Results 151 to 154 of 154
-
2017-05-30, 09:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1072 - The Discussion Thread
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2017-05-30, 09:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1072 - The Discussion Thread
It is not as pronounced as it once was. During the 90's and a good portion of the 00's, job interviews had a "thing" from trying to select only ambitious people - any indication that you were not there to claw your way up the company ladder was pretty much the death-knell to any chance of surviving the interview process (this is the basis behind the infamous "where do you see yourself in 5 years" interview question).
Recently, that has started to change - or maybe they've gotten a lot better at hiding the question to the point where I can no longer tell they are fishing for that. But I suspect not - I tend to be quite open about not wanting to go into management, and I still have had good success rate in interviews in the last few years.
GWInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-05-30, 10:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #1072 - The Discussion Thread
Part of that is that it's no longer expected you'll spend any real length of time with any one company. Places that still expect you to be there for a term measured in decades do look for people who're going to play the game.
Of course, there are other organizations where if you show yourself unpromotable, they'll put you at the top of the list for the next downsizing. Or just tell you to plan on retirement in the near future, in the case of the military.
-
2017-05-30, 11:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender