Results 271 to 300 of 1497
-
2017-06-27, 12:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
I don't see anything wrong with using the 'own' pronoun in that sentence, and if we start removing language hacks from the English language, ugly or not, we will quickly discover that we have got no English language left, because it's a quilt of a language made up of so many patches on top of previous patches that we've kinda forgotten they're hacks in the first place.
But more broadly, I'm unsure why you think this rebuts my contention that "English (and indeed, every non-pedantic language) has ambiguity". You seem to be exposing the idea that the only way English has ambiguity when using pronouns is when using the plural pronoun as a singular genderless pronoun but, as I already demonstrated, gendered singular pronouns are not exempt from ambiguity.
So I suppose your point would be that there is more ambiguity when using it? Sure, I'll grant you that any time a word can have more than one meaning it will engender (pun not intended) ambiguity but I fail to see why you'd single out the gender-neutral pronoun as particularly bad in this respect, given that the verb-noun dichotomy ambiguity is so much worse*.
Grey Wolf
*Was it in this thread that I demonstrated the point by the good ol' garden path sentence "The complex houses single and married soldiers and their families" & "The raft floated down the river sank"?Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-06-27 at 12:18 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-06-27, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- In the Playground, duh.
-
2017-06-27, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-06-27 at 12:21 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-06-27, 12:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Mehville
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
-
2017-06-27, 06:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
-
2017-06-27, 08:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Watching the world go by
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
This, while interesting, is conjecture. I was asking for historical data. I apologise for the confusion. I'm not really expecting anyone to be able to pull this data out of a hat, but surely some correspondence has survived that spoke of the Holy Roman Emperor rather than to him. I will admit that it is a bit of a stretch since he pre-dates Shakespeare by about 50 years.
The other question that we might find worth answering is how people have referred to him in the centuries since his death. We, looking back 500 years might have one view of how he should have been called, whereas historians have doubtless been writing about him for most of that intervening time. How do they call him?
-
2017-06-27, 08:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-06-27, 08:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A6...;view=fulltext
This English contemporary calls him "Emperor" when referring about him.
What does Shakespeare have to do with this?
Machiavelli also simply calls him Emperor ( https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Lette...o_Guicciardini )
It's not unusual, people were often simply called by their title (the Greek Emperor for the Emperor of Constantinople, the Turk for the Ottoman Emperor, the Sultan for the ruler of Egypt...) when they were written about.
As for historians, I'm too lazy to search that nowOriginally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1955
-
2017-06-28, 04:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
These examples are actually different than what I was on about, which were single element tautological names, like the Shire, the City.
These are names with two or more elements even if some elements are only implicit, which are less likely to raise an eyebrow. I doubt this entire line of discussion would have arisen had the Shire been named Westshire or Hobbitshire.
-
2017-06-28, 08:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Just because I can't resist ambiguity: that sentence has an ambiguous actor: who clothed Mark?
Yes, current contextual clues would suggest Mark themselves did it, but if the action was set in, say, 18th century, with two other people in the room, it is not outside the realm of possibility that Mark got dressed by their ladies-in-waiting, Jenny and Joan (who also took the time to touch up their make up).
Ambiguity: it's the spice of life.
GWInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-06-29, 04:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
There's no ambiguity. Jenny and Joan are doing each other's makeup while someone is putting clothes on Mark. Unless there are other people in the room that we haven't been told about (and Occam's razor says no), Mark is the only one not otherwise occupied so it's obvious that Mark is the one putting the clothes on.
-
2017-06-29, 07:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-06-29, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
It's possible, but it could easily be phrased more directly ("Joan and Jenny did each other's makeup while they dressed Mark"). It's also so unusual that it's unreasonable to assume that's the case if it isn't directly stated. It's only ambiguous if you're being deliberately obtuse.
-
2017-06-29, 02:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-06-29 at 02:51 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-07-01, 06:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Location
- near athens, ga
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
THE STUPID MISUSE OF 'Y'ALL'
on the one hand, we have the haters. just recently in a chat room an otherwise intelligent looking fellow opined, "i hate it when guys say y'all, it just sounds so stupid" i would guess that he also thinks that southern accents sound stupid. for decades it's been perfectly okay to portray southerners as ignorant, racist, inbreed fools. if you took such a video and make it about black people, the NAACP would go full rapid and that show would never be seen again.
on the other hand, writers often pop up souther (or inner city black) characters that will when talking to one person, address that person as 'ya'll'. a double evil, you note - you+all=>y'all, not ya'll. just saw that today, telling me that editors still don't have a clue.
english NEEDS a second person plural. given how useful it is and how it's spread through america with inner city slang, y'all will almost certainly become official in a few more years.
Atlantic article America Needs ‘Y’all’
English has no standard second-person plural word, and it’s time for that to change.
-
2017-07-01, 07:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Calgary, AB
- Gender
-
2017-07-01, 08:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
English does have a second person plural: you (note that it's "you are", not "you is/art", even when talking to a single individual). English used to have a second person singular (thou) which was abandoned for some silly reason, and now 'you' has to pull double duty of second person singular and plural.
Which is fine by the way. I have no problem with y'all, since it does serve to remove a tiny bit of ambiguity. But what English needs is a second person singular, not plural.
GWLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-07-01 at 08:34 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-07-01, 09:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
-
2017-07-01, 09:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- 3 inches from yesterday
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Thanks Uncle Festy for the wonderful Ashling Avatar
I make music
-
2017-07-01, 09:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Last edited by Bohandas; 2017-07-01 at 09:26 PM.
"If you want to understand biology don't think about vibrant throbbing gels and oozes, think about information technology" -Richard Dawkins
Omegaupdate Forum
WoTC Forums Archive + Indexing Projext
PostImage, a free and sensible alternative to Photobucket
Temple+ Modding Project for Atari's Temple of Elemental Evil
Morrus' RPG Forum (EN World v2)
-
2017-07-01, 10:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Toledo, Ohio
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Both "shire" and "dale" have been used by themselves since the words were formed. Many of the x-shire names were originally "The Shire of X), or X Shire - two words that blended together over generations, just like Charles Town eventually became "Charleston".
"Icewind Dale should be only one word" has even less support - there's several towns existing to this day that follow the same format - such as Darley Dale.
-
2017-07-01, 11:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
They're their own words, but they're used as such way less often than they're used as suffixes (and here in the eastern United States I think the only time I've ever encountered "shire" as a word by itself was in situations where people were talking about or quoting something directly related to either England or The Lord of The Rings, and in the former case it's still usually a suffix even then)
"If you want to understand biology don't think about vibrant throbbing gels and oozes, think about information technology" -Richard Dawkins
Omegaupdate Forum
WoTC Forums Archive + Indexing Projext
PostImage, a free and sensible alternative to Photobucket
Temple+ Modding Project for Atari's Temple of Elemental Evil
Morrus' RPG Forum (EN World v2)
-
2017-07-02, 01:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Manchester, UK
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
Wikipedia claims it's still used in parts of Scotland and Northern England, but I'd definitely like a [citation needed] on that, because I've lived in Northern England for more than 20 years and never heard it used--plus I have a Scottish brother-in-law, and he doesn't use it either!
-
2017-07-02, 04:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
What do you mean by "the thing escalated?" I understand the idea that using both "thou" and "you" could be due to copying the French, since we have both in French, but I'm not sure why it would escalate to using only one of the two.
A gripe I have, since we're talking about it, is people who say things like "You shouldn't use "they" for just one person. "They" is a plural pronoun!". Note that the person used "you" (a plural pronoun) and that they used it to talk to a single person, all the while saying that very thing shouldn't be done. This really frustrates me every time I see something like that.
I don't have a problem with "y'all" or any other "plural" of you (even though I agree with Grey_wolf that English needs a singular you, not a plural one). It makes things less ambiguous and that's good.
-
2017-07-02, 05:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
I mean that French still has "tu", and English doesn't any more They overdid it.
Edit: as for why, I have no idea. Some ways of speaking simply are cooler according to the speaker, and they stomp away their equivalents. Others are the result of hypercorrection, so you just aren't sure anymore if there is a place for "thou", and you stop using it even where it would have been right to.
I am one who gripes about singular they, but the reason is mostly that it sounds bad to me. There is a logical component (neutral vs indeterminate) to it, however. To me, saying "they said" is like "somebody, whose identity I am not referring, said". Which is weird to me when the personal identity is actually clear.
Edit #2: I am not sure if I got the question right, what I mean is that you can say vous in French to a single person as a form of respect. This is what the English probably imitated.Last edited by Vinyadan; 2017-07-02 at 05:41 AM.
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1955
-
2017-07-02, 05:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Oz county
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
I've had southerners explain to me that "y'all" IS the singular form of you. The plural is "all y'all." Maybe they were having a laugh. I dunno, I heard it a lot when I was down the the southern states.
I say y'all now more than "you" because it's better received by the people I say it to, for some reason. I'm not going to argue against making my dealings with people easier.I used to live in a world of terrible beauty, and then the beauty left.
Dioxazine purple.
-
2017-07-02, 07:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
But such 'tautological' names aren't exactly rare either, I think.
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gródek
At least this many places called "little Burg' (Gród + ek)
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miastk...noznacznienie)
At least those called 'little town'.
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wioska
And those called 'little village', of course.Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2017-07-02, 08:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Location
- near athens, ga
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
did you seriously just [sic] me? in HS you learn prescriptive grammar - a set of rules you must obey so as to conform to the upper class sociolect. in college, you learn descriptive grammar - rules that describe how language works. to quote my linguistics prof, «you can never speak you native tongue incorrectly». correcting someone's grammar is pure elitism. so long as you understand the meaning of what is being said, live with it.
that 'you' takes the plural conjugation doesn't mean a lick. consider: «¡look what you've done to yourself!» it is clearly singular. of course, there's «¡look what you've done to yourselves!».
another nice reform that english could use - get rid of capital letters. if you're really worried about knowing where a sentence begins, use the japanese full stop (。) instead of our period. to avoid ambiguity with acronyms and abbreviates, use the interpunct (・), ・u・s vs us. while i'm at it, the quotation system sucks ass. See how clean this looks:
—A ella se le ve que algo raro tiene, que no es una mujer como todas. Parece muy joven, de unos veinticinco años cuanto más, una carita un poco de gata, la nariz chica, respingada, el corte de cara es… más redondo que ovalado, la frente ancha, los cachetes también grandes pero que después se van para abajo en punta, como los gatos.
—¿Y los ojos?
—Claros, casi seguro que verdes, los entrecierra para dibujar mejor. Mira al modelo, la pantera negra del zoológico, que primero estaba quieta en la jaula, echada. Pero cuando la chica hizo ruido con el atril y la silla, la pantera la vio y empezó a pasearse por la jaula y a rugirle a la chica, que hasta entonces no encontraba bien el sombreado que le iba a dar al dibujo.
Alicia empezaba ya a cansarse de estar sentada con
su hermana a la orilla del río, sin tener nada que
hacer: había echado un par de ojeadas al libro que su
hermana estaba leyendo, pero no tenía dibujos ni
diálogos. «¿Y de qué sirve un libro sin dibujos ni diá-
logos?», se preguntaba Alicia
—
I've had southerners explain to me that «y'all» IS the singular form of you. The plural is «all y'all». Maybe they were having a laugh. I dunno, I heard it a lot when I was down the the southern states.
I say y'all now more than «you» because it's better received by the people I say it to, for some reason. I'm not going to argue against making my dealings with people easier.
southern woman, talking to two yankees at a gala: so, where y'all from?
yankee woman: from whence we come we do not end our sentences with prepositions.
southern woman: okay, where y'all from, bitch?
'all y'all' means every last one of you, a kind of inclusivity.Last edited by tantric; 2017-07-02 at 08:36 AM.
-
2017-07-02, 08:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
I didn't correct, just made sure to point out that I did not introduce mistakes in what you wrote.
Also, behold exhibit A of what I was referring to here. Especially how it assumes everyone is a "native speaker".
No, tantric, I do not easily understand the meaning of what is being said, because I cannot easily tell where your sentence start without the capital letters.
GWLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-07-02 at 08:45 AM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-07-02, 12:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Re: Completely unimportant language misuses that bug you
The phrase "romantic comedy" really should be "comedic romance", as in my experience the romance usually takes priority in these films. It isn't a funny movie that also has a romantic subplot, it's a romance movie with a bunch of jokes thrown in so that it doesn't become too unbearably oppressive.
"If you want to understand biology don't think about vibrant throbbing gels and oozes, think about information technology" -Richard Dawkins
Omegaupdate Forum
WoTC Forums Archive + Indexing Projext
PostImage, a free and sensible alternative to Photobucket
Temple+ Modding Project for Atari's Temple of Elemental Evil
Morrus' RPG Forum (EN World v2)