The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed
The Order of the Stick: Utterly Dwarfed - Coming in December and available for pre-order now
Page 4 of 38 FirstFirst 123456789101112131429 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 120 of 1118
  1. - Top - End - #91
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Yawielas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Perception: (1d20-1)[2]

  2. - Top - End - #92
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Tellos rolled pretty well on his knowledge religion, is there an aspect of Torag that would account for the purity of the water? Also, where is this water, what is it contained in?

  3. - Top - End - #93
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    At the east side of the antechamber, it's in a basin atop a stone pedestal. Tellos cannot think of anything specific to Torag, though it occurs to him that it could be holy water.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  4. - Top - End - #94
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Going to wait OOG so that the others can perform actions.

  5. - Top - End - #95
    Alchemist in the Playground Moderator
     
    flat_footed's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Sense Motive
    (1d20+2)[8]

  6. - Top - End - #96
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2016

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Sense Motive: (1d20+1)[10].
    Wasing not of wasing is.

  7. - Top - End - #97
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Ionbound's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Gender
    Intersex

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Sense Motive: (1d20+4)[5]

  8. - Top - End - #98
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    That just leaves Tellos and Arrow to potentially act (though Runa might want to try the Sense Motive roll).
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  9. - Top - End - #99
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Yawielas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Sense motive (1d20-1)[17](17)

  10. - Top - End - #100
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Tellos is still looking around.

    EDIT: What are we waiting for now?
    Last edited by Novabomb; 2016-06-26 at 07:27 PM.

  11. - Top - End - #101
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    We were waiting for Arrow, but it's Monday, so:

    ???'s Initiative: (1d20+6)[25])[26]
    Anevia’s Initiative: (1d20+7)[16]
    Aravashnial’s Initiative: (1d20+2)[6]
    Horgus’ Initiative: (1d20-1)[18]
    Rung’s Initiative: (1d20+4)[12]
    Arrow’s Initiative: (1d20+2)[19]
    Kel’s Initiative: (1d20+5)[16]
    Runa’s Initiative: (1d20+2)[12]
    Tellos’ Initiative: (1d20)[6]
    Alexia’s Initiative: (1d20)[7]
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  12. - Top - End - #102
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Ionbound's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Gender
    Intersex

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    I swear, Kish, what is it with you and one-shotting my characters...

  13. - Top - End - #103
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    *tap tap* Where is everyone?
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  14. - Top - End - #104
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Ionbound's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Gender
    Intersex

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    I mean, I posted for getting knocked out...

  15. - Top - End - #105
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2016

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    I'm just waiting for Rung's place in the Initiative order.
    Wasing not of wasing is.

  16. - Top - End - #106
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    I was waiting for my turn. I think more than a day grace is excessive.

  17. - Top - End - #107
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Yawielas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Yes, waiting my turn :)

  18. - Top - End - #108
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    "Everyone is up" means post your actions. The NPCs aren't going to do anything that matters this round (Anevia is the only one who is armed and can see what happened, and she can't both move and attack this round). The monster won initiative, so it won't act again until everyone conscious does. If there are arrows (>>) next to your name, it's time for you to act.
    Last edited by Kish; 2016-06-30 at 05:09 AM.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  19. - Top - End - #109
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    You both hit. It looks badly damaged. Rung is standing on Alexia. Anyone else who wants to melee it will need to move diagonally into the temple and provoke an attack of opportunity from the creature.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  20. - Top - End - #110
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2016

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    You both hit. It looks badly damaged. Rung is standing on Alexia. Anyone else who wants to melee it will need to move diagonally into the temple and provoke an attack of opportunity from the creature.
    Umm... since when does moving into a threatened square provoke?
    And Rung still has a move action, correct?
    Wasing not of wasing is.

  21. - Top - End - #111
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    That depends on which of these rephrasings would capture what you're saying.

    "Since when does moving from non-threatened to threatened provoke?" It doesn't, but to get into the main area of the temple you need to move through Alexia's square, going diagonally from E7 (threatened and which the creature already empirically proved it can attack into) to D6 (also threatened).
    "Since when does moving from a threatened square to another threatened square provoke?" Since 3.5ed came out; I hear that 5ed looks at whether you're leaving the threatened area entirely, but 3.5ed only cares that you're leaving one threatened square.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  22. - Top - End - #112
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Crusader Strike
    Attack: (1d20+4)[24]
    Dmg: (2d6+4)[9]

    ConfAttack: (1d20+4)[19]
    ConfDmg: (2d6+4)[13]

    If the attack hits, heal Alexia for (1d6+1)[5] and another 2 from martial spirit

  23. - Top - End - #113
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2016

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    That depends on which of these rephrasings would capture what you're saying.

    "Since when does moving from non-threatened to threatened provoke?" It doesn't, but to get into the main area of the temple you need to move through Alexia's square, going diagonally from E7 (threatened and which the creature already empirically proved it can attack into) to D6 (also threatened).
    "Since when does moving from a threatened square to another threatened square provoke?" Since 3.5ed came out; I hear that 5ed looks at whether you're leaving the threatened area entirely, but 3.5ed only cares that you're leaving one threatened square.
    Ah. Didn't realise that you'd have to move out of such a square. My bad.
    Wasing not of wasing is.

  24. - Top - End - #114
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Also posted in wrong thread, oops. Moved to IC thread.

    * post roll count doesn't match database
    Last edited by Kish; 2016-06-30 at 07:58 PM.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  25. - Top - End - #115
    Alchemist in the Playground Moderator
     
    flat_footed's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Hey guys, sorry for my absence. Got laid off, so looking for a new job has been foremost on my agenda. Will still be a part, gonna try to login at least once a day.

  26. - Top - End - #116
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Good luck finding a new job.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  27. - Top - End - #117
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Knowledge Religion
    (1d20+7)[26]

    Why would it be beneficial to reconsecrate the temple, and how would we do so?
    Last edited by Novabomb; 2016-07-04 at 10:38 PM.

  28. - Top - End - #118
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    It would take hours of cleaning and praying. As for "why," well, all the good gods (particularly, but not limited to, whichever one you reconsecrated it to) would probably prefer there was a proper temple here again rather than a desecrated temple, but whether that's the best use of your time--well, you'll need to decide that.
    Spoiler
    Show
    "The really unforgivable acts are committed by calm men in beautiful green silk rooms, who deal death wholesale, by the shipload, without lust, or anger, or desire, or any redeeming emotion to excuse them but cold fear of some pretended future. But the crimes they hope to prevent in the future are imaginary. The ones they commit in the present--they are real." --Aral Vorkosigan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    This, in a nutshell.
    Yes, exactly.

  29. - Top - End - #119
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2015

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    So, unless we find anything else in the temple, does anyone disagree with moving on?

  30. - Top - End - #120
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2016

    Default Re: Wrath of the Righteous OOC [3.5, Group B]

    Quote Originally Posted by Novabomb View Post
    So, unless we find anything else in the temple, does anyone disagree with moving on?
    If the possibility of resanctifying the temple is raised, Rung will definitely advocate it.
    If it isn't, he sees no reason to stay.
    Wasing not of wasing is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •