New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 47 of 50 FirstFirst ... 223738394041424344454647484950 LastLast
Results 1,381 to 1,410 of 1474
  1. - Top - End - #1381

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by AnimeTheCat View Post
    Q 731

    Can any character with a sufficient Handle Animal check result direct an animal companion to perform one of the animal companions known tricks?
    A 731

    Yes

  2. - Top - End - #1382
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Doctor Awkward's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Collegeville, PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Repost from previous page. Still looking for an answer:

    Q 732
    A cleric casts the Hallow spells upon a structure, and when doing so chooses to affix a Dispel Magic to it, and designates that the dispel magic shall affect all creatures who do not share her faith.

    Are all such creatures that enter the site affected by a targeted dispel, or an area dispel, or is it up to the cleric to choose when she casts the spell?
    Does it only happen once when they enter, does it happen once per round, or does it function continuously, effectively preventing spells with a duration from being cast within the area?
    OR... if she can choose the facet of dispel magic when she affixes it, can she choose the Counterspell option, thus allowing a caster level check against any valid target who attempts to cast a spell within the area?
    Resident Mad Scientist...

    "It's so cool!"

    Spoiler: Contests
    Show
    VC I: Lord Commander Conrad Vayne, 1st place
    VC II: Lorna, the Mother's Wrath, 5th place
    VC XV: Tosk, Kursak the Marauder, Vierna Zalyl; 1st place, 6th/7th place
    Kitchen Crashers Protocol for Peace

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    But that's one of the things about interpreting RAW—when you pick a reading that goes against RAI, it often has a ripple effect that results in dysfunctions in other places.

  3. - Top - End - #1383
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Karrnath
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q733
    Is there a feat that makes it so that you do not provoke an attack of opportunity with a ranged strike?
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaq View Post
    I feel like telling the ghost of Gary Gygax to hold your beer is a good way to suddenly stop being the GM, but I have to admit that this would probably be remarkably effective. At what, I dunno, but effective.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zombulian View Post
    I am continually astounded by how new you are here in contrast to how impressive your mind is.

  4. - Top - End - #1384
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    WhiteWizardGirl

    Join Date
    May 2018

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q734
    Can a beholder mage/incantatrix use cooperative metamagic on its own eyestalks' castings?

  5. - Top - End - #1385
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by ksbsnowowl View Post
    Q 721
    Incorporeal creatures "can be harmed only by [magic]." Nonmagical fire is given as an example of what cannot hurt them. What effects of the Positive Energy Plane would affect an incorporeal creature? Would it gain Fast Healing & Temp HP's? Would it risk exploding from too many Temp HP's?
    A 721
    Yes to all of the above. Positive energy is magical and a positive-dominant plane would affect incorporeal creature not protected from it the same as corporeal ones.

    A 733
    Versatile Combatant, from Drow of the Underdark, will keep you from provoking AoOs when attacking with a Hand Crossbow.

    A 734
    No. The eyestalks are still part of the same spellcaster.

  6. - Top - End - #1386
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q735

    Do negative levels have any effect on a martial adept's maneuvers or stances known or maneuvers readied? As in, I realize that of course a strike maneuver will be affected by -1 to hit and so on, but a seventh-level swordsage with three negative levels still knows and can use the same fourth-level maneuver as before gaining the negative levels, correct? I'm pretty sure the answer is "correct," but I want to make sure I'm not missing something.

  7. - Top - End - #1387
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q736

    Are the inflict X wounds spells weaponlike as per the Complete Arcana definition?

  8. - Top - End - #1388
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    Q735

    Do negative levels have any effect on a martial adept's maneuvers or stances known or maneuvers readied? As in, I realize that of course a strike maneuver will be affected by -1 to hit and so on, but a seventh-level swordsage with three negative levels still knows and can use the same fourth-level maneuver as before gaining the negative levels, correct? I'm pretty sure the answer is "correct," but I want to make sure I'm not missing something.
    Correct.

    Quote Originally Posted by Night Wanderer View Post
    Q736

    Are the inflict X wounds spells weaponlike as per the Complete Arcana definition?
    Yes. Well, not including the Mass versions.
    Last edited by Troacctid; 2018-05-21 at 02:52 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #1389
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Chimaera's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q737
    Would the Pierce Magical Protection feat allow to bypass and break the Scintilating Scales spells?
    The DM argue if dont increase the AC it wont be affected as it just change one kind of AC (Natural Armor) to another (Deflection).

    Q738
    A troll that die by being drown is permanently dead? What if a fisherman later hook it out of water?
    Last edited by Chimaera; 2018-05-21 at 07:35 PM.
    Ruven Feathers, tengu opportunist with a keen eye for gold and an accute scent for death.

  10. - Top - End - #1390
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 738

    Yes, a troll that dies by suffocation is dead, and remains dead.

    Relevant SRD:
    Regeneration does not restore hit points lost from starvation, thirst, or suffocation.
    Last edited by Goaty14; 2018-05-21 at 08:17 PM.
    Spoiler: List of Things You Don't Need To Know
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Venger View Post
    killing and eating a bag of rats is probably kosher.
    Gosh 2D8HP, you are so very correct (and also good looking), and your humility is stunning

  11. - Top - End - #1391
    Troll in the Playground
     
    WolfInSheepsClothing

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q739: a) A lich'd phylactery is destroyed, but the lich is unharmed otherwise. Is the lich affected? Can the lich just make a new philactery?
    b) Assuming the answer to the above is yes: A lich wants to change philactery while his old one is still good (scenario: the heroes capture the phylactery while the lich was out. knowing that destrooying it outright will have no effect, they store the captured phylactery somewhere safe where they can destroy it the moment they destroy the lich. the lich can't get his philactery back, and decides to make a new one); can he?
    In memory of Evisceratus: he dreamed of a better world, but he lacked the class levels to make the dream come true.

    Ridiculous monsters you won't take seriously even as they disembowel you

    my take on the highly skilled professional: the specialized expert

  12. - Top - End - #1392
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 739

    According to Libris Mortis (on page 151, right before the sample Liches), a Lich can craft only a single phylactery.

    The Lich is not otherwise harmed by the destruction of their phylactery, it just means that they cannot reform the next time they are destroyed.

    There is, however, a method to split a phylactery into multiple pieces. It is specific to the Forgotten Realms, and I believe it requires an Epic-level spell, but I don't remember the details off-hand. I'm sure someone else can help if you're curious, but I'd wager you'd need to have your phylactery in your own possession to do it.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  13. - Top - End - #1393
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Karrnath
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by KillianHawkeye View Post
    A 739

    According to Libris Mortis (on page 151, right before the sample Liches), a Lich can craft only a single phylactery.

    The Lich is not otherwise harmed by the destruction of their phylactery, it just means that they cannot reform the next time they are destroyed.

    There is, however, a method to split a phylactery into multiple pieces. It is specific to the Forgotten Realms, and I believe it requires an Epic-level spell, but I don't remember the details off-hand. I'm sure someone else can help if you're curious, but I'd wager you'd need to have your phylactery in your own possession to do it.
    The spell targets your phylactery, and basically splits your soul like voldemort.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaq View Post
    I feel like telling the ghost of Gary Gygax to hold your beer is a good way to suddenly stop being the GM, but I have to admit that this would probably be remarkably effective. At what, I dunno, but effective.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zombulian View Post
    I am continually astounded by how new you are here in contrast to how impressive your mind is.

  14. - Top - End - #1394
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    St Fan's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    France
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 740

    The rule for Dismissible spells include the line "You must be within range of the spell’s effect".

    I presume this means the spell's normal range is used as basis for the dismissal.

    What about touch spells? Does the caster need a touch attack on an unwilling subject to dismiss her own spell?


    Q 741
    Using "Imbue with Spell Ability" imply to have the spell slot used to cast it "blocked" until the subjects discharge the spells, or the imbue itself is dispelled. Since it is a 4th-level spell, the description apply this to a 4th-level spell slot.

    What if the "Imbue with Spell Ability" is prepared in a higher-level spell slot? For example, because of a metamagic feat (like Rapid Spell). In this case, is it a 5th-level spell slot that is blocked, since it's the one used to cast the spell?
    Last edited by St Fan; 2018-05-23 at 05:02 AM.
    Spoiler
    Show

    DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
    PC: Excuse me, what?
    DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.


    "Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."

    Extended signature

  15. - Top - End - #1395
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by St Fan View Post
    Q 740

    The rule for Dismissible spells include the line "You must be within range of the spell’s effect".

    I presume this means the spell's normal range is used as basis for the dismissal.

    What about touch spells? Does the caster need a touch attack on an unwilling subject to dismiss her own spell?
    Only if that spell has an effect. This is a case of mixed terminology—"effect" is sometimes used in its vernacular form, and sometimes used to refer to a particular quality of a spell or power. Here, it's the latter.

    Quote Originally Posted by St Fan View Post
    Q 741
    Using "Imbue with Spell Ability" imply to have the spell slot used to cast it "blocked" until the subjects discharge the spells, or the imbue itself is dispelled. Since it is a 4th-level spell, the description apply this to a 4th-level spell slot.

    What if the "Imbue with Spell Ability" is prepared in a higher-level spell slot? For example, because of a metamagic feat (like Rapid Spell). In this case, is it a 5th-level spell slot that is blocked, since it's the one used to cast the spell?
    No, it still blocks off a 4th level slot, as per the text.
    Last edited by Troacctid; 2018-05-23 at 03:53 PM.

  16. - Top - End - #1396
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Thurbane's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Terra Australis
    Gender
    Male

    Question Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 472

    Not really "RAW", but also not worth a thread of it's own: did the Gravewight template that appeared in the 3.0 adventure "The Standing Stone" ever get reprinted or updated anywhere?

  17. - Top - End - #1397
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by Thurbane View Post
    Q 472

    Not really "RAW", but also not worth a thread of it's own: did the Gravewight template that appeared in the 3.0 adventure "The Standing Stone" ever get reprinted or updated anywhere?
    Monster Index says no.

  18. - Top - End - #1398
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    remetagross's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Paris
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 473

    The description of the net (the exotic weapon) in the SRD indicates a trailing rope to which said net is attached. It does not, however, give the length of said rope. Is it ever given somewhere else?
    VC XV, The horsemen are drawing nearer: The Alien and the Omen (part 1 and part 2).
    VC XVI, Burn baby burn:Nero
    VC XVIII, This is Heresy! Torquemada
    VC XX, Elder Evil: Henry Bowyer

    And a repository of deliciously absurd sentences produced by maddened optimisers in my extended signature

  19. - Top - End - #1399
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 473
    It isn't explicitly stated. However, given that the same description says that the net has a maximum range of 10 ft, I think that is likely to be the length of the trailing rope.

  20. - Top - End - #1400
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    RogueGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Rocky Mountains, Colorado

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    [Bold]Q 237 [/Bold]Q 474
    Does kung fu genius stack with carmendine monk?
    INT x2 to AC, Stunning Fist, etc?

    B: what's that bold tag look like?
    Thx
    Last edited by bean illus; 2018-05-24 at 07:25 PM.

  21. - Top - End - #1401
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 237

    (237?)

    Anyway, Kung Fu Genius and Carmendine Monk both replace wis with int in the monk stuff, so they do not stack.

    B: The code for making things bold is to use a B in square brackets. [ B] without the space.

  22. - Top - End - #1402
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2013

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 475

    Are there any races, classes or feats that provide the Elf ability to detect secret doors without actively searching?

  23. - Top - End - #1403
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by justiceforall View Post
    Q 475

    Are there any races, classes or feats that provide the Elf ability to detect secret doors without actively searching?
    There are.

  24. - Top - End - #1404
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Thurbane's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Terra Australis
    Gender
    Male

    Exclamation Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by justiceforall View Post
    Q 475

    Are there any races, classes or feats that provide the Elf ability to detect secret doors without actively searching?
    A 475

    Off the top of my head, Tallfellow Halflings.

    Also, Watch Detective (MotW) prestige class at level 5.

    There's probably more.

  25. - Top - End - #1405
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 476

    If a 1st level wizard has an 14 INT, can she use her 2nd level bonus spell to prepare and cast an additional 1st level spell? Relevant quote please.
    Spoiler: List of Things You Don't Need To Know
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Venger View Post
    killing and eating a bag of rats is probably kosher.
    Gosh 2D8HP, you are so very correct (and also good looking), and your humility is stunning

  26. - Top - End - #1406
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Doctor Awkward's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Collegeville, PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Quote Originally Posted by Goaty14 View Post
    Q 476

    If a 1st level wizard has an 14 INT, can she use her 2nd level bonus spell to prepare and cast an additional 1st level spell? Relevant quote please.
    A 476
    Yes.
    On the SRD, under Magic Overview, Preparing Wizard Spells:

    Spell Slots
    The various character class tables show how many spells of each level a character can cast per day. These openings for daily spells are called spell slots. A spellcaster always has the option to fill a higher-level spell slot with a lower-level spell. A spellcaster who lacks a high enough ability score to cast spells that would otherwise be his or her due still gets the slots but must fill them with spells of lower level.
    EDIT: I just noticed the 1st-level wizard part.
    A 1st level wizard has no 2nd level spell slots available to them, as noted on the class table for The Wizard.
    If they did gain bonus spells of that level for having a high ability score, the table entry would be a zero (0), not a dash (-).
    Last edited by Doctor Awkward; 2018-05-26 at 12:15 PM.
    Resident Mad Scientist...

    "It's so cool!"

    Spoiler: Contests
    Show
    VC I: Lord Commander Conrad Vayne, 1st place
    VC II: Lorna, the Mother's Wrath, 5th place
    VC XV: Tosk, Kursak the Marauder, Vierna Zalyl; 1st place, 6th/7th place
    Kitchen Crashers Protocol for Peace

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    But that's one of the things about interpreting RAW—when you pick a reading that goes against RAI, it often has a ripple effect that results in dysfunctions in other places.

  27. - Top - End - #1407
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 476 additional

    Quote Originally Posted by SRD
    The ability that governs bonus spells depends on what type of spellcaster your character is: Intelligence for wizards; Wisdom for clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers; or Charisma for sorcerers and bards. In addition to having a high ability score, a spellcaster must be of high enough class level to be able to cast spells of a given spell level.
    The last sentence in this paragraph states that you do not get bonus spell slots for a particular spell level from having a high ability score until you can cast spells of that level.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  28. - Top - End - #1408
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2013

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 477

    Does using a warlock's "Spider Shape" invocation heal the warlock as per the polymorph spell?

  29. - Top - End - #1409
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    A 477

    No. While the invocation is in the polymorph subschool it does not reference the spell polymorph for its rules. Since healing is neither in the rules for the subschool nor those for the invocation itself, the warlock does not heal when reverting.

  30. - Top - End - #1410
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2013

    Default Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #33: Doesn't everything popular die when 33?

    Q 478

    Would the rogue ACF Penetrating Strike (or similar ACFs) allow a Spellthief to steal spells from foes normally immune to sneak attack?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •