easily kill immersion.
If you get it set up as a script where all the look ups are internal to the code's logic it probably won't be bad. But as a chart...yes it's cumbersome.-
I laugh at myself first, before anyone else can.
-- Paraphrased from Elsa Maxwell
-
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you.
-- Paul Graham in Keep Your Identity Small
-
2007-04-14, 04:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Would you find a chart like this cumbersome?
It's one chart that each player has on their character sheet. It's not Rolemaster...