Results 31 to 48 of 48
Thread: Is this Legal?
-
2015-03-18, 03:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
Re: Is this Legal?
You are wrong here. Only effects that explicitly increase your size do not stack. If increase in size is a side effect of some other effect(in this case, of becoming an animal), it is not a "magical effect that increase size".
Wild shape also explicitly says that you become an animal - and animals are valid target for Animal Growth.
-
2015-03-18, 04:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: Is this Legal?
Wild Shape and Animal Growth stack.
Subtypes have no bearing on Animal Growth's legality, it's the type that matters.
-
2015-03-18, 04:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Re: Is this Legal?
He could still not have turned into an elephant though..
And in the SRD it does call how how he dont get the animal type but retains his own.thnx to Starwoof for the fine avatar
-
2015-03-18, 06:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
Re: Is this Legal?
There is no mention of 'explicitly' in the rules for any of these size changing spells. They only say "Multiple magical effects that increase size do not stack." If you use wild shape, which is a magical effect, to increase your size, no other magic will stack with that.
Also, wild shape only says you become animal in a way that functions as the alternate form special ability. Since alternate form doesn't change either your type or your subtype, and you retain your 'natural form', you only appear to be an animal. Because 'animal growth' can only be cast on animals, a wild shaped druid is still an invalid target for the spell.Last edited by Bronk; 2015-03-18 at 06:19 AM.
-
2015-03-18, 07:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
Re: Is this Legal?
What is a magical effect? The term "magical effect" isn't explicitly defined, thanks to d20 RPGs being notoriously badly edited. Wild shape is a supernatural ability. As a point in favour of it being a magical effect, it is suppressed by an antimagic field. However, I wouldn't consider a supernatural ability to be a magical effect.
The "Multiple magical effects that increase size do not stack" clause, to me, seems intended to prevent the stacking of spells like enlarge person, greater enlarge person, and divine might.
-
2015-03-18, 08:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
As was noted, you're adding in the word explicitly here. Wild shape is a magical effect, given that it's a supernatural ability, and it increases size, because you're using it to increase size. Simple as that.
Wild shape also explicitly says that you become an animal - and animals are valid target for Animal Growth.
-
2015-03-18, 10:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
Re: Is this Legal?
"Explicitly" is the default rule of the game - it must either have a name like "magical size increasing effect" - or have a description that says "increases size".
Otherwise, everything can cause everything: Fireball that was changed through Energy Substitution to deal cold damage causes you to drop your vial of alchemist's fire that explodes and deals fire damage? It is affected by Energy Substitution too, so your alchemist's fire deals cold damage to you...
What if you "increased your size" by merging with your horse to become a centaur?
What if you switched souls with somebody bigger than you?
What if "magical effect" made you "increase size" by compelling you to overeat? Would it still not stack?
And your misreading of "wild shape" rule is incredibly "creative". Wild shape directly says "You become an animal". Forms, creature types or subtypes - all of those are completely irrelevant. When you are wild shaped you are an animal.
Animal growth has target: animal. Thus, it works on someone wild shaped.
It can't be written any more clear than that.Last edited by SinsI; 2015-03-18 at 10:11 AM.
-
2015-03-18, 10:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
Magical size increasing effect isn't a game term. Even enlarge person is only implicitly a magical effect that increases size. As this isn't a game defined term, we default to base definitions, and wild shape is magic, an effect, and size increasing.
Otherwise, everything can cause everything: Fireball that was changed through Energy Substitution to deal cold damage causes you to drop your vial of alchemist's fire that explodes and deals fire damage? It is affected by Energy Substitution too, so your alchemist's fire deals cold damage to you...
What if you "increased your size" by merging with your horse to become a centaur?
What if you switched souls with somebody bigger than you?
What if "magical effect" made you "increase size" by compelling you to overeat? Would it still not stack?
And your misreading of "wild shape" rule is incredibly "creative". Wild shape directly says "You become an animal". Forms, creature types or subtypes - all of those are completely irrelevant. When you are wild shaped you are an animal.
Animal growth has target: animal. Thus, it works on someone wild shaped.
It can't be written any more clear than that.
-
2015-03-18, 10:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
Re: Is this Legal?
Errata and other specific details don't matter. The spell still says "you become an animal", not "you take on animal shape" or anything like that, thus you are an animal for anything and everything that targets animals - Animal Growth, Speak With Animals, Handle Animal skill, etc.
Errata affects only how other spells and effects (i.e. that target humanoids) affect Wild Shaped druid or things like Awaken that require additional qualifiers.
No. It is a game term, though loosely defined. For example, Righteous Might wouldn't stack with Enlarge Person:
"This spell causes you to grow, doubling your height and multiplying your weight by 8. This increase changes your size category to the next larger one, and you gain a +4 size bonus to Strength and a +2 size bonus to Constitution."
A magical effect would have to have that kind of explicit text to count as "increasing size".
Note that it also explicitly has the "Multiple magical effects that increase size do not stack" note. Any spell or effect with such a note is a "magical affect that increases size".Last edited by SinsI; 2015-03-18 at 10:53 AM.
-
2015-03-18, 10:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
What are you talking about right now? The errata in this case fundamentally altered wild shape such that it doesn't alter your type. Animal growth is based on type, because that's the only thing that type based targeting could be based on.
No. It is a game term, though loosely defined. For example, Righteous Might wouldn't stack with Enlarge Person:
"This spell causes you to grow, doubling your height and multiplying your weight by 8. This increase changes your size category to the next larger one, and you gain a +4 size bonus to Strength and a +2 size bonus to Constitution."
A magical effect would have to have that kind of explicit text to count as "increasing size".
-
2015-03-18, 10:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
Away from my books at the moment, but would it be possible to get the bigger size with a Goliath and one level of Barbarian? I can't remember if Mountain Rage gives you +1 size, or just Large size...
-
2015-03-18, 10:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
Re: Is this Legal?
Lets eh... lets take a look at wildshape, using the SRD, since its 99.99999% of the time up to date on eratta(which are rule changes by the way) and is OGL meaning direct copypasta is legal.
Originally Posted by SRD, Druid
Originally Posted by SRD, Alternate Form Special Ability
-
2015-03-18, 03:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Gender
-
2015-03-18, 04:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
-
2015-03-18, 04:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
Why, exactly, is that the case? My understanding of the "new" rule is that it doesn't have a significant positive impact on druid power, and it might actually be detrimental. The whole point of the thing, after all, is to distance the druid from the screwed up polymorph rules. Point is, I'm either insane or non-existent, because I would absolutely use that part of the errata.
-
2015-03-18, 08:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?
I don't use that part of the errata ... but only because Druids in my game are all the PHB2 variant. If I allowed regular Druids, I'd use the errata.
-
2015-03-18, 09:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
Re: Is this Legal?
OK. Let's take a look at SRD:
At 5th level, a druid gains the ability to turn herself into any Small or Medium animal and back again once per day.
This ability functions like the alternate form special ability polymorph spell, except as noted here.Last edited by SinsI; 2015-03-18 at 09:57 PM.
-
2015-03-18, 09:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Gender
Re: Is this Legal?