Results 61 to 90 of 317
-
2018-01-09, 02:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Gender
-
2018-01-09, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Somewhere eh?
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
-
2018-01-09, 02:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- U.S.A., Earth
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
A great battle is yet to come, but at least we get to see a battle of wits in the next strip
-
2018-01-09, 02:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2018-01-09, 02:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Europe
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Yup. The vampires could just stay there and deliberately trigger the symbol when Vaarsuvius or Haley comes close. The vampires wouldn't even be harmed by the symbol, because they're undead, and so immune to any effects that require a fortitude save, and the symbol does require a fortitude save.
Does covering work still after the symbol was triggered? Yes, GW, I believe the second method would work in theory.
-
2018-01-09, 02:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Location
- Eaten by the Snarl
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
I hope Minrah isn't just here to get killed to legitimize the thread these adversaries pose, but I can't see anyone else dying...
Last edited by SilverCacaobean; 2018-01-09 at 02:41 PM. Reason: typo
-
2018-01-09, 03:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Olympia, WA
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
False. We can see that undead are not automatically immune to illusions; even Malack needed True Seeing to see what Durkula could not.
The Giant says: Yes, I am aware TV Tropes exists as a website. ... No, I have never decided to do something in the comic because it was listed on TV Tropes. I don't use it as a checklist for ideas ... and I have never intentionally referenced it in any way.
-
2018-01-09, 03:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
That's what I understood too. Which brings me to the following question: why such an important voting apparently doesn't take any precautions against one (or more) of the voters being dominated by an external force? I mean, there must be means of detecting the domination, that could be used before each vote. Even more, in the present situation, Greg anounced what he intended to do. If the order warns the dwarves (why hasn't anyone in the temple sent a Sending?), why don't the simply make the voting inside the area of a Magic Circle against Evil/Chaos/Law/Good?
Any number of Hit Dice above 4. And +4 Turn Resistance.Last edited by D.One; 2018-01-09 at 03:03 PM.
Each one of us, alone, is but a drop in the sea
Our powers pale compared with the great heroes
Our battles don’t hit theheadlines or shake the earth
But they are few, can’t be everywhere, and we, many
So, when the world or universe needs saving, they come
But when people needs saving, we are the ones to appear
We're underdogs, but we rise up to the challenge to be heroes.
(Wishing Joe, a low-powered superhero)
"I really like the Geek Math'ology we do here"
-
2018-01-09, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Somewhere eh?
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Yes? It was just meant to be a specific thought of mine. And just as a possibility I never meant to discount any other possibilities nor advocate it as likely or ideal, ect.
Edit And your anticipation would be wrong. I was asking about turning for my specific post due to it being rather integral and not being 100% on the exact mechanics.Last edited by goodpeople25; 2018-01-09 at 03:16 PM.
-
2018-01-09, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Each one of us, alone, is but a drop in the sea
Our powers pale compared with the great heroes
Our battles don’t hit theheadlines or shake the earth
But they are few, can’t be everywhere, and we, many
So, when the world or universe needs saving, they come
But when people needs saving, we are the ones to appear
We're underdogs, but we rise up to the challenge to be heroes.
(Wishing Joe, a low-powered superhero)
"I really like the Geek Math'ology we do here"
-
2018-01-09, 03:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
They don't know where the clan elders are right now, just that they will be in the meeting hall by midmorning at which point either Durkula will be there or they will be dominated already. Stopping him right now is the most sensible thing to do. Especially since should they just manage to protect the Elders but not end him he'd go on a murder spree just to be an ass.
Howcould Durkula be seen only when he wants to, he has no way of knowing when he is scryed on has he? And he can't block it other than by making a successful save right?
The clan elders would be the one voting whether they are dominated or not, why they vote what they vote, even if they are dominated, is their problem, and I suspect that if Dvalin is lawful enough to go through this for these stakes rather than break his oath, he is lawful enough to obey their vote even if he notices their domination.
Also Durk' vamped his troops yesterday. He is at full clerical power now.
I suspect Jerkon used one of the Mechane's crate to make a dwarf-sized coffin and will try to escape by there.
Could the rune be destroyed be a fireball or the like?
Edit :
Nitick, Greg did not announce what he planned, ExaarghHamerfallen did to Durkula's discontent.
For why no one in the temple Sended a warning : either all three of them are too low levzl for that (not a D&D player speaking) or, more likely, none of them prepared it today. Would you if you expecting just another regular day indoor?
For why the council is not prepared, well I guess this will be explained later but in the meantime I could suggest : general lack of dwarven magic users, apart from Clerics we haven't seen any and/or since this councli is not the parliament anymore they are very low on the security to save on funds. I admit that this is really weak but that's all I got.Last edited by Fyraltari; 2018-01-09 at 03:22 PM.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2018-01-09, 03:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
First, let me point out that the symbol lasts not 10 minutes, but 10 minutes PER CASTER LEVEL. That's a long time. Not even fortunate fate would save someone from a straight-out death effect. Maybe if V could cast greater dispel at an angle to the door where she can see the floor NEAR the symbol but not the symbol itself...
Also, let me point out that Durkula CAN fail a save versus scry intentionally. Isn't it odd that durkula's most important preparations occur right after the scrying attempt? He knows there's a cleric that can turn undead and therefore can also scry, so he may be leaving traps, making orders, then sending to convince Roy to assault a place that he's already abandoned (or left his flunkies at for a diversion) to go dominate the elders whole the OOTS goes to the trapped room.Last edited by Manty5; 2018-01-09 at 03:26 PM.
-
2018-01-09, 03:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
This ... is my signature finishing move!
"It's never good when you make a fiend cringe" - MadGrady
According to some online quiz, I'm a 6th level TN Wizard. They didn't give me full XP for all the monsters I've defeated while daydreaming.
http://easydamus.com/character.html
I am a Ranger Archetype: Gleaming Warden (thx to Ninja Prawn)
-
2018-01-09, 03:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
He would only know he was scryed on if he made his will save and used spellcraft to determine the spell used. He failed his save cuz they saw him so he has no idea.
He has no options available to him to block the scrying. A scry proof location is pretty much the only thing that could work and I imagine those are hard to find in Firmament and heavily warded/defended if they even exist.
-
2018-01-09, 03:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
I don't make the crazy rules, I just twist them to my purpose
"...the Perilious Path of Crushing Doom"
" Please, tell me it is actually filled with cute, fuzzy bunnies and they just named it that to be ironic."
Note to Self:
If you ever happen to doubt the Giant again remember the "Ghost-martyrs of the Sapphire guard
-
2018-01-09, 03:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Nondetection is a spell available to rangers and arcane casters. It can easily be placed on a ring or other item, and is specifically proof against scrying. It is but one method of preventing scrying.
Durkula has, according to Hilgya, been pushing back scrying attempts. He wouldn't be worth his Spellcraft Check if he didn't notice her failures. One who is aware of a scrying attempt can stop it with a save, and even backtrack and identify the scryer if desired.
He has known it's Hilgya for a while now. He'd also be a fool to have done nothing to protect himself. We never saw him defeat the scrying attempts, so we never saw him do what he had to do to stop it, which may have been as simple for him as simply deciding to resist.
Scrying is not the perfect one way view players want it to be. Just ask Pippin Took.
-
2018-01-09, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
I'm sorry, my source for that info was what someone else on the forum said. The actual 3.x description simply says that will negates. What someone else said was that you could detect the attempt, with enough spellcasting skill know who made the attempt (but obviously he can guess who made the attempt), and then intentionally fail the attempt. Then since he knows someone's watching him, he can do things to lure Roy into a trap or perhaps just have Roy wait outside the area thinking he's blocking Durkula, who has actually already left.
I can find no source to back up this interpretation for scry failures. It's entirely possible I misremembered, and those rules apply to some other spell. I apologise.
It would need to affect 150 HP worth of creatures to stop its effects. That's a LOT of ferrets.Last edited by Manty5; 2018-01-09 at 04:03 PM.
-
2018-01-09, 03:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Somewhere eh?
-
2018-01-09, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Does Hilgya's spell give us any hint about her class level?
I wonder why Durkon never used a scrying spell like that. Avoiding plot spoilers, perhaps, but still...
-
2018-01-09, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
A vote to tell a minor deity what they need to support amongst all other minor deities is not "an important vote". The system was not designed with the foresight that one day the world would hang in the balance. It was probably not designed at all: Dvalin listened to the other clans when he was alive without regard to mental state of influencing magics, and he still does.
GWLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2018-01-09 at 03:48 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2018-01-09, 03:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
We wouldn't know if he did unless Rich told us. The only party member with a decent spellcraft score is V.
EDIT: Would rebellious Mocha Lattes be made with Anarchic water?
http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0350.htmlLast edited by Manty5; 2018-01-09 at 03:59 PM.
-
2018-01-09, 04:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Skyron, Andromeda
- Gender
-
2018-01-09, 04:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
What makes you think she ever scryed on Durkula?
For all we know she tried it on Durkon a few times, he kept resisting and eventually she stopped.
And from what Hylgia said the resistance is subconscious, so he wouldn't even notice.
Besides, even if she used it on Durkula or he noticed something in D's memory how should he know it's Hylgia?
Or care about her at all?
Some chick his host used to know is spying on him, so what?
Wouldn't be the first time he missed something important.
And comparing some run of the mill television spell with a set of very powerful artifacts explicitly designed to communicate with each other is seriously underselling the latter.
Even if Hylgia's improvised scrying pool worked like the palantir Durkula is no Sauron.
Sure, spying on a demi-god or even a powerful outsider like that is just asking for trouble, but a run of the mill vampire- even with cleric levels?
Maybe if he were vastly more powerful I would be concerned."If it lives it can be killed.
If it is dead it can be eaten."
Ronkong Coma "the way of the bookhunter" III Catacombium
(Walter Moers "Die Stadt der träumenden Bücher")
-
2018-01-09, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
-
2018-01-09, 04:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Wait: if a puppet master causes his marionette to stab you in the eye, the puppet is to blame and the puppet master is guilt free? It is an extreme example, but the point is valid. The clan chiefs are supposed to vote, yes, but domination is a form of duress in the very best circumstances, and nothing said under duress can be binding. However, if they are compelled to vote against their will, then they didn't actually vote because they had no free choice, which is the definition of a vote.
Domination may be what Roy fears, but if That's Durkula's plan, it's got holes in it Elan could ride a chocobo through.
-
2018-01-09, 04:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
-
2018-01-09, 04:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
-
2018-01-09, 04:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2018-01-09, 04:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
-
2018-01-09, 04:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: OOTS #1109 - The Discussion Thread
For the benefit of the discussion on scrying:
A symbol of death can be removed by a successful dispel magic targeted solely on the rune. An erase spell has no effect on a symbol of death. Destruction of the surface where a symbol of death is inscribed destroys the symbol but also triggers it.
Symbol of death can be made permanent with a permanency spell. A permanent symbol of death that is disabled or that has affected its maximum number of hit points becomes inactive for 10 minutes, then can be triggered again as normal.
Note: Magic traps such as symbol of death are hard to detect and disable. A rogue (only) can use the Search skill to find a symbol of death and Disable Device to thwart it. The DC in each case is 25 + spell level, or 33 for symbol of death.