New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 8 of 50 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171833 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 240 of 1487
  1. - Top - End - #211
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 92

    Yes.
    Quote Originally Posted by D&D Glossary
    A creature friendly to you. In most cases, references to "allies" include yourself.

  2. - Top - End - #212
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 093 Ask your DM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Resurrection
    So long as some small portion of the creature’s body still exists, it can be resurrected, but the portion receiving the spell must have been part of the creature’s body at the time of death.
    A spell affects a creature, not just some portion of the creature’s body. If the body is intact the spell effect will continue. If the body is not intact but is recreated from a piece by Resurrection or True Resurrection it will be up to your DM to adjudicate.

  3. - Top - End - #213
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RogueGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2014

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q94
    Does using a bardic knowledge check to replace a knowledge check to discover a personal truename take the truename research amount of time or the typical bard knowledge check amount of time? p.197 ToM

  4. - Top - End - #214
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Jowgen's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2013

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 95

    Is there any RAW on how the solar system is meant to work in a generic 3.x setting? I'm basically interested in what orbits what and how/why.
    Quote Originally Posted by afroakuma View Post
    Ugh. For the record, I hate you. I hate you very much.
    The Voidstone Arsenal

    The Redeemery

    Feat-buying resource

    Magical Plants and Where to Find Them

    Floating Disk Utility

    Taking 10 resource

  5. - Top - End - #215
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2011

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 96

    When you use two weapon fighting with the ToB maneuvers Burning Blade and Inferno Blade (and equivelants), do both weapons get the benefits from these boosts or just one of them?

  6. - Top - End - #216
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 096

    Until the end of your turn, your melee attacks deal an extra 3d6 points of fi re damage + 1 point per initiator level.
    For this sort of statement to be correct it has to apply with whatever melee weapon you use. It is not restricted to a specific weapon, and there is no requirement to designate one weapon at the time of the boost. You could also draw new weapons before the end of your turn and still benefit from the boost.

  7. - Top - End - #217
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Spain
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q96 If an opponent is tiny and blinded and stunned for 3 rounds, can I walk up to him and pick up his weapons? Can I take all his equipment off? Do I have to step into his square to do so? How many movement actions would it be?

  8. - Top - End - #218
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    WalkingTheShade's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Smelly cheese land

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q098
    These have probably been asked before. Grapple/Improved grab/Constrict questions.

    So, on round 1, our friendly neighborhood pit fiend (FNPF) is tail slapping generic medium sized fighter (GMSF). FNPF touches, and wins the grapple check.
    Q098a: How many times does FNPF deal damage to GMSF? Once for the attack, once for winning the grapple check and once for the constrict ability?
    Q098b: If FNPF wants to hold on GMSF using only its tail, when does the -20 to grapple check apply? Starting on the first grapple check made thanks to Improved grab? Or only on subsequent grapple checks?

    Assuming FNPF manages to hold on GMSF using only the tail (reference). On round 2:
    Q098c: Can FNPF use its tail slap to Attack Your Opponent? If yes, how much damage does it deal?
    Q098e: Can FNPF use its tail slap to Damage your opponent? If yes, how much damage does it deal?
    Q098f: If none of b or c, how can FNPF deal damage to GMSF?

    This is utterly confusing.
    Last edited by WalkingTheShade; 2015-12-18 at 11:37 AM.
    'Jernau Gurgeh', the machine said, making a sighing noise, 'a guilty system recognises no innocents. … The very way you think places you amongst its enemies. … Prevarication will be more difficult than you might imagine; neutrality is probably impossible. You cannot choose not to have the politics you do; they are not some separate set of entities somehow detachable from the rest of your being; they are a function of your existence. I know that and they know that; you had better accept it.'

  9. - Top - End - #219
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 097

    Being blinded makes the creature incapable of attacks of opportunity*, and being stunned means the creature has dropped whatever they were holding. You can walk up to an adjacent square (if you have at least 5' natural reach) and pick up the dropped items. Walking takes one or more move actions depending on the distance. Picking up dropped items takes a move action each. No, you can't simply take the creature's equipment; you must succeed at relevant disarm attacks (unarmed) or Sleight of Hand checks to take any gear.

    * - Note that being stunned merely prevents taking actions, yet AoOs are officially "no action". Everything gaining total cover vs. the blinded creature is what makes AoOs impossible for them.
    Last edited by Curmudgeon; 2015-12-18 at 11:45 AM. Reason: AoO note

  10. - Top - End - #220
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Sub-Prime Material Plane
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q99

    Are there any ways to gain some of the extraordinary abilities of the Terrasque without actually becoming the Terrasque? Some useful ones might be its Carapace or its Regeneration, for starters.
    Last edited by Doctor Despair; 2015-12-18 at 01:14 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by eggynack View Post
    What I care about here, though, is that the highest standard of pedantry is upheld.
    Know-It-All
    Long Arm of the Law
    Phantom of the Opera
    Arthropods, the Bane of Giants
    Horselord
    Mother Cyst of Invention
    Rule #15: a hero is only as good as his weapon!
    Master of Disguise

  11. - Top - End - #221
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor Despair View Post
    Q99

    Are there any ways to gain some of the extraordinary abilities of the Terrasque without actually becoming the Terrasque? Some useful ones might be its Carapace or its Regeneration, for starters.
    A 99

    The Dread Carapace soulmeld allows you to take on lesser versions of several aspects of the Tarrasque, if that helps.

  12. - Top - End - #222
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Xhosant's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2012

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q100:

    Bob has land speed 30 and Flight speed 60.
    a) Bob runs for 30ft, then takes flight, how much more can he move?
    b) Bob flies for 35ft then lands, how much more can he move?
    c) Bob flies for 15ft then lands, how much more can he move?
    Quote Originally Posted by AvatarVecna View Post
    "What's this? A railroad? Well, we better cross it now, or the train will come along and sweep us down the tracks!"

    *kills important NPC, avoids entire planned out plot*

  13. - Top - End - #223
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 100

    a) If Bob uses the Run action, that takes up the full round and no other movement is available. If by "runs" you just mean Bob is moving on land, then he has used all of a move action for land travel. Bob has a standard action left, and he can use that to fly up to 60'.

    b) Bob has in this case used up 35/60 = 7/12th of a move action. On land Bob can continue for the remaining 5/12th of a 30' land move, or 10' (after rounding down). Bob still has a standard action left, which could be used to move up to 30' more on land.

    c) Bob has used 15/60 = 1/4th of a move action. On land Bob can use the remaining 3/4 of his move action to go 20' (after rounding down) on foot. Bob still has a standard action left, which could be used to move up to 30' more on land.

  14. - Top - End - #224
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Imp

    Join Date
    Jul 2013

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 101

    Do the blast orbs from Magic Item Compendium allow spell resistance?

  15. - Top - End - #225
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 101

    If you mean the Blast Globes (Magic Item Compendium, page 152), then the answer is no. This is a magical effect, but not a spell.

  16. - Top - End - #226
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Char

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 102

    If you threaten adjacent squares, can you make unarmed strikes into them without IUS?
    D&D 3.0 and 3.5 SRDs

    Spoiler: Quotes
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelb_Panthera View Post
    I'm honestly surprised at how often I spawn new sig's. Am I really that quotable?
    Quote Originally Posted by MetaMyconid View Post
    What do you mean it's not that great?

    It lets you reload your greatsword.
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Fel View Post
    Neutral Evil is Evil untainted by concern over Law or Chaos. It is Evil in its purest form, much like NG is Good in its purest form, LN is Law in its purest form, and CN is murderhoboing in its purest form.


  17. - Top - End - #227
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 102 Yes.

    Threatening is required for an AoO. The AoO needn't be made with the threatening weapon, however. Your unarmed AoO will in turn provoke AoOs from your enemies.

  18. - Top - End - #228
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 103

    Is there any reason one couldn't have a spellstoring weapon with a CL 20 vampiric touch?

    Say it was on a throwing axe, could you activate it (and benefit from it) with a thrown attack?

  19. - Top - End - #229
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 103 No.

    There are two problems with your scenario. One is that if you throw an axe, you're not wielding it; you have no control over the weapon.
    Spell Storing

    A spell storing weapon allows a spellcaster to store a single targeted spell of up to 3rd level in the weapon. (The spell must have a casting time of 1 standard action.) Any time the weapon strikes a creature and the creature takes damage from it, the weapon can immediately cast the spell on that creature as a free action if the wielder desires.
    The second problem is that the weapon casts the spell, not you. Thus all the temporary HP from Vampiric Touch would go to the weapon.

  20. - Top - End - #230
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2012

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q104

    In gestalt, if a character take sorcerer 7/ incantatrix x//clerix 7+x, does the cleric loose access to the school of magic that the incantatrix forbids, or just the sorcerer?

  21. - Top - End - #231
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    BilltheCynic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Here
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q105

    Could a Psychic Warrior with the Soulbound Weapon ACF use Call Weapon twice to get two soulbound weapons?
    Why yes, my avatar is a gelatinous cube swashbuckler. It is from the excellent webcomic Rusty and Co.

    I'm two magic items!


  22. - Top - End - #232
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 104 Sorcerer only.

    Incantatrix advances arcane spellcasting only. Its school restriction applies to arcane spellcasting only. In this case Gestalt rules only require that "X" in your formula not be a prestige class.

  23. - Top - End - #233
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    The SRD says this about Concentration checks.

    Check

    You must make a Concentration check whenever you might potentially be distracted (by taking damage, by harsh weather, and so on) while engaged in some action that requires your full attention. Such actions include casting a spell, concentrating on an active spell, directing a spell, using a spell-like ability, or using a skill that would provoke an attack of opportunity. In general, if an action wouldn’t normally provoke an attack of opportunity, you need not make a Concentration check to avoid being distracted.
    The SRD says this about spells with a casting time of one round or longer.

    Cast a Spell

    A spell that takes 1 round to cast is a full-round action. It comes into effect just before the beginning of your turn in the round after you began casting the spell. You then act normally after the spell is completed.

    A spell that takes 1 minute to cast comes into effect just before your turn 1 minute later (and for each of those 10 rounds, you are casting a spell as a full-round action). These actions must be consecutive and uninterrupted, or the spell automatically fails.

    When you begin a spell that takes 1 round or longer to cast, you must continue the invocations, gestures, and concentration from one round to just before your turn in the next round (at least). If you lose concentration after starting the spell and before it is complete, you lose the spell.
    Finally, the SRD says this about concentrating to maintain a spell.

    Concentrating to Maintain a Spell

    Some spells require continued concentration to keep them going. Concentrating to maintain a spell is a standard action that doesn’t provoke an attack of opportunity. Anything that could break your concentration when casting a spell can keep you from concentrating to maintain a spell. If your concentration breaks, the spell ends.
    I expect that the answer to each of the following questions will be "yes," but I want confirmation from the experienced players and dungeon masters of the Playground.

    Q 106

    When you cast a spell with a casting time of one round or longer, can you be interrupted by a distraction at any time, even between turns, so that until your spellcasting action is finished, whenever a distraction occurs, you must make a Concentration check to avoid wasting the spell?

    Q 107

    Does concentrating to maintain a spell occupy you only during your turn, not between turns?

    Q 108

    While you concentrate to maintain a spell, can you be interrupted only by a distraction that affects you during your turn – for example, by distraction that is readied by an enemy to interrupt you – but not by a distraction that affects you only between turns – for example, by continuous damage, which affects you every round on the turn of the enemy who dealt the damage, but never during your turn?
    Last edited by Duke of Urrel; 2015-12-20 at 03:19 PM.

  24. - Top - End - #234
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 105

    No, you only get one soulbound weapon. you could however use call weaponry to summon a weapon of the same type to dual-wield a weapon that also benefits from Weapon focus and any other weapon specific feat you have.

    A 106

    Yes

    A 107

    No, you even quoted the relevant bit:
    Quote Originally Posted by SRD
    Some spells require continued concentration to keep them going.
    If you only concentrated during the standard action you need to spend, you wouldn't be concentrating continuously.

    A 108

    See above. You can be interrupted at any time during the round. So any type of damage whether on your turn or not applies.
    Last edited by Andezzar; 2015-12-20 at 03:29 PM.

  25. - Top - End - #235
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2015

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q 109

    When my non-Undead Character with Spell Resistance is targeted by a Cure Spell from my groups cleric, does he have to roll against my Spell Resistance or not? Could I even use, even if stupid, my Will Save against Cure Spells?

  26. - Top - End - #236
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 109

    Yes, but you can voluntarily lower your spell resistance as a standard action.

    Q 110

    If the party fighter is being grappled by a lion, and the party rogue tries to attack the lion without improved precise shot and rolls the fighter as his target, does the fighter take sneak attack damage? Is it up to the rogue whether or not to apply sneak attack damage to one of their attacks?
    Last edited by Eladrinblade; 2015-12-20 at 08:56 PM.

  27. - Top - End - #237
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 110

    The rogue’s attack deals extra damage any time her target would be denied a Dexterity bonus to AC (whether the target actually has a Dexterity bonus or not), or when the rogue flanks her target.
    There is no choice by the Rogue; the sneak attack happens if any qualifying condition applies.

  28. - Top - End - #238
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2014

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q111 Where exactly does the human extra/bonus feat come from?

    Since subtypes can not have features, is it a trait of the subtype Human? So far i understand that a normal human is in D&D type terms: Humanoid(Human). If a template changes this, the type would be: NEWTYPE(Augumented Humanoid(Human)) Is the feat gone now?

  29. - Top - End - #239
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    A 111

    It's a racial trait, as stated in the Races chapter of Player's Handbook (see page 13). Human is also the name of a subtype, but the word "subtype" is never used in the Races chapter. Type, subtype, and race are all distinct categories in D&D.

  30. - Top - End - #240
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2014

    Default Re: Simple RAW thread for 3.5 #31. By now, your question has probably been answered.

    Q112 Are the subtype Human traits and the Human racial traits the same?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •