Results 121 to 150 of 815
-
2019-03-01, 05:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Why are you assuming he was a thrall? He acted and sounded nothing like Durkon as a thrall. And given that Hel created his soul, it's not clear why Durkon wouldn't release him. IIRC, there's a limit on how many vampires Durkon could have in his thrall, so from that perspective releasing Gontor would make more sense as well, since they could control a greater number of vampire underlings.
-
2019-03-01, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Location
- NJ (right next to philly)
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
-
2019-03-01, 05:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Either the Exarch was a thrall and became free-willed (seems possible since he appears to have matured significantly like how Durkon did when Malack was destroyed) or he learned from the dark-skinned female vampire (who was present at the battle versus Durkon and fled when Belkar slew Ponchula).
-
2019-03-01, 05:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
What about spraying holy water around? it is water, it's harmless. And if it happen to hit some vampire, well, accidents happens.and what are they even doing in the council room?
but what I think it will happen isI think it would be thematically appropriate, and very OOTS-ish.Spoilerthat Durkon enter the inner chamber and make a stirring speech in Thor's name that give the council members another saving throw against Domination, with a big bonus. And at point the vampires can do nothing, they can't attack or use dominate again and if they exit the inner chamber must face two high level clerics, and the other dwarves. They are screwedLast edited by Sebastian; 2019-03-01 at 05:26 PM.
I don't make the crazy rules, I just twist them to my purpose
"...the Perilious Path of Crushing Doom"
" Please, tell me it is actually filled with cute, fuzzy bunnies and they just named it that to be ironic."
Note to Self:
If you ever happen to doubt the Giant again remember the "Ghost-martyrs of the Sapphire guard
-
2019-03-01, 05:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Wait, Exarch specifically said casting a spell on a creature. So is there a reason Durkon couldn't simply cast Dispel Magic as an area dispel? Technically, he isn't targeting any creature, he is targeting an area.
Last edited by truthwatcher; 2019-03-01 at 05:28 PM.
-
2019-03-01, 05:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2019-03-01, 05:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
This is, presumably, what the prior instruction about 'vote Yes on the main topic' is for. The thing about 'obey verbal instructions from a Vampire' is likely just to make sure they have a fallback in case any relevant additional business is bought under discussion, or maybe if they need to try to force argument/discussion to end and bring the actual "should we destroy the world" topic to a vote. I can pretty readily imagine somebody realizing what's going on and trying to tie up the council in procedural/parliamentary rules nonsense because the protections and rules regarding the council don't permit more direct action. ("I am now going to read the entire list of dwarves I personally know who will be adversely affected by destroying the world.." -proceeds to filibuster by reading off the entire living roster of their extended clan-"... and that is why my vote is No.")
-
2019-03-01, 05:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
-
2019-03-01, 05:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
When the words "technically" and "law" apply to the same scenario, it normally comes down to whether or not the law has bylaws that address the technicality. And given the trivial ease with which "a spell that affects a creature is considered a spell cast on that creature" could be a bylaw, I would advise against betting on the technicality.
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2019-03-01, 05:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
- Italy, Turin
-
2019-03-01, 05:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-03-01, 05:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
-
2019-03-01, 05:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Five quataloos on: council votes to say “it is our will to destroy the world”, Dvalin breaks his oath and decides to *NOT* follow the will of the council. Dvalin is dishonored and goes to Hel.
(Five quataloos is about $2.50, right?)
Edit: oops. Added a word in **Last edited by Dion; 2019-03-01 at 05:48 PM.
-
2019-03-01, 05:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
-
2019-03-01, 05:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
-
2019-03-01, 05:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Ah, I was thinking it might be something like that.
So that implies that, for example, (flawed) Mass Death Ward became known to not only Durkon, but Thor, and any of Thor's clerics who know to ask for it, the moment Durkon finished learning it from, or developing it in collaboration with Malaack. (The latter also implying that Nergal and his followers gained that spell concurrently.)
I suppose that also explains why the Order was so surprised Veldrina had the slots but didn't know Resurrection--my assumption at the time was that it was such a vital clerical spell that any cleric would learn about as soon as they were able.
-
2019-03-01, 05:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Rules about spell research were written with wizards in mind, so the rules are really unclear of how a clerical spell development works. In OotS, it seems it requires each individual deity to have one of their cleric figure it out but, once it is, it's available to all their other clerics.
No, that's because Veldrina is not a cleric, but the deity magic equivalent of a sorcerer - she can cast more spells per day than a cleric (one assumes), but can only pray for a few pre-selected ones. That kind of caster doesn't waste her spells known with any non-urgent ones, in general, because you need the urgent ones at your fingertips and can always depend on scrolls and the like for anything that can wait (dead people seldom get deader so fast you need to have resurrection this very minute)
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2019-03-01 at 05:55 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2019-03-01, 05:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I dunno - I don't see being turned to stone stopping either Minrah or Durkon from casting dispell magic, unless that also disrupts the spell. I mean, they've already died - what's being temporarily turned to stone?
-
2019-03-01, 05:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
-
2019-03-01, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2019-03-01, 05:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Neat defenses! If only they had managed a permanent protection from evil effect—but I suppose hind-Spot is natural 20/20.
-
2019-03-01, 06:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2019-03-01, 06:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
-
2019-03-01, 06:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
The gods have magical senses and at least occasional contact with their followers. It's certainly possible Dvalin isn't strong enough to sense the deception, isn't social enough to be warned by other involved gods like Thor, or sufficiently stuck on the letter of his oath for that to make no difference.
But I am not assuming he will be physically present in the chamber and am unclear on why you think I would be. I am simply curious about the details of how their plan is intended to work.
-
2019-03-01, 06:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I know. My point is, when they thought she was a cleric, and she confirmed that she could cast Res-level spells, they assumed from that information that she must have it.
Err, just to clarify it a bit more in case it's necessary, the "she's not a cleric, she's the favored soul of her minor deity" was extra information (or more accurately, corrective information that refuted an assumption that they made) needed to explain an apparent inconsistency to Roy and Durkon*--that inconsistency being "Veldrina is a cleric with enough levels to cast Resurrection" and "Veldrina does not have access to Resurrection." The fact that Roy and Durkon* expected her toknowhave access Resurrection implied that they expected that most or all clerics (again, I know she wasn't a cleric, but Roy and Durkon* thought she was at time) who could have that spell would have that spell. At the time, I thought it was a matter of them not believing that a cleric would prioritize other spells of that level--Vel's comments about being "temple-certified" and having to "master" particular spells reinforced the idea of having to learn specific spells, even though the favored soul system is separate.
Thanks to both of you for sharing what you believed was new and relevant info for me, though. It's a situation where, much like Roy and Durkon, your motivations properly analyzed based on what you thought you knew at the time, and not based on the actual facts if they turn out a few panels later to be inconsistent with prior assumptions.Last edited by Xyril; 2019-03-01 at 06:16 PM.
-
2019-03-01, 06:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
-
2019-03-01, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
-
2019-03-01, 06:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
I'll take that bet if Dion wants to bet with gold pieces instead of "quatloos."
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2019-03-01, 06:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.
That's an interesting question. Was Dvalin raised to demi-godhood while he was still alive, or was he deified after his death? I could see that making an important distinction--if the former, there's really no legitimate argument that he's one of the "dwarven dead," dishonored or not, but if the latter, then it raises the question of whether his deadness or his demi-godness take precedence.
For the sake of keeping the controversy in play, let's assume he died first. Then this also raises the question of whether being dishonored after his death matters. The rules for dwarves seems to be that they specifically have to die with honor--Durkon's mom, Minrah, and others specifically worried that raising a dwarf who died in combat opened up the risk that they die again, under less favorable circumstances, and punch their ticket straight to Hel. This strongly implies that the cumulative honor or dishonor of their lives doesn't matter that much--basically, dwarves try to be honorable all the time because they could die at any time. If you're honorable your whole life and die in a mining accident, you go to Hel; if you're mostly dishonorable, but die going after a tree, you go to Valhalla.
So if your honor before the moment of death doesn't matter all that much, can we really assume that your conduct after death matters either? Keep in mind, the examples of dishonorable deaths we were given haven't been moments where the dwarf in question exhibited any particularly bad traits--treachery, cowardice, cruelty, etc--they simply weren't actively being brave or honorable at that moment. Using that same standard, Dvalin must have had moments in his demi-god life where he was just hanging out, being fairly unremarkable; however, none of these have given Hel the opportunity to pull her lever on him.
-
2019-03-01, 06:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Toledo, Ohio
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1157 - The Discussion Thread.