Results 271 to 300 of 1054
Thread: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
-
2016-06-23, 04:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Try TORG. The system can get very complicated if you want to do more than cast pre-made spells but the system exists and you can theoretically cast any spell off the top of your head. However, it will take you (the player not the character) about an hour to create the spell using the system for doing so and that's not particularly appropriate in the middle of combat. It goes into loving detail about the arcane knowledges you may need for various things and even allows for adjusting spells on the fly (affecting things like duration, area, range, etc).
-
2016-06-23, 10:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
-
2016-06-24, 10:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Mage: the Ascension also allows for "build-your-own effect" magic. Even if you don't like a lot of the other mechanics surrounding it, that part of their "Spheres" system may appeal.
(I haven't looked at "Spheres of Power," but supposedly that's a good system for that kind of thing, too. It's a 3rd party PF supplement.)
-
2016-06-26, 04:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
I've ranted before (and not just here) about how the class and level system in D&D and anywhere else is usually dumb, inelegant and boring compared to the point buy of, say, GURPS.
Like, class and level is pretty only going to work in video games, not tabletop roleplaying games. It has NO advantages over even a rudimentary point-buy/directly buy advancement with experience points set-up.
That's all I got to say about that.Anachronism will never high-light the folly of my convictions!
-
2016-06-26, 05:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
-
2016-06-26, 10:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
-
2016-06-26, 10:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
As someone prefers D&D (even *shudders* 4e) over GURPS, I disagree rather severely, especially since GURPS is one of the most horrible point-buys I've ever seen.
Both point-buy and class based systems have innate faults and benefits. Neither is innately better than the other. The only possible reason I can see behind the arguement of class based being boring would be just that people have made a lot of heartbreakers without trying to actually have any originality rather than a fault in the concept of a class based system.Last edited by Milo v3; 2016-06-26 at 11:00 AM.
Spoiler: Old Avatar by Aruiushttp://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q56/Zeritho/Koboldbard.png
-
2016-06-26, 11:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
I've never played GURPS because most people who play games with me had an eventful session where they spent hours filling out a character sheet. Either they lack an attention span (always possible), or GURPS has very complex character sheets...
Last edited by Honest Tiefling; 2016-06-26 at 11:55 AM.
For all of your completely and utterly honest needs. Zaydos made, Tiefling approved.
-
2016-06-26, 11:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Location
- The Lakes
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
GURPs is not a great system.
That said, level-based systems really only work for a certain specific sort of game. The progression is wonky, the world has to be built in strange ways, etc.It is one thing to suspend your disbelief. It is another thing entirely to hang it by the neck until dead.
Verisimilitude -- n, the appearance or semblance of truth, likelihood, or probability.
The concern is not realism in speculative fiction, but rather the sense that a setting or story could be real, fostered by internal consistency and coherence.
The Worldbuilding Forum -- where realities are born.
-
2016-06-26, 11:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2014
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
I always hated the fact that your melee attack bonus is almost always based on Strength. It ends up meaning that giant creatures with high Str always have massive attack bonuses despite usually low Dex. According to both genre conventions and basic logic, huge, slow creatures should be easy to dodge.
-
2016-06-26, 03:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
-
2016-06-26, 04:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Xin-Shalast
- Gender
-
2016-06-26, 04:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Hero system (Champions/Fantasy Hero) uses DEX for attack. And defence. And speed. With the result that basically every character has high DEX.
Armour in such a system doesn't affect chance to hit, it affects damage done, and that's where strength comes in. If a defender has 5 points of armour, and gets hit by a 1d6 dagger, it only has a one in six chance of doing a single point of damage. Whereas if the attacker has enough strength to hit harder, that 1d6 becomes 2d6, and it'll get through the armour. It makes sense, although of course it does introduce more issues."None of us likes to be hated, none of us likes to be shunned. A natural result of these conditions is, that we consciously or unconsciously pay more attention to tuning our opinions to our neighbor’s pitch and preserving his approval than we do to examining the opinions searchingly and seeing to it that they are right and sound." - Mark Twain
-
2016-06-26, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
NOW COMPLETE: Let's Play Starcraft II Trilogy:
Hell, It's About Time: Wings of Liberty
Does This Mutation Make Me Look Fat: Heart of the Swarm
My Life For Aiur? I Barely Know 'Er: Legacy of the Void
-
2016-06-26, 06:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- a nice pond
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
-
2016-06-26, 07:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Under a strict reading of the rules of deadEarth, that is exactly what happens. It's easy to die in character creation, and according to the RAW, you're only allowed to build three characters ever.
-
2016-06-26, 07:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
-
2016-06-26, 07:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
NOW COMPLETE: Let's Play Starcraft II Trilogy:
Hell, It's About Time: Wings of Liberty
Does This Mutation Make Me Look Fat: Heart of the Swarm
My Life For Aiur? I Barely Know 'Er: Legacy of the Void
-
2016-06-26, 08:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Location
- San Francisco Bay area
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
-
2016-06-26, 08:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Exactly what I meant by redoing the entire attack system.
It's certainly closer to reality, to be sure.
Um..I actually think this was often how it was really done. (after the "Knight" or "Man at Arms" was still knocked prone from their horse they were then dispatched with a Dirk through gaps in their armor.
-
2016-06-26, 09:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Location
- San Francisco Bay area
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Both.
*ahem*
On the battle of Crecy, from:
"The Hundreds Years War, The English in France 1337-1453" by Desmond Seward:The slaughter was heightened by the Welsh and Cornish knifemen who 'slew and murdered many as they lay on the ground, both early, barons, knights, and squires'.
-
2016-06-27, 02:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
NOW COMPLETE: Let's Play Starcraft II Trilogy:
Hell, It's About Time: Wings of Liberty
Does This Mutation Make Me Look Fat: Heart of the Swarm
My Life For Aiur? I Barely Know 'Er: Legacy of the Void
-
2016-06-27, 06:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Levels in D&D classes have, as far as I know, had problems with empty levels (thus, caster supremacy) and class-specific mechanics that were insufficiently integrated with other mechanics or otherwise esoteric (psionics and Vancian magic, to name two). The worst classes in D&D(-likes) often began with "this class has its OWN gimmick of abstract resources" (ninjas with Ki or gunslingers with Grit, for instance, both underwhelmed AND add (unnecessary?) gameplay complications). How much was a level in 3.5 Fighter worth compared to a level in 3.5 Wizard? If the values in levels (with the same amount of experience points needed to reach those levels) are not comparable, then you are just wasting ink writing up an inferior class. Why am I reading several pages of rules about sneaking, Lockpicking, rolls to hit, diplomacy and investigating a murder mystery, when there are spells that render those rules redundant? (Invisibility, Knock, save or die, Charm Person, Zone of Truth.) The magic system is the real rule set of D&D 3.5, all other rules are basically for people who chose the wrong class at character creation and are now proverbially bringing a knife to a gunfight. Any class must ALWAYS be worth playing, gaining any level must ALWAYS be an achievement of this much worth, or the system is promising Choose-Yo-Own-Adventure and delivering Three Card Monte. Linear Warriors and Quadratic Wizards has plagued D&D for...ever? because a class/level system can easily self-sabotage and be hard to fix without simply tearing out the guts. At best, it is simply doing what a point-buy system already did, but in a more rigid and uncreative way.
Long story short; I think the D&D level-class thing is a game-able abstraction that fails to A) be simple enough to work as an abstraction (gaining a level often means a lot of accounting all at once) and B) good enough as game design (the feat tax, trying to home-brew a D&D class and actually come out the other side with a good result is notoriously tricky, multi-classing, empty levels, etc.). Video games with class/level stuff typically do it better because it's game designers, put simply, are less concerned with allowing a more total freedom for players than you'd expect when playing a TRPG. The video game design space is much more limited, more controlled, and it was never meant to be really free form. That means the VG designer can give the players these options, and make all of those options somehow meaningful in play, assuming he knows what he is doing. But that same class/level thing will clash with a design space that is inherently more chaotic and open than the VG one. Am I making sense here?
I think I'm derailing the thread here. I should probably say no more than this post.Anachronism will never high-light the folly of my convictions!
-
2016-06-27, 07:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Correct.
In fact, my original point wasn't even "Str to attack makes more sense than Dex to attack", but more along the lines of "Str makes a certain amount of sense, and if you want to switch to Dex because you think it fixes all the problems, you'll be disappointed".
-
2016-06-27, 07:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Just to clarify; I think the class/level thing in D&D is the only mechanic in the game that is truly BAD. Every other part of playing D&D (rolling to hit, skill checks, saving throws, ability scores, magic) is, at worst, flawed (not irredeemably so) and whatever flaws were there could be easily compensated for. No campaign of D&D was ruined by rolling a D20 and adding modifiers versus an AC score in order to simulate a melee attack. The Vancian magic thing was never my cup of tea, but I'd like to note that the magic in most TRPG systems is rarely a stand-out.* In isolation, having magic be a specifically limited resource via spell slots is a serviceable mechanic.
But the second D&D passes the ball to class/level, the opposing team is up by five touchdowns and the coach is eaten by a bear. Every mechanic is worse off because one class is badly written or one level just makes five numbers go up by one AND NOTHING ELSE.
*I mean, what's the greatest magic system you've ever seen in a TRPG? I think a popular choice is usually Ars Magica - and that's a game where the designers CLEARLY thought the campaign should be focused on people who do are DEFINED by casting spells, so of course they put a lot of effort into making spellcasting mechanically compelling and richly flavoured.Anachronism will never high-light the folly of my convictions!
-
2016-06-27, 08:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
None of that is actually required in the creation of a system that uses class/level structure, for example Pathfinder has no dead levels and there are both balanced non-magical classes and balanced magical classes. I don't see why you'd think the class/level structure would be a reason that "some people are much weaker than other people", same thing happens in point-buy if you put your points in something weak, the dev's over or under value something, or if you generalize rather than specialize.... Magic rendering non-magic redundant is especially unrelated to class/level structure, as same thing happens in point-buy games.
Last edited by Milo v3; 2016-06-27 at 08:36 AM.
Spoiler: Old Avatar by Aruiushttp://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q56/Zeritho/Koboldbard.png
-
2016-06-27, 09:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Location
- The Lakes
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
It is one thing to suspend your disbelief. It is another thing entirely to hang it by the neck until dead.
Verisimilitude -- n, the appearance or semblance of truth, likelihood, or probability.
The concern is not realism in speculative fiction, but rather the sense that a setting or story could be real, fostered by internal consistency and coherence.
The Worldbuilding Forum -- where realities are born.
-
2016-06-27, 10:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Denver.
- Gender
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
Thats an odd sentiment. Could you clarify?
It seems like you are saying that if you want to play a fantasy game that isnt class and level based you should just get over it and either play d&d or leave the hobby.
If so, I have to ask, what is wrong with making an RPG that is actually designed for the style of game you want to play rather than trying to hack an existing game that isnt suited for it?Looking for feedback on Heart of Darkness, a character driven RPG of Gothic fantasy.
-
2016-06-27, 10:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
I would suggest that it's possibly a result of concussion or injury from falling off a horse, which is a pretty dangerous thing, especially if you're not adequately padded or protected.
Edit: Just noticed your comment in the other thread, and am in general agreement.Last edited by AMFV; 2016-06-27 at 10:25 AM.
My Avatar is Glimtwizzle, a Gnomish Fighter/Illusionist by Cuthalion.
-
2016-06-27, 11:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
Re: Most Ridiculous Rules in RPGS
In other words, it sounds like you're taking relatively little experience in tabletop rpgs, and D&D in particular, and extrapolating that to mean that *all* class and level base systems are terrible by focusing on the one iteration that even most fans would admit has the largest problem with LFQW. That's painting with an awfully broad brush there, dude.