Results 961 to 990 of 1484
Thread: Simple RAW 3
-
2017-12-04, 11:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
QA31 Strictly by RAW, and assuming the first save, you would be forced to target a different creature, as the spell has no provisions for trying again against the same target, automatically or otherwise.
"As an action, you can cause the hand to crush the restrained target"
"As an action, you can cause the hand to reach for a different creature"
That is, however, dumb, and I would suggest the RAI of "You can spend your action to try again against the same target".
-
2017-12-05, 06:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q392 Does the Dual Wielder grant the option of drawing/stowing or stowing/drawing the same weapon as a free object interaction, or can this only be used to make one of those interactions, but to two weapons?
Dual Wielder
You master fighting with two weapons, gaining the following benefits:
You gain a +1 bonus to AC while you are wielding a separate melee weapon in each hand.
You can use two-weapon fighting even when the one handed melee weapons you are wielding aren’t light.
You can draw or stow two one-handed weapons when you would normally be able to draw or stow only one.
IMO the wording is such that the interactions need to be with two separate weapons; however, on the other hand, it also leaves open the possibility of drawing one weapon and stowing another, at which point it would be kind of arbitrary to not let the PC spend those two interactions on the same weapon.
EDIT: Just came up with another question
Q393 Does the Monk's Tongue of the Sun and Moon feature prevent you from covertly communicating with someone in a language that others don't understand? E.g. if a Monk speaks in Elvish to someone, do bystanders who only understand Common pick up what the Monk is saying?
Tongue of the Sun and Moon
Starting at 13th level, you learn to touch the ki of other minds so that you understand all spoken languages. Moreover, any creature that can understand a language can understand what you say.Last edited by Platypusbill; 2017-12-05 at 09:15 AM.
-
2017-12-05, 09:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A 392 Two different weapons. Some might even argue it has to be at the same time based on the idea that you only get one free action per turn but I think most DMs would be flexible about that timing since it's not a big deal.
A 393 By RAW, you can't turn it off. So far DMs have been allowing me to control it. It is kind of bizarre otherwise.If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?
In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.
Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition
-
2017-12-06, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q 394
If you happen to be a level 5 fighter/3 ranger(Gloom stalker), and use action surge the first round of combat, do you get 6 attacks, or 5 attacks? I am refering to Dread Ambusher which grants an extra attack when you use the attack action. Action surge lets's you use two attacktion.
-
2017-12-06, 01:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2017-12-07, 12:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2016
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q 395
Can an Abjuration Wizard use his Projected Ward on a Phantom Steed?Last edited by Rub; 2017-12-07 at 12:24 AM.
-
2017-12-07, 12:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2017-12-08, 12:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q396 What if I have a Homunculus from the spell "Create Homunculus", and the party cleric casts an "Aid" spell on me before a short rest. During that short rest, I increase my Homunculus' HP maximum. What goes on here?
-
2017-12-08, 08:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q397 Can a level 13 warlock who took Finger of Death as 7th level Mystic Arcanum cast Plane Shift from a scroll?
Last edited by Pharaon; 2017-12-08 at 08:46 PM.
-
2017-12-08, 09:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q398 In regard to Arcane Recovery, a 3rd level wizard can recover how many slots?
Last edited by Dmdork; 2017-12-08 at 09:22 PM.
-
2017-12-09, 12:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A 397 Yes. It's on the warlock spell list.
A 398 2 levels worth, so either a 2nd level spell or two 1st level spells.If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?
In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.
Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition
-
2017-12-09, 01:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A396 A: You have 5 more hit points with which your Homunculus' HP could be increased.
B: Assuming you mean that "what happens if my Homunculus' HP are increased such that the expiration of Aid would drop my HP maxiumum to 0?" then the following: The "Create Homunculus" spell states that only the process of transferring hp cannot reduce you to 0, So Aid's expiration could, however unlikely, reduce your hit point maximum to 0.
There isn't a general rule for what happens if your hp maximum becomes 0, but every effect that does so says that you die if that effect reduces your HP Maximum to 0. What happens is up to your DM, but a likely scenario is that you die. You perform no death saves, you do not cross Go nor collect 200GP. Your death causes your homunculus to die, which restores your normal hit point total. You do not return to life, as this transfer does not heal you. You could be resurrected as normal, but your homunculus remains dead (of course).
[red for "Not RAW"]
-
2017-12-09, 04:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q399 combat is starting and initiative is being rolled. The wizard is two rooms back and can't see/hear what's happening. Is he still a part of the initiative? Does the wizard having the alert Feat change this?
-
2017-12-09, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Re: Simple RAW 3
A399
There's no rule for this. DM's interpretation. If the wizard wishes to take actions during the fight, then he should roll initiative; otherwise, if there's no chance the fight could come to him or vice versa, there's not much point.
If the wizard might join the fight at some point, then the DM can either have him roll initiative right away or wait until the fight is actually joined. But if he hasn't rolled initiative, it may be hard to tell exactly when that occurs.
Powers &8^]
-
2017-12-09, 07:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q400: invocation from Xanathar says
GIFT OF THE EVER-LIVING ONES
Prerequisite: Pact of the Chain feature
Whenever you regain hit points while your familiar is
within 100 feet of you, treat any dice rolled to determine
the hit points you regain as having rolled their maximum
value for you.Last edited by Godshoe; 2017-12-09 at 07:22 PM.
Lisping and bad memory - what kills most aged wizards.
-
2017-12-09, 07:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Why am I here?
-
2017-12-09, 08:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2017-12-09, 08:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A401 Technically yes, as initiative is a skill check. In practice, no, as this would require some strange circumstance where you were taking actions, and initiative had not yet been rolled, such that you could do so.
Personally, I would allow it in a dungeon scenario where characters are choosing what to spend their time doing. Person A is investigating a sarcophagus, Person B is attempting to disable a trap, and Person C is keeping a lookout- Essentially taking the "Help" action for a single ally's initiative. Why not. [Red=Not RAW]
-
2017-12-10, 02:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q402 can you target someone with a spell through a wall of fire?
-
2017-12-10, 02:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q403 Web spell collapses if it's not 'layered across a floor'. What does that mean?
-
2017-12-10, 03:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A402. No, as per description "The wall is opaque" which means you can't see through it. If you can't see your target, you can't target it with a spell.
A403. For example, you can't spread it across a chasm in the floor to form a "bridge of web", because there's not floor that could support the web.Last edited by Arkhios; 2017-12-10 at 04:15 PM.
Please be mindful of what you say in public; sadly not all can handle sarcasm or The Internet Credibility.
My Homebrew:
Base Class: Warlord | Roguish Archetype: Inquisitor | Roguish Archetype: Thug | Primal Path: Rage Mage
Ongoing game & character:
Sajan Uttam, human Monk 6/Fist of Irori 3 (Legacy of Fire)
D&D/Pathfinder CV of sorts
3.0 since 2002
3.5 since 2003
4e since 2008
Pathfinder 1e since 2008
5e since 2014
-
2017-12-10, 05:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
A402 what if you had blindsight?
-
2017-12-10, 05:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q404 does an unseen servant take up a 5ft space, meaning nothing can move into that space, and perhaps allies would move through it as difficult terrain?
Last edited by Dmdork; 2017-12-10 at 05:46 PM.
-
2017-12-10, 05:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q405 Is unseen servant subject to a web spell?
-
2017-12-10, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q406 can unseen servant move any more than 15feet in a round?
-
2017-12-10, 06:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW 3
Q407 There's a spell in the Book of Lost Spells called Augment Flames. Material components call for an ordinary fire to be present. Would a torch be considered an ordinary fire?
-
2017-12-10, 06:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
A402b
Sure
A404
As a "shapeless force", the spell does not specify that it is a creature. That it specifies the Unseen Servant appears in an unoccupied space suggests it follows the rules for creatures, but those interactions are ultimately up to the DM.
A405
No, the Unseen Servant is not a creature, and you simply "move it" 15 feet with a bonus action. It does not possess movement on its own.
A406
If you have a means of generating additional bonus actions.
A407
This thread does not deal with third-party supplements. (however, a torch is probably as ordinary as a fire gets, without further qualification)Last edited by Hyde; 2017-12-10 at 06:24 PM.
-
2017-12-11, 01:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW 3
That's not entirely accurate. Many spells say "a target you can see" or something to that effect. Not all spells require you to see your target. Spells that require an attack roll generally don't (you can firebolt with disadvantage if you can't see the target) and Acid Splash comes to mind as an excellent spell that doesn't involve an attack and seems intended to be more useful in just such a circumstance. The common words "that you can see" are pointedly exempt from its description and this seems very intentional and fitting with the nature of the spell.
If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?
In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.
Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition
-
2017-12-11, 01:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
-
2017-12-11, 04:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Texas
- Gender